切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 436 -439. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究
张斌1, 侯海金2, 闫慧明3,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二临床医学院
    2. 030600 晋中,晋中市第一人民医院普通外科
    3. 030000 太原,山西医科大学第二医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-01 出版日期:2018-12-18
  • 通信作者: 闫慧明

Clinical comparative study of ProGrip and UHS mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia under the corresponding operation

Bin Zhang1, Haijin Hou2, Huiming Yan3,()   

  1. 1. The Second Medical School of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Jinzhong City, Jinzhong 030600, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000
  • Received:2018-03-01 Published:2018-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Huiming Yan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yan Huiming, Email:
引用本文:

张斌, 侯海金, 闫慧明. ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 436-439.

Bin Zhang, Haijin Hou, Huiming Yan. Clinical comparative study of ProGrip and UHS mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia under the corresponding operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 436-439.

目的

对比分析应用ProGrip自固定型补片行Lichtenstein术与应用UHS型补片行腹膜前间隙无张力修补术(Gilbert)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析自2015年9月至2017年8月,山西医科大学第二医院150例男性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,按所采用的手术方法和补片类型分为2组,每组75例。A组选用美国柯惠公司生产的ProGrip自固定型补片+Lichtenstein术,B组选用美国强生公司生产的UHS型补片+Gilbert术。

结果

A组手术时间短于B组,术后慢性疼痛发生情况高于B组,异物感发生情况低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(t=30.21、χ2=5.37、11.04,P<0.05);2组住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2组患者均无感染,随访3个月均无复发。

结论

两种不同补片及对应术式治疗腹股沟疝都有良好的近期效果,应用ProGrip自固定型补片行Lichtenstein术在缩短手术时间、减少术后异物感方面有一定优势,且具有简单易操作的特点;应用UHS型补片行Gilbert术在理论上更符合人体力学,且在预防术后慢性疼痛方面有一定优势,但操作相对复杂,术式学习曲线相对较长。

Objective

To compare the clinical effect between Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh and anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS mesh (Gilbert operation) in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 150 male cases of inguinal hernia who were admitted to the second hospital of Shanxi medical university from September 2015 to August 2017 were enrolled. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the operation method and the types of mesh, 75 cases in each group. The patients in group A were treated by Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh (Covidien?, US). The patients in group B were treated with anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS mesh (Johnson&Johnson?, US).

Results

In the two groups, operation time, postoperative incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation were statistically significant (t=30.21、χ2=5.37、11.04, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time (t=0.98, P>0.05). There was no infection and recurrence in the period of 3 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Both the two different meshes and the corresponding treatment of inguinal hernia have good short term effect, the application of Lichtenstein operation with ProGrip self-gripping mesh has certain advantages in the prevention of postoperative incidence of foreign body sensation and shortening the operation time, and it's easy to perform. In theory, anterior preperitoneal tension-free repair with UHS patch is more in line with human mechanics, and has certain advantages in preventing postoperative chronic pain, but it is relatively complicated and the operation learning curve is relatively long.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组术后相关资料比较
[1]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[2]
梁森,赵乾焜,申素纲, 等. 山西省偏关县成人腹股沟疝患病率初步调查及危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6): 83-85.
[3]
Miserez M,Peeters E,Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 151-163.
[4]
唐健雄. 现代疝外科解剖和治疗原则的新认识[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(10): 806-810.
[5]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用乡村医师杂志, 2015, 52(14): 484-486.
[6]
李俊生,赵亮,张炜宇, 等. 开放腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术的历史及与Lichtenstein术的比较[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 241-244.
[7]
唐健雄. 从现代疝外科原则谈今后发展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 93-97.
[8]
李健文,乐飞. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术术式演变与合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1202-1205.
[9]
Kocijan R,Sandberg S,Chan YW, et al. Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(2): 395-399.
[10]
Magnusson J,Nygren J,Gustafsson UO, et al. UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(5): 641-648.
[11]
李继东,耿天祥. ProGrip自固定补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 59.
[12]
吕会增,陈新岐,张文海, 等. 改良李金斯坦无张力疝修补术应用于腹股沟疝的临床治疗[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(6): 40-42.
[13]
李俊生,李寅翔,嵇振岭. 从荟萃分析认识李金斯坦和腹膜前间隙修补术[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 17-20.
[14]
Bjurstrom MF,Nicol AL,Amid PK, et al. Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives[J]. J Pain Res, 2014, 7: 277-290.
[1] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[2] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[3] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[7] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[8] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[9] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[13] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[15] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
阅读次数
全文


摘要