切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 90 -93. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.003

所属专题: 文献

综述

生物补片在疝与腹壁外科的临床应用进展
陈松耀1, 戴伟钢1,(), 陈创奇1   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-24 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 戴伟钢
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划资助项目(2016A0103038)

Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery

Songyao Chen1, Weigang Dai1,(), Chuangqi Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2017-09-24 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Weigang Dai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dai Weigang, Email:
引用本文:

陈松耀, 戴伟钢, 陈创奇. 生物补片在疝与腹壁外科的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 90-93.

Songyao Chen, Weigang Dai, Chuangqi Chen. Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 90-93.

目前人工合成补片在疝与腹壁外科中应用广泛,并取得良好的效果,但是合成补片具有难以避免的缺点,如补片感染、慢性疼痛、肠粘连、甚至肠瘘等,一旦补片感染则需要移除补片。此外,因合成补片可能增加手术部位感染的概率,故目前不推荐其应用于存在明确污染或感染部位的手术中。生物补片正是针对人工合成补片存在的缺陷而研发出来,它具有耐感染性好、良好组织相容性、完全可吸收等优势。研究证明生物补片可以安全应用于潜在污染或感染部位的疝修补术中。目前生物补片已应用于各种腹壁疝以及腹壁肿瘤、感染或创伤后的腹壁重建等手术中。然而,现阶段有关生物补片的循证医学证据等级较低,不同研究报道生物补片的应用效果差异较大,尚无共识形成,故针对生物补片的临床应用尚需要持谨慎态度。我们期待前瞻性的临床研究来进一步论证生物补片的长期疗效。本文针对生物补片临床应用现状和进展进行简要综述。

At present, synthetic patch is widely used in hernia and abdominal wall surgery, which has achieved good outcomes. However, it is difficult to avoid some disadvantages of the synthetic patch, such as patch infection, chronic pain, intestinal adhesion and even intestinal fistula. Once the patch is infected, it needs to be removed. In addition, because the synthetic patch may increase the probability of surgical site infection, it is not recommended to be applied in the area where is a definite contamination or infection. Biological patch is developed for the defects of synthetic patch, which has the advantages of better infection resistance, histocompatibility and completely absorbability. Biological patches have been proved to be safe for herniorrhaphy in potentially contaminated or infected sites. It has been effectively used in ventral hernia and the reconstruction of the abdominal wall tumor, infection or trauma. However, at present, the level of evidence about biological patch was low, and the results of many studies associated with biological mesh were quite different. So it was difficult to get consensus on the application of biological patch. Therefore, it is still necessary to take a cautious attitude towards the clinical application of biological patch. We expect a prospective clinical study to further demonstrate the long-term efficacy of biological patches. This article briefly reviews the current status and progress of clinical application of biological patches.

[1]
Zhang J, Wang GY, Xiao YP, et al. The biomechanical behavior and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(29): 7086-7095.
[2]
Zhong T, Janis JE, Ahmad J, et al. Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: A systematic review[J]. J Plast Reconst Aesth Surg, 2011, 64(12): 1562-1571.
[3]
Bochicchio GV, Jain A, McGonigal K, et al. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218(4): 751-757.
[4]
Bellows CF, Shadduck P, Helton WSet al. Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 221-230.
[5]
Fine AP. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia using Surgisis mesh and fibrin sealant[J]. JSLS, 2006, 10(4): 461-465.
[6]
宋斌,刘栋,刘思达, 等. 采用生物补片进行腹腔镜与开腹无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效对比[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11): 1088-1091.
[7]
Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Absorbable Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Surg Innov, 2017, 24(3): 289-298.
[8]
Köckerling F, Alam NN, Narang SK, et al. Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair - Review of the Literature[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 48.
[9]
Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J, Moazzez A, Lipham JC, Mason RJ, et al. Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(1): 40-50.
[10]
Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, et al. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3): 498-505.
[11]
Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJet al. Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: Outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(6): 1517-1527.
[12]
Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingston EH, et al. The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(4): 510-517.
[13]
Roth JS, Zachem A, Plymale MA, et al. Complex Ventral Hernia Repair with Acellular Dermal Matrices: Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes[J]. Am Surg, 2017, 83(2): 141-147.
[14]
Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(1): 118-121
[15]
Janes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(2): 189-192.
[16]
Serra-Aracil X, Bomvardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(4): 583-587.
[17]
Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, May Cet al. Prevention of a Parastomal Hernia by Biological Mesh Reinforcement[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 53.
[18]
Patel SV, Zhang L, Chadi SAet al. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlledstudies [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2017, 21(1): 5-13.
[19]
Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, et al. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(3): 179-186.
[20]
Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, et al. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2010, 211(5): 637-645.
[21]
Gillern S, Bleier JI. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2014, 27(4): 162-171.
[22]
Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, Hendriks T, Bleichrodt R P. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(7): 1252-1258.
[23]
Warwick AM, Velineni R, Smart NJ, et al. Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(2): 321-325.
[24]
张伟,仇明,单成祥, 等. 复合补片和生物补片治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效对比研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2014, 19(2): 145-148
[25]
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(4): 481-490.
[26]
Panait L, Novitsky YW. Hiatal Hernia Repair: Current Evidence for Use of Absorbable Mesh to Reinforce Hiatal Closure[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2017, 30: 182-187.
[27]
Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA, et al. The Use of Biological Meshes in Diaphragmatic Defects-An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 56.
[28]
马颂章. 疝和腹壁外科生物学类修补材料再认识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11): 1153-1156.
[29]
Wolf MT, Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(1): 234-246.
[30]
Primus FE, Harris HW. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(1): 21-30.
[1] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[2] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[3] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[4] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 王苏睿, 胡根, 邵国益. A 型肉毒杆菌毒素在腹腔开放后腹壁缺损修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 649-653.
[7] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[8] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[9] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[10] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[11] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[12] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[13] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[14] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[15] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?