切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 390 -393. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.04.007

论著

α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值
王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明()   
  1. 518107 深圳,中山大学附属第七医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-29 出版日期:2026-08-18
  • 通信作者: 吴恺明

Application value of the isobutyl α-cyanoacrylate medical adhesive in postoperative incision management of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery

Wenqing Wang, Yu Sun, Kaiming Wu()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2026-05-29 Published:2026-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Kaiming Wu
引用本文:

王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明. α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.

Wenqing Wang, Yu Sun, Kaiming Wu. Application value of the isobutyl α-cyanoacrylate medical adhesive in postoperative incision management of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.

目的

探讨α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶的防水特性对腹腔镜腹股沟疝无张力修补术后切口管理及患者早期生活质量的影响。

方法

选取2025年12月至2026年3月于中山大学附属第七医院治疗的40例行择期腹腔镜腹股沟疝无张力修补术的成年患者作为研究对象。分为观察组(20例,采用α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶闭合切口)与对照组(20例,采用传统间断缝线闭合切口)。观察组自术后第3天起允许淋浴,对照组于术后第7天拆线、第8天起允许淋浴。比较2组患者对术后切口的愈合情况、并发症发生率及术后1个月健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)各维度评分及切口护理满意度。

结果

2组患者术后切口均获甲级愈合,均未发生深部感染、积液或切口裂开;2组切口并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月,观察组在SF-36问卷的生理机能、生理职能、躯体疼痛及社会功能等维度的评分均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义[(85.5±3.9)分比(81.5±3.9)分,(87.5±4.0)分比(84.6±4.0)分,(85.4±3.0)分比(83.2±3.0)分,(85.4±3.0)分比(83.2±3.0)分;P<0.05]。

结论

α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶闭合腹腔镜腹股沟疝无张力修补术手术切口可形成可靠的防水屏障,术后早期淋浴安全可行,不增加切口并发症发生率,能显著简化护理流程并提高患者术后早期的生活质量,符合快速康复外科理念。

Objective

To investigate the impact of the waterproof properties of α-cyanoacrylate isobutyl ester medical adhesive on postoperative incision management and early quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The study included 40 adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair at the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between December 2025 and March 2026. The patients were divided into an observation group (n=20, with incisions closed using α-cyanoacrylate isobutyl ester medical adhesive) and a control group (n=20, with incisions closed using traditional interrupted sutures). Patients in the observation group were permitted to shower starting on the third postoperative day, while those in the control group had their sutures removed on the seventh postoperative day and were permitted to shower starting on the eighth day. Postoperative incision healing, complication rates, scores on each dimension of the 1-month postoperative SF-36 health status questionnaire, and satisfaction with incision care were compared between the two groups.

Results

Postoperative incisions in both groups achieved Grade A healing, with no cases of deep infection, seroma, or incision dehiscence; there was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of incision complications between the two groups (P>0.05). One month postoperatively, the observation group had higher scores on the SF-36 questionnaire in the physical health, physical function, physical pain, and social function than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences [(85.5±3.9) points vs (81.5±3.9) points, (87.5±4.0) points vs (84.6±4.0) points, (85.4±3.0) points vs (83.2±3.0) points, (85.4±3.0) points vs (83.2±3.0) points; all P<0.05].

Conclusion

The use of α-cyanoacrylate isobutyl ester medical adhesive in laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair creates a reliable waterproof barrier at the surgical incision site. This allows for safe and feasible showering in the early postoperative period without increasing the incidence of incision complications. It significantly simplifies nursing procedures and improves patients' quality of life in the early postoperative period, aligning with the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患者基线资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组腹股沟疝患者术后1个月SF-36各维度评分比较
[1]
Wu G, Chen J, Wang L, et al. Clinical effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery on spinal trauma[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2024, 95(4): 552-560.
[2]
Zhang X, Chen Y, Wang G, et al. Four cases of abdominal expander implantation in adult chronic osteomyelitis of lower extremity with soft tissue defect and literature review[J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(8): 1980-1989.
[3]
Setlik DE, Seldomridge DL, Adelman RA, et al. The effectiveness of isobutyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for the treatment of corneal perforations[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2005, 140(5): 920-921.
[4]
Shepler TR, Seiff SR. Use of isobutyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive to stabilize external eyelid weights in temporary treatment of facial palsies[J]. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001, 17(3): 169-173.
[5]
Bromberg NM. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for treatment of refractory corneal ulceration[J]. Vet Ophthalmol, 2002, 5(1): 55-60.
[6]
Joyce K, Potter S. A Novel skin closure technique for the management of lacerations in thin-skinned individuals[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(9): e10702.
[7]
Rouhani DS, Singh NK, Chao JJ, et al. Superiority of a silk surgical site wound closure device over synthetic dressings[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2024, 154(6): 1233-1244.
[8]
Swanson S, Bashmail R, Fellin CR, et al. Prototype development of a temperature-sensitive high-adhesion medical tape to reduce medical-adhesive-related skin injury and improve quality of care[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(13): 7164.
[9]
Khabbaz A, Cohen KL, Zhang S, et al. Optimizing mouse urodynamic techniques for improved accuracy[J]. J Vis Exp, 2024(208): e67019.
[10]
Ali SH, Lohano G, Lohano G, et al. From incision to discharge: the role of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) in modern surgical care[J]. J Perioper Pract, 2026, 36(7-8): 430-431.
[11]
Wang J, Karami P, Ataman NC, et al. Light-activated, bioadhesive, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) brush coatings[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2020, 21(1): 240-249.
[12]
Chen D, Wu M, Chen J, et al. Robust, flexible, and bioadhesive free-standing films for the co-delivery of antibiotics and growth factors[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(46): 13898-13906.
[13]
Pereira GG, Detoni CB, Balducci AG, et al. Hyaluronate nanoparticles included in polymer films for the prolonged release of vitamin E for the management of skin wounds[J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2016, 83: 203-211.
[14]
Larauche M, Gourcerol G, Million M, et al. Repeated psychological stress-induced alterations of visceral sensitivity and colonic motor functions in mice: influence of surgery and postoperative single housing on visceromotor responses[J]. Stress, 2010, 13(4): 343-354.
[15]
Maneesrisajja T, Srikulawong K. Tissue adhesive versus skin suture plus waterproof wound dressings for carpal tunnel wound closure: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Malays Orthop J, 2024, 18(2): 63-70.
[16]
Oladega AA, James O, Adeyemo WL. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized controlled study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2019, 47(1): 93-98.
[17]
Caroci-Becker A, Brunelli WS, de Oliveira Pimentel Lima M, et al. Use of surgical glue versus suture to repair perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2023, 23(1): 246.
[18]
Ochiai AM, Araújo NM, Moraes SDTA, et al. The use of non-surgical glue to repair perineal first-degree lacerations in normal birth: a non-inferiority randomised trial[J]. Women Birth, 2021, 34(5): e514-e519.
[19]
Teixeira TT, Riesco ML. Surgical adhesive glue to repair first-degree perineal tears in vaginal birth: a randomised controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud Adv, 2023, 5: 100130.
[20]
Setlik DE, Seldomridge DL, Adelman RA, et al. The effectiveness of isobutyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for the treatment of corneal perforations[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2005, 140(5): 920-921.
[21]
Cen R, Cui F, Wan Q, et al. Preoperative localisation of pulmonary ground-glass opacity using medical adhesive before thoracoscopic resection[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(10): 4048-4052.
[1] 李文婷, 黄欢. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 296-300.
[2] 郑宇, 邱少凡, 宋春义, 张翔宇, 王佳, 马少卫. 不同腹腔镜手术对老年男性复发性腹股沟疝的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 307-312.
[3] 段飞, 杨尚, 毕旭东, 董永明, 赵琴, 张金柱. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与经腹股沟腹膜前修补术对单侧腹股沟疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 318-323.
[4] 华志鹏, 黄菏, 张维, 骆成林, 苏宁, 洪琼, 张宏文. 弓状线入路单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 324-328.
[5] 阴明, 唐翔宇, 李居剑, 赵铁彦. 完全腹膜外、经腹腹膜前与Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术的临床结局比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 329-333.
[6] 张鹏, 舒芳, 肖赟, 吴书清, 钟斌. 针式抓钳辅助单孔腹腔镜在治疗小儿腹股沟嵌顿斜疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-340.
[7] 部凡迪, 邹振玉, 刘雨辰, 曹金鑫, 邢晓伟, 蒋凤茹, 崔洁, 王明刚. 新型疝穿戴装置对腹股沟疝修补术后早期预后影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 341-345.
[8] 郭芸青, 周敏露, 郁烨. 基于生物反馈理论的术前心理干预在腹股沟疝修补术患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 346-350.
[9] 王奕阳, 刘昌华, 吕文钰, 曹丽玲, 陈玲. CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝术前鉴别诊断与嵌顿风险预测中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 149-154.
[10] 于昆, 司仙科, 郑侃, 陈志升, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 168-173.
[11] 赵发宽, 梁伟纲, 杨义明, 祁木锐, 段应海. 腔镜定位后逆向穿刺法建立操作空间在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 174-177.
[12] 章忆晖, 袁廷东, 穆林松, 吕忠船. 国产生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 178-182.
[13] 王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡. 瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.
[14] 宋云, 陈光海, 杜尖. Lichtenstein术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效、康复及成本效益对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 195-200.
[15] 高木超, 牛峻坚, 崔海龙, 盛国涛. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和平片式无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 201-205.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?