切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 264 -266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.013

临床论著

局部麻醉下腹股沟疝无张力修补术在高龄患者中的应用
张戈1, 李鸿鹏1, 罗锐1, 李明晋1, 房仲平1,()   
  1. 1. 638001 四川省,广安市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-03 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 房仲平

Feasibility of inguinal hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients

Ge Zhang1, Hongpeng Li1, Rui Luo1, Mingjin Li1, Zhongping Fang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an 638500, China
  • Received:2019-12-03 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhongping Fang
引用本文:

张戈, 李鸿鹏, 罗锐, 李明晋, 房仲平. 局部麻醉下腹股沟疝无张力修补术在高龄患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 264-266.

Ge Zhang, Hongpeng Li, Rui Luo, Mingjin Li, Zhongping Fang. Feasibility of inguinal hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 264-266.

目的

探讨局部麻醉下高龄患者行腹股沟疝无张力补修术的安全性以及有效性。

方法

选择2016年3月至2019年3月,广安市人民医院在局部麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术126例高龄患者的临床资料,分析住院时间、术后并发症及住院费用情况。

结果

手术时间为35~74 min,平均(43.4±12.1)min,于术后48 h之内出院患者99例(78.6%),于术后72 h出院20例(15.9%),于术后3~12 d出院患者7例(5.6%),住院时间(2.1±0.6)d,住院费用(3932±267)元。离院后失访患者5例,术后并发症患者8例(5.4%),术后出现切口浆液渗出患者3例(2.4%),出现阴囊血肿患者1例(0.8%),术后发热患者2例(1.6%),术后切口血肿患者1例(0.8%),因术后反复尿潴留复发患者1例(0.8%)。术后4 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)为(3.1±1.4)分,术后3 d的VAS评分为(1.6±0.6)分。术后的第1天出现疼痛、恶心、紧张等不适症状患者28例(22.2%),第3天5例(4.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

短期临床观察,高龄患者在局部麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术是安全有效的。

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 126 elderly patients underwent inguinal hernia repair with mesh under local anesthesia in Guang'an people's hospital between March 2016 and March 2019. Length of hospitalization stay, hospitalization costs and complications were evaluated.

Results

The operation time was 35 to 74 minutes, with an average of (43.4±12.1) minutes; 99 patients (78.6%) were discharged within 48 hours after operation, 20 patients (15.9%) were discharged within 72 hours after operation, and 7 patients (5.6%) were discharged in 3 to 12 days after operation; The length of hospital stay was (2.1±0.6) days, and hospitalization expenses was (3 932±267) yuan. Five patients lost to follow-up after operation, eight patients had postoperative complications (5.4%), three patients (2.4%) had postoperative wound serous exudate, 1 patient (0.8%) had scrotal hematoma, 2 patients (1.6%) had postoperative fever, 1 patient (0.8%) had postoperative hematoma, and 1 patient (0.8%) had recurrence due to repeated urinary retention. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain at 4 hours after operation was (3.1±1.4) points. The VAS score at 3 days after operation was (1.6±0.6) points. There were 28 cases (22.2%) with pain, nausea, tension and other discomfort symptoms at the first day after operation, and 5 cases (4.0%) at the third day after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

After short term clinical observation, inguinal hernia repair with local anesthesia is feasible in older patients.

表1 局部麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术后轻度不适情况[例(%)]
[1]
Wagh PV, Leverich AP, Sun CN, et al. Direct inguinal herniation in men: a disease of collagen[J]. J Surg Res, 1974, 17(6): 425-433.
[2]
Rosenthal RA. Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patient[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1994, 74(2): 261-291.
[3]
陈杰,那冬鸣,申英末, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2005, 20(2): 107-108.
[4]
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-free hernioplasty[J]. Am J Surg, 1989, 157(2): 188-193.
[5]
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1993, 73(3): 413-426.
[6]
Lichtenstein IL SA, Amid PK. The cause, prevention, and treatment of recurrent groin hernia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1993, 73(3): 529-544.
[7]
Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2003, 83(5): 1045-1051.
[8]
Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1995, 222(6): 719-727.
[9]
Kingsnorth AN, Gray MR, Nott DM. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 1992, 79(10): 1068-1070.
[10]
Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, et al. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(1): 35-42.
[11]
陈双. 腹股沟疝外科学[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2005:1.
[12]
Chow A, Purkatyastha S, Athanasiou T, et al. Inguinal hernia[J]. BMJ Clin Evid, 2007, 4: 1-20.
[13]
Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2006, 203(6): 865-877.
[14]
Allen PIM, Zager M, Goldman M. Elective repair of groin hernias in the elderly[J]. Br J Surg, 1987, 74(11): 987-991.
[15]
Sanjay P, Jones P, Woodward A. Inguinal hernia repair: are ASA grades 3 and 4 patients suitable for day case hernia repair[J]. Hernia 2006, 10(4): 299-302.
[1] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[2] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[3] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[4] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[5] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[6] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[7] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[8] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[9] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[10] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[11] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[12] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[13] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[14] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[15] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
阅读次数
全文


摘要