切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 623 -628. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.06.004

述评

增强视野全腹膜外修补术(e-TEP)的起源和进展
李健文1,(), 乐飞1,(), 李金东2   
  1. 1200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院普外科
    2201100 上海,复旦大学附属闵行医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-11 出版日期:2025-12-18
  • 通信作者: 李健文, 乐飞

The origin and advances of the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair (e-TEP)

Jianwen Li1,(), Fei Yue1,(), Jindong Li2   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201100, China
  • Received:2025-11-11 Published:2025-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Jianwen Li, Fei Yue
引用本文:

李健文, 乐飞, 李金东. 增强视野全腹膜外修补术(e-TEP)的起源和进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 623-628.

Jianwen Li, Fei Yue, Jindong Li. The origin and advances of the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair (e-TEP)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 623-628.

增强视野全腹膜外修补术(e-TEP)由完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)演变而来,通过腔镜观察孔布局的调整,优化手术视野,以适应不同部位疝的治疗。e-TEP最初用于复杂性腹股沟疝,后来用于原发性腹壁疝、中小切口疝,逐渐尝试向大切口疝拓展。机器人手术系统、单孔手术、组织结构分离技术等的融入使这种愿望成为可能。目前,e-TEP技术正在探索和完善中,其短中期疗效在总体上与其他术式相似,尚缺乏长期随访结果,外科医生可根据经验选择性开展。e-TEP秉承"微创和层面"优先理念,具有理论上的优势,但技术上具有挑战性。手术空间小、学习曲线长是影响e-TEP开展的主要因素,避免腹壁过度分离、预防新型并发症发生等焦点问题也备受关注。随着微创平台的进展,包括e-TEP在内的各类微创修补技术都会有所获益,最终实现精准的个体化治疗。

The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) approach evolved from the classical totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. By refining the optic trocar placement, endoscopic visualization was optimized to accommodate hernia repair at various sites. Initially applied to complex inguinal hernias, e-TEP was subsequently adopted for primary ventral hernias and small- to medium-sized incisional hernias, with ongoing attempts to extend its use to large incisional hernias. The incorporation of robotic surgical systems, single-port platforms, and the component separation technique has further facilitated this expansion. At present, e-TEP remains in a phase of active exploration and refinement. Its short- and mid-term outcomes are generally comparable to those of alternative procedures, although long-term follow-up data are still unavailable. Surgeons may therefore adopt the technique selectively based on their expertise. Guided by the principles of minimally invasive surgery and plane-oriented dissection, e-TEP offers theoretical advantages but presents notable technical challenges. Limited operative space and a prolonged learning curve remain key barriers to wider implementation of e-TEP, while key issues such as avoiding excessive abdominal wall dissection and preventing emerging procedure-specific complications continue to draw attention. With advances in minimally invasive platforms, e-TEP—alongside other minimally invasive repair techniques—is expected to benefit and ultimately contribute to more precise, individualized hernia management.

[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 成人原发性腹壁疝腹腔镜手术中国专家共识(2025版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(1): 25-33.
[2]
唐建雄, 李绍杰, 李绍春. 腹壁缺损修复理念的演进与趋势:从解剖重建到功能再生[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(9): 1139-1143.
[3]
Dulucq JL. Treatment of inguinal hernia by insertion of a subperitoneal patch under pre-peritoneoscopy[J]. Chirurgie, 1992, 118(1-2): 83-85.
[4]
Ferzli GS, Massad A, Albert P. Extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Surg, 1992, 2(6): 281-286.
[5]
McKernan JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach[J]. Surg Endosc, 1993, 7(1): 26-28.
[6]
李健文, 乐飞, 薛佩. 浅谈腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的进展及现状[J]. 上海医学, 2022, 45(4): 221-225.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师协会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(1): 1-8.
[8]
Tarnoff M, Rosen M, Brody F. Planned totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2): 359.
[9]
Miserez M, Penninckx F. Endoscopic totally preperitoneal ventral hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(8): 1207-1213.
[10]
Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh: surgical technique and early results[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003, 13(2): 101-105.
[11]
Daes J. The enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique for repair of inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(4): 1187-1189.
[12]
Köckerling F, Jacob DA, Lomanto D, et al. The enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique for repair of inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12): 3691-3692; author reply 3693-3694.
[13]
Reinpold W. Endoskopisch total extraperitonealer transhernialer sublay –Bauchwand-Hernienverschluss in single- port-technik[M] //Schumpelick V, Arlt G, Conze J, et al. Hernien, 5th ed. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2015: 301-304.
[14]
Schwarz J, Reinpold W, Bittner R. Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique(EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(1): 173-180.
[15]
Reinpold W, Berger C, Adolf D, et al. Mini- or less-open sublay(E/MILOS) operation vs open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM repair for the treatment of incisional hernias: a registry-based propensity score matched analysis of the 5-year results[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(1): 179-190.
[16]
Li B, Qin C, Bittner R. Totally endoscopic sublay(TES) repair for midline ventral hernia: surgical technique and preliminary results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1543-1550.
[17]
Belyansky I, Daes J, Radu VG, et al. A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal(eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(3): 1525-1532.
[18]
Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Surg Innov, 2016, 23(2): 134-141.
[19]
Baig SJ, Priya P. Extended totally extraperitoneal repair(eTEP) for ventral hernias: Short-term results from a single centre[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2019, 15(3): 198-203.
[20]
Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias(International Endohernia Society(IEHS)): Part B[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(11): 3511-3549.
[21]
Tang R, Jiang H, Wu W, et al. A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1): 233.
[22]
Li B, Qin C, Yu J, et al. Totally endoscopic sublay(TES) repair for lateral abdominal wall hernias: technique and first results[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2): 523-533.
[23]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术规范化操作中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(1): 34-47.
[24]
Yeow M, Wijerathne S, Lomanto D. Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal mesh in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2): 533-541.
[25]
Aliseda D, Sanchez-Justicia C, Zozaya G, et al. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal(eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(6): 1511-1520.
[26]
Li J, Wang Y, Wu L. The comparison of eTEP and IPOM in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2022, 32(2): 252-258.
[27]
Tryliskyy Y, Tyselskyi V, Kebkalo A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ventral hernia repair using minimally-invasive extended totally extraperitoneal repair versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2023, 95(4): 1-5.
[28]
Chuah YHD, Lloyd A, Sahebally SM. IPOM versus eTEP as minimally invasive approaches for ventral/incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 144.
[29]
Rasador ACD, Silveira CAB, Fernandez MG, et al. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus(IPOM+) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal(e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(2): 1251-1260.
[30]
Oberlin O, Gillion JF, Saget A, et al. Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted retromuscular versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of small-to-medium ventral hernias: a prospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 257.
[31]
Graziani E Sousa A, Biscola da Cruz Y, Burmann JC, et al. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal Onlay mesh versus robotic retromuscular for small-and medium-sized ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2025, 35(11): 856-862.
[32]
Petro CC, Montelione KC, Zolin SJ, et al. Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(3): 2143-2153.
[33]
Maatouk M, Kbir GH, Mabrouk A, et al. Can ventral TAPP achieve favorable outcomes in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair? a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(4): 729-739.
[34]
Coco D, Leanza S. Robotic-assisted primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a comprehensive comparative analysis of rv-TAPP, r-Rives, and r-TARUP techniques[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 405.
[35]
Baur J, Süsstrunk J, Meir M, et al. Comparing robotic ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair(rvTAPP) and laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal repair(eTEP): a multicentre observational study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 282.
[36]
Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias(International Endohernia Society[IEHS])-Part III[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(2): 380-404.
[37]
Chowbey P, Wadhawan R, Subramanian D, et al. Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5): 1511-1523.
[38]
Köckerling F, Hoffmann H, Mayer F, et al. What are the trends in incisional hernia repair? Real-world data over 10 years from the Herniamed registry[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2): 255-265.
[39]
Barranquero AG, Ortega Alcaide J, Gas Ruiz C, et al. Robotic extended totally extraperitoneal(eTEP) repair with transversus abdominis release(TAR) for stoma-site incisional hernia associated with midline and inguinal defect-A video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2025, 27(11): e70292.
[40]
Henriksen NA, Kaufmann R, Simons MP, et al. EHS and AHS guidelines for treatment of primary ventral hernias in rare locations or special circumstances[J]. BJS Open, 2020, 4(2): 342-353.
[41]
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(3): 171-190.
[42]
Henriksen NA, Nazari T, Simons MP, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European and Americas Hernia Societies-a web-based survey on surgeons' opinion[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2022, 1: 10260.
[43]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 腹腔内补片修补术中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 721-729.
[44]
Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society[J]. Br J Surg, 2023, 110(12): 1732-1768.
[45]
Hernández-Granados P, Henriksen NA, Berrevoet F, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on management of rectus diastasis[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(10): 1189-1191.
[46]
李健文, 乐飞, 张云. 腹腔内和腹膜外微创技术治疗腹壁切口疝的思考[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(5): 377-382.
[47]
李健文, 张云, 乐飞. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修复术中腹壁功能重建[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2024, 29(4): 285-291.
[48]
Anusitviwat Y, Cheewatanakornkul S, Yolsuriyanwong K, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic eTEP-RS/TAR and IPOM techniques for ventral hernia repair[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2025, 4: 14176.
[1] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[2] 王思懿, 耿苗苗, 王增旭. 手术室中不同术前准备方式对腹壁疝手术效率影响和患者满意度分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 563-566.
[3] 张兴洲, 魏明, 董国强, 张楠. 切口疝修补术后补片感染并发肠瘘及疝复发一例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 599-601.
[4] 李亮, 谢肖俊, 隋梁. 腹外疝的关键病理生理:肌肉减少症[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 475-477.
[5] 毛永欢, 朱浩, 张简之, 缪骥, 李强, 喻春钊. 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.
[6] 李若云, 罗文彬, 潘超凡, 罗瑞英, 罗长江. 大鼠动物模型在腹壁疝中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 344-347.
[7] 马慧, 孟伊雯, 曹佳, 李绍杰, 唐健雄, 顾芬. 术前预康复在腹壁切口疝患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 306-310.
[8] 黄雨琳, 郑立锋, 嵇振岭. 四种完全可吸收合成补片的降解和再生[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 339-343.
[9] 张亚伟, 刘琪, 姜建武, 邓瑞, 符洋. 肠造口还纳联合巨大切口疝一期修补六例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 276-280.
[10] 罗文, 王勇, 段鑫, 石念, 柯文杰, 武英翔, 杜晨阳. 组织结构分离技术联合完全腹膜外桥接修补手术治疗成人巨大腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 178-182.
[11] 储修峰, 王苗锋, 周劲松, 李铧杰. 完全内镜下sublay 修补与腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补对中小型腹壁疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 195-201.
[12] 刘亦婷, 申英末. 腹腔镜修补手术在肝移植术后切口疝的应用及其效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 202-205.
[13] 吴颖, 陈贞. 先天性脊柱侧弯伴腹壁缺损切口疝的术后护理经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 228-231.
[14] 张爱东, 杨守臣, 董梅, 张卫立. 个性化护理在胆囊炎术后并发切口疝患者康复护理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 224-227.
[15] 黄雨琳, 嵇振岭. 不同疝补片对伤口愈合胶原蛋白沉积的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 25-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?