切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -167. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.02.007

论著

腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片修补术治疗成人脐疝的临床观察
何若琦1, 李炳根2, 高金军3,()   
  1. 1723000 陕西,汉中市人民医院普外科
    2510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院普通外科
    3723003 陕西汉中,西安医学院附属汉江医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-28 出版日期:2026-04-18
  • 通信作者: 高金军
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科学技术厅2021年科技计划项目(2021JQ-1214)

Clinical observation of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal patch repair in the treatment of adult umbilical hernia

Ruoqi He1, Binggen Li2, Jinjun Gao3,()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Hanzhong People's Hospital, Hanzhong 723000, Shaanxi Province, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    3Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hanjiang Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Hanzhong 723003, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2025-10-28 Published:2026-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jinjun Gao
引用本文:

何若琦, 李炳根, 高金军. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片修补术治疗成人脐疝的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 162-167.

Ruoqi He, Binggen Li, Jinjun Gao. Clinical observation of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal patch repair in the treatment of adult umbilical hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 162-167.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片修补术(TEP)治疗成人脐疝的临床效果。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入2022年2月至2025年2月汉中市人民医院收治的脐疝患者76例作为研究对象。依据治疗方法的不同分为对照组(n=33)和观察组(n=43),对照组行腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM),观察组行腹腔镜下TEP。比较2组患者的手术相关指标、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、胃肠功能恢复情况、应激因子指标、外周血炎症因子指标、并发症与复发情况。

结果

观察组较对照组手术时间延长8.16 min(95% CI 0.74~15.58 min)、术中出血量增加0.84 ml(95% CI 0.12~1.56 ml)、术后首次下床时间提前1.37 h(95% CI -2.33~-0.41 h),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析整体结果显示,疼痛VAS评分时间、组间、交互效应均显著(F时间=454.7、F组间=15.22、F交互=3.079,P均<0.05),2组疼痛均随时间推移明显减轻,观察组显著低于对照组。进一步对各时间点进行简单效应分析发现,观察组术后1 d、1周疼痛VAS评分更低(P<0.05)。观察组较对照组首次肛门排气时间、首次排便时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、恢复进食时间均提前,分别为0.81 h(95% CI -1.51~-0.11 h)、2.73 h(95% CI -4.62~-0.84 h)、1.12 h(95% CI -2.11~-0.13 h)、1.34 h(95% CI -2.30~-0.38 h),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d,2组患者的血清肾上腺素、皮质醇、去甲肾上腺素均升高,但观察组较对照组血清肾上腺素、皮质醇、去甲肾上腺素均低,分别为8.08 pg/ml(95% CI -14.18~-1.98 pg/ml)、10.69 nmol/L(95% CI -21.05~-0.33 nmol/L)、7.07 pg/ml(95% CI -12.61~-1.53 pg/ml),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月,2组均未出现不全性肠梗阻及复发,总并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对比IPOM,腹腔镜下TEP治疗成人脐疝在促进早期活动、减轻术后早期疼痛方面更具优势,可降低应激水平,且安全性良好。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal patch repair (TEP) in the treatment of adult umbilical hernia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 76 patients with umbilical hernias admitted to Hanzhong People's Hospital between February 2022 and February 2025. Patients were assigned to a control group (n=33) and an observation group (n=43). The control group underwent laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), whereas the observation group underwent laparoscopic TEP. The surgery-related indicators, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, gastrointestinal function recovery, stress factor indicators, peripheral blood inflammatory factor indicators, complications and recurrence were compared between the two groups.

Results

The observation group had a significantly longer operative time (8.16, 95% CI 0.74–15.58 min) and intraoperative blood loss (0.84, 95% CI 0.12–1.56 ml) compared to the control group, while showing shorter postoperative first out-of-bed time (-1.37, 95% CI -2.33–-0.41 h) (P<0.05). Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for pain VAS scores showed significant main effects of time, group, and their interaction (Ftime=454.7, Fgroup=15.22, Finteraction=3.079; all P<0.05). The overall pain level in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and pain relief was more rapid in the observation group. For simple effects analysis at each time point revealed that the observation group had significantly lower pain VAS scores at postoperative day 1 and postoperative week 1 (P<0.05). All parameters including first anal gas expulsion time (-0.81, 95% CI -1.51–-0.11 h), first bowel movement time (-2.73, 95% CI -4.62–-0.84 h), intestinal sound recovery time (-1.12, 95% CI -2.11–-0.13 h), and resumption of feeding time (-1.34, 95% CI -2.30–-0.38 h) were significantly shorter in the observation group (P<0.05). On postoperative day 1, serum levels of epinephrine (-8.08, 95% CI -14.18–-1.98 pg/ml), cortisol (-10.69, 95% CI -21.05–-0.33 nmol/L), and noradrenaline (-7.07, 95% CI -12.61–-1.53 pg/ml) were elevated in both groups compared to preoperative levels, with the observation group showing lower values than the control group (P<0.05). No cases of incomplete intestinal obstruction or hernia recurrence were observed in either group at 3 months postoperatively, and there was no statistically significant difference in overall complication rates (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with IPOM, laparoscopic TEP in the treatment of adult umbilical hernia offers advantages in promoting early ambulation and reducing early postoperative pain, is associated with reduced stress levels, and demonstrates a favorable safety profile.

表1 2组脐疝患者的一般资料比较
表2 2组脐疝患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组脐疝患者不同时间疼痛视觉模拟评分法评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组脐疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复情况比较(h,±s
表5 2组脐疝患者手术前后应激因子变化情况比较(±s
表6 2组脐疝患者外周血炎症因子指标比较(±s
[1]
陆冰, 邓学东, 潘琦, 等. 疑难病例阅片(一)[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(5): 382-386.
[2]
李光兴, 申英末. 腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 8-11.
[3]
胡伟泽, 郑辉明, 戴育坚. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术治疗成人脐疝13例报告[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1516-1521.
[4]
李航宇, 顾岩, 王明刚, 等. 腹腔内补片修补术中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 721-729.
[5]
Tran H, Tran K, Zajkowska M, et al. Single-port onlay mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernias after failed anterior and laparoscopic repairs[J]. JSLS, 2015, 19(1): e2014. 00212.
[6]
Ponten JEH, Leenders BJM, Leclercq WKG, et al. Mesh versus patch repair for epigastric and umbilical hernia(MORPHEUS Trial); one-year results of a randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(5): 1312-1320.
[7]
Stirler VMA, Nallayici EG, de Haas RJ, et al. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic repair of primary umbilical hernia: titanium tacks versus absorbable tacks: a prospective comparative cohort analysis of 80 patients with a long-term follow-up[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2017, 27(6): 424-427.
[8]
Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdiscectomy[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2022, 2022: 5337483.
[9]
张庆普, 毛志海. 腹腔镜与开放式手术治疗成人脐疝的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 154-156.
[10]
Malik AM. Laparoscopic versus open repair of para-umbilical hernia. Is it a good alternative[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2015, 65(8): 865-868.
[11]
傅锦波, 洪晓泉, 旷鹏昊, 等. 侧方入路腹腔镜下完全腹膜外成人脐疝修补术5例经验[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(4): 406-411.
[12]
蒋会勇, 郭一君, 张丹, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹直肌后间隙成人脐疝修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 47-50.
[13]
陈慧颖, 孙颖, 刘付懿斐. 扶正通腑导滞法联合电针治疗腹腔镜术后胃肠功能紊乱疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2020, 29(1): 59-62.
[14]
郝亚丽, 万显荣, 江从庆, 等. 基于残差神经网络、双向长短期记忆网络和注意力机制的肠鸣音检测方法研究[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2024, 48(5): 498-504.
[15]
林国雄, 毛海飞, 熊规翔, 等. 地氟烷吸入麻醉在老年肠梗阻患者手术中的临床效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2025, 45(14): 3396-3400.
[16]
吉日木图雅, 韩东梅. 腹横肌平面阻滞联合地佐辛对妇科腹腔镜手术患者苏醒质量和应激指标的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(8): 1056-1059.
[17]
董文泽, 张丽伟, 张莉莉, 等. 不同气腹压及肌松程度对后腹腔镜手术患者腹膜后空间、术野满意度及凝血、应激指标的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2022, 35(2): 92-96.
[18]
李洁, 田赟, 韩笑, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术对卵巢囊肿剥除术患者应激反应及卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2024, 52(4): 462-465.
[19]
尹天圣, 张雅军, 李斌, 等. 腹腔镜Sublay术治疗原发性腹壁疝临床疗效研究[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学, 2023, 11(3): 192-195, 201.
[20]
李安云, 苏芹芹. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术对老年腹股沟疝患者的影响[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(8): 619-622.
[21]
褚伯良, 陈瑛瑛, 姚华琪, 等. 加速康复外科在妇科腹腔镜围术期的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(8): 1293-1296.
[22]
完玛南杰, 李成棽. 腔镜及开腹手术对阑尾穿孔腹膜炎脓毒症患儿免疫指标及细胞因子的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(1): 33-37.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 杜峻峰, 吕远, 孙亮. 全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-115.
[3] 燕速, 赵康, 谢宏宇, 霍博文, 梁浩, 李园园, 刘云荣. 无助手减孔腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 116-116.
[4] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[5] 王萌, 管文贤. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治关键技术与质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 108-110.
[6] 袁浩宇, 肖远松, 杨成林, 胡正飞, 王志勇, 杨悦. 全腹腔镜下回肠膀胱扩大术治疗氯胺酮相关性膀胱炎的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 154-158.
[7] 陈智溢, 张恩溥, 戴平, 姜刚刚, 甘露, 黄谋, 张文娟, 杨江根, 黄桂晓. 机器人手术治疗盲肠膀胱瘘一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 226-230.
[8] 杨轶, 廖新惠, 陈杰青, 吴建挺, 张仲富, 韩晓红, 梅红兵. 机器人辅助腹腔镜对比腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项针对低、中危前列腺癌患者的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 197-201.
[9] 贺慷, 杨诚, 刘存东. 经膀胱入路单孔腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 140-146.
[10] 崔钰珂, 周长东, 林虹君, 李江波, 石静琦, 杨稳, 王晨辉, 董帅, 刘秀兰, 李恬, 岳洋, 郭靓. 蓝莓提取物改善特应性皮炎的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 74-85.
[11] 张浩波, 牛剑祥. NLRP3炎症小体在非酒精性脂肪性肝病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 271-277.
[12] 牛晓华, 黄长文. 腹腔镜肝切除平面探讨:多技术融合肝切除平面定位策略理论与实践[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 167-171.
[13] 卢曼曼, 冯其柱, 孙杰, 张健. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中联合超细胆道镜治疗胆囊管结石的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 205-210.
[14] 魏子杰, 陈欣欣, 姚瑶, 闫振宇. 老年代偿期肝硬化患者膳食炎症指数、营养参数与衰弱发生风险的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 167-172.
[15] 肖骥峰, 廖兴志, 汤燕彬, 陈湉, 施冬冬, 乔燕. 环泊酚复合小剂量艾司氯胺酮在老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果及术后认知功能影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 179-184.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?