切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -4. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.01.001

所属专题: 文献

综述

生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝的应用
徐滔1, 刘子文1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院 基本外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 刘子文
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81572459); 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程经费资助

Application of biological mesh in treatment of inguinal hernia in adolescents

Tao Xu1, Ziwen Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Ziwen Liu
引用本文:

徐滔, 刘子文. 生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 1-4.

Tao Xu, Ziwen Liu. Application of biological mesh in treatment of inguinal hernia in adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 1-4.

青少年(一般认为13~18岁)腹股沟疝的发病原因多为先天性鞘状突未闭,亦有腹横筋膜缺损、疝囊较大的情况,单纯疝囊高位结扎复发率高。考虑到青少年处于发育阶段,合成补片无法随青少年成长而伸展,补片挛缩可能造成术后局部产生牵拉、异物感,发生慢性疼痛,甚至可引起精索黏连,影响生育,不建议用于青少年。而生物补片刺激机体组织再生修复缺损的同时,自身可被降解,术后局部不适和慢性疼痛发生率较低,因此比较适合应用于青少年腹股沟疝修补,但是对于其复发问题目前尚无结论,仍需大样本多中心的临床研究来证实远期效果。

The causes of inguinal hernia in adolescents (generally believed to be 13 to 18 years old) are mostly congenital patent processus vaginalis, as well as transverse fascia defect and large hernial sac. Traditional high ligation of the hernia sac is prone to postoperative recurrence. Considering that adolescents are at the stage of development, synthetic materials do not enlarge with the children's growth, and complications, such as local contracture, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, even adhesions of the spermatic cord and infertility in adolescents can occur. Therefore, they are not recommended for use in adolescents. While biological mesh can stimulate regeneration of new tissues to repair defects, at the same time, it will gradually degrade with low incidence of postoperative local discomfort and chronic pain. The aforementioned features of biological mesh make it very suitable for the repair of inguinal hernias in adolescents. But there is no conclusion about its recurrence at present. Thus, we expect a large sample, multi-center clinical study to further demonstrate the long-term efficacy of biological meshes.

[1]
Melkemichel M, Bringman S, Widhe B, et al. Lower recurrence rate with heavyweight mesh compared to lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal(TEP) repair of groin hernia: a nationwide population-based register study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 989-997.
[2]
Montupet P, Esposito C. Fifteen years experience in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients. Results and considerations on a debated procedure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(2): 450-453.
[3]
Shen YM, Chen J, Tian ML, et al. Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernias with acellular tissue matrix grafts in adolescent patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Surg Today, 2014, 44(3): 429-435.
[4]
Gao HJ. Application of bio-patch in children with inguinal hernia[J]. J Med Theory Pract, 2012, 25(2): 172-173.
[5]
Bruns NE, Glenn IC, McNinch NL, et al. Treatment of routine adolescent inguinal hernia vastly differs between pediatric surgeons and general surgeons[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(2): 912-916.
[6]
Criss CN, Gish N, Gish J, et al. Outcomes of adolescent and young adults receiving high ligation and mesh repairs: a 16-year experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2): 223-228.
[7]
Donati M, Brancato G, Grosso G, et al. Immunological reaction and oxidative stress after light or heavy polypropylene mesh implantation in inguinal hernioplasty: A CONSORT-prospective, randomized, clinical trial[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(24): e3791.
[8]
Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(12): 3073-3079.
[9]
Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, et al. The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal(TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(9): 2690-2696.
[10]
Cunha-E-Silva JA, Oliveira FMM, Ayres AFSMC, et al. Conventional inguinal hernia repair with self-fixating mesh versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair with polypropylene mesh: early postoperative results[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2017, 44(3): 238-244.
[11]
Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(4): 474-481.
[12]
Torcivia A, Vons C, Barrat C, et al. Influence of mesh type on the quality of early outcomes after inguinal hernia repair in ambulatory setting controlled study: Glucamesh® vs Polypropylene®[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396(2): 173-178.
[13]
Tabbara M, Genser L, Bossi M. Inguinal hernia repair using self-adhering sutureless mesh: Adhesix™: A 3-year follow-up with low chronic pain and recurrence rate[J]. Am Surg, 2016, 82(2): 112-116.
[14]
Bower C, Hazey JW, Jones EL, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a novel hernia mesh incorporating a nitinol alloy frame compared with a standard lightweight polypropylene mesh[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22(5): 508-513.
[15]
Yang K, Liu C. Advance on clinical application and research of biological mesh[J]. Med Recapitulate, 2015, 21(11): 1951-1953.
[16]
孙立,陈杰,申英末, 等. 生物补片在腹股沟疝治疗中应用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1223-1227.
[17]
李卫兵,黄博. 生物补片在腹外疝修补中的应用进展[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2016, 23(2): 165-167.
[18]
孙立,陈杰. 青少年腹股沟疝治疗中应用补片的争议、共识及合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(8): 798-800.
[19]
申英末,陈杰,杨硕, 等. 脱细胞基质材料生物补片在青少年(6~18岁)患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用研究. 中华外科杂志, 2011, 49(10): 914-917.
[20]
陈富强,申英末. 生物补片在疝和腹壁外科的应用及研究进展[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 364-368.
[21]
李辰焰,李彦旭. 生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝患者疝修补手术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(3): 258-260.
[22]
Magnusson J, Nygren J, Gustafsson UO, et al. UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(5): 641-648.
[23]
Chang SJ, Chen JY, Hsu CK, et al. The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(4): 559-563.
[24]
Bona S, Rosati R, Opocher E. Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh(Supermesh Study)[J]. Updates Surg, 2018, 70(1): 77-83.
[25]
Haastrup E, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Low reoperation rates in young males after sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia: Arguments for a tailored approach[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 214(5): 844-848.
[26]
Keller JJ, Muo CH, Lan YC, et al. A nation-wide population-based study of inguinal hernia repair incidence and age-stratified recurrence in an Asian population[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 735-740.
[27]
Singh AN, Bansal VK, Misra MC, et al. Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(5): 1304-1317.
[28]
Gürbulak EK, Gürbulak B, Akgün İE. Effects of totally extraperitoneal(TEP) and Lichtenstein hernia repair on testicular blood flow and volume[J]. Surgery, 2015, 158(5): 1297-1303.
[29]
Stula I, Družijanić N, Sršen D, et al. Influence of inguinal hernia mesh repair on testicular flow and sperm autoimmunity[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(4): 417-424.
[30]
Xiang B, Jin S, Zhong L, Li F, et al. Reasons for recurrence after the laparoscopic repair of indirect inguinal hernia in children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(8): 681-683.
[1] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[4] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[5] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[6] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[7] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[8] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[9] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[13] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[14] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[15] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
阅读次数
全文


摘要