切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 755 -758. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.020

论著

手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果
王红艳(), 马艳丽, 郑洁灿   
  1. 233500 安徽亳州,蒙城县中医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 王红艳
  • 基金资助:
    2018年安徽省医学会急诊临床研究项目(ky2018030)

The effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in the operating room for inguinal hernia surgery

Hongyan Wang(), Yanli Ma, Jiecan Zheng   

  1. Operating Room, Mengcheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Bozhou, Anhui 233500, China
  • Received:2022-12-27 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Wang
引用本文:

王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.

Hongyan Wang, Yanli Ma, Jiecan Zheng. The effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in the operating room for inguinal hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.

目的

探究手术室综合护理对腹股沟疝修补术患者的应用效果。

方法

纳入2021年1月至2022年7月,在蒙城县中医院行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者80例,经电脑随机数字法分成对照组和观察组,每组40例。对照组实施常规手术室护理,观察组分别在术前、术中及术后实施手术室综合护理干预,比较2组护理效果差异。评价分析指标包括:手术室留置时间、首次下床时间、疼痛持续时间、总住院时间、护理满意度、焦虑、抑郁、HADS评分、术后并发症发生率及手术切口愈合情况。

结果

观察组患者手术室留置时间(23.53±2.75)h、首次下床时间(10.36±4.97)h、疼痛持续时间(25.39±5.83)h和住院时间(4.80±1.92)d均低于对照组(28.69±3.06)h、(17.58±6.31)h、(30.14±6.47)h和(6.75±2.68)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入院时,2组患者焦虑、抑郁及HADS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1 d,2组患者焦虑、抑郁及HADS评分均较入院时降低,且对照组各项评分均显著高于观察组(P<0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度95.00%高于对照组77.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症总发生率(2.50%)显著低于对照组(15.0%)(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;观察组手术切口愈合情况显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

手术室综合护理可有效缩短疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的手术室留置时间以及术后住院时间和疼痛时间,显著缓解患者焦虑、抑郁等负面情绪、提高患者护理满意度、降低患者术后并发症发生率并缩短手术切口愈合时间。

Objective

To explore the nursing effects of comprehensive care in the operating room for patients undergoing hernia repair surgery for inguinal hernia.

Methods

This study included 80 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at Mengcheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022. They were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, each with 40 patients, using a computer-generated random number method. The control group received routine operating room nursing care, while the observation group received comprehensive nursing care interventions before, during, and after the surgery. The nursing outcomes of the two groups were compared. Evaluation and analysis indicators included: operating room stay time, time to first getting out of bed, duration of pain, total hospital stay, nursing satisfaction, anxiety, depression, HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores, postoperative complication rates, and surgical incision healing.

Results

The operating room stay time (23.53±2.75 hours), time to first getting out of bed (10.36±4.97 hours), duration of pain (25.39±5.83 hours), and total hospital stay (4.80±1.92 days) in the observation group were all significantly lower than those in the control group (28.69±3.06 hours, 17.58±6.31 hours, 30.14±6.47 hours, and 6.75±2.68 days respectively), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). At admission, there were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, or HADS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). On the first day after surgery, anxiety, depression, and HADS scores in both groups decreased compared to admission, and the scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group (95.00%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (77.50%) (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the observation group (2.50%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (15.0%) (P<0.05). The healing of surgical incisions in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Comprehensive nursing care in the operating room can effectively shorten the operating room stay, postoperative hospitalization, and pain duration for patients undergoing hernia repair for inguinal hernia. It significantly alleviates negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, improves patient nursing satisfaction, reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerates the healing of surgical incisions.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者焦虑及抑郁情况(分,±s
表4 2组患者护理满意度[例(%)]
表5 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
表6 2组患者手术切口愈合情况[例(%)]
[1]
陈越火, 顾翔宇, 于志臻. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术手术部位感染危险因素[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020, 19(2): 173-176.
[2]
王帆, 靳翠红, 申英末, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的外科治疗策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(10): 1070-1075.
[3]
谢玲莉, 刘旭. 腹腔镜下疝修补术联合预见性护理在老年腹股沟疝中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 474-476.
[4]
孙叶飞, 陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[5]
吴仿琴, 颜伟, 陆丽. 手术室综合护理干预对腹股沟斜疝患儿围术期的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(4): 380-381, 392
[6]
胡媛媛, 杨丽, 李霞. 手术室综合护理对传统开腹手术治疗腹股沟疝患者焦虑及生理应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4): 434-437.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[8]
Allam AH, Rawy AM, Abdeldayem OM, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with airway obstruction using hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS) in different localities of Saudi Arabia[J]. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc, 2017, 66(4): 782-784.
[9]
王青青, 蒋红娜, 顾燕儿, 等. 综合护理干预对腹股沟疝手术患者恢复情况并发症疼痛及护理满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(14): 2491-2493.
[10]
游雅媛. 认知诊断Cronbach's α系数属性信度点估计和区间估计研究[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学, 2019.
[11]
全能花. 手术室综合护理干预对患者手术应激反应的影响分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(33): 180-182.
[12]
王彦峰. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与开放网塞-平片修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝效果对比[J].中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(6): 960-961.
[13]
王林, 王冉, 刘婷. 8种非药物干预方法对手术患者术前焦虑影响的网状meta分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2022, 51(5): 847-853.
[14]
于芳, 张羡, 侯小涛, 等. 全身麻醉手术前后综合护理对患者生命体征、焦虑抑郁情绪和不良反应的影响[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生, 2022(1): 137-140.
[15]
付佳. 平片无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术室护理要点分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(14): 207-208.
[16]
徐旺. 腹股沟疝患者采用传统腹股沟疝开放手术治疗对手术指标的影响[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生, 2022, (6): 13-16.
[17]
于锦绣, 赵颖, 蒋励, 等. 术中综合护理配合对腹股沟疝修补术的临床意义及护理体会[J]. 中国医药指南, 2018, 16(3): 275-278.
[18]
孙晓红, 戴峰. 纽曼系统三级护理模式对腹股沟疝手术患者心理状态,疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2021, (8): 7.
[19]
陈淑梅. 平片无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术室护理对策探讨[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(23): 233-234.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 陈秀梅, 陈思涓, 郑小静. 护理联盟体构建及实践的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 703-708.
[13] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[14] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
[15] 于洁, 金小红, 顾艳楣, 王慧, 葛杨杨, 李燕. 癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症患者疾病体验与需求的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 739-744.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?