切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 417 -421. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.04.010

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

基于心下囊解剖的腹腔镜大食管裂孔疝补片修补术单中心40例分析
刘虎1,2, 任振1, 韦笑韩3, 王书翰1, 潘晨2, 吴立胜1,2,()   
  1. 1233030 安徽,蚌埠医科大学研究生院
    2230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院/安徽省立医院疝及肥胖外科
    3241002 安徽芜湖,皖南医学院研究生院
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-16 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 吴立胜
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2022-07-7)

Analysis of 40 cases of laparoscopic repair of massive hiatal hernia based on the anatomy of the infracardiac bursa

Hu Liu1,2, Zhen Ren1, Xiaohan Wei3, Shuhan Wang1, Chen Pan2, Lisheng Wu1,2,()   

  1. 1Graduate School of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, Anhui Province, China
    2Department of Hernia and Obesity Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China/Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
    3Graduate School of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2025-04-16 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Lisheng Wu
引用本文:

刘虎, 任振, 韦笑韩, 王书翰, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 基于心下囊解剖的腹腔镜大食管裂孔疝补片修补术单中心40例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 417-421.

Hu Liu, Zhen Ren, Xiaohan Wei, Shuhan Wang, Chen Pan, Lisheng Wu. Analysis of 40 cases of laparoscopic repair of massive hiatal hernia based on the anatomy of the infracardiac bursa[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 417-421.

目的

评估基于心下囊解剖行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝补片修补术(LHHR)治疗大食管裂孔疝(MHH)患者的安全性和有效性,为临床提供循证参考。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年12月,在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院疝及肥胖外科接受基于心下囊解剖行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝补片修补术手术治疗的40例MHH患者的临床资料。借助胃镜、胃食管反流病问卷(GERD-Q),对患者术前及术后的反流症状变化展开评估。主要研究指标为术中右侧胸膜破裂和食管肌层损伤结果、引流情况,次要指标包括术后并发症、住院时长。

结果

40例患者中,2例(5%)失访,中位随访时间为24(4~48)个月;1例于出院后2个月因急性脑梗死死亡。术中有28例患者成功辨识出心下囊结构,均未发生右侧胸膜破裂或食管肌层损伤;另有12例患者未能识别出心下囊,其中5例出现右侧胸膜破裂、1例食管肌层损伤。中位疝缺损直径为4.5(4.5~5.0)cm,中位手术时长为108(60~310)min,中位术中出血量为10(10~50)ml;术中25例患者放置引流管,中位留置时间为2(1~7)d,中位术后住院时长3.5(2.5~4.5)d。术前GERD-Q平均为(11.38±0.98)分,术后降至(7.57±0.73)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论

基于心下囊解剖进行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝补片修补术,能够有效降低术中胸膜破裂和食管肌层损伤,提高手术安全性。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) based on infracardiac bursa in the treatment of massive hiatal hernia (MHH), and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical practice.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of clinical data from January 2021 to December 2024 of 40 MHH patients in Hernia and Obesity Surgery at the First Hospital, Affiliated with the University of Science and Technology of China, who received surgical treatment based on infracardiac bursa for massive hiatal hernia repair under laparoscopy. The changes of reflux symptoms before and after surgery were assessed by gastroscopy and the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q). The main study indicators were right-sided pleural rupture and esophageal muscle injury results during surgery, and diverticulation. Secondary indicators included postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

Results

Of the 40 patients, 2 (5%) were lost to follow-up, and the median follow-up time was 24 (4-48) months. One died of acute cerebral infarction two months after discharge. Twenty-eight patients successfully identified the structure of the infracardiac bursa during surgery, and none suffered rupture of the right pleural membrane or damage to the oesophageal muscles. A further 12 patients failed to identify the infracardiac bursa, including five with a rupture of the right pleural membrane and one with damage to the oesophageal muscle. The median hernia defect diameter was 4.5 (4.5-5.0) cm, the median operative duration was 108 (60-310) min, and the median intraoperative bleeding was 10 (10-50) ml. The median indwelling time was 2 (1-7) days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 (2.5-4.5) days. The average score of GERD-Q was (11.38±0.98) points preoperatively and decreased to (7.57±0.73) points postoperatively (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Based on infracardiac bursa, laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair can effectively reduce the rupture of the pleura and damage to the muscles of the esophagus during surgery, and improve surgical safety.

图2 基于心下囊行LHHR手术时打开的心下囊解剖结构
[1]
罗冰清,张秋子,张也, 等. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合改良DOR胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 40-43.
[2]
Logarajah S, Karumuri J, Ahle D, et al. Fundoplication at the time of paraesophageal hernia repair may not reduce postoperative reflux[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2024, 28(1): 70-71.
[3]
Nakajima M, Kojima K. [Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair][J]. Kyobu Geka, 2024, 77(10): 891-895.
[4]
Ma L, Luo H, Kou S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis [J]. J Robot Surg, 2023, 17(5): 1879-1890.
[5]
薄霞,程领,张玉珠. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen胃底折叠术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病中的应用[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2025, 46(2): 189-193.
[6]
刘小莉,聂玉胜,马秋月, 等. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后生命质量及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(10): 1332-1337.
[7]
Lin Z, Zeng H, Xiong W, et al. Whether the infracardiac bursa protect right pleura during laparoscopic radical operation of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction?[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 927.
[8]
Nakamura T, Shinohara H, Okada T, et al. Revisiting the infracardiac bursa using multimodal methods: topographic anatomy for surgery of the esophagogastric junction[J]. J Anat, 2019, 235(1): 88-95.
[9]
Nakamura T, Yamada S, Funatomi T, et al. Three-dimensional morphogenesis of the omental bursa from four recesses in staged human embryos[J]. J Anat, 2020, 237(1): 166-175.
[10]
Cooney GM, Kiernan A, Winter DC, et al. Optimized wound closure using a biomechanical abdominal model[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(4): 395-400.
[11]
Kim J, Hiura GT, Oelsner EC, et al. Hiatal hernia prevalence and natural history on non-contrast CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis(MESA)[J]. BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 2021, 8(1): e000565.
[12]
Phillips S, Falk GL. Surgical Tension Pneumothorax during Laparoscopic Repair of Massive Hiatus Hernia: A Different Situation Requiring Different Management[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2010, 39(6): 1020-1023.
[13]
屈坤鹏,伊同英,张琪, 等. 食管裂孔疝的手术干预策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1059-1065.
[14]
张馨予,杨珂璐,刘小南, 等. 胃食管反流病的全病程管理策略:一项基于临床实践指南的证据图研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2023, 26(4): 389-395.
[15]
嵇振岭,刘宗航. 谈谈食管裂孔疝手术中食管裂孔缺损修补的方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(3): 245-252.
[16]
元海成,张楠,董国强, 等. 巨大食管裂孔疝诊断和腹腔镜治疗研究进展[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2021, 27(6): 923-927.
[17]
金勇妍,周海燕,徐彩娟. 1例高龄喉癌术后合并Ⅳ型巨大食管裂孔疝患者的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(18): 2251-2255.
[18]
Gendron K, McDonough SP, Flanders JA, et al. The pathogenesis of paraesophageal empyema in dogs and constancy of radiographic and computed tomography signs are linked to involvement of the mediastinal serous cavity[J]. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 2018, 59(2): 169-179.
[19]
Kurahashi Y, Nakamura T, Ishida Y, et al. Transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophagogastric junction carcinoma by interconnecting four body cavities[J]. Surg Oncol, 2022, 43: 101793.
[20]
闫文锋,温东朋,张建成. 系膜理论下进展期胃癌D 2根治术的思考与技巧分享[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(7): 653-656.
[21]
罗思静,熊文俊,陈妍, 等. 胸腔单孔辅助腹腔镜"五步法"下纵隔淋巴结清扫术在SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(8): 684-690.
[22]
郑铭,鄂一民,陆晨, 等. 胃食管反流病发生的解剖学基础及手术治疗策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(11): 1465-1470.
[23]
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Desai M, Ruan W, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence[J]. VideoGIE, 2024, 10(2): 81-137.
[24]
Ugliono E, Rebecchi F, Mantova S, et al. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: long-term clinical outcomes[J]. Updat Surg, 2023, 75(4): 979-986.
[25]
Ruiz de Angulo D, Ortiz , Martínez de Haro LF. Side effects of proton-pump inhibitors: another reason to indicate anti-reflux surgery for Barrett’s esophagus?[J]. Cirugia Espanola, 2014, 92(5): 303-304.
[26]
Schlottmann F, Bertona S, Herbella FAM, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications for antireflux surgery, outcomes, and side effects[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 18(10): 693-703.
[1] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[2] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[3] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[4] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[5] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[6] 赵燕玲, 王珩, 秦勤, 李静. 不同手术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者中的应用观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[7] 李盼, 张华秦. 不同腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[8] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[9] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 五定四观察循证方案对直肠癌造口患者生活质量与应用效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 409-412.
[10] 李玉庆, 王刚, 李强, 李云川, 杜明新. 不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.
[11] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 317-320.
[12] 李健雄, 周江, 李涛, 乔培宇, 汤鑫, 董明. 两种不同保脾胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾肿瘤的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 325-328.
[13] 魏子雯, 谢永怡, 郭洪瑞, 胡金奇, 李鹏. 机器人胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 466-469.
[14] 依力帕·肖克来提, 王丹, 李义亮. 生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 470-474.
[15] 程颖慧, 孙娟, 杨冬梅, 朱晓俊, 程鹤, 郝月琴. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后并发症影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 442-446.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?