切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 283 -285. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.04.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

髂腹下神经切除术对腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛患者的影响
谭李阳1, 张美凤1, 胡世雄1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,广东省人民医院 广东省医学科学院 血管腹壁疝甲状腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-29 出版日期:2018-08-18
  • 通信作者: 胡世雄

Influence of iliohypogastric neurectomy on postoperative chronic pain of inguinal hernia

Liyang Tan1, Meifeng Zhang1, Shixiong Hu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Thyroid Abdomial wall Hernia Surgery, Guangdong People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2017-12-29 Published:2018-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Shixiong Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Shixiong, Email:
引用本文:

谭李阳, 张美凤, 胡世雄. 髂腹下神经切除术对腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 283-285.

Liyang Tan, Meifeng Zhang, Shixiong Hu. Influence of iliohypogastric neurectomy on postoperative chronic pain of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 283-285.

目的

探讨髂腹下神经切除术对腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛患者的影响。

方法

收集2014年7月至2016年7月,广东省人民医院640例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,运用腹股沟前入路行Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术,以手术日期确定是否切除髂腹下神经并将入组患者均分为试验组和对照组。试验组患者在术中接受髂腹下神经切除术,而对照组未行神经切除,2组术后治疗及护疼痛水平。

结果

本组患者均顺利完成手术。术中试验组切除髂腹下神经患者348例,对照组未切除髂腹下神经患者292例。试验组的患者平均手术时间为(50±12.5)min,平均住院时间为(1.8±0.6)d;理方法相同。随访6个月后应用疼痛数字评价量表(numerical rating scale,NRS),比较2组患者的对照组平均手术时间为(49±14.3)min,平均住院时间为(1.9±0.8)d,2组在住院平均手术时间和住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后随访6个月,试验组NRS评分0分214例,1分53例,2分54例,3分25例,4分2例,5分及5分以上0例。对照组NRS评分0分93例,1分86例,2分32例,3分68例,4分9例,5分及5分以上4例。以3分为界试验组≤3分346例,>3分2例;对照组≤3分279例,>3分13例,2组以3分为界NRS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

髂腹下神经切除能够在不增加手术时间及住院时间的情况下,显著减少术后慢性疼痛的发生。

Objective

To explore the influence of iliohypogastric neurectomy on postoperative chronic pain of inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 640 cases of inguinal hernia patients in Guangdong people's hospital between July 2014 to July 2016 who accepted randomized iliohypogastric neurectomy during Lichtenstein tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Numeric rating scale (NRS) was adopted to conduct a comparison of postoperative pain degree between patients accepting iliohypogastric neurectomy and those not.

Results

A total of 640 patients with inguinal hernia was recorded including 43 females and 597 males. 348 patients received iliohypogastric neurectomy, while the rest 292 cases did not. Based on the overall statistical analysis, the average operation time for experimental group was (50±12.5) minutes and the length of hospitalization was (1.8±0.6) days; the control group had an average operation time as (49±14.3) minutes and hospitalization time as (1.9±0.8) days. No statistical differences were observed in average operation time and length of hospitalization (P>0.05). The Postoperative follow-up time was 6 months. For patients received the neurectomy, 214 cases scored 0 point in NRS scale, 53 scored 1, 54 scored 2, 25 scored 3, 2 scored 4 and none scored 5 points or above. Comparatively, for those patients not receiving the neurectomy, 93 cases scored 0 point in NRS scale, 86 scored 1, 32 scored 2, 68 scored 3, 9 scored 4, and 4 cases reported above 5 points pain degree. No one scored 6 points or above. If 3 points was set as a mark, the amount of patients ≤3 points was 346 and only 2 above 3 points in experimental group while number of patients ≤3 points was 279 and 13 above 3 points in control group, for which a significant difference was indicated (P<0.05 for accurate chi-square test and Fisher test).

Conclusion

Iliohypogastric neurectomy during hernia repair showed an obvious effect in reduction of NRS score and reduced chronic pain without increasing operation time and hospitalization.

表1 640例患者术后6个月疼痛评分(例)
表2 以3分为界2组患者的疼痛评分计数(例)
表3 以3分为界2组患者疼痛评分计数的卡方检验结果(n=640)
[1]
Current issues, problems and prospects of tension-free hernioplasty (review)[J]. Georgian Med News, 2014(232/233): 7-12.
[2]
Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles[J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(1): 1-7.
[3]
Reinpold WMJ, Nehls J, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(1): 163-168.
[4]
Ferzli GS, Edwards ED, Khoury GE. Chronic Pain after Inguinal Herniorrhaphy[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2007, 205(2): 333-341.
[5]
International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitionsof pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy[J]. Pain Suppl, 1986, 3: S211-S226.
[6]
Aasvang E, Kehlet H. Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 95(1): 69-76.
[7]
王荫龙, 张新, 谢加东. 预防性切断髂腹下神经对Lichtenstein手术术后疼痛影响的分析[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2010, 15(6): 627-631.
[8]
时德. 腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛[J]. 咸宁学院学报(医学版), 2005, 19(2): 77-80.
[9]
何鹏飞, 郑文武. 髂腹下神经前皮支的解剖及临床应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2010, 23(2): 128.
[1] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[2] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[10] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[11] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[12] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[13] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[14] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[15] 邓杨, 彭豪, 刘剑文. 腹腔镜疝修补术腹膜前负压引流的效果和长期安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 402-405.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?