切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 660 -664. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.06.013

论著

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理
周正阳1, 陈凯1, 仇多良1, 邵乐宁1, 吴浩荣1, 钟丰云1,()   
  1. 1.215004 江苏,苏州大学附属第二医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-30 出版日期:2024-12-18
  • 通信作者: 钟丰云
  • 基金资助:
    苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项项目(LCZX202204)

Analysis and management of postoperative hemorrhage following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Zhengyang Zhou1, Kai Chen1, Duoliang Qiu1, Lening Shao1, Haorong Wu1, Fengyun Zhong1,()   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow 215004,Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2024-10-30 Published:2024-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Fengyun Zhong
引用本文:

周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.

Zhengyang Zhou, Kai Chen, Duoliang Qiu, Lening Shao, Haorong Wu, Fengyun Zhong. Analysis and management of postoperative hemorrhage following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.

目的

分析探讨导致腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后出血的相关因素。

方法

选取2019年9 月1 日至2024 年8 月31 日,于苏州大学附属第二医院进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)的2010 例患者的临床资料,进行回顾性分析。对患者的一般资料、手术方式、手术部位、手术时机、糖尿病史、术前使用抗凝药物、疝囊大小、前列腺癌根治手术史及LIHR 术后复发疝等因素与术后出血发生的相关性进行分析,采用卡方检验进行单因素分析筛选可能相关的危险因素,并通过二元Logistic 回归分析进一步评估其是否为独立危险因素,计算比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在2010 例接受LIHR 的患者中,共有32 例(1.59%)术后出血,其中29 例经保守治疗成功止血,3 例因大出血接受二次腹腔镜手术,术中发现出血原因包括巨大疝疝囊血管活动性出血、死亡冠血管出血及精索血管出血。单因素分析显示,术前使用抗凝药物、疝囊大小(≥5 cm)、前列腺癌根治手术史及LIHR 术后复发疝均与术后出血显著相关(P<0.05)。进一步Logistic 回归分析证实,这些因素均为术后出血的独立危险因素,其OR 值分别为4.289(95% CI 1.882~9.775,P<0.001)、2.840(95% CI 1.375~5.866,P=0.005)、4.071(95% CI 1.644~10.078,P=0.002)及9.639(95% CI 4.000~23.230,P<0.001)。

结论

术前使用抗凝药物、疝囊≥5 cm、前列腺癌根治手术史及LIHR 术后复发疝是术后出血的独立危险因素。术中血管意外损伤及处理不当亦是导致术后出血的重要原因。临床应针对上述危险因素采取预防性措施,规范术中操作,以降低术后出血的发生风险。

Objective

To investigate and analyze the factors associated with postoperative hemorrhage following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 2010 patients who underwent LIHR at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2024.Factors including patients' general characteristics, surgical method, surgical site, timing of surgery, history of diabetes, preoperative use of anticoagulants, hernia sac size, history of radical prostatectomy, and recurrent hernia after LIHR were analyzed for their association with postoperative hemorrhage.Chi-square tests were used for univariate analysis to identify potential risk factors, followed by binary logistic regression to evaluate independent risk factors.Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

Among the 2010 patients who underwent LIHR, 32 cases (1.59%) experienced postoperative hemorrhage.Of these, 29 were successfully treated with conservative methods, while 3 cases required secondary laparoscopic surgery due to massive bleeding.The intraoperative causes of bleeding included active vascular bleeding from the hernia sac in large hernias, corona mortis vascular injury, and spermatic vessel bleeding.Univariate analysis showed that preoperative use of anticoagulants, hernia sac size (≥5 cm), history of radical prostatectomy, and recurrent hernia after LIHR were significantly associated with postoperative hemorrhage (P<0.05).Logistic regression confirmed these as independent risk factors, with ORs of 4.289(95% CI 1.882-9.775, P<0.001), 2.840 (95% CI 1.375-5.866, P=0.005), 4.071 (95% CI 1.644-10.078,P=0.002), and 9.639 (95% CI 4.000-23.230, P<0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

Preoperative use of anticoagulants, hernia sac size ≥5 cm, history of radical prostatectomy, and recurrent hernia after LIHR were independent risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage.Intraoperative vascular injury and improper handling were also important causes of postoperative bleeding.Clinical strategies should focus on preventive measures targeting these risk factors and enhancing intraoperative procedural standards to reduce the risk of postoperative hemorrhage.

表1 32 例腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术患者术后出血单因素分析[例(%)]
表2 术后出血危险因素的Logistic 回归分析
[1]
韩啸.腹股沟疝手术中医源性血管损伤的防范及处理[J].中国医药指南, 2018, 16(5): 24-25.
[2]
唐健雄, 李绍杰.我国疝与腹壁外科发展现状与展望[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(12): 1409-1412.
[3]
Amato G, Agrusa A, Rodolico V, et.al.Combined inguinal hernia in the elderly.Portraying the progression of hernia disease[J].Int J Surg, 2016, 33 Suppl 1: S20-29.
[4]
Kroon L, Ticehurst K, Ahonen J, et al.Causes of chronic pain unrelated to surgical trauma after groin hernia repair: a prospective cohort study[J].Hernia, 2024, 29(1): 13.
[5]
黄永刚, 叶静, 张方捷, 等.腹股沟疝修补术后腹膜前间隙出血危险因素分析及急诊处理[J/OL].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2017, 10(5): 328-333.
[6]
HerniaSurge Group.International guidelines for groin hernia management[J].Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[7]
Weyhe D, Tabriz N, Sahlmann B, et al.Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair-a systematic review[J].Innov Surg Sci, 2017, 2(2): 47-52.
[8]
Nordin P, Ahlberg J, Johansson H, et al.Risk factors for injuries associated with damage claims following groin hernia repair[J].Hernia, 2017, 21(2): 215-221.
[9]
胡安然, 黄华龙, 郑志铭, 等.腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹膜前修补术后复发疝10 例[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2024, 24(9):638-641.
[10]
王学虎, 赵渝.凝血功能异常腹股沟疝病人治疗策略[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 666-670.
[11]
江志鹏, 谭进富, 邹湘才, 等.疝修补术后腹腔间隔室综合征预防与处理中国专家共识(2022 版)[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2022,31(12): 1578-1589.
[12]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018 年版)[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4):244-246.
[13]
杨传振.斜疝巨大疝囊TAPP 中不同疝囊处理策略的应用研究[J].医学信息, 2021, 34(8): 98-102.
[14]
陈钊, 钟克力, 范宝航.前列腺癌根治术后并发腹股沟疝的研究进展[J].临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(9): 994-997.
[15]
宗华, 潘凯, 陶红光, 等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中出血控制及解剖分析[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1):34-38.
[16]
孙善平, 崔兆清, 章阳.Corona Mortis 血管的解剖学特征及在腹股沟疝修补术中的研究[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2013, 7(6): 526-528.
[17]
Cao C, Shi X, Jin W, et al.Clinical Data Analysis for Treatment of Adult Inguinal Hernia by TAPP or TEP[J].Front Surg, 2022, 9:900843.
[18]
Andresen K, Rosenberg J.Transabdominal pre-peritoneal(TAPP)versus totally extraperitoneal(TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024, 7(7):CD004703.
[19]
陈思梦, 李原.腹股沟疝手术中血管意外损伤处理[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 675-679.
[20]
朱江帆.腹腔镜胃袖状切除术胃食管反流的预防和处理策略[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(8): 1029-1033.
[21]
唐健雄, 李绍杰, 李绍春, 等.腹壁疝治疗进展: 从修补走向功能性修复[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1158-1162.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要