切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 528 -533. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.05.010

论著

不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素
周艳1, 李盈1, 周小兵1, 程发辉1, 何恒正1,()   
  1. 1.410011 长沙,湖南省第二人民医院胃食管反流病诊疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-18 出版日期:2024-10-18
  • 通信作者: 何恒正
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2020-16-1)

Efficacy of different types of mesh combined with Nissen fundoplication for repairing hiatal hernia and potential risk factors for recurrence

Yan Zhou1, Ying Li1, Xiaobing Zhou1, Fahui Cheng1, Hengzheng He1,()   

  1. 1.Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Center, Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province,Changsha 410011, China
  • Received:2024-01-18 Published:2024-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Hengzheng He
引用本文:

周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.

Yan Zhou, Ying Li, Xiaobing Zhou, Fahui Cheng, Hengzheng He. Efficacy of different types of mesh combined with Nissen fundoplication for repairing hiatal hernia and potential risk factors for recurrence[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.

目的

探讨不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝(HH)的疗效及其潜在的复发危险因素。

方法

选取自2019 年10 月至2022 年6 月于湖南省第二人民医院行腹腔镜下补片修补联合Nissen 胃底折叠术的120 例HH 患者,根据术中应用补片类型分为试验组(脱细胞猪小肠黏膜下层基质源生物补片)及对照组(聚丙烯补片),回顾性分析2组HH 患者术后疗效,并通过Logistic 回归分析进一步探讨潜在的复发危险因素。

结果

2组患者术后胃食管反流病问卷量表(Gerd Q)评分[(7.6±1.8)分、(7.8±1.2)分]均较术前降低[(11.2±3.0)分、(11.1±3.2)分],差异有统计学意义(t=7.971、7.479;P<0.001、<0.001);单因素分析结果表明HH 术后复发与患者年龄(OR=3.211,95% CI=1.831~5.191,P=0.012)、术后反酸(OR=3.385,95% CI 1.525~6.213;P=0.013)、术后吞咽困难(OR=3.512,95% CI=1.902~5.914;P=0.022)、裂孔缺损直径(OR=5.810,95% CI=3.2261~9.993;P=0.020)、术后住院时间(OR=2.426,95% CI=1.421~4.270;P=0.027)、术后食管压力(OR=0.372,95% CI=0.105~0.823;P=0.019)及术后DeMeester 评分(OR=1.916,95% CI=1.022~4.885;P=0.013)具有相关性;进一步多因素Logistic 回归分析发现,术后反酸(OR=3.518,95% CI=1.050~5.423;P=0.013)、术后吞咽困难(OR=3.307,95% CI=1.384~7.065;P=0.011)、裂孔缺损直径大(OR=3.673,95% CI=1.821~10.368;P=0.016)、术后住院时间长(OR=7.025,95% CI=4.313~16.335;P=0.017)、术后食管压力高(OR=14.013,95% CI=7.735~21.926;P=0.007)、术后DeMeester 评分高(OR=15.342,95% CI=3.024~24.012;P=0.004)均是HH 复发的独立危险因素。

结论

无论应用生物或合成补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠修补术均能安全、有效修补HH,且改善患者预后。裂孔缺损直径大、术后出现反酸及吞咽困难、术后住院时间长、术后食管压力高、术后DeMeester 评分高均提示HH 复发高风险,临床治疗?选择补片?应遵循个体化原则。

Objective

To investigate the effect of different meshes combined with Nissen fundoplication for repairing hiatal hernia (HH) and potential risk factors for recurrence.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with HH underwent laparoscopic mesh repair combined with Nissen fundoplication in Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province from October 2019 to June 2022 were selected. According to intraoperative type of mesh, patients were divided into the experimental group (decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa-derived biological mesh) and the control group (polypropylene mesh). The postoperative efficacy of the two groups of HH patients were retrospectively analyzed, and the potential risk factors for recurrence were further explored by Logistic regression analysis.

Results

The postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (Gerd Q) scores [(7.6±1.8), (7.8±1.2) points]of both groups of patients decreased compared to preoperative scores [(11.2±3.0), (11.1±3.2) points], with statistically significant difference (t=7.971, 7.479; P<0.001, <0.001).The results of univariate analysis showed that postoperative recurrence of HH was associated with age (OR=3.211, 95% CI=1.831-5.191;P=0.012), postoperative acid reflux (OR=3.385, 95% CI=1.525-6.213; P=0.013), postoperative dysphagia(OR=3.512, 95% CI=1.902-5.914; P=0.022), hiatal defect diameter (OR=5.810, 95% CI=3.2261-9.993;P=0.020), postoperative hospital stay (OR=2.426, 95% CI=1.421-4.270; P=0.027), postoperative esophageal pressure (OR=0.372, 95% CI=0.105-0.823; P=0.019) and postoperative DeMeester score(OR=1.916, 95% CI=1.022-4.885; P=0.013). Further multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative acid reflux (OR=3.518, 95% CI=1.050-5.423; P=0.013), postoperative dysphagia(OR=3.307, 95% CI=1.384-7.065; P=0.011), large hiatal defect diameter (OR=3.673, 95% CI=1.821-10.368; P=0.016), long postoperative hospital stay (OR=7.025, 95% CI=4.313-16.335; P=0.017), high postoperative esophageal pressure (OR=14.013, 95% CI=7.735-21.926; P=0.007) and high postoperative DeMeester score (OR=15.342, 95% CI=3.024-24.012; P=0.004) were independent risk factors for HH recurrence.

Conclusion

Both biological and synthetic meshes combined with Nissen fundoplication can safely and effectively repair HH and improve the prognosis of patients. Large diameter of hiatal defect,postoperative acid reflux and dysphagia, long postoperative hospital stay, high postoperative esophageal pressure and DeMeester score suggest higher risk of HH recurrence, and clinical application should follow the principle of individualized treatment.

图1 腹腔镜下补片修补联合Nissen 胃底折叠术 注:1A 显露迷走神经后干;1B 测量食管裂孔大小;1C 2-0 Prolene 间断缝合膈肌脚;1D Nissen 胃底折叠固定;1E 将补片裁剪成6 cm(高度)×8(宽度)cm 大小;1F 再进一步裁剪补片,其中黑点标志处为固定点;1G 7 针缝合法固定合成补片,中间3 针,左右膈肌脚两侧上下各1 针固定补片;1H;7 针缝合法固定生物补片,中间3 针,左右膈肌脚两侧上下各1 针固定补片。
表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表4 术2组患者后1 年生活质量比较(分,±s
表5 2组患者术后复发相关因素的单因素Logistic 回归分析
表6 术后复发相关因素的多因素Logistic 回归分析
[1]
Lima DL, de Figueiredo SMP, Pereira X, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(10): 7425-7436.
[2]
Nie Y, Xiong Y, Guan L, et al. Laparoscopic fixation of biological mesh at hiatus with glue and suture during hiatal hernia repair[J].BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 158-164.
[3]
Satoh H. Hiatal hernia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis[J]. Tuberk Toraks, 2022, 70(4): 405-406.
[4]
王智勇, 姚国栋, 黄伯儒, 等. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术复发的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021,15(5): 479-484.
[5]
Yano F, Tsuboi K, Omura N, et al. Treatment strategy forlaparoscopic hiatal hernia repair[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2021, 14(4): 684-691.
[6]
Klock JA, Walters RW, Nandipati KC. Robotic hiatal hernia repair associated with higher morbidity and readmission rates compared to laparoscopic repair: 10-year analysis from the national readmissions database(NRD)[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2023, 27(3): 489-497.
[7]
Chung SK, Bludevich B, Cherng N, et al. Paraconduit hiatal hernia following esophagectomy: incidence, risk factors, outcomes and repair[J]. J Surg Res, 2021, 268(1): 276-283.
[8]
Obisesan A, Singhal V, Satoskar S. Robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and pulmonary embolism: an institution-based retrospective cohort study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(3): 501-505.
[9]
屈坤鹏, 伊同英, 张琪, 等. 食管裂孔疝的手术干预策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1059-1065.
[10]
高颖, 杜兴, 罗颖, 等. 改良Nissen 胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的短期疗效分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(1): 34-40.
[11]
Liu DS, Allan Z, Wong DJ, et al. Pre-existing hiatal mesh increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery: a retrospective multicenter study[J]. Surgery, 2023, 174(3): 549-557.
[12]
张志刚, 邵翔宇, 张炜宇, 等. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术补片的选择与固定[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(2): 141-143.
[13]
聂玉胜, 熊尧, 杨慧琪, 等. 不同类型补片在食管裂孔疝修补术中应用的研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(2): 104-107.
[14]
Thomopoulos T, FitzGerald M, Mantziari S, et al. Management of a late-term hiatal hernia with intrathoracic pouch migration after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass[J]. Obes Surg, 2022, 32(3): 957-958.
[15]
Ribieras AJ, Monzon Canales EJ, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal series and symptom questionnaires with intraoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia during sleeve gastrectomy[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2023, 19(8): 843-849.
[16]
秦昌富, 申英末. 生物可降解补片在青少年和青壮年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1047-1053.
[17]
孟云潇, 司仙科, 平定, 等. 复合生物补片在腹股沟疝修补术中远期临床价值的多中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1069-1074.
[18]
Zaslavsky A, Solomon D, Varon D, et al. Incidence and impact of preoperative hiatal hernia in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing curative surgical resection[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2023,27(12): 2907-2919.
[19]
Serrano-Aroca A, Pous-Serrano S. Prosthetic meshes forhernia repair:state of art, classification, biomaterials, antimicrobial approaches, and fabrication methods[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2021, 109(12):2695-2719.
[20]
何恒正, 程发辉, 梁红燕, 等. 生物补片在食管裂孔疝修补术中应用的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5):489-492.
[21]
文森, 秦伟. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝的诊治进展[J]. 临床医学进展,2022, 12(7): 6391-6396.
[22]
邹孟龙, 宁芯, 陈雅璐, 等. 胃食管反流病患者酸反流与食管动力的相关性研究[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2020, 68(21): 41-45.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[3] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[4] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[5] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[6] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[7] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[8] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[9] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[10] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[11] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[12] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[13] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[14] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[15] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
阅读次数
全文


摘要