切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 190 -194. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.02.012

论著

瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用
王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡()   
  1. 710003 西安市儿童医院麻醉与围术期医学科二科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-23 出版日期:2026-04-18
  • 通信作者: 缪怡
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省自然科学基金(2022JM-443)

Application of nasal administration of remimazolam combined with dexmedetomidine in laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac in children

Ni Wang, Zhe Zhao, Min Wang, Yi Miao()   

  1. Department of 2 Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an 710003, China
  • Received:2026-01-23 Published:2026-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yi Miao
引用本文:

王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡. 瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.

Ni Wang, Zhe Zhao, Min Wang, Yi Miao. Application of nasal administration of remimazolam combined with dexmedetomidine in laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.

目的

探讨瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的麻醉效果及安全性。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究。回顾性分析2025年3—12月在西安市儿童医院行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的201例腹股沟斜疝患儿的临床资料。根据麻醉方案将患者分为试验组(n=101)和对照组(n=100)。试验组采用瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻麻醉,对照组采用丙泊酚联合右美托咪定滴鼻麻醉。对比2组麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后5 min(T1)、手术开始5 min(T2)、术毕(T3)各时间段患者的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、麻醉诱导时间、苏醒时间、麻醉恢复室(PACU)停留时间及麻醉相关不良反应情况。

结果

重复测量方差分析显示:2组患儿不同时间点的心率、MAP的波动幅度的组间效应(F组间=5.824、3.837,P组间=0.005、0.015)、时间效应(F时间=2.975、7.387,P时间=0.018、0.006)及交互效应(F交互=3.718、3.539,P交互=0.002、0.025)比较,差异均有统计学意义;进一步采用Bonferonni法校正进行简单效应分析中的两两比较结果,发现与T0对比,2组T1时心率、MAP下降,T2、T3时升高,但试验组各时间点心率、MAP波动幅度均小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SpO2组间效应(F组间=2.141,P组间=0.061)、时间效应(F时间=6.264,P时间=0.089)及交互效应(F交互=2.911,P交互=0.117)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组麻醉诱导时间、苏醒时间、PACU停留时间均短于对照组(t=2.362、19.634、2.259,P均<0.05)。试验组与对照组患儿麻醉相关不良反应总发生率比较(7.92%比10.00%),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.266,P=0.606)。

结论

瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术,麻醉起效快、苏醒迅速,能稳定围手术期血流动力学,不良反应发生率低,安全性高。

Objective

To explore the anesthetic effect and safety of remimazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac surgery.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 201 children with indirect inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic high ligation of the hernial sac at Xi'an Children's Hospital from March to December 2025. The patients were divided into an experimental group (n=101) and a control group (n=100) according to the anesthesia regimen. The experimental group received remimazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops for anesthesia, while the control group received propofol combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops for anesthesia. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), anesthesia induction time, recovery time, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and anesthesia-related adverse reactions were compared between the two groups at four time points: before anesthesia induction (T0), 5 minutes after induction (T1), 5 minutes after the start of surgery (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3).

Results

Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that there were statistically significant differences in the fluctuation ranges of heart rate and MAP between the two groups of children at different time points in terms of inter-group effect (Fgroup=5.824, 3.837; Pgroup=0.005, 0.015), time effect (Ftime=2.975, 7.387; Ptime=0.018, 0.006), and interaction effect (Finteraction=3.718, 3.539; Pinteraction=0.002, 0.025). Further pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction in simple effect analysis revealed that, compared with T0, heart rate and MAP decreased at T1 and increased at T2 and T3 in both groups. However, the fluctuation ranges of heart rate and MAP at all time points in the experimental group were significantly smaller than those in the control group (P<0.05). For SpO2, there were no statistically significant differences in the inter-group effect (Fgroup=2.141, Pgroup=0.061), time effect (Ftime=6.264, Ptime=0.089), and interaction effect (Finteraction=2.911, Pinteraction=0.117) (all P>0.05). The anesthesia induction time, awakening time, and PACU stay time in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group (t=2.362, 19.634, 2.259; all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions between the experimental group and the control group (7.92% vs 10.00%; χ2=0.266, P=0.606).

Conclusion

Remimazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops is used for pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sacs. The anesthetic effect is rapid, the recovery is swift, it can stabilize the perioperative hemodynamics, the incidence of adverse reactions is low, and the safety is high.

表1 2组腹股沟斜疝患儿的基线资料比较
表2 2组腹股沟斜疝患儿的血流动力学指标比较(±s
表3 2组腹股沟斜疝患儿不同时间点的血氧饱和度比较(%,±s
表4 2组腹股沟斜疝患儿手术相关指标比较(min,±s
表5 2组腹股沟斜疝患儿麻醉相关不良反应发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
凌新建, 王永胜, 潘书鸿. 不同残端疝囊处理方式在腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用效果比较[J]. 医学综述, 2022, 28(18): 3730-3735.
[2]
庄渊钊, 谢文钦, 黄计璇, 等. 术前口服咪达唑仑对学龄前患儿疝囊高位结扎术后不良行为改变的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(11): 1174-1177.
[3]
同红伟, 王燕, 张磊. 艾司氯胺酮静脉注射联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿疝气手术中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23(15): 1670-1674.
[4]
程玥, 沈勤, 柏耀林, 等. 瑞马唑仑在小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术麻醉中的应用及对苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2025, 56(4): 1098.
[5]
王宣, 徐四七, 陈永权, 等. 口服不同剂量咪达唑仑对腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术患儿术前焦虑的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(5): 493-496.
[6]
张伶俐, 汪俊, 姚琼. 罗哌卡因骶管阻滞对小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022(4): 421-424.
[7]
张忠成, 李彪, 郑马强, 等. 艾司氯胺酮滴鼻在患儿术前镇静中的应用进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(8): 868-871.
[8]
李蕾, 李宝永, 韩晓亮, 等. 艾司氯胺酮联合右美托咪定在小儿扁桃体切除术后的镇痛效果及安全性研究[J]. 中国医刊, 2025, 60(7): 820-823.
[9]
金苍元, 徐丹兵, 张霞, 等. 小儿腹腔镜疝手术实施右美托咪定注射液滴鼻复合七氟醚麻醉的镇痛效果[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 5-11.
[10]
庞沙沙, 曾毅, 杨玉峰, 等. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于小儿全身麻醉诱导镇静成功的半数有效量[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2024(2): 140-143.
[11]
Ericksen AM, Kane TD, Tubog TD. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared With Intranasal Midazolam for Pediatric Emergence Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Perianesth Nurs, 2025, 40(5): 1375-1385.
[12]
刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(5): 570-573.
[13]
Strickley T, Smith K, Ericksen AM. Dexmedetomidine-An Alternative to Midazolam in the Treatment of Ketamine-Induced Emergence Delirium: A Systematic Review[J]. J Perianesth Nurs, 2024, 9(2): 311-318.
[14]
张瑜, 马伟, 李蕾, 等. 艾司氯胺酮辅助臂丛神经阻滞麻醉对小儿上肢骨折手术血流动力学, OAA/S评分和应激损伤的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2024, 37(14): 64-69.
[15]
蔡亚娇, 张晓楠, 李小丽. 不同剂量舒芬太尼与丙泊酚复合麻醉对小儿腹腔镜手术麻醉及苏醒的临床研究[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2025, 31(11): 29-34.
[16]
Dhiman T, Verma V, Kumar Verma R, et al. Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine or Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam Nebulised Drug Combination as a Premedicant in Children: A Randomised Clinical Trial[J]. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim, 2022, 50(5): 380-387.
[17]
Sirohiya P, Kumar V, Mittal S, et al. Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Sedation During Medical Thoracoscopy: A Pilot Randomized-Controlled Trial(RCT)[J]. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol, 2022, 29(4): 248-254.
[18]
黄威龙, 钟洪才, 陶波圆, 等. 小儿单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术后复发的原因及防治[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(10): 768-773.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[3] 王萌, 管文贤. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治关键技术与质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 108-110.
[4] 袁浩宇, 肖远松, 杨成林, 胡正飞, 王志勇, 杨悦. 全腹腔镜下回肠膀胱扩大术治疗氯胺酮相关性膀胱炎的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 154-158.
[5] 陈智溢, 张恩溥, 戴平, 姜刚刚, 甘露, 黄谋, 张文娟, 杨江根, 黄桂晓. 机器人手术治疗盲肠膀胱瘘一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 226-230.
[6] 杨轶, 廖新惠, 陈杰青, 吴建挺, 张仲富, 韩晓红, 梅红兵. 机器人辅助腹腔镜对比腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项针对低、中危前列腺癌患者的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 197-201.
[7] 贺慷, 杨诚, 刘存东. 经膀胱入路单孔腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 140-146.
[8] 王奕阳, 刘昌华, 吕文钰, 曹丽玲, 陈玲. CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝术前鉴别诊断与嵌顿风险预测中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 149-154.
[9] 何若琦, 李炳根, 高金军. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片修补术治疗成人脐疝的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 162-167.
[10] 于昆, 司仙科, 郑侃, 陈志升, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 168-173.
[11] 赵发宽, 梁伟纲, 杨义明, 祁木锐, 段应海. 腔镜定位后逆向穿刺法建立操作空间在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 174-177.
[12] 章忆晖, 袁廷东, 穆林松, 吕忠船. 国产生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 178-182.
[13] 麦吾兰江·麦麦提, 阿力娅·图拉丁, 吐尔洪江·吐逊. ABO血型不相容肝移植免疫抑制策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 152-159.
[14] 牛晓华, 黄长文. 腹腔镜肝切除平面探讨:多技术融合肝切除平面定位策略理论与实践[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 167-171.
[15] 卢曼曼, 冯其柱, 孙杰, 张健. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中联合超细胆道镜治疗胆囊管结石的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 205-210.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?