切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 681 -686. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.06.017

论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析
于新峰1, 曾琦2,(), 后强1, 徐浩1, 操谢芳1   
  1. 1.243000 安徽,德驭医疗马鞍山总医院普外诊疗中心
    2.442000 湖北,十堰市妇幼保健院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-27 出版日期:2024-12-18
  • 通信作者: 曾琦
  • 基金资助:
    十堰市科技局科研基金项(22Y50)

Analysis of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair on efficacy and prognosis of inguinal hernia in adults

Xinfeng Yu1, Qi Zeng2,(), Qiang Hou1, Hao Xu1, Xiefang Cao1   

  1. 1.General Treatment Center, Deyu Medical Maanshan General Hospital, Ma'anshan 243000, Anhui Province, China
    2.General Surgery Department, Shiyan City Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Propvince, China
  • Received:2023-12-27 Published:2024-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Qi Zeng
引用本文:

于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.

Xinfeng Yu, Qi Zeng, Qiang Hou, Hao Xu, Xiefang Cao. Analysis of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair on efficacy and prognosis of inguinal hernia in adults[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.

目的

探究腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)和完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)对成人腹股沟疝的疗效及预后。

方法

回顾性分析2021 年6 月至2022 年11 月德驭医疗马鞍山总医院普外科收治的腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,根据接受术式不同,将其分为TAPP 组(接受TAPP 术治疗)与TEP 组(接受TEP 术治疗),通过倾向性匹配评分法(卡钳值设置0.02)排除基线资料混杂因素影响,最终2 组各获得患者60 例。对比2 组围手术期指标、并发症,术前及术后6、12、24 h 视觉模拟评分(VAS),术前、术后24 h 应激指标,术前、术后4 周男性患者精索静脉情况(精索静脉管径及精索静脉血流速度),以及术后12 个月复发率。

结果

TEP 组术中出血量、创口直径、手术时间、下床活动时间少于TAPP 组(P<0.05),而2 组住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);TEP组并发症总发生率为3.33%(2/60),TAPP 组并发症总发生率为6.67%(4/60),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);组间与时间对TEP 组与TAPP 组患者的VAS 评分存在交互作用(P<0.05),组间、时间对VAS 主效应显著(P<0.05);术后24 h,2 组患者皮质醇(Cor)、醛固酮(ALD)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)水平高于术前(P<0.05),TEP 组术后24 h Cor、ALD、NE 水平低于TAPP 组(P<0.05);术后4 周,2 组男性患者精索静脉管径高于术前(P<0.05),TEP 组男性患者精索静脉管径低于TAPP组(P<0.05),2 组男性患者精索静脉血流速度低于术前(P<0.05),TEP 组男性患者精索静脉血流速度高于TAPP 组(P<0.05);术后12 个月,TEP 组总复发率(5.00%,3/60)与TAPP 组(1.67%,1/60)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜TAPP 术与TEP 术均可有效治疗腹股沟疝,并发症较少,但TEP 术创伤更小、恢复更快、对男性患者精索静脉影响更小,可酌情选择合适术式。

Objective

To explore the influence of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) and laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair (TEP) on the efficacy and prognosis of adults with inguinal hernia.

Methods

Data of patients with inguinal hernia admitted to department of general surgery of Deyu Medical Ma'anshan General Hospital from June 2021 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different surgical methods, they were divided into TAPP group (TAPP treatment) and TEP group (TEP treatment).The propensity matching score method (caliper value=0.02) was used to exclude the influence of confounding factors of baseline data.Finally, 60 patients were obtained in each group (P>0.05).The perioperative indicators, complications, visual analogue scale(VAS) scores before surgery and at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery, stress indicators before surgery and at 24 h after surgery, spermatic vein in male patients (spermatic vein diameter and spermatic vein blood flow velocity) before surgery and at 4 w after surgery, and recurrence rate within 1 year were compared between the two groups.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss, wound diameter, surgical time, ambulation time in TEP group were significantly less or shorter than those in TAPP group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no statistical significance in the incidence of complications between TEP group (3.33%, 2/60) and TAPP group (6.67%, 4/60) (P>0.05).There was interaction between groups and time on VAS scores in TEP group and TAPP group (P<0.05).The main effect between groups and time on VAS was significant (P<0.05).The levels of cortisol (Cor),aldosterone (ALD) and norepinephrine (NE) in both groups were significantly increased at 24 h after surgery than those before surgery (P<0.05), but the levels of Cor, ALD and NE were significantly lower in TEP group than those in TAPP group after surgery (P<0.05).At 4 w after surgery, the spermatic vein diameter of male patients in the two groups was significantly increased than that before surgery (P<0.05),but the spermatic vein diameter was significantly lower in TEP group compared to TAPP group (P<0.05).The blood flow velocity of spermatic vein in both groups was significantly declined than that before surgery (P<0.05), but it was significantly higher in TEP group than in TAPP group (P<0.05).There was no statistical significance in the recurrence rate between TEP group (5.00%, 3/60) and TAPP group (1.67%,1/60) (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic TAPP and TEP are both effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia with few complications, but TEP has smaller trauma, faster recovery, and less impact on the spermatic vein of male patients, so it is necessary to select the appropriate surgery by the actual situation.

表1 2 组患者术中指标及术后恢复情况比较(±s
表2 2 组患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
表3 2 组患者VAS 评分比较(分,±s
表4 2 组患者应激指标比较(±s
表5 2 组男性患者精索静脉情况(±s
表6 2 组患者术后12 个月复发率情况[例(%)]
[1]
薛佩, 李绍杰, 乐飞, 等.新型生物补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中临床价值的多中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(4): 532-540.
[2]
Chao TC, Tung HY, Tsai CH, et al.Laparoscopic versus robotic TAPP/TEP inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter, propensity score weighted study[J].Hernia, 2024, 28(1): 199-209.
[3]
张昕, 顾远辉, 李小飞, 等.腹腔镜TAPP 术和―两针”连续腹膜缝合技术在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2021, 24(5): 357-359+ 363.
[4]
Wang X, Fei T, Zhou E.Application of a custom-made single-incision sealing device in laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: initial experience[J].Ann Transl Med,2022, 10(10): 598-607.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018 年版)[J].中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[6]
王晓庆, 段培蓓, 陈毓雯, 等.腹部手术患者术后疼痛知识、信念及行为问卷的编制与信效度检验[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2012,18(34): 4096-4099.
[7]
曾玉剑, 张同, 施承民, 等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术的临床应用进展[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1197-1200.
[8]
陈敏辉, 吴康瑞, 吴志辉.TEP 手术治疗男性腹股沟疝的效果及对睾丸血流的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展, 2019, 22(1): 52-54.
[9]
王双辉, 李彦宁, 刘红彬, 等.开放式与腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗132 例腹股沟疝患者临床疗效研究[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2022, 28(3): 311-313.
[10]
谢允虎, 吴海明, 孙宁杰, 等.改良腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟疝患者中应用效果比较[J].中国医师进修杂志, 2023, 46(4): 357-360.
[11]
储诚兵, 陈杰, 申英末, 等.腹股沟疝无张力修补术后感染影响因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(2): 257-260.
[12]
程玉刚, 李波, 张光永.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿的预防和处理对策[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1054-1058.
[13]
郑腊梅, 吕容, 汪同旋, 等.术前肋间神经阻滞对后腹腔镜肾切除术患者围术期应激反应的影响[J].重庆医学, 2023, 52(5):720-723.
[14]
刘志宁, 程晓虎, 余富龙, 等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用反穿刺侧位布孔法的临床效果[J].安徽医学, 2022, 43(10):1176-1180.
[15]
张武合, 蒋遥, 苏燕胜, 等.经腹入路腹腔镜下肾上腺嗜铬细胞瘤切除术中肾上腺中央静脉的处理体会[J].国际外科学杂志,2021, 48(3): 159-163.
[16]
龚义军, 任军, 谢泽民, 等.TAPP 术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效及对其炎性应激及疼痛的影响分析[J].空军医学杂志, 2019, 35(4):328-330.
[17]
肖琼瑶, 王世禄, 李媛, 等.超声引导下QLB 复合气管插管全麻对于老年患者TEP 腹股沟疝无张力修补术影响因素分析[J].现代生物医学进展, 2021, 21(13): 2578-2582.
[18]
张红波, 刘发军, 熊远芳, 等.腹腔镜手术同时治疗腹股沟疝与精索静脉曲张的可行性研究[J].局解手术学杂志, 2020, 29(5):373-376.
[19]
Cheng PL, Duh YC, Chen JJ, et al.Laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair versus open repair in boys with inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis[J].J Pediatr Surg, 2023, 58(7): 1322-1331.
[20]
刘超, 闫动, 李香, 等.腹壁吻合器在小儿腹腔镜手术中的应用分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志, 2021, 42(7): 617-621.
[21]
张红波, 刘发军, 熊远芳, 等.腹腔镜手术同时治疗腹股沟疝与精索静脉曲张的可行性研究[J].局解手术学杂志, 2020, 29(5):373-376.
[22]
Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, et al.Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials[J].Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7):4685-4700.
[23]
张敏剑, 吴永友, 钟丰云, 等.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人单侧初发腹股沟疝的效果比较[J].中国医药导报, 2023, 20(10): 84-87+ 99.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要