切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 296 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.03.010

论著

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策
李文婷, 黄欢()   
  1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学唐都医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-02 出版日期:2026-06-18
  • 通信作者: 黄欢
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发项目(2023-YBSF-388)

Risk factors and preventive measures for hematoma formation after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery

Wenting Li, Huan Huang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China
  • Received:2026-02-02 Published:2026-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Huan Huang
引用本文:

李文婷, 黄欢. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 296-300.

Wenting Li, Huan Huang. Risk factors and preventive measures for hematoma formation after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 296-300.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策。

方法

本研究为回顾性病例对照研究,纳入2025年1—12月,空军军医大学唐都医院收治的275例接受LIHR的患者的临床资料进行分析。根据术后是否形成血肿分为血肿组(n=32)和无血肿组(n=243)。收集两组患者的临床资料,采用多因素Logistic回归分析,分析LIHR术后血肿形成的危险因素,并针对相关危险因素提出预防对策。

结果

2组患者的年龄、体重指数、疝部位、疝环直径、手术类型、补片类型比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄≥65岁(OR 4.735,95% CI 1.510~14.845)、体重指数≥24 kg/m2OR 3.445,95% CI 1.363~8.707)、双侧疝(OR 4.375,95% CI 1.887~10.144)、疝环直径≥4 cm(OR 5.436,95% CI 1.422~20.773)、手术类型为完全腹膜外疝修补术(OR 3.105,95% CI 1.158~8.322)、补片类型为普通补片(OR 4.088,95% CI 1.266~13.198)均是LIHR术后血肿形成的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

年龄、体重指数、疝部位、疝环直径、手术类型及补片类型与LIHR术后血肿形成密切相关,是其独立危险因素。可通过适当减重训练、严格遵循手术操作规范、超声刀精细分离、优先使用轻量型补片及加压护理等措施,积极降低血肿发生率。

Objective

To explore the risk factors for hematoma formation after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and its preventive measures.

Methods

This study is a retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 275 patients who received LIHR and were admitted to Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University from January to December 2025, they were divided into the hematoma group (n=32) and the non-hematoma group (n=243) based on whether a hematoma formed after the operation. The clinical data of both groups were collected and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for hematoma formation after LIHR surgery, and corresponding preventive measures were proposed based on the identified risk factors.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, location of the hernia, diaphragm diameter, surgical type, and mesh type between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age≥65 years (OR 4.735, 95% CI 1.510-14.845), body mass index≥24 kg/m2 (OR 3.445, 95% CI 1.363-8.707), bilateral hernia (OR 4.375, 95% CI 1.887-10.144), diaphragm diameter≥4 cm (OR 5.436, 95% CI 1.422-20.773), surgical type (total extraperitoneal hernia repair) (OR 3.105, 95% CI 1.158-8.322), and conventional mesh type (OR 4.088, 95% CI 1.266-13.198) were all independent risk factors for hematoma formation after LIHR (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The hematoma formation following LIHR are closely associated with age, body mass index, hernia location, diaphragm diameter, surgical type, and mesh type. The incidence of hematoma can be actively reduced through measures such as appropriate weight loss training, strict adherence to surgical operating standards, meticulous dissection using ultrasonic scalpel, preferential use of lightweight mesh, and compression care.

表1 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的单因素分析[例(%)]
表2 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的多因素Logistic回归分析赋值表
表3 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Campanelli G. Primary inguinal hernia, postoperative chronic pain and quality of life[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(1): 1-2.
[2]
Cowan B, Kvale M, Yin J, et al. Risk factors for inguinal hernia repair among US adults[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(6): 1507-1514.
[3]
Sivakumar J, Chen Q, Hii MW, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression [J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(4): 2453-2475.
[4]
Supsamutchai C, Wattanapreechanon P, Saengsri S, et al. Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 277.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[6]
Bulyk I, Shkarban V, Vasyliuk S, et al. The history of inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Rozhl Chir, 2023, 102(4): 149-153.
[7]
Reghunandanan RP, Usman AA, Basheer S, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e48619.
[8]
李健文, 乐飞, 薛佩. 提高腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术安全性和有效性的关键环节[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(1): 84-88.
[9]
陈思梦, 李原. 腹股沟疝手术中血管意外损伤处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 675-679.
[10]
Liu J, Zhang H, Qiao X, et al. The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair as a 24-h day surgery for patients aged 80 years and older: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(6): 1533-1541.
[11]
唐健雄, 李绍春. 特殊情况腹股沟疝外科治疗现状及展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 646-649.
[12]
Pararas N, Pikouli A, Bounnah M, et al. Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Obese Patient Population: A Single-Center Five-Year Experience[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e48265.
[13]
Kumar M, Jha AK, Kumar D, et al. An Observational Study on the Comparative Analysis of Trans Abdominal Preperitoneal and Totally Extraperitoneal: A Single-center Experience of 105 Patients[J]. Ann Afr Med, 2025, 24(4): 755-758.
[14]
Xu EW, Wang HC, Mao ZQ. Clinical application of the dissection of the preperitoneal space without electrocoagulation in laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair throughout of the whole process[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2024, 19(1): 42-51.
[15]
钟秋润, 严丹檎, 范小莉, 等. 腹股沟疝修补术后发生血清肿危险因素的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(6): 701-706.
[16]
旷鹏昊, 卢毅卓, 傅锦波, 等. 3 Dmax轻量型疝补片对成人腹股沟疝患者疝修补术后疼痛程度、炎症反应及并发症的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2022, 35(9): 71-74.
[17]
张俊烁, 彭淮都, 蔡楚东, 等. 腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的影响因素分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2025, 22(2): 109-113, 118.
[18]
程玉刚, 李波, 张光永. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿的预防和处理对策[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1054-1058.
[19]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 大中华腔镜疝外科学院, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术焦点问题中国专家共识(2)——特殊情况处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(4): 387-391.
[20]
韩曲, 曾慧, 汪艮亮, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜前放置引流管减轻血清肿形成的Meta分析[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2023, 63(6): 27-32, 38.
[21]
刘沐阳, 沈晓军, 史立洲, 等. 术后血清肿:腹股沟疝修补术的潜在挑战及干预策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(6): 712-716.
[1] 刘湘奇, 吴家顺, 罗雪婷, 田美霞, 杨辛, 匡世军. 下颌第三磨牙拔除与下牙槽神经损伤的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 119-125.
[2] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[3] 邓瑞锋, 程璐, 刘远灵, 郑秋平, 刘溪, 江文聪, 江敏耀, 习明. 基于Logistic回归构建一期输尿管通路鞘置入失败的预测模型[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 171-178.
[4] 王奕阳, 刘昌华, 吕文钰, 曹丽玲, 陈玲. CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝术前鉴别诊断与嵌顿风险预测中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 149-154.
[5] 于昆, 司仙科, 郑侃, 陈志升, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 168-173.
[6] 赵发宽, 梁伟纲, 杨义明, 祁木锐, 段应海. 腔镜定位后逆向穿刺法建立操作空间在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 174-177.
[7] 章忆晖, 袁廷东, 穆林松, 吕忠船. 国产生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 178-182.
[8] 严友杰, 王武昌, 李方宝, 魏民, 张恒柱, 王晓东. 基底节脑出血患者术后形成下肢深静脉血栓的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 86-91.
[9] 韩一梅, 冯仕川, 陈志娟. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的危险因素及其列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 222-228.
[10] 程大伟, 梁海. 基于Logistic回归的结肠憩室病并发风险预警模型及其价值研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 229-235.
[11] 张维娜, 潘亚娟, 徐敏. 晚期消化系统癌症手术患者器官/腔隙感染的风险预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 120-124.
[12] 李晨阳, 汪涛, 徐忠瑞, 黄福秀, 李淑玲, 徐衍, 周旋, 赵慧, 张宁宁, 陈超. 急性下消化道出血患者安全出院风险评分的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 156-161.
[13] 单子凤, 罗峪梅, 郭慧丽. 成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术的并发症发生率及危险因素[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 162-166.
[14] 李庄, 陈慧, 冀晓慧, 李飞燕, 吴斯瑶, 麦卓瑶, 郭义红. 绒毛膜下血肿患者自然流产相关因素及妊娠结局分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 98-103.
[15] 于玲, 秦伟, 徐霁华, 胡秀朝, 杨磊, 胡文立. 急性小脑梗死的临床影像学特征[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 133-138.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?