切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 687 -692. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.06.018

论著

低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果
臧宇1, 姚胜1,(), 朱新勇1, 戎世捧1, 田智超1   
  1. 1.100853 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-18 出版日期:2024-12-18
  • 通信作者: 姚胜

Clinical effect of low temperature plasma ablation technology in the treatment of mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia surgery

Yu Zang1, Sheng Yao1,(), Xinyong Zhu1, Shipeng Rong1, Zhichao Tian1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2023-05-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Yao
引用本文:

臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.

Yu Zang, Sheng Yao, Xinyong Zhu, Shipeng Rong, Zhichao Tian. Clinical effect of low temperature plasma ablation technology in the treatment of mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.

目的

探讨低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果。

方法

选取2007 年1 月至2022 年3 月解放军总医院第四医学中心普通外科收治的56 例腹壁疝术后补片感染患者作为研究对象。将2007 年1 月至2013 年12 月使用电刀及锐器取出补片及清创的29 例腹壁疝术后补片感染患者纳入对照组;将2014 年1 月至2022 年3 月使用低温等离子射频消融技术取出补片及清创的27 例腹壁疝术后补片感染患者纳入试验组。比较2 组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、切口甲级愈合发生率、细菌培养结果阳性率和不良反应发生率。

结果

试验组与对照组手术时间[(62.2±14.2)min 比(59.3±15.7)min]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组术后住院时间(28.5±3.3)d 显著低于对照组(37.4±2.9)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组与对照组切口甲级愈合发生率[100%(27/27)比79.3%(23/29)]比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2 组术中细菌培养阳性率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后第5 天及第10 天,试验组细菌培养阳性率均显著低于相应时间点的对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组不良反应发生率为0%(27/27),显著低于对照组27.6%(8/29),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

低温等离子射频消融可以减少术后住院时间,改善切口愈合等级、减少术后并发症并改善术后创面的细菌培养结果,可以作为感染补片取出的选择。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of low temperature plasma ablation technology in the treatment of mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia.

Methods

From January 2007 to March 2022, 56 patients with mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia surgery who were admitted to the department of the Fourth Center of the General Surgery Department of the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were selected as the research objects.29 patients diagnosed as having mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia surgery that removed the mesh and debrided with electrocautery and sharp instruments from January 2007 to December 2013 were included in the control group; 27 patients diagnosed as having mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia surgery that removed the mesh and debrided with low temperature plasma ablation were included in the experimental group.The operation time and postoperative hospital stay, the incidence of grade A wound healing, the positive rate of bacterial culture results and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time of the experimental group and the control group were (62.2±14.2) min and (59.3±15.7) min respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).The postoperative hospital stay in the experimental group was (28.5±3.3) d significantly lower than that in the control group (37.4±2.9) d, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of grade A wound healing in the experimental group and the control group was 100% (27/27) and 79.3% (23/29), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no statistical significance in the positive rate of bacterial culture between the two groups (P>0.05).On the 5th and 10th day after surgery, the positive rate of bacterial culture in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group at corresponding time points, with statistical significance (P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was 100% (27/27), which was significantly lower than 27.6% (8/29) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation can reduce postoperative hospital stay, improve the grade of incision healing,reduce postoperative complications, and improve the bacterial culture results of postoperative wounds, and can be used as an option for infection mesh removal.

表1 2 组患者一般资料比较
图1 低温等离子射频消融设备的连接示意图
图2 游离补片壁层
图3 游离补片脏层
图4 取出的感染补片
[1]
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al.The tension-free hernioplasty[J].Am J Surg, 1989, 157(2): 188-193.
[2]
Phoa S, Chan KS, Lim SH, et al.Comparison of glue versus suture mesh fixation for primary open inguinal hernia mesh repair by Lichtenstein technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Hernia, 2022, 26(4): 1105-1120.
[3]
Li B, Zhang X, Man Y, et al.Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with porcine small intestine submucosa: a 5- year follow-up.a prospective randomized controlled study[J].Regen Biomater, 2021, 8(1): rbaa055.
[4]
Solé Cruz E, Rabattu PY, Todesco A, et al.Study of abdominal wall muscle innervation applied to large-defect closure in congenital diaphragmatic hernia[J].Clin Anat, 2020, 33(5): 759-766.
[5]
Bendavid R.Mesh abdominal wall hernia surgery is safe and effective-the harm New Zealand media has done: response to Dr Steven Kelly's article[J].N Z Med J, 2017, 130(1467): 97-98.
[6]
邹振玉, 曹金鑫, 朱熠林, 等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后补片感染的外科治疗[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1080-1085.
[7]
唐小龙, 何一, 周彤.负压封闭引流与根治性感染网片切除在腹壁疝无张力修补术后感染中的应用[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 378-380.
[8]
中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.中国慢性鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2018)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 54(2): 81-100.
[9]
马瑞, 苏帆, 李月月, 等.低温等离子刀射频消融术治疗结膜血管畸形的疗效[J].武警医学, 2020, 31(2): 150-152, 156.
[10]
王帆, 靳翠红, 申英末, 等.腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的外科治疗策略[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(10): 1070-1075.
[11]
陈昕, 毛忠琦, 胡浩, 等.腹股沟疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染16 例诊治分析[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2021, 15(2): 146-149.
[12]
马宁, 汤福鑫, 宗振, 等.腹腔镜下取出双侧腹股沟疝腹腔内补片植入术后的感染补片[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(4): 404.
[13]
王殿琛, 张辉, 郑伟, 等.亚甲蓝介导的补片取出术在腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染中的应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2020, 23(2): 134-136.
[14]
黎卫, 李志坚.超声刀与高频电刀在腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术应用中的比较[J/OL].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(5):408-411.
[15]
曹键, 杨晓东, 叶颖江, 等.甲状腺手术中能量器械热损伤的对比研究[J].中华内分泌外科杂志, 2018, 12(4): 278-281.
[16]
张硕, 孙晓楠.低温等离子射频消融术治疗真菌性角膜炎效果观察[J].中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志, 2020, 42(11): 806-814.
[17]
Kramer A, Hübner NO, Weltmann KD, et al.Polypragmasia in the therapy of infected wound-conclusions drawn from the perspectives of low temperature plasma technology for plasma wound therapy[J].GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip, 2008, 3(1): Doc13.
[18]
Sönnergren HH, Polesie S, Strömbeck L, et al.Bacteria aerosol spread and wound bacteria reduction with different methods for wound debridement in an animal model[J].Acta Derm Venereol,2015, 95(3): 272-277.
[19]
路遥, 杨润功, 朱加亮.慢性创面清创技术的研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2018, 32(8): 1096-1101.
[20]
Nusbaum AG, Gil J, Rippy MK, et al.Effective method to remove wound bacteria: comparison of various debridement modalities in an in vivo porcine model[J].J Surg Res, 2012, 176(2): 701-707.
[1] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[2] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[3] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[4] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[5] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[6] 盛伟伟, 林峰, 武梦成, 张嘉炜, 汪明庆, 熊茂明. 无张力疝修补术后补片感染32例再手术的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 311-314.
[7] 徐杨荣, 杨毅, 王凤飞, 潘姣. 腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外疝修补术和腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术在腹壁疝修补中的安全性及临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 296-301.
[8] 赛甫丁·艾比布拉, 买买提·依斯热依力, 李义亮, 王永康, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同材质补片修补对腹壁疝大鼠腹横筋膜组织转化生长因子-β1及Collagen合成代谢的作用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 161-167.
[9] 宋延冰. 腹腔镜手术方式在嵌顿性腹壁疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 189-191.
[10] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[11] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[12] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[13] 喻海波, 张春军. 腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹壁疝补片固定方法的选择与应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 274-279.
[14] 霍蒙蒙, 马春方, 商玉环. 延续性护理在腹壁疝日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 359-361.
[15] 李义亮, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王永康, 王志, 赛甫丁·艾比布拉, 李赞林, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 聚丙烯和生物补片对腹壁疝大鼠腹横筋膜组织氧化应激、MMPs及TIMPs的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 125-129.
阅读次数
全文


摘要