切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 755 -758. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.020

论著

手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果
王红艳(), 马艳丽, 郑洁灿   
  1. 233500 安徽亳州,蒙城县中医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 王红艳
  • 基金资助:
    2018年安徽省医学会急诊临床研究项目(ky2018030)

The effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in the operating room for inguinal hernia surgery

Hongyan Wang(), Yanli Ma, Jiecan Zheng   

  1. Operating Room, Mengcheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Bozhou, Anhui 233500, China
  • Received:2022-12-27 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Wang
引用本文:

王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.

Hongyan Wang, Yanli Ma, Jiecan Zheng. The effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in the operating room for inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.

目的

探究手术室综合护理对腹股沟疝修补术患者的应用效果。

方法

纳入2021年1月至2022年7月,在蒙城县中医院行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者80例,经电脑随机数字法分成对照组和观察组,每组40例。对照组实施常规手术室护理,观察组分别在术前、术中及术后实施手术室综合护理干预,比较2组护理效果差异。评价分析指标包括:手术室留置时间、首次下床时间、疼痛持续时间、总住院时间、护理满意度、焦虑、抑郁、HADS评分、术后并发症发生率及手术切口愈合情况。

结果

观察组患者手术室留置时间(23.53±2.75)h、首次下床时间(10.36±4.97)h、疼痛持续时间(25.39±5.83)h和住院时间(4.80±1.92)d均低于对照组(28.69±3.06)h、(17.58±6.31)h、(30.14±6.47)h和(6.75±2.68)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入院时,2组患者焦虑、抑郁及HADS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1 d,2组患者焦虑、抑郁及HADS评分均较入院时降低,且对照组各项评分均显著高于观察组(P<0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度95.00%高于对照组77.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症总发生率(2.50%)显著低于对照组(15.0%)(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;观察组手术切口愈合情况显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

手术室综合护理可有效缩短疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的手术室留置时间以及术后住院时间和疼痛时间,显著缓解患者焦虑、抑郁等负面情绪、提高患者护理满意度、降低患者术后并发症发生率并缩短手术切口愈合时间。

Objective

To explore the nursing effects of comprehensive care in the operating room for patients undergoing hernia repair surgery for inguinal hernia.

Methods

This study included 80 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at Mengcheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022. They were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, each with 40 patients, using a computer-generated random number method. The control group received routine operating room nursing care, while the observation group received comprehensive nursing care interventions before, during, and after the surgery. The nursing outcomes of the two groups were compared. Evaluation and analysis indicators included: operating room stay time, time to first getting out of bed, duration of pain, total hospital stay, nursing satisfaction, anxiety, depression, HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores, postoperative complication rates, and surgical incision healing.

Results

The operating room stay time (23.53±2.75 hours), time to first getting out of bed (10.36±4.97 hours), duration of pain (25.39±5.83 hours), and total hospital stay (4.80±1.92 days) in the observation group were all significantly lower than those in the control group (28.69±3.06 hours, 17.58±6.31 hours, 30.14±6.47 hours, and 6.75±2.68 days respectively), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). At admission, there were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, or HADS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). On the first day after surgery, anxiety, depression, and HADS scores in both groups decreased compared to admission, and the scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group (95.00%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (77.50%) (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the observation group (2.50%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (15.0%) (P<0.05). The healing of surgical incisions in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Comprehensive nursing care in the operating room can effectively shorten the operating room stay, postoperative hospitalization, and pain duration for patients undergoing hernia repair for inguinal hernia. It significantly alleviates negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, improves patient nursing satisfaction, reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerates the healing of surgical incisions.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者焦虑及抑郁情况(分,±s
表4 2组患者护理满意度[例(%)]
表5 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
表6 2组患者手术切口愈合情况[例(%)]
[1]
陈越火, 顾翔宇, 于志臻. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术手术部位感染危险因素[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020, 19(2): 173-176.
[2]
王帆, 靳翠红, 申英末, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的外科治疗策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(10): 1070-1075.
[3]
谢玲莉, 刘旭. 腹腔镜下疝修补术联合预见性护理在老年腹股沟疝中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 474-476.
[4]
孙叶飞, 陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[5]
吴仿琴, 颜伟, 陆丽. 手术室综合护理干预对腹股沟斜疝患儿围术期的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(4): 380-381, 392
[6]
胡媛媛, 杨丽, 李霞. 手术室综合护理对传统开腹手术治疗腹股沟疝患者焦虑及生理应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4): 434-437.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[8]
Allam AH, Rawy AM, Abdeldayem OM, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with airway obstruction using hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS) in different localities of Saudi Arabia[J]. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc, 2017, 66(4): 782-784.
[9]
王青青, 蒋红娜, 顾燕儿, 等. 综合护理干预对腹股沟疝手术患者恢复情况并发症疼痛及护理满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(14): 2491-2493.
[10]
游雅媛. 认知诊断Cronbach's α系数属性信度点估计和区间估计研究[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学, 2019.
[11]
全能花. 手术室综合护理干预对患者手术应激反应的影响分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(33): 180-182.
[12]
王彦峰. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与开放网塞-平片修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝效果对比[J].中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(6): 960-961.
[13]
王林, 王冉, 刘婷. 8种非药物干预方法对手术患者术前焦虑影响的网状meta分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2022, 51(5): 847-853.
[14]
于芳, 张羡, 侯小涛, 等. 全身麻醉手术前后综合护理对患者生命体征、焦虑抑郁情绪和不良反应的影响[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生, 2022(1): 137-140.
[15]
付佳. 平片无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术室护理要点分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(14): 207-208.
[16]
徐旺. 腹股沟疝患者采用传统腹股沟疝开放手术治疗对手术指标的影响[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生, 2022, (6): 13-16.
[17]
于锦绣, 赵颖, 蒋励, 等. 术中综合护理配合对腹股沟疝修补术的临床意义及护理体会[J]. 中国医药指南, 2018, 16(3): 275-278.
[18]
孙晓红, 戴峰. 纽曼系统三级护理模式对腹股沟疝手术患者心理状态,疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2021, (8): 7.
[19]
陈淑梅. 平片无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术室护理对策探讨[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(23): 233-234.
[1] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[2] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[3] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[6] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[7] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[8] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[9] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[10] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[11] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[12] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[13] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[14] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[15] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
阅读次数
全文


摘要