切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 721 -724. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.06.025

临床论著

快速康复外科理念在成人腹股沟疝日间手术的应用体会
王亮1, 刘梅宝2, 张涛1,(), 赖家骏1, 翁伟明1, 曾德强1, 李定云1, 朱晓峰1, 谭逸衍1   
  1. 1. 512026 广东韶关,汕头大学医学院附属粤北人民医院胃肠外科
    2. 512026 广东韶关,汕头大学医学院附属粤北人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-12-18
  • 通信作者: 张涛

Application of the concept of fast track surgery in ambulatory surgery of adult inguinal hernia

Liang Wang1, Meibao Liu2, Tao Zhang1,(), Jiajun Lai1, Weiming Weng1, Deqiang Zeng1, Dingyun Li1, Xiaofeng Zhu1, Yiyan Tan1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shantou University, Shaoguan 512026, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Yuebei People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shantou University, Shaoguan 512026, China
  • Received:2022-03-03 Published:2022-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Tao Zhang
引用本文:

王亮, 刘梅宝, 张涛, 赖家骏, 翁伟明, 曾德强, 李定云, 朱晓峰, 谭逸衍. 快速康复外科理念在成人腹股沟疝日间手术的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 721-724.

Liang Wang, Meibao Liu, Tao Zhang, Jiajun Lai, Weiming Weng, Deqiang Zeng, Dingyun Li, Xiaofeng Zhu, Yiyan Tan. Application of the concept of fast track surgery in ambulatory surgery of adult inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 721-724.

目的

探讨快速康复外科理念指导下的成人腹股沟疝日间手术的安全性及有效性。

方法

采用前瞻性研究方法,将符合入选条件的67例患者分为试验组与对照组。试验组采用快速康复外科理念指导下的日间手术治疗成人腹股沟疝,麻醉方式为局部浸润麻醉;对照组为住院手术患者,常规采用椎管内麻醉。分析比较2组术后2 h疼痛评分、术后下床活动时间及术后进食或饮水时间、术后并发症发生情况及平均住院费用;记录试验组15 d内非计划再次入院率、日间手术延迟出院率。

结果

试验组术后2 h疼痛评分(3.6±1.1)分、术后下床活动时间(3.2±1.1)h、术后进食或饮水时间(2.3±0.9)h及平均住院费用(4060.0±91.3)元与对照组(6.0±1.0)分、(7.2±1.1)h、(7.1±0.9)h、(5635.6±229.0)元比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组术后并发症发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后随访4~16个月,均无复发。试验组无15 d内非计划再次入院及日间手术延迟出院患者。

结论

快速康复外科理念指导下的成人腹股沟疝日间手术,安全有效。

Objective

To explore the safety and effectiveness of ambulatory surgery for adult inguinal hernia under the guidance of the concept of fast track surgery.

Methods

A prospective study method was used, and 67 patients eligible for inclusion were divided into the treatment group and the control group. The treatment group was treated with ambulatory surgery under the guidance of the concept of fast track r surgery with local infiltration anesthesia. The patients in the control group were routine hospitalized patients with spinal anesthesia. The VAS pain score at 2-hours postoperatively, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative eating or drinking time, the incidence of postoperative complications and the average cost of hospitalization were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, the rate of unplanned readmission within 15 days and delayed discharge rate after ambulatory surgery in the treatment group were recorded.

Results

The VAS pain score at 2-hours postoperatively (3.6±1.1 vs 6.0±1.0), postoperative ambulation time (3.2±1.1 h vs 7.2±1.1 h), postoperative eating or drinking time (2.3±0.9 h vs 7.1±0.9 h) and average hospitalization cost (4060.0±91.3 vs 5635.6±229.0 yuan) in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no recurrence after the follow-up of 4~16 months in both groups. There was no unplanned readmission within 15 days and delayed discharge of ambulatory surgery in the treatment group.

Conclusion

It is safe and effective for adult patients with inguinal hernia to receive ambulatory surgery under the guidance of the concept of fast track surgery.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者术后指标及住院费用比较
[18]
王明镜, 黄鹤光, 林贤超, 等. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(1): 81-86.
[1]
Hoggett L, Anderton MJ, Khatri M. 30-day complication rates and patient-reported outcomes following day case primary lumbar microdiscectomy in a regional NHS spinal centre[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2019, 101(1): 50-54.
[2]
Solodkyy A, Feretis M, Fedotovs A, et al. Elective "True Day Case" Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in a District General Hospital: Lessons Learned from 1000 Consecutive Cases[J]. Minim Invasive Surg, 2018, 2018: 7123754.
[3]
Wang L, Baser O, Wells P, et al. Benefit of early discharge among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(10): e0185022.
[4]
Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5): 606-617.
[5]
Kehlet H. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS): good for now, but what about the future?[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2015, 62(2): 99-104.
[6]
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(3): 292-298.
[7]
Liu VX, Rosas E, Hwang J, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation in 2 Surgical Populations in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System[J]. AMA Surg, 2017, 152(7): e171032.
[8]
Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) Society recommendations[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(10): 1209-1229.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(7): 704-706.
[10]
Bona S, Molteni M, Riccardo R, et al. Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(46): 17578-17587.
[11]
申英末, 孙立, 陈杰. 腹股沟疝日间手术的发展历程及诊疗经验[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(7): 725-728.
[12]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会,中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)编辑委员会,等.腹股沟疝日间手术规范化流程专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020,19(7):714-719.
[13]
刘子嘉, 黄会真, 黄宇光. 从加速康复外科理念看日间手术:英国2019年日间手术指南解读[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2019, 10(6): 570-574.
[14]
Grant MC, Yang D, Wu CL, et al. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast Track Surgery Pathways on Healthcare-associated Infections: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(1): 68-79.
[15]
陈杰, 申英末. 腹股沟疝日间手术规范化流程专家共识(2019版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 193-197.
[16]
冷希圣, 韦军民, 刘连新, 等. 普通外科围手术期疼痛处理专家共识[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2015, 30(2): 166-173.
[17]
中华医学会麻醉学分会. 成人日间手术后镇痛专家共识(2017)[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(8): 812-815.
[1] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[2] 国家人体捐献器官获取质量控制中心, 中国医院协会器官获取与分配工作委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会移植质控专业委员会. 成人脑死亡潜在器官捐献者的护理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 193-203.
[3] 莫林键, 杨舒博, 农卫赟, 程继文. 人工智能虚拟数字医师在钬激光前列腺剜除日间手术患教管理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 318-322.
[4] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[11] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[12] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[13] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[14] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[15] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?