切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 632 -636. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.06.022

临床论著

个体化预测老年患者腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留的风险Nomogram模型的建立
杨琴燕1,(), 季刚1, 赵万文1, 孙艳1   
  1. 1. 214001 江苏省无锡市锡山人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-17 出版日期:2021-12-20
  • 通信作者: 杨琴燕
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(H2018112)

Establishment of an individualized Nomogram model for predicting the risk of urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients

Qinyan Yang1,(), Gang Ji1, Wanwen Zhao1, Yan Sun1   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Xishan People's Hospital, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province Jiangsu Wuxi 214001
  • Received:2020-09-17 Published:2021-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Qinyan Yang
引用本文:

杨琴燕, 季刚, 赵万文, 孙艳. 个体化预测老年患者腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留的风险Nomogram模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 632-636.

Qinyan Yang, Gang Ji, Wanwen Zhao, Yan Sun. Establishment of an individualized Nomogram model for predicting the risk of urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 632-636.

目的

构建个体化预测老年患者腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)后尿滞留(POUR)的风险nomogram模型。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2020年1月于无锡市锡山人民医院行LIHR的老年腹股沟疝患者223例的临床资料。使用单因素和Logistic回归多因素分析老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的独立危险因素,并建立相关nomogram预测模型。

结果

年龄>74岁(OR=3.343,95% CI:1.293~8.639)、良性前列腺肥大(OR=6.293,95% CI:1.932~20.503)、手术时间≥90 min(OR=4.287,95% CI:1.689~10.879)、术后使用麻醉类镇痛药物(OR=6.560,95% CI:2.383~18.062)、术后首次排尿时间≥5 h(OR=7.291,95% CI:2.779~19.128)是老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于以上5项独立危险因素建立预测老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的nomogram模型,并对该模型进行内部验证显示,校正曲线与理想曲线拟合较好,预测值同实测值基本一致,AUC高达0.874(95% CI:0.842~0.906),表明该nomogram模型具有良好的预测能力。

结论

老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的独立危险因素较多,本研究建立的nomogram模型具有准确的预测能力,可为临床筛查高风险患者和采取有效的临床对策提供参考依据。

Objective

To construct a nomogram model that can individually predict the risk of urine retention (POUR) after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) in elderly patients.

Methods

The clinical data of elderly patients with inguinal hernia who underwent LIHR in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Single factor and logistic regression were used to analyze the independent risk factors of POUR in elderly patients under LIHR. Establish relevant nomogram prediction models.

Results

Age>74 years old (OR=3.343, 95% CI: 1.293-8.639), benign prostatic hypertrophy (OR=6.293, 95% CI: 1.932-20.503), operation time≥90 min (OR=4.287, 95% CI: 1.689-10.879), postoperative use of narcotic analgesics (OR=6.560, 95% CI: 2.383-18.062), postoperative first micturition time≥5 h (OR=7.291, 95% CI: 2.779-19.128) are independent risk factors in elderly patients for POUR in LIHR (P<0.05). Based on the above 5 independent risk factors, a nomogram model was established to predict the occurrence of POUR in elderly patients undergoing LIHR, and internal verification of the model showed that the calibration curve fits the ideal curve well, and the predicted value is basically the same as the measured value. AUC is as high as 0.874 (95% CI: 0.842-0.906), indicating that the nomogram model has good predictive ability.

Conclusion

There are many independent risk factors for POUR in elderly patients undergoing LIHR. The nomogram model established in this study has accurate predictive ability and can provide reference for clinical screening of high-risk patients and effective clinical countermeasures.

表1 老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的单因素分析[例(%)]
类别 POUR组(34例) 非POUR组(189例) χ2 P
性别     0.613 >0.05
  男性 26(76.47) 132(69.84)    
  女性 8(23.53) 57(30.16)    
年龄     8.750 <0.05
  60~74岁 18(52.94) 146(77.25)    
  >74~84岁 16(47.06) 43(22.75)    
体质量指数     0.200 >0.05
  <24 kg/m2 23(67.65) 135(71.43)    
  ≥24 kg/m2 11(32.35) 54(28.57)    
吸烟史     0.010 >0.05
  13(38.24) 74(39.15)    
  21(61.76) 115(60.85)    
糖尿病     0.223 >0.05
  9(26.47) 43(22.75)    
  25(73.53) 146(77.25)    
冠心病     0.103 >0.05
  5(14.71) 24(12.7)    
  29(85.29) 165(87.3)    
高血压     0.003 >0.05
  11(32.35) 62(32.8)    
  23(67.65) 127(67.2)    
高血脂     1.754 >0.05
  7(20.59) 23(12.17)    
  27(79.41) 166(87.83)    
良性前列腺肥大     16.436 <0.05
  12(35.29) 18(9.52)    
  22(64.71) 171(90.48)    
疝部位     2.856 >0.05
  单侧 13(38.24) 102(53.97)    
  双侧 21(61.76) 87(46.03)    
术前膀胱排空     0.051 >0.05
  18(52.94) 104(55.03)    
  16(47.06) 85(44.97)    
手术方式     0.200 >0.05
  经腹腹膜前补片植入术 23(67.65) 135(71.43)    
  全腹膜外补片植入术 11(32.35) 54(28.57)    
补片类型     0.598 >0.05
  高分子聚丙烯 15(44.12) 97(51.32)    
  聚酯纤维 19(55.88) 92(48.68)    
手术时间     19.385 <0.05
  <90 min 15(44.12) 151(79.89)    
  ≥90 min 19(55.88) 38(20.11)    
术中补液量     1.121 >0.05
  <1000 ml 15(44.12) 102(53.97)    
  ≥1000 ml 19(55.88) 87(46.03)    
术后镇痛药物类型     15.739 <0.05
  麻醉类 26(76.47) 75(39.68)    
  非麻醉类 8(23.53) 114(60.32)    
术后首次排尿时间     19.463 <0.05
  <5 h 11(32.35) 135(71.43)    
  ≥5 h 23(67.65) 54(28.57)    
表2 老年患者行LIHR发生POUR的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 预测老年患者行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术发生术后尿潴留的nomogram风险模型
图2 Nomogram模型预测老年患者行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术发生术后尿潴留风险的验证
图3 Nomogram模型预测老年患者行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术发生术后尿潴留的ROC曲线
[1]
Amato G, Agrusa A, Rodolico V, et al. Combined inguinal hernia in the elderly. Portraying the progression of hernia disease[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 33(Suppl 1): S20-S29.
[2]
Shalaby R, Alrazek MA, Elsaied A, et al. Fifteen years' experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(1): 101-105.
[3]
王卫涛,张有福. 中西医在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后并发症的防治进展[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志, 2018, 13(6): 883-888.
[4]
Unal Y, Kilinc MF, et al. Does inguinal hernia repair affect uroflowmetric parameters? A prospective controlled clinical trial[J]. Low Urin Tract Symptoms, 2019, 11(3): 99-103.
[5]
Hall BR, Armijo PR, Grams B, et al. Identifying patients at risk for urinary retention following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution study[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(2): 311-315.
[6]
Cybułka B. Inguinal pain syndrome. The influence of intraoperative local administration of 0.5% bupivacaine on postoperative pain control following Lichtenstein hernioplasty. A prospective case-control study[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2017, 89(2): 11-25.
[7]
梁敏,程静,章文静, 等. 腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留的危险因素[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(S4): 341.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1238-1242.
[9]
陈孝平,汪建平. 外科学. 8版[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 106.
[10]
张云,郝晓晖,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10): 967-971.
[11]
Huerta S, Patel PM, Mokdad AA, et al. Predictors of inguinodynia, recurrence, and metachronous hernias after inguinal herniorrhaphy in veteran patients[J]. Am J Surg, 2016, 212(3): 391-398.
[12]
Wormer BA, Ross SW, Walters AL, et al. Bladder fill after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair reduces time to discharge[J]. Am Surg, 2017, 83(4): 385-389
[13]
徐爱萍,杨明霞,杨小冬. 普通外科手术患者术后尿潴留危险因素分析[J]. 江苏医药, 2015, 41(9): 1092-1093.
[14]
Tsambarlis PN, Sherer BA, Godlewski KF, et al. Quantification of risk factors in 500 patients with postoperative urinary retention[J]. Can J Urol, 2017, 24(2): 8705.
[15]
Blair A B, Dwarakanath A, Mehta A, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a single institution experience [J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(6): 895-900.
[16]
Denham M, Donovan K, Wetoska N, et al. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 33(9): 3008-3013.
[17]
时利荣,王媛媛,王静, 等. 蛛网膜下腔阻滞联合硬脊膜外麻醉致长时间尿潴留1例[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(11): 140-142.
[18]
汪波,刘勇,蔡逊. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留发生的危险因素分析[J]. 腹部外科, 2016, 29(2): 127-129.
[19]
赵鑫,韩威,刘鹏, 等腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留发生特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2018, 21(4): 68-72.
[20]
Xiong Z, Deng G, Huang X, et al. Score for the survival probability in metastasis breast cancer: a nomogram-based risk assessment model[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2018, 50(4): 1260-1269.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要