切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 677 -681. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.06.004

复杂腹壁疝

基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值
邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚()   
  1. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
    100085 北京,浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-15 出版日期:2023-12-18
  • 通信作者: 王明刚
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金面上项目(7222071)

A research on predictive value of convolutional neural network based on preoperative abdominal CT for recurrence of incisional hernia after surgical repair

Xiaowei Xing, Yuchen Liu, Bing Zhao, Minggang Wang()   

  1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medial University, Beijing 100043, China
    Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co.Ltd, Beijing 100085, China
  • Received:2023-10-15 Published:2023-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Minggang Wang
引用本文:

邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.

Xiaowei Xing, Yuchen Liu, Bing Zhao, Minggang Wang. A research on predictive value of convolutional neural network based on preoperative abdominal CT for recurrence of incisional hernia after surgical repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.

目的

基于术前腹部CT图像构建腹壁切口疝术后复发预测模型,以辅助疝外科医生制定个体化治疗方案。

方法

收集2016—2019年在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院就诊的528例腹壁切口疝患者资料,将患者术前腹部CT图像进行标准化处理后共获得44380张图像。按4∶1的比例随机分为训练集及验证集,用以构建和验证预测切口疝复发的卷积神经网络(CNN)模型。通过灵敏度、特异度、受试者工作特征曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)等指标验证模型性能。

结果

528例接受切口疝修补手术的患者中有73例出现复发,复发率为13.8%。本研究成功建立了切口疝术后复发预测的CNN模型,验证结果显示AUC值为0.840,灵敏度85.2%,特异度68.1%。

结论

基于术前腹部CT图像构建的CNN模型对切口疝患者术后复发具有较好的预测能力,对疝外科医生制定个体化治疗方案具有一定辅助作用。

Objective

To construct a predictive model for the postoperative recurrence of incisional hernia based on preoperative abdominal CT images, with the aim of assisting hernia surgeons in formulating individualized treatment plans.

Methods

A cohort of 528 patients with incisional hernia who were treated at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between 2016 and 2019, was assembled. Preoperative abdominal CT images underwent standardization, yielding 44,380 images. These images were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 4∶1 ratio to train and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for predicting incisional hernia recurrence. Model performance was evaluated utilizing indicators including sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Among the 528 patients who underwent incisional hernia repair, 73 experienced recurrence, resulting in a recurrence rate of 13.8%. The study successfully established a CNN model for predicting postoperative recurrence of incisional hernia, with a validated AUC value of 0.840, sensitivity of 85.2%, and specificity of 68.1%.

Conclusion

The CNN model constructed based on preoperative abdominal CT images has a good ability to predict postoperative recurrence in patients with incisional hernia and has a certain role for hernia surgeons in developing individualized treatment plan.

图1 切口疝患者术前腹部CT图像
图2 切口疝患者腹部CT图像数据增强注:2A初始图像;2B对初始图像进行随机裁剪;2C对2B图像进行随机翻转。
图3 卷积神经网络模型的可视化解释注:3A列为腹部CT原图;3B列为模型输出热力图覆盖于腹部CT原图后的效果图。该结果仅作为理解模型的一种直观方式,并不一定与真实的医学分析相同。
表1 切口疝复发与未复发患者一般资料比较[例(%)]
图4 模型训练loss曲线
图5 模型预测结果的受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
Besancenot A, Salomon Du Mont L, Lejay A, et al. Risk Factors of Long-Term Incisional Hernia after Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Bicentric Study[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 83: 62-69.
[2]
Manoharan S, Liu G, Crump RT, et al. Incisional hernia repair surgery improves patient reported outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 219(5): 874-878.
[3]
Tanaka H, Kitazawa M, Miyagawa Y, et al. Risk factors for umbilical incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2022, 92(12): 3219-3223.
[4]
Bueno-Lledo J, Bonafe-Diana S, Carbonell-Tatay F, et al. Component separation and large incisional hernia: predictive factors of recurrence[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(6): 1593-1600.
[5]
Sekiya M, Sakaino S, Toshiaki T. Linear Logistic Regression for Estimation of Lower Limb Muscle Activations[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2019, 27(3): 523-532.
[6]
Yuan H, Gao Z, He X, et al. Application of logistic regression and convolutional neural network in prediction and diagnosis of high-risk populations of lung cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2022, 31(2): 145-151.
[7]
Lin Y, Hu J, Xu R, et al. Application of Logistic Regression and Artificial Intelligence in the Risk Prediction of Acute Aortic Dissection Rupture[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 12(1): 179.
[8]
De Almeida MA, Pimenta T, Barbosa E. Incarcerated Incisional Hernia Causing Gastric Outlet Obstruction[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2022, 26(9): 2010-2011.
[9]
Rhemtulla IA, Hsu JY, Broach RB, et al. The incisional hernia epidemic: evaluation of outcomes, recurrence, and expenses using the healthcare cost and utilization project(HCUP) datasets[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(6): 1667-1675.
[10]
Acar T, Acar N, Sur Y, et al. The Effects of Operation Technique on Recurrence of Incisional Hernia Repair[J]. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul, 2020, 54(1): 23-28.
[11]
Cheema F, Andacoglu O, Huang L C, et al. Risk Factors for Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection and Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair in Abdominal Transplant Population[J]. Transplant Proc, 2021, 53(2): 762-767.
[12]
Gignoux B, Bayon Y, Martin D, et al. Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia and recurrence: Retrospective analysis of the French national database[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021, 23(6): 1515-1523.
[13]
Lomanto D, Iyer S G, Shabbir A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(7): 1030-1035.
[14]
Timmermans L, De Goede B, Van Dijk SM, et al. Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 207(6): 980-988.
[15]
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, et al. Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(2): 217-228.
[16]
Parker SG, Mallett S, Quinn L, et al. Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJS Open, 2021, 5(2): zraa071.
[17]
Van Silfhout L, Leenders L AM, Heisterkamp J, et al. Recurrent incisional hernia repair: surgical outcomes in correlation with body-mass index[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(1): 77-83.
[18]
Higuchi N, Hiraga H, Sasaki Y, et al. Automated evaluation of colon capsule endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis using ResNet 50[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(6): e0269728.
[19]
Hossain MB, Iqbal S, Islam MM, et al. Transfer learning with fine-tuned deep CNN ResNet 50 model for classifying COVID-19 from chest X-ray images[J]. Inform Med Unlocked, 2022, 30: 100916.
[20]
Panthakkan A, Anzar SM, Jamal S, et al. Concatenated Xception-ResNet50-A novel hybrid approach for accurate skin cancer prediction[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2022, 150: 106170.
[1] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[2] 杨菲菲, 林锡祥, 陈亦新, 王秋霜, 张丽伟, 陈煦, 张梅青, 王淑华, 何昆仑. 基于深度学习的超声心动图自动识别节段性室壁运动异常的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 424-429.
[3] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[4] 范帅华, 郭伟, 郭军. 基于机器学习的决策树算法在血流感染预后预测中应用现状及展望[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 289-293.
[5] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[6] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[7] 胡博文, 戴英波. 泌尿外科机器人手术新趋势[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 418-421.
[8] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[9] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 康星, 朱兴亚, 徐恩, 夏雪峰. 造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-534.
[10] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[11] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[12] 雷漫诗, 邓锶锶, 汪昕蓉, 黄锦彬, 向青, 熊安妮, 孟占鳌. 人工智能辅助压缩感知技术在上腹部T2WI压脂序列中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 551-556.
[13] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
[14] 葛云鹏, 崔红元, 宋京海. 人工智能在原发性肝癌诊断、治疗及预后中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 367-371.
[15] 胡平, 鄢腾峰, 周海柱, 祝新根. 人工智能在非增强CT图像中颅内出血早期检出和血肿分割的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-416.
阅读次数
全文


摘要