切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 579 -583. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.05.021

论著

MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究
刘明辉1,(), 葛方明1   
  1. 1.610200 成都市双流区第一人民医院·四川大学华西空港医院放射科
  • 出版日期:2024-10-18
  • 通信作者: 刘明辉
  • 基金资助:
    四川省中医药管理局科学技术研究专项(2021M5336)

Evaluation value of MRI on early postoperative complications in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Minghui Liu1,(), Fangming Ge1   

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District, Chengdu, Sichuan University, West China Airport Hospital, Chengdu 610200, Sichuan Province,China
  • Published:2024-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Minghui Liu
引用本文:

刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.

Minghui Liu, Fangming Ge. Evaluation value of MRI on early postoperative complications in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.

目的

探究MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期手术并发症的评估价值。

方法

选取2019 年1 月至2023 年1 月于成都市双流区第一人民医院·四川大学华西空港医院80 例行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗且术后早期出现不良症状的患者为研究对象,术后1 个月内对各种不适症状患者行MRI 检查,评估MRI 对患者术后并发症的检出情况并分析各并发症的MRI 特征。

结果

80 例患者经穿刺或手术探查证实有55 例存在术后并发症,25 例无术后并发症,MRI 诊断术后并发症阳性57 例,阴性23 例,其中漏诊4 例,误诊6 例,诊断灵敏度为92.72%,特异度为76.00%,准确度为87.50%,阳性预测值为89.47%,阴性预测值为82.61%,Kappa 值为0.703。57 例并发症阳性患者中共检出病灶77 个,其中19 个(24.68%)为局部伤口积液,包括4 个脂肪液化,MRI 示腹壁脂肪层T1WI 信号降低;5 个血肿(补片上方血肿2 个,补片下方血肿3 个),血清肿10 个,MRI 表现为残余疝囊水肿、精索与重建内环口粘连;19 个局部伤口积液中9 例经穿刺治疗并证实诊断。5个(6.49%)切口感染并窦道形成。14 个(18.18%)MRI 诊断为阴囊壁水肿。16 个(20.78%)为精索增粗,包括9 个(11.69%)睾丸炎症,其中6 个显示睾丸单侧增大,3 个睾丸萎缩。6 个(7.79%)补片周围积液,MRI 显示积液分布于补片与腹前外侧之间。8 个(10.39%)复发疝经手术证实7 个诊断正确,1 个为腹股沟蜂窝织炎,误诊为复发疝。

结论

MRI 能够清晰显示腹股沟及其边缘区域深层结构的解剖信息,对早期术后并发症的诊断具有良好的应用价值。

Objective

To explore the evaluation value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on early postoperative complications in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

Eighty patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and had early postoperative adverse symptoms in the First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District, Chengdu, Sichuan University, West China Airport Hospital and had early postoperative adverse symptoms were selected as the study subjects. MRI examination was performed on the patients with various discomfort symptoms within 1 month after surgery to evaluate the detection of postoperative complications and analyze the MRI characteristics of each complication.

Results

Among the 80 patients, 55 had postoperative complications by puncture or surgical exploration and 25 had no postoperative complications. MRI diagnosis of postoperative complications was positive in 57 patients and negative in 23 patients, of which 4 patients were missed and 6 patients were misdiagnosed. The diagnostic sensitivity was 92.72%, the specificity was 76.00%, the accuracy was 87.50%, and the positive predictive value was 89.47%, the negative predictive value was 82.61%, and the Kappa value was 0.703. A total of 77 lesions were detected in 57 patients with positive complications, of which 19 (24.68%) were local wound effusion. T1WI signal decreased in 4 abdominal fat layers, which was diagnosed as fat liquefaction by MRI; There were 5 hematoma (2 above the mesh, 3 below the mesh) and 10 seroma. MRI showed residual hernia sac edema and adhesion between spermatic cord and reconstructed internal ring opening. Among 19 local wound effusion, 9 were treated by puncture and confirmed diagnosis. Five (6.49%) were incisional infection with sinus tract formation. Scrotal wall edema was diagnosed in 14 lesions (18.18%) by MRI.Sixteen (20.78%) had spermatic cord thickening, and 9 (11.69%) had testicular inflammation, including 6 showed unilateral enlargement of testis and 3 had testicular atrophy. There were 6 lesions (7.79%) with effusion around the meshes and MRI showed that the effusion was distributed between the mesh and the anterolateral abdomen. Of the [8 (10.39%) recurrent hernias, 7 were correctly diagnosed by surgery, and 1 was inguinal cellulitis which was misdiagnosed as recurrent hernia.

Conclusion

MRI can clearly display the anatomical information of deep structure of the groin and its marginal region, and has good application value in the diagnosis of early postoperative complications.

表1 MRI 对腹股沟疝患者术后并发症的诊断价值[例]
表2 腹股沟疝修补术患者术后并发症情况统计
图1 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后患者并发症情况统计及MRI 影像特征 注:1A 局部伤口积液,T2WI 脂肪抑制序列呈高信号影;1B 补片周围积液,T1WI 序列呈等信号影;1C、1D 补片皱缩变形,补片在T2WI 序列呈低信号,轻度波浪状改变,皱缩的补片在T1WI 序列呈等信号;1E 补片周围积液,T2WI 序列呈斑片状长T2 信号影;1F 精索增粗,左侧精索较对侧增粗,边缘毛糙,T2WI 序列信号增高;1G 阴囊壁水肿,阴囊壁肿胀增厚,在T2WI 序列见模糊斑片状高信号改变;1H 复发疝,腹壁薄弱,术区软组织肿胀,腹腔脂肪部分疝出,MRI 显示T1WI 序列信号增高,T2WI 序列信号增高,皮下积液处有条片状水样信号影,T1WI 序列呈等信号,T2WI 序列信号增高。
[1]
Park JB, Chong DC, Reid JL, et al. Should asymptomatic contralateral inguinal hernia be laparoscopically repaired in the adult population as benefits greatly outweigh risks? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(4): 999-1007.
[2]
Lobe TE, Bianco FM. Adolescent inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature and recommendations for selective management[J].Hernia, 2022, 26(3): 831-837.
[3]
郭志伟, 覃代镭, 魏士博, 等. 老年腹股沟疝修补术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1):18-21.
[4]
鲍文莉, 张黎, 朱娅娟. 彩色多普勒超声在腹股沟疝术后并发症评估中的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021,15(4): 406-408.
[5]
刘维光, 潘竹楼. 老年男性腹股沟疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后并发症及影响因素探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 372-375.
[6]
Özveri E, Şanlı DET, Yıldırım D, et al. Magnetic resonance visualization of iron-loaded meshes in patients with pain after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(3): 727-732.
[7]
Çil AS, Üntan İ. Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the Inguinal Hernia Sac Diagnosed Radiologically: A Case Report[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2024, 27(6): 341-345.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018 年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[9]
Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, et al. Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7): 4685-4700.
[10]
刘吉平, 张国胜, 高志伟. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补联合腹股沟小切口治疗特殊类型腹股沟疝[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2022, 28(7): 599-602.
[11]
Vassalou EE, Vardas K, Dimitriadis E, et al. The Role of Imaging in the Pre- and Postoperative Evaluation of Inguinal Hernia[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2023, 42(10): 2425-2438.
[12]
Rosbach N, Wenger-Alakmeh K, Lahrsow M, et al. The role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in exclusion of inguinal hernia in patients suffering from indefinitive groin pain[J]. Hernia, 2023,27(1): 31-34.
[13]
De la Fuente Hagopian A, Guadarrama-Sistos Vazquez S, Farhat S, et al. The emerging role of MRI neurography in the diagnosis of chronic inguinal pain[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 319.
[14]
李绍春, 李绍杰, 马慧, 等. 腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的研究进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(10): 1389-1394.
[15]
王双辉, 李彦宁, 刘红彬, 等. 开放式与腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗132 例腹股沟疝患者临床疗效研究[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2022, 28(3): 311-313.
[16]
Zarbaliyev E, Turhan N, Dündar F, et al. The Relationship Between Small Peritoneal Flap Defects and Postoperative Seroma in TAPP Repair of Inguinal Hernias[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2023, 33(5): 493-498.
[17]
Nakabayashi R, Matsubara T, Shimada G. Arteriovenous malformation of the spermatic cord mimicking reducible inguinal hernia[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2023, 16(3): 575-578.
[18]
汪涛, 董平, 彭朝辉. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与李金斯坦手术对男性性功能与睾丸功能的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2021, 20(14): 1531-1534.
[19]
陶平, 谢海伟. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的外科处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(5): 544-547.
[20]
旷鹏昊, 卢毅卓, 傅锦波, 等. 3 Dmax 轻量型疝补片对成人腹股沟疝患者疝修补术后疼痛程度、炎症反应及并发症的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2022, 35(9): 71-74.
[21]
王志, 孙敏, 李义亮, 等. 两种腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对男性腹股沟疝患者精索血管及睾丸功能影响的对比分析[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2019, 21(2): 243-246.
[1] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[3] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[4] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[5] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[6] 仝聪, 周哲琦, 阎立昆. 食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病治疗现状及与胃食管结合部肿瘤的关系[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-493.
[7] 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同检查方法对巨大食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的诊断价值及各检查指标间的相关性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-500.
[8] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[9] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[10] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[11] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 短食管型食管裂孔疝临床特点及疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-522.
[12] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 蒋凤茹, 朱熠林. 双腔造瘘口旁疝诊疗经验[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 534-537.
[15] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
阅读次数
全文


摘要