切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 383 -386. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.05.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响
徐美芳1, 万丽琴2, 卢斌1,()   
  1. 1. 214002 江苏省,无锡市妇幼保健院妇科
    2. 330006 南昌大学第一附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-03 出版日期:2018-10-18
  • 通信作者: 卢斌

Effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients

Meifang Xu1, Liqin Wan2, Bin Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Wuxi 214002, China
    2. Department of General surgery, First affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2018-02-03 Published:2018-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Bin Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Bin, Email:
引用本文:

徐美芳, 万丽琴, 卢斌. 妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 383-386.

Meifang Xu, Liqin Wan, Bin Lu. Effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 383-386.

目的

探讨妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响。

方法

选取2010年1月到2015年1月,南昌大学第一附属医院行妇科手术联合疝修补术的女性腹股沟疝64例患者的临床资料,依据术后干预方式的不同分为观察组(30例)与对照组(34例)。2组患者均行妇科手术联合疝修补术,对照组于术后行常规干预,观察组于术后行综合干预,2组均连续干预3个月。比较2组术后疼痛及并发症的发生情况,统计干预前后2组患者生活能力的变化及患者对干预的满意度。

结果

与干预前相比,干预1、3个月后2组口述分级评分法(verbal rating scaks,VRSs)评分均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且观察组干预1、3个月后VRSs评分均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后观察组并发症总发生率为16.67%,显著低于对照组的41.18%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与干预前相比,干预后2组ADL评分均显著升高,且观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组总满意度90.00%显著高于对照组58.82%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预可显著减轻患者疼痛,减少并发症的发生,有利于改善患者恢复状况,提升其生活能力。

Objective

To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological operation combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients.

Methods

64 cases of female patients undergoing gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy from January 2010 to January 2015 in first affiliated hospital of Nanchang university were selected, and they were divided into the experimental group (n=30) and the control group (n=34) according to the different ways of intervention. The patients in 2 groups were treated with gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy, the control group treated with routine intervention after operation, and the experimental group treated with comprehensive intervention. Both group received intervention for 3 months continuously. The postoperative pain and incidence of complications were compared between 2 groups. The changes of living ability and satisfaction with intervention in 2 groups before and after intervention were counted.

Results

Compared with the before intervention, the VRSs scores of the 2 groups at 1, 3 months after intervention significantly decreased (P<0.01), and the VRSs scores at 1 and 3 months after intervention of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05 or P<0.01); The total incidence of complications in the experimental group was 16.67%, which was significantly lower than the 41.18% in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with before intervention, the ADL scores of 2 groups increased significantly after intervention, and the scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.01). The total satisfaction rates of the experimental group and the control group were 90.00% and 58.82% respectively, the total satisfaction rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy can significantly reduce the pain and the complications, improve the patients' recovery and enhance their living ability.

表1 2组干预前后VRSs评分比较(分,±s
表2 2组干预前后ADL评分及患者满意度比较
[1]
刘威,沈根海,高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术在女性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(10):1672-1674.
[2]
Leow JJ, How KY, Goh MH, et al. Non-operative management of obturator hernia in an elderly female[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3):431-431.
[3]
谢晓玲. 体位干预护理对疝手术患者术后非切口疼痛以及腹胀的影响分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(22):107-109.
[4]
徐丹凤,董巧儿,刘新元. 中老年女性脐疝无张力修补术的护理[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2013, 30(15):55-56.
[5]
董晋,戴勇,胡毓. 成年女性腹股沟疝的临床特点及手术相关问题[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(8):688-688.
[6]
端木艳丽, 任曼曼. 术前心理干预对心血管外科病人术后疼痛的影响[C]. 郑州: 河南省外科创伤及灾难救治护理专科知识学术会议, 2011.
[7]
陈善佳,周小炫,方云华, 等. 日常生活活动能力量表在脑卒中康复临床使用情况的调查[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(11):1044-1049.
[8]
Schouten N, Burgmans J P, Van T D, et al. Female 'groin' hernia: totally extraperitoneal(TEP) endoscopic repair seems the most appropriate treatment modality[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(4):387-392.
[9]
陈瑶,王光海,肖鸣, 等. 腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝时子宫圆韧带的处理方式及术后对女性生育能力的影响[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2017, 39(4):403-408.
[10]
郝悦琪. 人性化护理干预措施对疝气术后患者的护理效果观察[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2014, 10(12):2204.
[11]
Mahoori A, Noroozinia H, Hasani E, et al. The effect of pre-operative administration of gabapentin on post-operative pain relief after herniorrhaphy[J]. Saudi J Anaesth. , 2014, 8(2):220-223.
[12]
Elahi F, Reddy C, Ho D. Ultrasound guided peripheral nerve stimulation implant for management of intractable pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(1):E31-E38.
[13]
赵凌燕. 妇科手术联合疝修补中完全腹膜外疝修补术的应用及其护理效果分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1):73-75.
[14]
申添名. 综合干预护理在小儿疝气中的护理应用评价[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2016, 10(24):126-126.
[15]
廖小英. 小儿疝气手术前后综合护理效果研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2013, 4(11):151-152.
[1] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[4] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[5] 刘星, 吴立胜, 王炜林, 李猛. 远端疝囊残端固定与游离对腹股沟斜疝TAPP术后血清肿的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 550-553.
[6] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[7] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[8] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[9] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[10] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[13] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要