切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 716 -720. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.06.024

临床论著

超声下腹横筋膜阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术后的镇痛效果
林满洲1, 李俊杰1, 杨俊光1, 莫坚2, 陈明1,()   
  1. 1. 524023 湛江,广东医科大学附属医院疝和腹壁外科
    2. 524023 湛江,广东医科大学附属医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-12-18
  • 通信作者: 陈明

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transverse fascia plane block after elderly inguinal hernia tension-free repair

Manzhou Lin1, Junjie Li1, Junguang Yang1, Jian Mo2, Ming Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
  • Received:2022-03-03 Published:2022-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Ming Chen
引用本文:

林满洲, 李俊杰, 杨俊光, 莫坚, 陈明. 超声下腹横筋膜阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术后的镇痛效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 716-720.

Manzhou Lin, Junjie Li, Junguang Yang, Jian Mo, Ming Chen. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transverse fascia plane block after elderly inguinal hernia tension-free repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 716-720.

目的

探讨超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞技术在老年腹股沟疝行Modified Kugel无张力疝修补术及TAPP术后镇痛的安全性和有效性。

方法

对2019年1月1日至2020年1月30日在广东医科大学附属医院疝和腹壁外科诊断为腹股沟疝并同意择期行Modified Kugel无张力疝修补术者54例及TAPP术者70例行前瞻性对照研究。依据随机数字表法将Modified Kugel无张力疝修补术组(O组)分为观察组(O1组,脊椎麻醉+超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞)20例,对照组(O2组,脊椎麻醉)34例;TAPP组(L组)分为观察组(L1组,气管插管全身麻醉+超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞)31例,对照组(L2组,气管插管全身麻醉)39例。观察各组术后2 h、8 h、12 h、24 h、48 h的VAS评分、术后首次使用止痛药及首次离床活动时间、术后不良反应例数。并对不同术式观察组及对照组结果进行分析比较。

结果

不同术式观察组2 h、8 h、12 h、24 h的VAS评分均明显低于对照组(P<0.05),首次使用止痛药时间均较对照组晚,首次离床活动时间明显早于对照组,不良反应发生率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞技术在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中有显著的镇痛效果,能促进患者术后快速康复。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided transverse fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia of Modified Kugel tension-free hernia repair and TAPP in elderly inguinal hernia.

Methods

A prospective controlled study was performed on 54 patients who had been diagnosed with inguinal hernia and agreed to receive elective Modified Kugel tension-free hernia repair and 70 patients who had received TAPP at the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from January 1, 2019, to January 30, 2020. The patients in the Modified Kugel surgery group (O group) were divided into 20 patients in the observation group (O1 group) and 34 patients in the control group (O2 group) according to the random number table method. Among the 70 cases in the TAPP group (L group), 31 cases were divided into observation (L1 group) and 39 cases were divided into a control group (L2 group). VAS scores at 2 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, time of first use of painkillers, time out of bed, and the number of postoperative adverse reactions in the 4 groups were observed. The results of the observation groups with different surgical methods and the control groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

VAS scores of different operation groups at 2 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h were significantly lower than those of the control groups (P<0.05). The time of first postoperative use of analgesics in the observation groups was later than those in the control groups (P<0.05), the first time out of bed activity was significantly earlier than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the postoperative adverse reactions rates in the observation groups were lower than those in the control groups. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided transverse fascia plane block has a significant analgesic effect in tension-free inguinal hernia repair and promotes rapid postoperative recovery of patients.

表1 各组一般资料比较(±s
表2 各组术后各时点视觉模拟评分比较(±s
表3 各组首次使用止痛药、首次离床活动时间比较(±s
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[2]
王平, 黄永刚. 腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛处理流程国际共识解读[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 6-9.
[3]
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001, 322(7284): 473-476.
[4]
Rambhia MT, Castro AL, Kumar AH. General Topics: Regional Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery[M]// Banik RK. Anesthesiology In-Training Exam Review. Regional Anesthesia and Chronic Pain. Spinger, 2022.
[5]
欧阳剑波, 黄耿文, 何文, 等. 多学科合作快速康复外科理念在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(4): 506-513.
[6]
李珠钰, 李绍杰, 李绍春, 等. 基于快速康复理念的医护联合模式在疝外科中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 553-555.
[7]
Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(12): 1497-1504.
[8]
Bongiovanni T, Lancaster E, Ledesma Y, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Operative Bleeding in the Perioperative Period[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2021, 232(5): 765-790.
[9]
Lissauer J, Mancuso K, Merritt C, et al. Evolution of the transversus abdominis plane block and its role in postoperative analgesia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2014, 28(2): 117-126.
[10]
Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Endersby RV, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane(TAP) block for laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled double-blinded trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2013, 23: 1309-1314.
[11]
Johns N, O'Neill S, Ventham NT, et al. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane(TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(10): 635-642.
[12]
Aydin ME, Bedir Z, Yayik AM, et al. Subarachnoid block and ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for caesarean section A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol , 2020, 37(9):765-772.
[13]
李健文, 乐飞. 前腹壁膜解剖在腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中临床意义的探讨[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 4.
[14]
Beel E, Berrevoet F. Surgical treatment for chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic literature review[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(2): 541-548.
[15]
Lopes A, Menezes MS, Barros GAMD. Chronic postoperative pain: ubiquitous and scarcely appraised-narrative review[J]. Braz J Anesthesiol, 2021, 71(6): 649-655.
[16]
Campanelli G. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair is a real risk and a major issue[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(1): 1.
[17]
Small C, Laycock A H. Acute postoperative pain management[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(2): e70-e80.
[18]
Boiko VV, Parkhomenko KY, Feskov OE, et al. Fast-track surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery concepts after their application in hernia repair[J]. Romanian Medical Journal, 2021, 68(1): 10-16.
[19]
Chin K, Lirk P, Hollmann M, et al. Mechanisms of action of fascial plane blocks: a narrative review[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021, 46(7): 618-628.
[20]
张珏颢, 张凯, 杨学林. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞技术在腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6):617-620.
[21]
Ueshima Hironobu, Otake Hiroshi, Lin Jui-An. Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 2752876.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 郝玥萦, 毛盈譞, 张羽, 汪佳旭, 韩林霖, 匡雯雯, 孟瑶, 杨秀华. 超声引导衰减参数成像评估肝脂肪变性及其对心血管疾病风险的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 770-777.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[11] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[14] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[15] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
阅读次数
全文


摘要