切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 720 -723. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.013

论著

抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响
徐金林(), 陈征   
  1. 231501 安徽,庐江县中医院药剂科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-08 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 徐金林
  • 基金资助:
    合肥市2020年度科研项目计划(合科[2020]30号)

The impact of clinical monitoring of antimicrobial drugs on prophylactic medication and infection in inguinal hernia repair surgery

Jinlin Xu(), Zheng Chen   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Lujiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 231501, China
  • Received:2023-02-08 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Jinlin Xu
引用本文:

徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.

Jinlin Xu, Zheng Chen. The impact of clinical monitoring of antimicrobial drugs on prophylactic medication and infection in inguinal hernia repair surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.

目的

探究对抗菌药物临床应用进行监测后,腹股沟疝修补术围手术期预防用药情况及手术切口感染发生情况。

方法

选择2019年7月至2022年7月,庐江县中医院收治的389例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,进行回顾性分析,根据抗菌药物应用方式分为A组与B组,A组为2019年7月—2020年12月,对抗菌药物临床应用进行监测前,常规应用抗菌药物的196例患者,B组为2021年1月—2022年7月,在药剂科临床药师监测和干预条件下应用抗菌药物的193例患者,均行经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗。统计2组围手术期预防性抗菌药物应用情况及手术切口感染发生情况。

结果

2组患者的性别、年龄及手术部位等临床资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者发热总发生率及切口愈合时间、术后住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组抗菌药物总使用率(61.22%)高于B组(18.13%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A、B组手术切口感染率分别为1.02%(2/196)、1.55%(3/193),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对抗菌药物临床应用进行监测后,腹股沟疝修补术围手术期抗菌药物的使用率明显降低,手术切口感染发生率及术后切口愈合情况无明显变化。

Objective

To explore the impact of clinical monitoring of antimicrobial drug use on perioperative prophylactic medication and the incidence of surgical site infections in inguinal hernia repair surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 389 patients with inguinal hernia treated at Lujiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2019 to July 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the method of antimicrobial drug use: Group A (196 patients from July 2019 to December 2020, before the monitoring of clinical use of antimicrobial drugs, routinely using antimicrobial drugs) and Group B (193 patients from January 2021 to July 2022, under the monitoring and intervention of clinical pharmacists in the pharmacy department, using antimicrobial drugs). All patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair surgery. The perioperative prophylactic use of antimicrobial drugs and the incidence of surgical site infections in both groups were statistically analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, or surgical site between the two groups (P>0.05). There were also no significant differences in the overall incidence of fever, wound healing time, or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The total use rate of antimicrobial drugs in Group A (61.22%) was higher than that in Group B (18.13%), with a statistical difference (P<0.05). The rates of surgical site infection in Groups A and B were 1.02% (2/196) and 1.55% (3/193), respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

After the clinical monitoring of antimicrobial drugs, the use rate of antimicrobial drugs during the perioperative period of inguinal hernia repair surgery significantly decreased, while the incidence of surgical site infection and postoperative wound healing showed no significant change.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者围手术期抗菌药物应用情况
表3 2组患者手术时间及术后恢复情况比较
表4 2组患者术后发热情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Bökkerink WJV, Koning GG, Malagic D, et al. Long‐term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method(TULIP trial)[J]. Br J Surg, 2019, 106(7): 856-861.
[2]
Zhuo Y, Cai D, Chen J, et al. Pre-surgical peripheral blood inflammation markers predict surgical site infection following mesh repair of groin hernia[J]. Medicine, 2021, 100(9): e25007.
[3]
裴保方, 曹松山, 段彦彦, 等. 小儿腹股沟疝修补术围术期预防用药与手术切口感染情况分析[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2020, 26(1): 37-39.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[5]
杨彪, 项本宏, 王琼. 不同腹膜切开法在老年腹股沟疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用疗效比较[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2021, 27(6): 1261-1264.
[6]
吴小波. 腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术与开放性手术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果观察[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(15): 2693-2695.
[7]
国家卫计委办公厅, 国家中医药管理局, 总后勤卫生部. 抗菌药物临床应用指导原则:国卫办医发〔2015〕43号[S/OL]. [2015-08-27].

URL    
[8]
姜纪华, 刘翠萍. 医院感染管理[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2010, 20(9): 1232.
[9]
Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Ishimaru M, et al. Comparison of postoperative infection after emergency inguinal hernia surgery with enterectomy between mesh repair and non-mesh repair: a national database analysis[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(1): 217-223.
[10]
韩万林, 崔航, 支洲航, 等. 128例开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染的外科治疗[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 29(11): 1488-1494.
[11]
Perry TJ 2nd, Fraser S, Orion K, et al. Extra-Anatomic Bypass and Excision is Superior to Graft Salvage Attempts with Antibiotic Beads to Treat Vascular Graft Infections in the Groin[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 22(9): 2-8.
[12]
Sereysky J, Parsikia A, Stone ME, et al. Predictive factors for the development of surgical site infection in adults undergoing initial open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(1): 173-178.
[13]
Usher MG, Tourani R, Webber B, et al. Patient Heterogeneity and the J-Curve Relationship Between Time-to-Antibiotics and the Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Bacterial Infection[J]. Crit Care Med, 2022, 50(5): 799-809.
[14]
高大爽, 项本宏. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(7): 492-496, 500.
[15]
宋晓超, 赵丽娜, 乔美珍, 等. 神经外科Ⅰ类切口手术部位感染的影响因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(12): 1838-1841, 1866.
[16]
Razafinimanana M, Aoun O, Durond S, et al. Relevance of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Non-Mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair in Remote and Poor Medical Settings in Sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2021, 22(7): 752-756.
[17]
储诚兵, 陈杰, 申英末, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后感染影响因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(2): 257-260.
[18]
陈越火, 顾翔宇, 于志臻. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术手术部位感染危险因素[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020, 19(2): 173-176.
[19]
林栓琴, 赵亚笙. 腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术后术区感染的相关因素探析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(14): 1854-1856.
[20]
Fafaj A, Lo Menzo E, Alaedeen D, et al. Effect of Infraoperative Urinary Catheter Use on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(8): 667-674.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[11] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[12] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[13] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?