切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 90 -93. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.003

所属专题: 文献

综述

生物补片在疝与腹壁外科的临床应用进展
陈松耀1, 戴伟钢1,(), 陈创奇1   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-24 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 戴伟钢
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划资助项目(2016A0103038)

Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery

Songyao Chen1, Weigang Dai1,(), Chuangqi Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2017-09-24 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Weigang Dai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dai Weigang, Email:
引用本文:

陈松耀, 戴伟钢, 陈创奇. 生物补片在疝与腹壁外科的临床应用进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 90-93.

Songyao Chen, Weigang Dai, Chuangqi Chen. Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 90-93.

目前人工合成补片在疝与腹壁外科中应用广泛,并取得良好的效果,但是合成补片具有难以避免的缺点,如补片感染、慢性疼痛、肠粘连、甚至肠瘘等,一旦补片感染则需要移除补片。此外,因合成补片可能增加手术部位感染的概率,故目前不推荐其应用于存在明确污染或感染部位的手术中。生物补片正是针对人工合成补片存在的缺陷而研发出来,它具有耐感染性好、良好组织相容性、完全可吸收等优势。研究证明生物补片可以安全应用于潜在污染或感染部位的疝修补术中。目前生物补片已应用于各种腹壁疝以及腹壁肿瘤、感染或创伤后的腹壁重建等手术中。然而,现阶段有关生物补片的循证医学证据等级较低,不同研究报道生物补片的应用效果差异较大,尚无共识形成,故针对生物补片的临床应用尚需要持谨慎态度。我们期待前瞻性的临床研究来进一步论证生物补片的长期疗效。本文针对生物补片临床应用现状和进展进行简要综述。

At present, synthetic patch is widely used in hernia and abdominal wall surgery, which has achieved good outcomes. However, it is difficult to avoid some disadvantages of the synthetic patch, such as patch infection, chronic pain, intestinal adhesion and even intestinal fistula. Once the patch is infected, it needs to be removed. In addition, because the synthetic patch may increase the probability of surgical site infection, it is not recommended to be applied in the area where is a definite contamination or infection. Biological patch is developed for the defects of synthetic patch, which has the advantages of better infection resistance, histocompatibility and completely absorbability. Biological patches have been proved to be safe for herniorrhaphy in potentially contaminated or infected sites. It has been effectively used in ventral hernia and the reconstruction of the abdominal wall tumor, infection or trauma. However, at present, the level of evidence about biological patch was low, and the results of many studies associated with biological mesh were quite different. So it was difficult to get consensus on the application of biological patch. Therefore, it is still necessary to take a cautious attitude towards the clinical application of biological patch. We expect a prospective clinical study to further demonstrate the long-term efficacy of biological patches. This article briefly reviews the current status and progress of clinical application of biological patches.

[1]
Zhang J, Wang GY, Xiao YP, et al. The biomechanical behavior and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(29): 7086-7095.
[2]
Zhong T, Janis JE, Ahmad J, et al. Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: A systematic review[J]. J Plast Reconst Aesth Surg, 2011, 64(12): 1562-1571.
[3]
Bochicchio GV, Jain A, McGonigal K, et al. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218(4): 751-757.
[4]
Bellows CF, Shadduck P, Helton WSet al. Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 221-230.
[5]
Fine AP. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia using Surgisis mesh and fibrin sealant[J]. JSLS, 2006, 10(4): 461-465.
[6]
宋斌,刘栋,刘思达, 等. 采用生物补片进行腹腔镜与开腹无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效对比[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11): 1088-1091.
[7]
Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Absorbable Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Surg Innov, 2017, 24(3): 289-298.
[8]
Köckerling F, Alam NN, Narang SK, et al. Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair - Review of the Literature[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 48.
[9]
Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J, Moazzez A, Lipham JC, Mason RJ, et al. Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(1): 40-50.
[10]
Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, et al. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3): 498-505.
[11]
Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJet al. Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: Outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(6): 1517-1527.
[12]
Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingston EH, et al. The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(4): 510-517.
[13]
Roth JS, Zachem A, Plymale MA, et al. Complex Ventral Hernia Repair with Acellular Dermal Matrices: Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes[J]. Am Surg, 2017, 83(2): 141-147.
[14]
Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(1): 118-121
[15]
Janes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(2): 189-192.
[16]
Serra-Aracil X, Bomvardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(4): 583-587.
[17]
Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, May Cet al. Prevention of a Parastomal Hernia by Biological Mesh Reinforcement[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 53.
[18]
Patel SV, Zhang L, Chadi SAet al. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlledstudies [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2017, 21(1): 5-13.
[19]
Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, et al. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(3): 179-186.
[20]
Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, et al. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2010, 211(5): 637-645.
[21]
Gillern S, Bleier JI. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2014, 27(4): 162-171.
[22]
Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, Hendriks T, Bleichrodt R P. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(7): 1252-1258.
[23]
Warwick AM, Velineni R, Smart NJ, et al. Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(2): 321-325.
[24]
张伟,仇明,单成祥, 等. 复合补片和生物补片治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效对比研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2014, 19(2): 145-148
[25]
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(4): 481-490.
[26]
Panait L, Novitsky YW. Hiatal Hernia Repair: Current Evidence for Use of Absorbable Mesh to Reinforce Hiatal Closure[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2017, 30: 182-187.
[27]
Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA, et al. The Use of Biological Meshes in Diaphragmatic Defects-An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature[J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 56.
[28]
马颂章. 疝和腹壁外科生物学类修补材料再认识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11): 1153-1156.
[29]
Wolf MT, Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(1): 234-246.
[30]
Primus FE, Harris HW. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(1): 21-30.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[3] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[4] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[5] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[6] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[7] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[8] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[9] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[13] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[14] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[15] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
阅读次数
全文


摘要