切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 715 -719. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.012

论著

腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨
杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳()   
  1. 210006 南京医科大学附属南京医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-09 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 吴向阳

Discussion on the treatment of postoperative infection in inguinal hernia

Ruizhou Yang, Guodong Li, Xiangyang Wu()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nangjing Medical University, Nangjing 210006, China
  • Received:2022-10-09 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiangyang Wu
引用本文:

杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.

Ruizhou Yang, Guodong Li, Xiangyang Wu. Discussion on the treatment of postoperative infection in inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.

目的

分析腹股沟疝术后感染的原因,探讨临床治疗方法。

方法

收集2018年1月至2022年1月,南京医科大学附属南京医院普外科收治的13例腹股沟疝术后感染患者的临床资料进行回顾分析。分析患者的感染情况,腹股沟疝手术采用的术式、补片、发病时间、感染的治疗方法、住院时间及伤口愈合情况。

结果

13例患者中腹股沟疝术后浅部感染10例,深部感染3例。10例浅部感染患者腹股沟疝手术方式为,Lichtenstein术7例,网塞技术3例。均采用聚丙烯补片。发病时间(7.10±1.10)d。深部感染3例,腹股沟疝手术术式分别为,Lichtenstein术2例,TEP 1例。2例采用聚丙烯补片,1例为生物补片。发病时间(42.33±34.99)d。10例浅部感染患者经清创、闭式引流、二期缝合,伤口全部愈合,补片未取。3例深部感染患者经抗感染,取出补片后,临床治愈。13例患者术后随访4~6个月,未见复发。

结论

腹股沟疝术后感染多数为浅部感染,应早期积极处理,可应用闭式负压引流,加速伤口愈合,减少住院时间。深部感染伴有补片感染相对复杂,经腹腔镜探查、适时取出补片等处理,获得满意疗效。

Objective

To investigate the etiology and clinical treatment of postoperative inguinal hernia infection.

Methods

Clinical data of 13 patients with postoperative inguinal hernia infection admitted to the Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient's infection situation, the surgical method used for inguinal hernia surgery, the type of patch, the onset time, the treatment method for infection, hospital stay, and wound healing status were analyzed.

Results

Among the 13 patients with inguinal hernia, there were 10 cases of superficial infection after the operation and 3 cases of deep infection. The surgical methods of inguinal hernia in 10 patients with superficial infection were Lichtenstein in 7 cases and mesh plug technique in 3 cases. The meshes used all polypropylene mesh. The onset time was (7.10±1.10) days. There were 3 cases of deep infection, 2 cases of Lichtenstein operation and 1 case of TEP. The meshes used polypropylene mesh (2 cases) and biological mesh(1 case). The onset time was (42.33±34.99) d. After debridement, closed drainage and secondary suture after dressing change, the wounds of 10 patients with superficial infection were all healed without mesh removal. Three patients with deep infections were healed after the active operation to remove mesh. The 13 patients were followed up for 4-6 months, and no recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Most postoperative inguinal hernia infections are superficial infections that should be treated early, especially with the use of closed negative pressure devices, which can accelerate wound healing and reduce hospital stay. The deep infection with mesh infection is relatively complicated, and the correct treatment, such as intraoperative laparoscopic exploration and timely mesh removal can obtain satisfactory clinical efficacy.

图1 自制负压封闭引流装置的结构图
图7 自制负压装置伤口样图
表1 患者的临床处理(±s
[1]
刘威, 沈根海, 高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术在女性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(10): 1672-1674.
[2]
王立洲, 孟建民. 无张力疝修补术后治疗腹股沟疝的手术效果评价[J]. 世界临床医学, 2017, 11(2): 65-66.
[3]
Howard R, Johnson E, Berlin NL, et al. Hospital and surgeon variation in 30-day complication rates after ventral hernia repair[J]. Am J Sury, 2021, 222(2): 417-423.
[4]
Nissen AT, Henn D, Moshrefi S, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life After Ventral Hernia Repair With Biologic and Synthetic Mesh[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 82: S332-S338.
[5]
Park H, De Virgilio C, Kim D, et al. Effects of smoking and different BMI cutoff points on surgical site infection after elective open ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2): 337-343.
[6]
胡骁骅, 张普柱, 孙永华, 等. 纳米银抗菌医用敷料银离子吸收和临床应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2003, 83(24): 2178-2179.
[7]
宗振, 江志鹏, 侯泽辉, 等. 自制负压封闭引流装置治疗腹股沟疝术后补片感染疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(5): 569-570.
[8]
蒋琪霞, 王建东, 彭青, 等. 负压伤口治疗结合纳米银敷料处理创伤性慢性伤口的效果比较[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2019, 32(11): 1198-1202.
[9]
Gao J, Wang Y, Song J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(10): 3980-3990.
[10]
吴国富, 贺志刚. 腹股沟疝Lichtenstein手术后的切口感染[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(4): 357-358.
[11]
林栓琴, 赵亚笙. 腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术后术区感染的相关因素探析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(14): 1854-1856.
[12]
马丹. 成人腹股沟疝开放式无张力修补术后手术部位感染高发因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志, 2019, 13(4): 342-345.
[13]
Kohno S, Hasegawa T, Aoki H, et al. Analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection and postoperative recurrence following inguinal and femoral hernia surgery in adults[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(4): 1001-1006.
[14]
Berner-Hansen V, Oma E, Willaume M, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(6): 1481-1490.
[15]
Normandin S, Safran T, Winocour S, et al. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applications[J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2021, 35(3): 164-170.
[16]
韦瑞丽, 马辉, 余芳, 等. 自制简易负压引流装置联合普朗特液体伤口敷料治疗腹部感染性伤口的效果分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2021, 27(3): 280-283.
[17]
Agarwa P, Kukrele R, Sharma D. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) for difficult wounds: A review[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019, 10(5): 845-848.
[18]
Gillespie BM, Thalib L, Ellwood D, et al. Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on wound complications in obese women after caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJOG, 2022, 129: 196-207.
[19]
赵春, 姚宏芹. 腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术后迟发性深部感染的外科治疗[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 425-428.
[20]
韩万林, 崔航, 支洲航, 等. 128例开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染的外科治疗[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 11(29): 1488-1494.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[11] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[12] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[13] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?