切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 434 -437. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.04.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用
毛永欢1, 朱浩1, 张简之1, 缪骥1, 李强1,(), 喻春钊2,()   
  1. 1210008 南京鼓楼医院结直肠外科
    2211112 南京医科大学附属逸夫医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-19 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 李强, 喻春钊
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82373293); 南京鼓楼医院临床研究专项资金(2022-LCYJ-PY-33); 南京中医药大学医学院·整合医学学院2023年度本科教育教学改革研究课题(NZYYXY2023012)

The clinical application of colostomy reduction combined with the placement of biological mesh

Yonghuan Mao1, Hao Zhu1, Jianzhi Zhang1, Ji Miao1, Qiang Li1,(), Chunzhao Yu2,()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211112, China
  • Received:2024-08-19 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Li, Chunzhao Yu
引用本文:

毛永欢, 朱浩, 张简之, 缪骥, 李强, 喻春钊. 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.

Yonghuan Mao, Hao Zhu, Jianzhi Zhang, Ji Miao, Qiang Li, Chunzhao Yu. The clinical application of colostomy reduction combined with the placement of biological mesh[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.

目的

探究结肠造口还纳术联合生物补片置入术预防造口部位切口疝发生的临床应用。

方法

分析2022年1月至2023年12月南京鼓楼医院结直肠外科行结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术患者的临床资料,统计手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、随访时间等,观察原造口部位切口疝(SSIH)发生率,术后切口感染、补片感染、血肿、血清肿、腹腔出血、腹腔脏器副损伤、术区淤血、术区异物感、术区疼痛感、尿潴留等。

结果

共纳入患者18例,所有患者均于肌筋膜前放置补片(Onlay法),手术顺利,术后疼痛感均在可控范围内(口服药物或静脉注射止痛),3 d后明显好转,7 d左右基本正常,所有患者均无SSIH、切口感染、补片感染、血肿、腹腔出血、腹腔脏器副损伤、术区淤血、术区异物感、尿潴留发生;1例患者出现血清肿,局部引流管留置1周后好转,并顺利拔管出院,后续恢复良好。

结论

结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术预防SSIH的发生是安全有效的,对于此类患者可考虑临床应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application of colostomy reduction combined with the placement of biological mesh to prevent stomal site incisional hernia.

Methods

Clinical data of patients who underwent colostomy reduction combined with biological mesh placement in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were analyzed. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, follow-up time, etc. were recorded. The incidence of stomal site incisional hernia (SSIH) was observed, along with postoperative incision infection, mesh infection, hematoma, seroma, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal organ injury, congestion in the surgical area, foreign body sensation in the surgical area, pain in the surgical area, urinary retention, etc.

Results

Eighteen patients were included, all of whom had the mesh placed in the preperitoneal space (Onlay technique). The surgeries were successful, with postoperative pain well-controlled (either by oral medication or by intravenous analgesia). Significant improvement was observed within 3 days. And by around 7 days, patients were mostly back to normal. None of the patients developed SSIH, incision infection, mesh infection, hematoma, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal organ injury, congestion in the surgical area, foreign body sensation in the surgical area, or urinary retention. One patient experienced seroma, which improved after one week of local drainage tube placement. The tube was successfully removed and the patient was discharged, with subsequent good recovery.

Conclusion

Colostomy reduction combined with biological mesh placement is a safe and effective method for preventing SSIH. It can be considered for clinical application in similar patients.

图1 造口还纳术前情况
图2 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术中情况
表1 18例行结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术患者的基本情况
[1]
王劲松,魏家燕,彭敏. 2023年美国癌症统计报告和全球最新癌症统计数据解读及启示[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志, 2023, 38(6): 523-527.
[2]
Eng C, Yoshino T, Ruíz-García E, et al. Colorectal cancer[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10449): 294-310.
[3]
Ramírez-Giraldo C, Van-Londoño I, Monroy DC, et al. Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2024, 38(1): 267.
[4]
Takada N, Takano Y, Okamoto A, et al. Increased risk of incisional hernia after stoma closure in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Surg Today, 2024, 54(11): 1337-1344
[5]
Gachabayov M, Orujova L, Latifi La, et al. Use of biologic mesh for the treatment and prevention of parastomal hernias[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2020, 37: 115-119.
[6]
Dewantoro D, Manson P, Brazzelli M, et al. Reversal of stoma with biosynthetic mesh fascial reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2024, 26(4): 632-642.
[7]
Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(5): 973-983.
[8]
Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site(ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site(ROCSS): a multicentre, randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10222): 417-426.
[9]
中国医师协会肛肠医师分会造口专业委员会,中国医师协会肛肠医师分会,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 等. 中低位直肠癌手术预防性肠造口中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(6): 471-478.
[10]
毛永欢,仝瀚文,康星, 等. 造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(5): 530-534.
[11]
Batistotti P, Montale A, Bruzzone M, et al. Protective ileostomy after low anterior resection for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: does the reversal surgery timing affect closure failure?[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(7): 1811-1818.
[12]
Vu BK, Lam J, Sherman MJ, et al. Prophylactic biosynthetic retrorectus mesh placement during stoma reversal reduces the rate of stoma site incisional hernia[J]. Perm J, 2024, 28(2): 16-25.
[13]
Mao Yonghuan, Xi Ling, Lu Cheng, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and predictive modeling of stoma site incisional hernia after enterostomy closure: a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2023, 23(1): 201.
[14]
Borab ZM, Shakir S, Lanni MA, et al. Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(4): 1149-1163.
[15]
Barranquero AG, Villalobos Mori R, Maestre González Y, et al. Parietex composite ventral patch for primary and incisional hernia repair[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2023, 93(7-8): 1799-1805.
[16]
Vu BK, Lam J, Sherman MJ, et al. Prophylactic biosynthetic retrorectus mesh placement during stoma reversal reduces the rate of stoma site incisional hernia[J]. Perm J, 2024, 28(2): 16-25.
[17]
江志鹏,侯泽辉,甘文昌, 等. 生物补片在合并造口旁疝的肠造口还纳术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 342-345.
[18]
Li J, Wu L, Shao X. Impact of body fat location and volume on incisional hernia development and its outcomes following repair [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2024, 94(5): 804-810.
[19]
Sánchez Arteaga A, Gil Delgado JL, Feria Madueño A, et al. Impact of incisional hernia on abdominal wall strength[J]. BJS Open, 2024, 8(3): zrae045.
[1] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[2] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[3] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[4] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[5] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[6] 赵燕玲, 王珩, 秦勤, 李静. 不同手术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者中的应用观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[7] 李盼, 张华秦. 不同腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[8] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[9] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[10] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 五定四观察循证方案对直肠癌造口患者生活质量与应用效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 409-412.
[11] 马文明, 梁朝朝. 肾脏肿瘤保留肾单位手术的技术进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 404-411.
[12] 张知格, 丁佐佑, 董瑞朝, 徐静, 庄秋林, 杨子昂. 腹壁肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损的处理及分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 401-406.
[13] 刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 王书翰, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 基于心下囊解剖的腹腔镜大食管裂孔疝补片修补术单中心40例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 417-421.
[14] 依力帕·肖克来提, 王丹, 李义亮. 生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 470-474.
[15] 王美, 赵勇, 张健, 张俐娜, 丁健华, 曹煜. 基于CT测量肾周脂肪面积对Lap-ISR吻合口并发症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 367-373.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?