切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 501 -506. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.05.005

论著

腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析
玉素江·图荪托合提1, 韩琦2, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明3,4,5, 黄旭东3, 王浩1, 克力木·阿不都热依木3,4,5, 艾克拜尔·艾力3,4,,5   
  1. 1.830054 乌鲁木齐，新疆医科大学研究生学院
    2.830002 乌鲁木齐，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院麻醉手术中心手术部
    3.830002 乌鲁木齐，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科
    4.830002 乌鲁木齐，新疆胃食管反流病与减重代谢外科临床医学研究中心
    5.830002 乌鲁木齐，新疆维吾尔自治区普外微创研究所
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-23 出版日期:2024-10-18
  • 通信作者: 艾克拜尔·艾力
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发任务专项-厅厅联动项目（2023B03010-3）国家自然科学基金（82060166）

Mid-term efficacy analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or combined with hiatal hernia repair in the treatment of obesity with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Qi Han2, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili2,3,4,5,6, Xudong Huang3, Hao Wang1, Abudureyimu Kelimu2,3,7,6, Aili Aikebaier2,3,7,,6   

  1. 1.Graduate School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054,China
    2.Surgical Department of the Surgical Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China
    3.Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China
    4.Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    5.and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China; 5Research
    6.Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China
    7.Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China; 5Research
  • Received:2024-08-23 Published:2024-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Aili Aikebaier
全文 ( 2 ) 下载PDF ( 17 ) 导出引用
引用本文：

玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.

Qi Han, Maimaitiming Maimaitiaili, Xudong Huang, Hao Wang, Abudureyimu Kelimu, Aili Aikebaier. Mid-term efficacy analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or combined with hiatal hernia repair in the treatment of obesity with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.

目的

探讨腹腔镜袖状胃切除（LSG）或联合食管裂孔疝修补术（HHR）治疗肥胖症合并胃食管反流病（GERD）的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2020 年1 月至2021 年4 月，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治并完成随访的45 例肥胖症合并GERD 患者的临床资料，根据手术方式分为LSG 联合HHR 或者单纯LSG组，比较分析2组患者减重效果及合并症改善情况。

结果

共51 例患者，失访6 例，其余45 例患者均获得术前及术后资料，中位随访时间为35（28～43）个月。45 例患者中，16 例通过术前检查及术中探查发现食管裂孔疝并行LSG 联合HHR，其余29 例行LSG。（1）2组患者术前一般资料比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。（2）2组患者术中及术后情况比较，LSG 联合HHR 手术时间较LSG组更长，差异有统计学意义（Z=－5.39，P＜0.001），术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后30 d 内再入院率和胆囊结石发生率差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。（3）2组患者体重指数、多余体重减少百分比和总体重减轻百分比均不满足球形检验（χ2=62.53，P＜0.001；χ2=26.26，P＜0.001；χ2=29.45，P＜0.001），多变量检验结果显示，上述指标时间效应比较，差异均有统计学意义（F时间=274.5，P时间＜0.001；F时间=12.56，P时间＜0.001；F时间=11.75，P时间＜0.001）；组间效应和交互效应比较，差异均无统计学意义（F组间=2.17、P组间=0.15，F交互=0.64、P交互=0.55；F组间=1.28、P组间=0.26，F交互=1.11、F交互=0.35；F组间=0.006、P组间=0.94，F交互=0.99，P交互=0.40）。（4）术前与术后胃食管反流病问卷量表评分比较，LSG 联合HHR组患者从9（8，12）分降至7（6，11）分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；LSG组患者从9（8，11）分降至8（6，15）分，差异无统计学意义（P=0.186）。

结论

LSG 联合HHR 手术和单纯LSG 手术均可显著降低肥胖症患者的体重指数，并有效改善肥胖症相关合并症。LSG 联合HHR 手术可显著改善肥胖症患者的GERD 症状，而LSG 术后肥胖症患者GERD 症状无明显变化。

关键词: 肥胖症, 胃食管反流病, 疝, 食管裂孔, 疝修补术, 腹腔镜, 袖状胃切除术

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)or combined with hiatal hernia repair (HHR) in the treatment of obesity with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 45 obese patients with GERD who admitted to People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2020 to April 2021 and completed the follow-up. Patients were divided into LSG combined with HHR group or LSG alone group according to the surgical method, and weight loss effects and improvement of comorbidities between two groups of patients were compared and analyzed.

Results

Among the 51 obese patients, six patients were lost to follow-up, and preoperative and postoperative data were obtained for the remaining 45 patients, the median follow-up time was 35 (28-43) months. Among the 45 patients, 16 patients were found to have hiatal hernia through preoperative examination and intraoperative exploration, and underwent LSG+HHR,while the remaining 29 patients underwent LSG. (1) There was no significant difference in the preoperative general information between two groups (P＞0.05). (2) The comparison of intraoperative and postoperative conditions between two groups showed that the LSG combined with HHR had a longer surgical time than the LSG group, and there was a significant difference (Z=-5.39, P＜0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, readmission within 30 days after surgery, and incidence of gallbladder stones between two groups (P＞0.05). (3) The body mass index, %EWL and %TWL among the two groups did not meeting the mauchly's test of sphericity(χ2=62.53, 26.26, 29.45, P＜0.001). The results of multi-variate test showed that there was a significant difference in the time effect of the above indexes (Ftime=274.5, 12.56, 11.75, Ptime＜0.001), while there was no significant difference in intergroup and interaction effects [(Fintergroup=2.17, Pintergroup=0.15; Finteraction=0.64,Pinteraction=0.55); (Fintergroup=1.28, Pintergroup=0.26; Finteraction=1.11, Pinteraction=0.35); (Fintergroup=0.006, Pintergroup=0.94;Finteraction=0.99, Pinteraction=0.40)]. (4) The Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire(Gerd Q) score of patients in the LSG combined with HHR group decreased from 9 (8, 12) points before surgery to 7 (6, 11)points after surgery, and there was a significant difference (P＜0.05). The Gerd Q score of patients in the LSG group decreased from 9 (8, 11) points to 8 (6, 15) points, with no statistically significant difference(P=0.186).

Conclusion

LSG combined with HHR and LSG alone can significantly reduce body mass index in obese patients and effectively improve obesity related comorbidities. LSG combined with HHR can significantly improve GERD symptoms in obese patients, but there is no significant change in GERD symptoms after LSG.

Key words: Obesity, Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD), Hernia, hiatal, Hernia repair, Laparoscope, Sleeve gastrectomy
表1 2组患者一般资料比较
组别 例数 性别[例(%)] 年龄(岁,xˉ±s) 体重指数(kg/m2,xˉ±s) 术前合并症(例)
男性 女性 高血压 糖尿病 糖尿病前期
LSG组 29 13(44.8) 16(55.2) 38±9 40.04±3.63 10 9 8
LSG联合HHR组 16 4(25.0) 12(75.0) 36±8 38.13±3.64 5 5 2
t/χ2值 1.73 0.92 1.69 0.04 0.00 1.36
P值 0.189 0.362 0.098 0.840 0.998 0.244
表2 2组患者术中及术后情况比较
组别 例数 手术时间[min,M(范围)] 术中出血量[ml,M(范围)] 术后住院时间[d,M(范围)] 术后30d内再入院(例)
LSG组 29 105(90,125) 80(50,150) 6(4,11) 1
LSG联合HHR组 16 130(115,140) 95(50,175) 6(4,8) 0
Z/Fisher值 -5.39 -0.68 -0.69 -
P值 ＜0.001 0.496 0.491 0.644
表3 2组患者手术前后减重相关指标比较（±s ）
组别 例数 体重指数(kg/m2)
术前 术后6个月 术后12个月 术后24个月 术后35(28～43)个月
LSG 29 40.04±3.63 29.96±3.66 27.54±3.09 27.96±3.69 28.84±4.37
LSG联合HHR 16 38.13±3.64 27.81±3.89 26.55±3.95 26.59±3.74 27.64±4.02
F值 2.857 3.393 0.863 1.415 0.828
P值 0.098a 0.072a 0.358a 0.241a 0.368a
组别 例数 %EWL(%)
术后6个月 术后12个月 术后24个月 术后35(28～43)个月
LSG 29 69.84±22.13 85.86±20.87 82.78±25.16 77.60±27.13
LSG联合HHR 16 82.86±24.64 92.60±28.31 91.08±27.07 82.21±27.47
F值 3.295 0.830 1.065 0.294
P值 0.076a 0.367a 0.308a 0.590a
组别 例数 %TWL(%)
术后6个月 术后12个月 术后24个月 术后35(28～43)个月
LSG 29 25.18±6.26 31.13±5.89 30.03±7.96 27.95±8.63
LSG联合HHR 16 27.12±6.47 30.38±7.66 30.13±8.31 27.32±9.34
F值 0.968 0.134 0.002 0.052
P值 0.331a 0.716a 0.969a 0.820a
[1]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库：2022 年度报告[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 9(2): 83-91.
[2]
朱利勇, 高祥, 李鹏洲, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术规范化操作要点[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(8)：1044-1048.
[3]
DuPree CE, Blair K, Steele SR, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease: A national analysis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2014, 149(4): 328-334.
[4]
Merrouche M, Sabaté JM, Jouet P, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux and esophageal motility disorders in morbidly obese patients before and after bariatric surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2007, 17(7): 894-900.
[5]
Chan DL, Wong SK, Lok HT, et al. Accuracy of hiatal hernia diagnosis in bariatric patients: Preoperative endoscopy versus intraoperative reference[J]. JGH Open, 2020, 4(6): 1074-1078.
[6]
Gorodner V, Viscido G, Signorini F, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and morbid obesity: Evaluation and treatment[J]. Updates Surg, 2018, 70(3): 331-337.
[7]
张松泽, 夏建福, 陈浩, 等. 袖状胃切除同期食管裂孔疝修补防止胃食管反流的疗效[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(2): 94-98.
[8]
艾克拜尔·艾力, 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 等. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合食管裂孔疝修补术在治疗肥胖合并胃食管反流病的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 7(1): 41-45.
[9]
Hider AM, Bonham AJ, Carlin AM, et al. Impact of concurrent hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: A state-wide analysis[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2023, 19(6): 619-625.
[10]
Dakour Aridi H, Asali M, Fouani T, et al. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair: an Unresolved Question[J]. Obes Surg, 2017,27(11): 2898-2904.
[11]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 肥胖与代谢病外科疗效报告的标准规范[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2020, 6(2): 73-77.
[12]
Salminen P, Grönroos S, Helmiö M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-y gastric bypass on weight loss,comorbidities, and reflux at 10 years in adult patients with obesity:The sleevepass randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022,157(8): 656-666.
[13]
Raj PP, Bhattacharya S, Misra S, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux-related physiologic changes after sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-y gastric bypass: A prospective comparative study[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2019, 15(8): 1261-1269.
[14]
Dang JT, Vaughan T, Mocanu V, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to roux-en-y gastric bypass: Indications, prevalence, and safety[J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(5): 1486-1493.
[15]
Chang P, Friedenberg F. Obesity and gerd[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2014, 43(1): 161-173.
[16]
Miron I, Dumitrascu DL. Gastrointestinal motility disorders in obesity[J]. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar), 2019, 15(4): 497-504.
[17]
Ringhofer C, Lenglinger J, Riegler M, et al. Waist to hip ratio is a better predictor of esophageal acid exposure than body mass index[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(7).
[18]
King K, Sudan R, Bardaro S, et al. Assessment and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease following bariatric surgery[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2021, 17(11): 1919-1925.
[19]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 精准肥胖代谢外科手术中国专家共识(2022 版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2022, 21(10): 1302-1312.
[20]
屈坤鹏, 伊同英, 张琪, 等. 食管裂孔疝的手术干预策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1059-1065.
[21]
Santonicola A, Angrisani L, Cutolo P, et al. The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in obese patients[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2014, 10(2): 250-255.
[22]
Şen O, Sekmen Ü, Türkçapar AG. The Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2022, 32(4): 449-452.
[23]
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2018, 319(3): 255-265.
[24]
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Borrelli V, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair in obese patients: long-term results on gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis,2020, 16(9): 1171-1177.
[25]
Boru CE, Coluzzi MG, de Angelis F, et al. Long-Term Results After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Posterior Cruroplasty: 5-Year Follow-up[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(9):1962-1968.
[26]
Chen W, Feng J, Wang C, et al. Effect of concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obes Surg, 2021, 31(9): 3905-3918.
[27]
Crawford C, Gibbens K, Lomelin D, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and anti-reflux procedures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(3): 1012-1021.
[28]
玉素江·图荪托合提, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 肥胖在胃食管反流病发生发展中的作用机制[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(1): 147-152.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文
19
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 2 0 0 17

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 12 7
  比例 63% 37%

摘要
51
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 51
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 15 36
  比例 29% 71%

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号