切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -4. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.01.001

所属专题: 文献

综述

生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝的应用
徐滔1, 刘子文1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院 基本外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 刘子文
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81572459); 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程经费资助

Application of biological mesh in treatment of inguinal hernia in adolescents

Tao Xu1, Ziwen Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Ziwen Liu
引用本文:

徐滔, 刘子文. 生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 1-4.

Tao Xu, Ziwen Liu. Application of biological mesh in treatment of inguinal hernia in adolescents[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 1-4.

青少年(一般认为13~18岁)腹股沟疝的发病原因多为先天性鞘状突未闭,亦有腹横筋膜缺损、疝囊较大的情况,单纯疝囊高位结扎复发率高。考虑到青少年处于发育阶段,合成补片无法随青少年成长而伸展,补片挛缩可能造成术后局部产生牵拉、异物感,发生慢性疼痛,甚至可引起精索黏连,影响生育,不建议用于青少年。而生物补片刺激机体组织再生修复缺损的同时,自身可被降解,术后局部不适和慢性疼痛发生率较低,因此比较适合应用于青少年腹股沟疝修补,但是对于其复发问题目前尚无结论,仍需大样本多中心的临床研究来证实远期效果。

The causes of inguinal hernia in adolescents (generally believed to be 13 to 18 years old) are mostly congenital patent processus vaginalis, as well as transverse fascia defect and large hernial sac. Traditional high ligation of the hernia sac is prone to postoperative recurrence. Considering that adolescents are at the stage of development, synthetic materials do not enlarge with the children's growth, and complications, such as local contracture, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, even adhesions of the spermatic cord and infertility in adolescents can occur. Therefore, they are not recommended for use in adolescents. While biological mesh can stimulate regeneration of new tissues to repair defects, at the same time, it will gradually degrade with low incidence of postoperative local discomfort and chronic pain. The aforementioned features of biological mesh make it very suitable for the repair of inguinal hernias in adolescents. But there is no conclusion about its recurrence at present. Thus, we expect a large sample, multi-center clinical study to further demonstrate the long-term efficacy of biological meshes.

[1]
Melkemichel M, Bringman S, Widhe B, et al. Lower recurrence rate with heavyweight mesh compared to lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal(TEP) repair of groin hernia: a nationwide population-based register study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 989-997.
[2]
Montupet P, Esposito C. Fifteen years experience in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients. Results and considerations on a debated procedure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(2): 450-453.
[3]
Shen YM, Chen J, Tian ML, et al. Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernias with acellular tissue matrix grafts in adolescent patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Surg Today, 2014, 44(3): 429-435.
[4]
Gao HJ. Application of bio-patch in children with inguinal hernia[J]. J Med Theory Pract, 2012, 25(2): 172-173.
[5]
Bruns NE, Glenn IC, McNinch NL, et al. Treatment of routine adolescent inguinal hernia vastly differs between pediatric surgeons and general surgeons[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(2): 912-916.
[6]
Criss CN, Gish N, Gish J, et al. Outcomes of adolescent and young adults receiving high ligation and mesh repairs: a 16-year experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2): 223-228.
[7]
Donati M, Brancato G, Grosso G, et al. Immunological reaction and oxidative stress after light or heavy polypropylene mesh implantation in inguinal hernioplasty: A CONSORT-prospective, randomized, clinical trial[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(24): e3791.
[8]
Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(12): 3073-3079.
[9]
Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, et al. The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal(TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(9): 2690-2696.
[10]
Cunha-E-Silva JA, Oliveira FMM, Ayres AFSMC, et al. Conventional inguinal hernia repair with self-fixating mesh versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair with polypropylene mesh: early postoperative results[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2017, 44(3): 238-244.
[11]
Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(4): 474-481.
[12]
Torcivia A, Vons C, Barrat C, et al. Influence of mesh type on the quality of early outcomes after inguinal hernia repair in ambulatory setting controlled study: Glucamesh® vs Polypropylene®[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396(2): 173-178.
[13]
Tabbara M, Genser L, Bossi M. Inguinal hernia repair using self-adhering sutureless mesh: Adhesix™: A 3-year follow-up with low chronic pain and recurrence rate[J]. Am Surg, 2016, 82(2): 112-116.
[14]
Bower C, Hazey JW, Jones EL, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a novel hernia mesh incorporating a nitinol alloy frame compared with a standard lightweight polypropylene mesh[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22(5): 508-513.
[15]
Yang K, Liu C. Advance on clinical application and research of biological mesh[J]. Med Recapitulate, 2015, 21(11): 1951-1953.
[16]
孙立,陈杰,申英末, 等. 生物补片在腹股沟疝治疗中应用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1223-1227.
[17]
李卫兵,黄博. 生物补片在腹外疝修补中的应用进展[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2016, 23(2): 165-167.
[18]
孙立,陈杰. 青少年腹股沟疝治疗中应用补片的争议、共识及合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(8): 798-800.
[19]
申英末,陈杰,杨硕, 等. 脱细胞基质材料生物补片在青少年(6~18岁)患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用研究. 中华外科杂志, 2011, 49(10): 914-917.
[20]
陈富强,申英末. 生物补片在疝和腹壁外科的应用及研究进展[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 364-368.
[21]
李辰焰,李彦旭. 生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝患者疝修补手术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(3): 258-260.
[22]
Magnusson J, Nygren J, Gustafsson UO, et al. UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(5): 641-648.
[23]
Chang SJ, Chen JY, Hsu CK, et al. The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(4): 559-563.
[24]
Bona S, Rosati R, Opocher E. Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh(Supermesh Study)[J]. Updates Surg, 2018, 70(1): 77-83.
[25]
Haastrup E, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Low reoperation rates in young males after sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia: Arguments for a tailored approach[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 214(5): 844-848.
[26]
Keller JJ, Muo CH, Lan YC, et al. A nation-wide population-based study of inguinal hernia repair incidence and age-stratified recurrence in an Asian population[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 735-740.
[27]
Singh AN, Bansal VK, Misra MC, et al. Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(5): 1304-1317.
[28]
Gürbulak EK, Gürbulak B, Akgün İE. Effects of totally extraperitoneal(TEP) and Lichtenstein hernia repair on testicular blood flow and volume[J]. Surgery, 2015, 158(5): 1297-1303.
[29]
Stula I, Družijanić N, Sršen D, et al. Influence of inguinal hernia mesh repair on testicular flow and sperm autoimmunity[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(4): 417-424.
[30]
Xiang B, Jin S, Zhong L, Li F, et al. Reasons for recurrence after the laparoscopic repair of indirect inguinal hernia in children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(8): 681-683.
[1] 刘佩, 黄晓洁, 郑曼玉, 金作林, 高洁. 人格特征对青少年矫治过程中依从性的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 412-415.
[2] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[3] 司钦亮, 毕世龙, 焦慧骁, 李世照, 陈哲禹, 武玉东. 精索去分化脂肪肉瘤两例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 585-590.
[4] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[5] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[6] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[7] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[8] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[9] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[10] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[11] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[12] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[13] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[14] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[15] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?