切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 715 -719. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.012

论著

腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨
杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳()   
  1. 210006 南京医科大学附属南京医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-09 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 吴向阳

Discussion on the treatment of postoperative infection in inguinal hernia

Ruizhou Yang, Guodong Li, Xiangyang Wu()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nangjing Medical University, Nangjing 210006, China
  • Received:2022-10-09 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiangyang Wu
引用本文:

杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.

Ruizhou Yang, Guodong Li, Xiangyang Wu. Discussion on the treatment of postoperative infection in inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.

目的

分析腹股沟疝术后感染的原因,探讨临床治疗方法。

方法

收集2018年1月至2022年1月,南京医科大学附属南京医院普外科收治的13例腹股沟疝术后感染患者的临床资料进行回顾分析。分析患者的感染情况,腹股沟疝手术采用的术式、补片、发病时间、感染的治疗方法、住院时间及伤口愈合情况。

结果

13例患者中腹股沟疝术后浅部感染10例,深部感染3例。10例浅部感染患者腹股沟疝手术方式为,Lichtenstein术7例,网塞技术3例。均采用聚丙烯补片。发病时间(7.10±1.10)d。深部感染3例,腹股沟疝手术术式分别为,Lichtenstein术2例,TEP 1例。2例采用聚丙烯补片,1例为生物补片。发病时间(42.33±34.99)d。10例浅部感染患者经清创、闭式引流、二期缝合,伤口全部愈合,补片未取。3例深部感染患者经抗感染,取出补片后,临床治愈。13例患者术后随访4~6个月,未见复发。

结论

腹股沟疝术后感染多数为浅部感染,应早期积极处理,可应用闭式负压引流,加速伤口愈合,减少住院时间。深部感染伴有补片感染相对复杂,经腹腔镜探查、适时取出补片等处理,获得满意疗效。

Objective

To investigate the etiology and clinical treatment of postoperative inguinal hernia infection.

Methods

Clinical data of 13 patients with postoperative inguinal hernia infection admitted to the Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient's infection situation, the surgical method used for inguinal hernia surgery, the type of patch, the onset time, the treatment method for infection, hospital stay, and wound healing status were analyzed.

Results

Among the 13 patients with inguinal hernia, there were 10 cases of superficial infection after the operation and 3 cases of deep infection. The surgical methods of inguinal hernia in 10 patients with superficial infection were Lichtenstein in 7 cases and mesh plug technique in 3 cases. The meshes used all polypropylene mesh. The onset time was (7.10±1.10) days. There were 3 cases of deep infection, 2 cases of Lichtenstein operation and 1 case of TEP. The meshes used polypropylene mesh (2 cases) and biological mesh(1 case). The onset time was (42.33±34.99) d. After debridement, closed drainage and secondary suture after dressing change, the wounds of 10 patients with superficial infection were all healed without mesh removal. Three patients with deep infections were healed after the active operation to remove mesh. The 13 patients were followed up for 4-6 months, and no recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Most postoperative inguinal hernia infections are superficial infections that should be treated early, especially with the use of closed negative pressure devices, which can accelerate wound healing and reduce hospital stay. The deep infection with mesh infection is relatively complicated, and the correct treatment, such as intraoperative laparoscopic exploration and timely mesh removal can obtain satisfactory clinical efficacy.

图1 自制负压封闭引流装置的结构图
图7 自制负压装置伤口样图
表1 患者的临床处理(±s
[1]
刘威, 沈根海, 高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术在女性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(10): 1672-1674.
[2]
王立洲, 孟建民. 无张力疝修补术后治疗腹股沟疝的手术效果评价[J]. 世界临床医学, 2017, 11(2): 65-66.
[3]
Howard R, Johnson E, Berlin NL, et al. Hospital and surgeon variation in 30-day complication rates after ventral hernia repair[J]. Am J Sury, 2021, 222(2): 417-423.
[4]
Nissen AT, Henn D, Moshrefi S, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life After Ventral Hernia Repair With Biologic and Synthetic Mesh[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 82: S332-S338.
[5]
Park H, De Virgilio C, Kim D, et al. Effects of smoking and different BMI cutoff points on surgical site infection after elective open ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2): 337-343.
[6]
胡骁骅, 张普柱, 孙永华, 等. 纳米银抗菌医用敷料银离子吸收和临床应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2003, 83(24): 2178-2179.
[7]
宗振, 江志鹏, 侯泽辉, 等. 自制负压封闭引流装置治疗腹股沟疝术后补片感染疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(5): 569-570.
[8]
蒋琪霞, 王建东, 彭青, 等. 负压伤口治疗结合纳米银敷料处理创伤性慢性伤口的效果比较[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2019, 32(11): 1198-1202.
[9]
Gao J, Wang Y, Song J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(10): 3980-3990.
[10]
吴国富, 贺志刚. 腹股沟疝Lichtenstein手术后的切口感染[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(4): 357-358.
[11]
林栓琴, 赵亚笙. 腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术后术区感染的相关因素探析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(14): 1854-1856.
[12]
马丹. 成人腹股沟疝开放式无张力修补术后手术部位感染高发因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志, 2019, 13(4): 342-345.
[13]
Kohno S, Hasegawa T, Aoki H, et al. Analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection and postoperative recurrence following inguinal and femoral hernia surgery in adults[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(4): 1001-1006.
[14]
Berner-Hansen V, Oma E, Willaume M, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(6): 1481-1490.
[15]
Normandin S, Safran T, Winocour S, et al. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applications[J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2021, 35(3): 164-170.
[16]
韦瑞丽, 马辉, 余芳, 等. 自制简易负压引流装置联合普朗特液体伤口敷料治疗腹部感染性伤口的效果分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2021, 27(3): 280-283.
[17]
Agarwa P, Kukrele R, Sharma D. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) for difficult wounds: A review[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019, 10(5): 845-848.
[18]
Gillespie BM, Thalib L, Ellwood D, et al. Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on wound complications in obese women after caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJOG, 2022, 129: 196-207.
[19]
赵春, 姚宏芹. 腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术后迟发性深部感染的外科治疗[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 425-428.
[20]
韩万林, 崔航, 支洲航, 等. 128例开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染的外科治疗[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 11(29): 1488-1494.
[1] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[2] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[3] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[7] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[8] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[9] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[10] 陆志峰, 周佳佳, 梁舒. 虚拟现实技术在治疗弱视中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 891-895.
[11] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[12] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[13] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
阅读次数
全文


摘要