切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 383 -386. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.05.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响
徐美芳1, 万丽琴2, 卢斌1,()   
  1. 1. 214002 江苏省,无锡市妇幼保健院妇科
    2. 330006 南昌大学第一附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-03 出版日期:2018-10-18
  • 通信作者: 卢斌

Effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients

Meifang Xu1, Liqin Wan2, Bin Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Wuxi 214002, China
    2. Department of General surgery, First affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2018-02-03 Published:2018-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Bin Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Bin, Email:
引用本文:

徐美芳, 万丽琴, 卢斌. 妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 383-386.

Meifang Xu, Liqin Wan, Bin Lu. Effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 383-386.

目的

探讨妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预对患者恢复状况与生活能力的影响。

方法

选取2010年1月到2015年1月,南昌大学第一附属医院行妇科手术联合疝修补术的女性腹股沟疝64例患者的临床资料,依据术后干预方式的不同分为观察组(30例)与对照组(34例)。2组患者均行妇科手术联合疝修补术,对照组于术后行常规干预,观察组于术后行综合干预,2组均连续干预3个月。比较2组术后疼痛及并发症的发生情况,统计干预前后2组患者生活能力的变化及患者对干预的满意度。

结果

与干预前相比,干预1、3个月后2组口述分级评分法(verbal rating scaks,VRSs)评分均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且观察组干预1、3个月后VRSs评分均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后观察组并发症总发生率为16.67%,显著低于对照组的41.18%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与干预前相比,干预后2组ADL评分均显著升高,且观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组总满意度90.00%显著高于对照组58.82%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

妇科手术联合疝修补术后行综合干预可显著减轻患者疼痛,减少并发症的发生,有利于改善患者恢复状况,提升其生活能力。

Objective

To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention after gynecological operation combined with herniorrhaphy on recovery and living ability of patients.

Methods

64 cases of female patients undergoing gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy from January 2010 to January 2015 in first affiliated hospital of Nanchang university were selected, and they were divided into the experimental group (n=30) and the control group (n=34) according to the different ways of intervention. The patients in 2 groups were treated with gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy, the control group treated with routine intervention after operation, and the experimental group treated with comprehensive intervention. Both group received intervention for 3 months continuously. The postoperative pain and incidence of complications were compared between 2 groups. The changes of living ability and satisfaction with intervention in 2 groups before and after intervention were counted.

Results

Compared with the before intervention, the VRSs scores of the 2 groups at 1, 3 months after intervention significantly decreased (P<0.01), and the VRSs scores at 1 and 3 months after intervention of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05 or P<0.01); The total incidence of complications in the experimental group was 16.67%, which was significantly lower than the 41.18% in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with before intervention, the ADL scores of 2 groups increased significantly after intervention, and the scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.01). The total satisfaction rates of the experimental group and the control group were 90.00% and 58.82% respectively, the total satisfaction rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Comprehensive intervention after gynecological surgery combined with herniorrhaphy can significantly reduce the pain and the complications, improve the patients' recovery and enhance their living ability.

表1 2组干预前后VRSs评分比较(分,±s
表2 2组干预前后ADL评分及患者满意度比较
[1]
刘威,沈根海,高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术在女性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(10):1672-1674.
[2]
Leow JJ, How KY, Goh MH, et al. Non-operative management of obturator hernia in an elderly female[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3):431-431.
[3]
谢晓玲. 体位干预护理对疝手术患者术后非切口疼痛以及腹胀的影响分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(22):107-109.
[4]
徐丹凤,董巧儿,刘新元. 中老年女性脐疝无张力修补术的护理[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2013, 30(15):55-56.
[5]
董晋,戴勇,胡毓. 成年女性腹股沟疝的临床特点及手术相关问题[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(8):688-688.
[6]
端木艳丽, 任曼曼. 术前心理干预对心血管外科病人术后疼痛的影响[C]. 郑州: 河南省外科创伤及灾难救治护理专科知识学术会议, 2011.
[7]
陈善佳,周小炫,方云华, 等. 日常生活活动能力量表在脑卒中康复临床使用情况的调查[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(11):1044-1049.
[8]
Schouten N, Burgmans J P, Van T D, et al. Female 'groin' hernia: totally extraperitoneal(TEP) endoscopic repair seems the most appropriate treatment modality[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(4):387-392.
[9]
陈瑶,王光海,肖鸣, 等. 腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝时子宫圆韧带的处理方式及术后对女性生育能力的影响[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2017, 39(4):403-408.
[10]
郝悦琪. 人性化护理干预措施对疝气术后患者的护理效果观察[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2014, 10(12):2204.
[11]
Mahoori A, Noroozinia H, Hasani E, et al. The effect of pre-operative administration of gabapentin on post-operative pain relief after herniorrhaphy[J]. Saudi J Anaesth. , 2014, 8(2):220-223.
[12]
Elahi F, Reddy C, Ho D. Ultrasound guided peripheral nerve stimulation implant for management of intractable pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(1):E31-E38.
[13]
赵凌燕. 妇科手术联合疝修补中完全腹膜外疝修补术的应用及其护理效果分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1):73-75.
[14]
申添名. 综合干预护理在小儿疝气中的护理应用评价[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2016, 10(24):126-126.
[15]
廖小英. 小儿疝气手术前后综合护理效果研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2013, 4(11):151-152.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[9] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[10] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[11] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[12] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[13] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[14] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[15] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
阅读次数
全文


摘要