切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 401 -406. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.04.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹壁肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损的处理及分析
张知格, 丁佐佑, 董瑞朝, 徐静, 庄秋林, 杨子昂()   
  1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院腹膜后及软组织肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-02 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 杨子昂
  • 基金资助:
    美国中华医学基金会(23-535)

Treatment and analysis of abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection

Zhige Zhang, Zuoyou Ding, Ruizhao Dong, Jing Xu, Qiulin Zhuang, Ziang Yang()   

  1. Department of Retroperitoneal and Soft Tissue Tumor Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2025-07-02 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Ziang Yang
引用本文:

张知格, 丁佐佑, 董瑞朝, 徐静, 庄秋林, 杨子昂. 腹壁肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损的处理及分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 401-406.

Zhige Zhang, Zuoyou Ding, Ruizhao Dong, Jing Xu, Qiulin Zhuang, Ziang Yang. Treatment and analysis of abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 401-406.

目的

总结复旦大学附属中山医院近3年腹壁肿瘤手术切除后腹壁缺损处理的治疗经验,为后续腹壁肿瘤的临床诊疗工作提供参考。

方法

回顾性收集2022年1月至2025年3月于复旦大学附属中山医院因腹壁恶性及交界性肿瘤行手术治疗的39例患者的临床资料,整理并分析患者术前基础资料、腹壁肿瘤情况、手术以及术后恢复情况,进一步对腹壁肿瘤及手术因素对术后并发症的影响行单因素分析。

结果

39例患者,腹壁恶性肿瘤病灶最大宽度平均(4.9±3.0)cm;腹壁缺损平均最大宽度(7.0±3.3)cm。腹壁缺损Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ型分别为11、16、12例,以Ⅱ型缺损多见;缺损位于U区8例,M区10例,L区20例,M+L区1例,以L区多见,占51.3%;缺损分级以1级缺损多见,占66.7%(26/39),2、3级缺损分别占7.7%(3/39)、25.6%(10/39);术后病理见13种肿瘤类型;肿瘤多来源于原发性肿瘤,占46.2%(18/39)。肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损修补采用单纯缝合20例、补片修补16例、皮瓣游离后重建腹壁3例。术后患者Clavien-DindoⅡ、Ⅲ级并发症发生率均为2.6%(1/39),无补片相关并发症发生,住院时间中位数为4(2,5)d,无出院后30 d内非计划再入院病例。随访发现出院后3个月内,30.8%(12/39)的患者出现肿瘤转移,21.3%(9/39)出现腹壁肿瘤复发,随访过程中无死亡病例。单因素分析发现3级腹壁缺损与术后并发症发生相关(P=0.043)。

结论

腹壁肿瘤的临床处理复杂多变,需根据患者自身情况、肿瘤大小及疾病进展程度个体化选择修补方法与材料,本研究显示腹壁肿瘤切除术后使用补片修补腹壁缺损安全可靠,但未来仍需开展更多临床研究提供数据参考。

Objective

To summarize the treatment experience in reconstruction of abdominal wall defect following surgical resection of abdominal wall tumors in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University over the past three years, and to provide reference for subsequent clinical diagnosis and treatment of abdominal wall tumors.

Methods

Clinical data including patients' baseline characteristics, abdominal wall tumor characteristics, surgical details and postoperative recovery data from 39 patients who underwent surgical treatment for malignant and borderline abdominal wall tumors in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University between January 2022 and March 2025 were retrospectively collected, sorted, and analyzed. Further univariate analysis was conducted on the influence of abdominal wall tumors and surgical factors on postoperative complications.

Results

Among the 39 patients, the average maximum width of malignant tumors in the abdominal wall was (4.9±3.0) cm, and the average maximum width of abdominal wall defects was (7.0±3.3) cm. There were 11, 16, and 12 cases of Type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ abdominal wall defects respectively. Type Ⅱ defects were more common. There were 8 patients with defects located in the U-zone, 10 in the M-zone, 20 in the L-zone, and 1 in the M+L-zone, with the L area being the most common, accounting for 51.3%. Grade 1 defects were more common (66.7%, 26/39), grade 2 and 3 defects were 7.7% (3/39) and 25.6% (10/39), respectively. There were 13 types of tumors on postoperative pathology. Most of the tumors originated from primary tumors (46.2%, 18/39). Intraoperatively, 20 patients underwent simple suture closure, 16 received mesh repair, and 3 underwent free flap reconstruction of the abdominal wall after tumor resection. Postoperatively, the incidence of Clavien-Dindo Grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ complications were both 2.6% (1/39) and no mesh-related complications occurred. The median of hospital stay was 4 (2, 5) days, and no patients required unplanned readmission within 30 days after discharge. Within three months after discharge, 30.8% (12/39) of patients developed tumor metastasis, 21.3% (9/39) experienced abdominal wall tumor recurrence, and no patients died during follow-up. Univariate analysis found that grade 3 abdominal wall defect was associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications (P=0.043).

Conclusion

The clinical management of abdominal wall tumors is complicated and variable, because of diverse patient-specific factors, tumor size, and disease progression, which require individualized selection of repair methods and materials. This study shows that mesh repair for abdominal wall defects after tumor resection is safe and reliable, but further clinical studies are needed to provide additional data for reference.

图2 腹壁缺损分型示意图
表1 39例腹壁恶性肿瘤患者术后病理类型
表2 39例患者腹壁恶性肿瘤切除后腹壁缺损修补方式
表3 腹壁肿瘤及手术因素对术后并发症影响的单因素分析[例(%)]
[1]
顾岩,田文,王平, 等. 腹壁缺损修复与重建中国专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(2): 101-109.
[2]
赵刚,彭林. 腹壁肿瘤的治疗原则[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(1): 25-28.
[3]
Fine A, Orgad R, Mnouskin Y, et al. Mesh-reinforced compared with primary closure in emergent laparotomies for incarcerated ventral incisional hernias: Is the added complexity justified?[J]. Surgery, 2025, 185: 109536.
[4]
Yezhelyev MV, Deigni O, Losken A. Management of full-thickness abdominal wall defects following tumor resection[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2012, 69(2): 186-191.
[5]
储修峰,王苗锋,周劲松, 等. 完全内镜下sublay修补与腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补对中小型腹壁疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(2): 195-201.
[6]
Csorba R, Buderath P, Ingenwerth M, et al. Isolated abdominal wall metastasis 42 years after curative surgery for ovarian cancer: A case report[J]. Case Rep Womens Health, 2025, 45: e00696.
[7]
Sabbah M, Bibani N, Gargouri D, et al.[Cutaneous metastasis of a ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma][J]. Tunis Med, 2015, 93(8-9): 497-499.
[8]
Mericli AF, Baumann DP, Butler C E. Reconstruction of the Abdominal Wall after Oncologic Resection: Defect Classification and Management Strategies[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(3 Suppl): 187s-196s.
[9]
Singh S, Rana K, Walia B, et al. Evaluation of light weight large pore mesh versus heavy weight small pore mesh in total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A prospective randomized study[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2023, 6(1): 37-43.
[10]
柯瑞盛,吴雅琳,黄坤寨, 等. IPOM与Sublay术对腹壁切口疝的疗效与安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(3): 258-261.
[11]
Gandhi JA, Gajjar AP, Shinde PH, et al. Posterior Component Separation Technique-Original Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) Technique[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2024, 3: 12542.
[12]
Lorentziadis M, Nadady Hego M, AL Nasser F. Enterocutaneous fistula from a mesh eroding the small bowel after incisional hernia repair: A case report[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2023, 6(1): 48-52.
[13]
Khansa I, Janis JE. Modern reconstructive techniques for abdominal wall defects after oncologic resection[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015, 111(5): 587-598.
[14]
Rashid A, Singh Bali R, Hamid Samoon A, et al. Totally extraperitoneal repair using three midline ports versus enhanced view totally extraperitoneal repair in men with uncomplicated inguinal hernia[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2023, 6(4): 222-226.
[15]
李绍杰,杨子昂,李绍春, 等. 生物材料在不同年龄腹股沟疝患者中应用价值的探讨[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2020, 26(4): 602-605.
[16]
Leblanc K. Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(1): 85-99.
[17]
Smith HG, Tzanis D, Messiou C, et al. The management of soft tissue tumours of the abdominal wall[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43(9): 1647-1655.
[18]
吴巨钢,顾岩. 消化道恶性肿瘤腹壁侵袭转移的外科治疗策略与选择[J/OL]. 手术电子杂志, 2016, 1(3): 60-62.
[19]
吴巨钢,杨建军,宋致成, 等. 腹壁肿瘤切除术后巨大/超大腹壁缺损的外科修复重建策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 500-502.
[20]
Kim MI, Manasyan A, Stanton EW, et al. Free Flap Reconstruction of Abdominal Wall Defects: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis[J]. Microsurgery, 2025, 45(4): e70059.
[21]
Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1990, 86(3): 519-526.
[22]
Toma M, Oprea V, Scarlat F, et al. Quality of life and abdominal wall functionality after abdominal wall reconstruction: A prospective single center follow-up study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(6): 2223-2234.
[1] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[2] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[3] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[4] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[5] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[6] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[7] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[8] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 五定四观察循证方案对直肠癌造口患者生活质量与应用效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 409-412.
[9] 赵燕玲, 王珩, 秦勤, 李静. 不同手术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者中的应用观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[10] 马文明, 梁朝朝. 肾脏肿瘤保留肾单位手术的技术进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 404-411.
[11] 张桂祥, 高重庆, 汪涛, 张朕, 张志, 李硕, 牛高华, 张世甲, 王刚成. 骶前囊肿的诊断及外科治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 396-400.
[12] 宋致成, 杨董超, 董文培, 吴巨钢, 杨建军, 顾岩. 桥接技术修复复杂腹壁缺损的回顾性临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 412-416.
[13] 刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 王书翰, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 基于心下囊解剖的腹腔镜大食管裂孔疝补片修补术单中心40例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 417-421.
[14] 毛永欢, 朱浩, 张简之, 缪骥, 李强, 喻春钊. 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.
[15] 王美, 赵勇, 张健, 张俐娜, 丁健华, 曹煜. 基于CT测量肾周脂肪面积对Lap-ISR吻合口并发症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 367-373.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?