切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 276 -280. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.03.006

论著

肠造口还纳联合巨大切口疝一期修补六例分析
张亚伟1, 刘琪1, 姜建武1, 邓瑞1, 符洋1,()   
  1. 1. 450002 郑州大学第一附属医院胃肠外科/疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-05 出版日期:2025-06-18
  • 通信作者: 符洋

Analysis of 6 cases of one-stage repair of stoma reversal combined with giant incisional hernia

Yawei Zhang1, Qi Liu1, Jianwu Jiang1, Rui Deng1, Yang Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002,China
  • Received:2025-05-05 Published:2025-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Yang Fu
引用本文:

张亚伟, 刘琪, 姜建武, 邓瑞, 符洋. 肠造口还纳联合巨大切口疝一期修补六例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 276-280.

Yawei Zhang, Qi Liu, Jianwu Jiang, Rui Deng, Yang Fu. Analysis of 6 cases of one-stage repair of stoma reversal combined with giant incisional hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 276-280.

目的

探讨一期还纳肠造口在腹壁巨大切口疝合并肠造口患者中的可行性及安全性,以期为临床决策提供循证依据。

方法

回顾性分析2023年1—12月在郑州大学第一附属医院胃肠外科/疝和腹壁外科接受腹壁巨大切口疝修补联合造口还纳的6例患者的临床资料,分析其手术方案、近期并发症及手术效果。

结果

6例患者顺利完成肠造口还纳并腹壁疝修补术,平均手术时间为(289.2±112.4)min,平均出血量为(65.0±49.5)ml,平均住院时间为(10.8±2.0)d。术后无吻合口瘘、腹腔间室综合征、肠梗阻及补片感染等严重并发症。2例患者发生皮下血清肿,经持续引流后治愈。术后随访12~24个月,腹壁疝无复发。

结论

在严格遵循无菌操作原则并确保合理选择腹壁修补技术的前提下,一期还纳造口联合腹壁切口疝修补术在初步研究中显示出安全性及可行性,有污染风险的切口并不是一期疝修补以及补片应用的绝对禁忌证。

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of primary stoma reversal combined with giant incisional hernia repair in patients with abdominal wall giant incisional hernia and intestinal stoma, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 6 patients who underwent large ventral incisional hernia repair combined with stoma reversal at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, between January 2023 and December 2023.The surgical strategies, short-term complications, and operative outcomes were evaluated.

Results

All 6 patients successfully underwent stoma reversal combined with abdominal wall hernia repair. The average operative time was (289.2±112.4) minutes, with an average blood loss of (65.0±49.5) ml. The average hospital stay was (10.8±2.0) days. No severe postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage,abdominal compartment syndrome, intestinal obstruction, or mesh infection occurred. Two patients developed postoperative subcutaneous seromas, which were cured after continuous drainage. During the 12-24 months of follow-up, there were no cases of incisional hernia recurrence.

Conclusion

Under strict adherence to aseptic techniques and with appropriate selection of abdominal wall reconstruction methods, the preliminary study demonstrates that single-stage stoma reversal combined with incisional hernia repair appears to be safe and feasible. Importantly, potentially contaminated surgical sites should not be considered an absolute contraindication for simultaneous hernia repair with mesh implantation.

图1 腹壁巨大切口疝修补联合造口还纳关键技术图示 注:1A 采用后组织结构分离技术分离腹直肌后腹膜前间隙;1B 放置聚丙烯补片于腹膜前肌后方(sublay);1C 采用前组织结构分离技术减轻腹部张力;1D 分层修补结肠造口处组织;1E 缝合关闭腹直肌;1F 采用桥接技术恢复腹壁完整性;1G 腹直肌前放置带凹槽的负压引流管;1H 术后切口及造口愈合良好。
表1 6例腹壁巨大切口疝修补联合造口还纳患者的一般资料
表2 6例腹壁巨大切口疝修补联合造口还纳手术所用操作技术
[1]
陈双, 唐健雄, 周太成, 等. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(3):397-408.
[2]
Cai X, Wang F, Zhu Y, et al. Application of bridging mesh repair in giant ventral incisional hernia[J]. Updates Surg, 2024, 76(6):2411-2420.
[3]
Yang S, Wang MG, Nie YS, et al. Outcomes and complications of open, laparoscopic, and hybrid giant ventral hernia repair[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2022, 10(1):51-61.
[4]
Cornette B, De Bacquer D, Berrevoet F. Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia:A systematic review[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(4):719-726.
[5]
罗文, 王勇, 段鑫, 等. 新型Dual Lap修补手术治疗成人复杂造口旁疝的临床研究[J]. 腹部外科, 2023, 36(1):60-63.
[6]
Thongpiya J, Yingchoncharoen P, Elmassry M, et al. Gallbladder containing incisional hernia in an elderly woman[J]. Clin Case Rep,2023, 11(4):e7240.
[7]
Kim Y, Choi S, Jeong S, et al. Risk factors of incisional hernia after single-incision cholecystectomy and safety of barbed suture material for wound closure[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2021, 24(3):145-151.
[8]
Wallace A, Houlton S, Garner J. Gastrointestinal procedures and anastomoses can be safely performed during complex abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(2):439-447.
[9]
Schmitz SM, Helmedag MJ, Kroh A, et al. Choice of Polymer, but Not Mesh Structure Variation, Reduces the Risk of Bacterial Infection with Staphylococcus aureus In Vivo[J]. Biomedicines,2023, 11(7):2083.
[10]
Dipp Ramos R, O'brien WJ, Gupta K, et al. Re-Infection after Explantation of Infected Hernia Mesh:Are the Same Micro-Organisms Involved?[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2021, 22(10):1077-1080.
[11]
Mungmunpuntipantip R, Wiwanitkit V. Comment on “Serum C-reactive protein level after ventral hernia repair with mesh reinforcement can predict infectious complications:a retrospective cohort study”[J]. Hernia, 2020, 25(1):249.
[12]
王伟刚, 俞永江. 疝补片材料学的现状和展望[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 29(04):556-560.
[13]
Luan F, Cao W, Cao C, et al. Construction and properties of the silk fibroin and polypropylene composite biological mesh for abdominal incisional hernia repair[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10:949917.
[14]
李云锋, 俞永江, 余坤, 等. 生物补片与合成补片在腹壁疝修补术中风险与效益评估的meta分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2022, 29(7):910-918.
[15]
Fortelny RH, Dietz U.[Incisional hernias:epidemiology, evidence and guidelines][J]. Chirurgie(Heidelb), 2024, 95(1):3-9.
[16]
Goh SSN, Sanghvi KA, Koura AN, et al. Elective incisional hernia repair:lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair[J]. Singapore Med J, 2023, 64(2):105-108.
[17]
张天明, 程振东, 靳猛. 内镜下Sublay修补术在腹壁疝中的应用及研究进展[J]. 腹部外科, 2025, 38(2):152-155.
[18]
李绍杰, 孟云潇, 李绍春, 等. 腹膜腱膜瓣加强补片修补技术用于腹壁切口疝手术158例报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021,41(4):398-401.
[19]
Gogiya B S, Chertova AD, Alyautdinov R R.[Surgical treatment of complex incisional hernia][J]. Khirurgiia(Mosk), 2022,(12):117-123.
[20]
Deangelo n, Perez AJ. Hernia Prevention:The Role of Technique and Prophylactic Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernias[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 103(5):847-857.
[1] 李继承, 刘仕祺, 杜娟, 杨子馨, 朱杏, 黑明燕. 肠造瘘术后新生儿肠液回输安全性的系统评价和Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 219-229.
[2] 陈隆, 段晓鑫, 王思卓, 董胜利. 胃癌免疫治疗的现状[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 177-182.
[3] 刘缤妍, 朱昱冰, 李慧敏, 郝梦迪, 刘晓丽, 袁大晋, 黄汶彬, 李文杰, 曾嘉, 丁磊. 术前CT血管造影三维重建在结直肠癌手术中的应用价值:一项荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 209-216.
[4] 王可依, 吴冲, 刘寒松, 高磊. 腹股沟疝术后补片感染的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 331-334.
[5] 朱本磊, 刘付恒, 周太成, 陈双, 曾兵, 甘文昌, 彭绍勇, 李英儒. 腹股沟疝术后感染补片取出手术方式探讨[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 63-68.
[6] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[7] 王黔宇, 王云, 蒋婷, 杨芳, 廖江荣. 微波消融和冷冻消融治疗肺结节有效性及安全性对比分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 980-984.
[8] 王楠, 李立安, 马鑫, 翟青枝, 王铭洋, 孟元光. 机器人手术多学科协作治疗静脉内平滑肌瘤病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 125-128.
[9] 许裕杰, 华学锋, 李宁, 陆敏强. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝脏肿瘤的围手术期疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 98-104.
[10] 龙吟, 何晓东, 廖建国, 黄珏, 张磊. 高复发风险肝癌患者术后靶向免疫治疗的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 379-386.
[11] 蒋佳君, 韦德令, 任洪冰, 朱海, 王继龙, 徐邦浩, 郭雅, 卢婷婷, 张灵, 吕自力, 文张. 全胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌安全性和疗效分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 281-289.
[12] 栾天继, 曹定, 梅洪亮, 付航玮, 杨凯, 王丹, 尚作宏, 凌锋, 李支会, 张振雨, 胡逸林. 腹腔镜左半肝切除联合左肝管残端胆管探查取石治疗复杂肝左叶胆管结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 81-86.
[13] 文皓男, 闻雅, 吴彬阁, 吴倩如, 刘晶, 接英, 田磊. 射频技术用于睑板腺功能障碍相关干眼治疗安全性与有效性的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 87-92.
[14] 李晓达, 焦岗军, 李天牧, 姜炬芳. 头孢地尼分散片联合微创旋切术对浆细胞性乳腺炎的治疗效果及安全性评估[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-19.
[15] 张弘玮, 彭刚, 班旭彦, 王晨, 许听, 刘伟杰, 韩晓东. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合经颏下前庭腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术治疗肥胖合并单侧甲状腺癌1 例报道[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 76-79.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?