切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 628 -631. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.06.021

临床论著

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中保留子宫圆韧带的临床价值
陈亮1, 张升敏1, 马克强1,(), 王晓龙1, 曹洪涛1, 邹来宾1, 嵇腾飞1, 罗玉媚1, 由田1, 任国亮2   
  1. 1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院胃肠外科
    2. 810001 西宁,青海红十字医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-29 出版日期:2021-12-20
  • 通信作者: 马克强
  • 基金资助:
    南方医科大学附属花都医院科研资金(2019B03)

Clinical value of preserving round ligament of uterus during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Liang Chen1, Shenmin Zhang1, Keqiang Ma1,(), Xiaolong Wang1, Hongtao Cao1, Laibin Zou1, Tengfei Ji1, Yumei Luo1, Tian You1, Guoliang Ren2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Huadu District People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510800, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai Provincial Red Cross Hospita, Xining 810001, China
  • Received:2020-04-29 Published:2021-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Keqiang Ma
引用本文:

陈亮, 张升敏, 马克强, 王晓龙, 曹洪涛, 邹来宾, 嵇腾飞, 罗玉媚, 由田, 任国亮. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中保留子宫圆韧带的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 628-631.

Liang Chen, Shenmin Zhang, Keqiang Ma, Xiaolong Wang, Hongtao Cao, Laibin Zou, Tengfei Ji, Yumei Luo, Tian You, Guoliang Ren. Clinical value of preserving round ligament of uterus during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 628-631.

目的

探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)术中保留子宫圆韧带在成年女性中的应用价值。

方法

采用横断面随机对照回顾性研究,选择2015年9月到2019年3月在青海省红十字医院和广州市花都区人民医院诊治的腹股沟疝成年女性60例,根据随机数字表法分为保留组与对照组,每组30例。所有患者都行TEP术式,对照组术中不保留子宫圆韧带,保留组术中保留子宫圆韧带,记录与随访2组预后情况。

结果

保留组的术后住院时间、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间显著少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。保留组术后12、24、36 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分法均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。保留组术后7 d并发症发生率为6.7%,显著低于对照组的26.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与术前1 d相比,术后7 d时2组血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平更低,C1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白12(CTRP12)水平更高(P<0.05)。

结论

在成年女性中应用腹腔镜TEP中保留子宫圆韧带并不增加手术难度,且能缓解术后疼痛,减少术后并发症的发生,降低血清AMH水平与提高CTRP12水平,促进患者的康复。

Objective

To explore the value of retaining the uterine round ligament in adult women during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).

Methods

A randomized controlled study was performed. From September 2015 to March 2019, 60 cases of adult women with inguinal hernia diagnosed and treated in Qinghai Provincial Red Cross Hospital and Guangzhou Huadu District People's Hospital were selected, and were divided into retention group and a control group with 30 cases in each group according to the random number table method. All patients underwent TEP repair. The control group not retained the uterine round ligament during the operation and the retention group retained the uterine round ligament during the operation. The outcomes of the two groups were recorded and followed up.

Results

The postoperative hospital stay, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function and the postoperative ambulation time in the retention group were significantly less than in the control group (P<0.05). The visual analogue scores of pain in the retention group at 12, 24 and 36 h after surgery were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications of 7 days after operation in the retention group (6.7%) were significantly lower than that in the control group (26.7%) (P<0.05). The serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level of 7 days after operation in both groups were lower than that of 1 day before operation, and the serum CTRP12 level were higher than that of 1 day before operation (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair retaining the round ligament of uterine does not increase the difficulty of surgery in the adult women, and can relieve postoperative pain, reduce postoperative complications, reduce serum AMH levels and increase CTRP12 Level, promote the rehabilitation of patients.

表1 2组腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术术女性患者一般资料比较
图2 腹腔镜下放置补片
表2 2组围手术指标比较(±s
表3 2组术后不同时间点的疼痛评分对比(分,±s
表4 2组手术前后血清AMH与CTRP12变化对比(±s
[1]
Farrokh D, Mortazavi R, Dehghani S, et al. Inguinal bladder hernia: use of virtual computed tomographic cystography[J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2019, 44(5): 430-431.
[2]
Han SR, Kim HJ. Inguinal hernia surgery in Korea: nationwide data from 2007-2015[J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2019, 97(1): 41-47.
[3]
李健文,乐飞. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术在青年患者中的应用特点[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1080-1082.
[4]
付焱,李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 58-61.
[5]
Heiss MM, Tulin A, Slavu I, et al. TAAP vs TEP in inguinal hernia repair-what is the evidence? a single center experience[J]. Trials, 2019, 114(1): 67-72.
[6]
Umer S, Zhao SJ, Sammad A, et al. AMH: Could it be used as a biomarker for fertility and superovulation in domestic animals?[J]. Genes(Basel), 2019, 10(12): 1009.
[7]
Shanaki M, Moradi N, Fadaei R, et al. Lower circulating levels of CTRP12 and CTRP13 in polycystic ovarian syndrome: irrespective of obesity[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(12): e0208059.
[8]
Kawai H, Haruki K, Takada N, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma incarcerated within an inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Case Rep, 2019, 5(1): 205.
[9]
刘恒辰,张新宇. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝的原因分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(2): 157-160.
[10]
Kim NH, Shin S, Yoo RN, et al. Delaying surgery for inguinal hernia in neonates: Is it worthwhile?[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2019, 14(4): 332-336.
[11]
Köckerling F. TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 439-459.
[12]
Kubiliute E, Venclauskas L, Jasaitis K, et al. Evaluation of mobility status after inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Visc Med, 2019, 35(6): 380-386.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[3] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[4] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[5] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[6] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[7] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[8] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[9] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[10] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[11] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[12] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[13] 邓杨, 彭豪, 刘剑文. 腹腔镜疝修补术腹膜前负压引流的效果和长期安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 402-405.
[14] 邱志东, 张杰, 薛鹏, 郑玲玲, 杨建桃, 赵海军, 陈双. 补片固定与否对腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术后患者并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-409.
[15] 申亚伟, 黄新, 李万林. 改良医用胶粘合假疝囊技术预防腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术后血清肿的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 410-413.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?