切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 436 -439. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究
张斌1, 侯海金2, 闫慧明3,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二临床医学院
    2. 030600 晋中,晋中市第一人民医院普通外科
    3. 030000 太原,山西医科大学第二医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-01 出版日期:2018-12-18
  • 通信作者: 闫慧明

Clinical comparative study of ProGrip and UHS mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia under the corresponding operation

Bin Zhang1, Haijin Hou2, Huiming Yan3,()   

  1. 1. The Second Medical School of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Jinzhong City, Jinzhong 030600, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000
  • Received:2018-03-01 Published:2018-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Huiming Yan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yan Huiming, Email:
引用本文:

张斌, 侯海金, 闫慧明. ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 436-439.

Bin Zhang, Haijin Hou, Huiming Yan. Clinical comparative study of ProGrip and UHS mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia under the corresponding operation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 436-439.

目的

对比分析应用ProGrip自固定型补片行Lichtenstein术与应用UHS型补片行腹膜前间隙无张力修补术(Gilbert)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析自2015年9月至2017年8月,山西医科大学第二医院150例男性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,按所采用的手术方法和补片类型分为2组,每组75例。A组选用美国柯惠公司生产的ProGrip自固定型补片+Lichtenstein术,B组选用美国强生公司生产的UHS型补片+Gilbert术。

结果

A组手术时间短于B组,术后慢性疼痛发生情况高于B组,异物感发生情况低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(t=30.21、χ2=5.37、11.04,P<0.05);2组住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2组患者均无感染,随访3个月均无复发。

结论

两种不同补片及对应术式治疗腹股沟疝都有良好的近期效果,应用ProGrip自固定型补片行Lichtenstein术在缩短手术时间、减少术后异物感方面有一定优势,且具有简单易操作的特点;应用UHS型补片行Gilbert术在理论上更符合人体力学,且在预防术后慢性疼痛方面有一定优势,但操作相对复杂,术式学习曲线相对较长。

Objective

To compare the clinical effect between Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh and anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS mesh (Gilbert operation) in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 150 male cases of inguinal hernia who were admitted to the second hospital of Shanxi medical university from September 2015 to August 2017 were enrolled. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the operation method and the types of mesh, 75 cases in each group. The patients in group A were treated by Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh (Covidien?, US). The patients in group B were treated with anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS mesh (Johnson&Johnson?, US).

Results

In the two groups, operation time, postoperative incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation were statistically significant (t=30.21、χ2=5.37、11.04, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time (t=0.98, P>0.05). There was no infection and recurrence in the period of 3 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Both the two different meshes and the corresponding treatment of inguinal hernia have good short term effect, the application of Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh has certain advantages in the prevention of postoperative incidence of foreign body sensation and shortening the operation time, and it's easy to perform. In theory, anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS patch is more in line with human mechanics, and has certain advantages in preventing postoperative chronic pain, but it is relatively complicated and the operation learning curve is relatively long.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组术后相关资料比较
[1]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[2]
梁森,赵乾焜,申素纲, 等. 山西省偏关县成人腹股沟疝患病率初步调查及危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6): 83-85.
[3]
Miserez M,Peeters E,Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 151-163.
[4]
唐健雄. 现代疝外科解剖和治疗原则的新认识[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(10): 806-810.
[5]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用乡村医师杂志, 2015, 52(14): 484-486.
[6]
李俊生,赵亮,张炜宇, 等. 开放腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术的历史及与Lichtenstein术的比较[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 241-244.
[7]
唐健雄. 从现代疝外科原则谈今后发展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 93-97.
[8]
李健文,乐飞. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术术式演变与合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1202-1205.
[9]
Kocijan R,Sandberg S,Chan YW, et al. Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(2): 395-399.
[10]
Magnusson J,Nygren J,Gustafsson UO, et al. UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(5): 641-648.
[11]
李继东,耿天祥. ProGrip自固定补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 59.
[12]
吕会增,陈新岐,张文海, 等. 改良李金斯坦无张力疝修补术应用于腹股沟疝的临床治疗[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(6): 40-42.
[13]
李俊生,李寅翔,嵇振岭. 从荟萃分析认识李金斯坦和腹膜前间隙修补术[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 17-20.
[14]
Bjurstrom MF,Nicol AL,Amid PK, et al. Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives[J]. J Pain Res, 2014, 7: 277-290.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[13] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[14] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[15] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?