切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 782 -786. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.026

论著

循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用
李芳(), 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全   
  1. 236200 安徽阜阳,颍上县人民医院普外科二病区
    236200 安徽阜阳,颍上县人民医院普外科三病区
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-13 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 李芳
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省中医药传承创新科研项目(2020ccyb29)

Application of the concept of evidence-based medicine in children with inguinal hernia

Fang Li(), Rui Xu, Yangyang Li, Xiuquan Shi   

  1. The Second Ward of General Surgery Department, People's Hospital of Yingshang County, Fuyang, Anhui 236200, China
    the Third Ward of General Surgery Department, People's Hospital of Yingshang County, Fuyang, Anhui 236200, China
  • Received:2023-02-13 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Fang Li
引用本文:

李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.

Fang Li, Rui Xu, Yangyang Li, Xiuquan Shi. Application of the concept of evidence-based medicine in children with inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.

目的

观察循证理念指导下循环改进策略在小儿腔镜疝护理中的应用效果。

方法

选取2020年2月至2022年8月于颍上县人民医院行腔镜手术的腹股沟疝患儿86例,以随机数表法将其分为对照组(n=43)和观察组(n=43)。对照组给予常规护理,观察组则在对照组基础上予以循证理念指导下循环改进策略干预。比较2组患儿的术后恢复情况、围手术期心率及平均动脉压(MAP)、干预前后儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表(SCARED)评分、儿童抑郁量表(CDI)评分,并统计干预期间并发症的发生情况。

结果

观察组患儿肠道排气时间[(3.61±0.86)h]及住院时间[(2.63±0.76)d]少于对照组[(4.12±1.06)h、(3.30±1.33)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),2组患儿复苏时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患儿围手术期心率及MAP均低于对照组(P<0.05),干预后2组患儿SCARED评分及CDI评分均较干预前降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。此外观察组术后并发症总发生率为4.65%,低于对照组的18.60%(P<0.05)。

结论

循证理念指导下循环改进策略能有效促进腹股沟疝患儿术后恢复,同时能改善患儿心率、MAP及心理状态,减少术后并发症。

Objective

To observe the application effect of circular improvement strategy under the guidance of evidence-based concept in nursing of pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery.

Methods

All 86 children with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic surgery in the People's Hospital of Yingshang County from February 2020 to Auguest 2022 were selected. They were divided into the control group (n=43) and the observation group (n=43) by random number table method. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given intervention with circular improvement strategy under the guidance of evidence-based concept on the basis of control group. Postoperative recovery, perioperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP), Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) scores and Child Depression Inventory (CDI) scores before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. The incidence rates of complications were analyzed.

Results

Intestinal exhaust time [(3.61±0.86) h] and hospital stay [(2.63±0.76) d] of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group [(4.12±1.06) h、(3.30±1.33) d], and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in recovery time between the two groups (P>0.05). Perioperative heart rate and MAP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the SCARED scores and CDI scores of the two groups decreased, and scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group (4.65%) was lower than that in the control group (18.60%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The circular improvement strategy under the guidance of evidence-based concept can effectively promote postoperative recovery of children with inguinal hernia, improve their heart rate, MAP and psychological status, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

表1 2组患儿一般资料比较
表2 2组患儿术后恢复情况比较(±s
表3 2组患儿心率及平均动脉压比较(±s
表4 2组患儿心理状态比较(分,±s
表5 2组患儿术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
方祝丹, 何敏芝, 郭自成, 等. 个体化疼痛管理在小儿疝气治疗中的效果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(19): 4484-4486.
[2]
唐彪, 顾萍, 李敏, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术中的应用观察[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(S01): 84-86.
[3]
马勤勤, 李艳. 围手术期心理护理在日间腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者中的应用价值[J]. 贵州医药, 2023, 47(6): 983-984.
[4]
刘文云. 双环节协同护理模式对腹股沟疝患者术后康复及护理工作满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(13): 2416-2418.
[5]
陈金耀, 吴玲珍, 辛帅, 等. 基于HAPA理论和护理解剖知识为基础的健康教育在腹股沟疝围术期的应用[J]. 解剖学研究, 2021, 43(4): 417-419.
[6]
陈佳, 吴培. 快速康复外科理念在疝囊高位结扎术患儿围手术期护理中的应用效果[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(22): 181-184, 196.
[7]
Skovgaards DM, Diab H, Midtgaard HG, et al. Causes of prolonged hospitalization after open incisional hernia repair: an observational single-center retrospective study of a prospective database[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(4): 1027-1034.
[8]
李妍. 人性化护理在小儿疝气手术后疼痛护理中的应用效果研究[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2019(A02): 2713-2714.
[9]
孙彩凤,徐夏君. 循证护理对食管癌放疗患者生活质量、胃肠道不良反应及营养状况的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(6):299-302.
[10]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 青年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 754-757.
[11]
Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1999, 38(10): 1230-1236.
[12]
Abdel-Khalek AM. Factorial structure of the Arabic Children's Depression Inventory among Kuwaiti subjects[J]. Psychol Rep, 1996, 78(3): 963-967.
[13]
李祎梅, 郭慧. 抚触疗法对腹股沟疝手术患儿术后应激反应及康复效果的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(2): 289-291.
[14]
黄思思, 陆丽, 徐洪辉. 基于快速康复外科理念的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对患儿围术期胃肠功能及FRS评分的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(3): 567-571.
[15]
魏谨颐, 陈琰. 前瞻性护理教育对腹腔镜小儿疝气手术患儿依从性、术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(11): 2650-2656.
[16]
刘婷婷.针对性访视结合快速康复理念对行腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术患儿康复质量的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文), 2021, 7(3): 46-49.
[17]
徐娟. 小儿腹股沟斜疝围手术期中亲情护理管理的应用效果分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2019(A01): 1336-1337.
[18]
陈俊, 潘海华, 胡桔萍. 循证护理干预在小儿疝气手术治疗中的应用效果及术后并发症分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(4): 658-660.
[19]
陆云. 童趣化诱导干预对腹股沟疝术后患儿疼痛及改良耶鲁围术期焦虑量表评分的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(7): 1232-1235.
[20]
柴淼, 郭鹏, 蒙岭. 儿童腹股沟疝患者术后恢复的影响因素分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(15): 2667-2670.
[21]
常晓华, 关丽娜, 李丹, 等. 父母陪伴下多元化兴趣诱导联合语言唤醒对腹股沟斜疝患儿麻醉配合度、焦虑及苏醒的影响[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 168-171.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?