切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 264 -266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.013

临床论著

局部麻醉下腹股沟疝无张力修补术在高龄患者中的应用
张戈1, 李鸿鹏1, 罗锐1, 李明晋1, 房仲平1,()   
  1. 1. 638001 四川省,广安市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-03 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 房仲平

Feasibility of inguinal hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients

Ge Zhang1, Hongpeng Li1, Rui Luo1, Mingjin Li1, Zhongping Fang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an 638500, China
  • Received:2019-12-03 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhongping Fang
引用本文:

张戈, 李鸿鹏, 罗锐, 李明晋, 房仲平. 局部麻醉下腹股沟疝无张力修补术在高龄患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 264-266.

Ge Zhang, Hongpeng Li, Rui Luo, Mingjin Li, Zhongping Fang. Feasibility of inguinal hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 264-266.

目的

探讨局部麻醉下高龄患者行腹股沟疝无张力补修术的安全性以及有效性。

方法

选择2016年3月至2019年3月,广安市人民医院在局部麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术126例高龄患者的临床资料,分析住院时间、术后并发症及住院费用情况。

结果

手术时间为35~74 min,平均(43.4±12.1)min,于术后48 h之内出院患者99例(78.6%),于术后72 h出院20例(15.9%),于术后3~12 d出院患者7例(5.6%),住院时间(2.1±0.6)d,住院费用(3932±267)元。离院后失访患者5例,术后并发症患者8例(5.4%),术后出现切口浆液渗出患者3例(2.4%),出现阴囊血肿患者1例(0.8%),术后发热患者2例(1.6%),术后切口血肿患者1例(0.8%),因术后反复尿潴留复发患者1例(0.8%)。术后4 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)为(3.1±1.4)分,术后3 d的VAS评分为(1.6±0.6)分。术后的第1天出现疼痛、恶心、紧张等不适症状患者28例(22.2%),第3天5例(4.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

短期临床观察,高龄患者在局部麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术是安全有效的。

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of hernioplasty under local anesthesia in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 126 elderly patients underwent inguinal hernia repair with mesh under local anesthesia in Guang'an people's hospital between March 2016 and March 2019. Length of hospitalization stay, hospitalization costs and complications were evaluated.

Results

The operation time was 35 to 74 minutes, with an average of (43.4±12.1) minutes; 99 patients (78.6%) were discharged within 48 hours after operation, 20 patients (15.9%) were discharged within 72 hours after operation, and 7 patients (5.6%) were discharged in 3 to 12 days after operation; The length of hospital stay was (2.1±0.6) days, and hospitalization expenses was (3 932±267) yuan. Five patients lost to follow-up after operation, eight patients had postoperative complications (5.4%), three patients (2.4%) had postoperative wound serous exudate, 1 patient (0.8%) had scrotal hematoma, 2 patients (1.6%) had postoperative fever, 1 patient (0.8%) had postoperative hematoma, and 1 patient (0.8%) had recurrence due to repeated urinary retention. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain at 4 hours after operation was (3.1±1.4) points. The VAS score at 3 days after operation was (1.6±0.6) points. There were 28 cases (22.2%) with pain, nausea, tension and other discomfort symptoms at the first day after operation, and 5 cases (4.0%) at the third day after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

After short term clinical observation, inguinal hernia repair with local anesthesia is feasible in older patients.

表1 局部麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术后轻度不适情况[例(%)]
[1]
Wagh PV, Leverich AP, Sun CN, et al. Direct inguinal herniation in men: a disease of collagen[J]. J Surg Res, 1974, 17(6): 425-433.
[2]
Rosenthal RA. Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patient[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1994, 74(2): 261-291.
[3]
陈杰,那冬鸣,申英末, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2005, 20(2): 107-108.
[4]
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-free hernioplasty[J]. Am J Surg, 1989, 157(2): 188-193.
[5]
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1993, 73(3): 413-426.
[6]
Lichtenstein IL SA, Amid PK. The cause, prevention, and treatment of recurrent groin hernia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1993, 73(3): 529-544.
[7]
Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2003, 83(5): 1045-1051.
[8]
Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1995, 222(6): 719-727.
[9]
Kingsnorth AN, Gray MR, Nott DM. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 1992, 79(10): 1068-1070.
[10]
Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, et al. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(1): 35-42.
[11]
陈双. 腹股沟疝外科学[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2005:1.
[12]
Chow A, Purkatyastha S, Athanasiou T, et al. Inguinal hernia[J]. BMJ Clin Evid, 2007, 4: 1-20.
[13]
Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2006, 203(6): 865-877.
[14]
Allen PIM, Zager M, Goldman M. Elective repair of groin hernias in the elderly[J]. Br J Surg, 1987, 74(11): 987-991.
[15]
Sanjay P, Jones P, Woodward A. Inguinal hernia repair: are ASA grades 3 and 4 patients suitable for day case hernia repair[J]. Hernia 2006, 10(4): 299-302.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?