切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 94 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术对血气指标及体内循环参数的影响
刘永刚1,()   
  1. 1. 075000 河北省,张家口市妇幼保健院儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-23 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 刘永刚

Analysis the effect of pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery on the blood gas index and circulating parameters

Yonggang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangjiakou Maternity and Child Care, Hebei 075000, China
  • Received:2017-08-23 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yonggang Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding auther: Liu Yonggang, Email:
引用本文:

刘永刚. 小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术对血气指标及体内循环参数的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 94-98.

Yonggang Liu. Analysis the effect of pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery on the blood gas index and circulating parameters[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 94-98.

目的

分析小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中不同气腹压对血气指标、体内循环状况的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2015年3月至2016年4月,张家口市妇幼保健院收治的74例腹股沟疝患儿的临床资料,所有患儿均行小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术治疗,依据术中采用的气腹压的不同将患儿分为低气腹压组及高气腹压组,每组患者37例。低气腹压组术中气腹压维持8 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),而高气腹压组维持12 mmHg。检测并比较术前、气腹后10 min、30 min及放气后10 min患儿血气分析指标及循环指标的变化。

结果

与术前比较,气腹后10 min及30 min 2组气道压力(Paw)、呼气末二氧化碳分压(PetCO2)、动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)及中心静脉压(CVP)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、心输出量(CO)及每搏输出量(SV)显著高于术前,且高气腹组显著高于低气腹组(P<0.01);放气后10 min 2组PetCO2及PaCO2仍显著高于术前,且高气腹组显著高于低气腹组(P<0.01),同时高气腹组SBP、DBP、MAP、CO及SVR显著高于术前,且SBP、DBP及CO仍显著高于低气腹组(P<0.05);与术前比较,气腹后10 min及30 min 2组胸廓顺应性(Cmpl)显著降低,且高气腹组显著低于低气腹组(P<0.05);与术前比较,低气腹组全血碱剩余(ABE)及标准碱剩余(SBE)均无显著变化(P>0.05),而气腹后30 min高气腹组ABE及SBE显著升高(P<0.05)。

结论

小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中高气腹压较低气腹压对患儿的血气及循环的影响大,因此临床应据实际情况尽量避免术中选择12 mmHg以上的气腹压。

Objective

To explore the effect of pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery on the blood gas index and circulating parameters.

Methods

74 cases chlidren with hernia in Zhangjiakou Maternity and Child Care from March 2015 to April 2016 were selected and all children were treated with pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery. All child patients were divided into low pneumoperitoneum pressure group and high pneumoperitoneum pressure group according to the different of pneumoperitoneum pressure during operation, and 37 cases for each group. Intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressure in low pneumoperitoneum pressure group maintained at 8 mmHg, and high pneumoperitoneum pressure group maintained at 12 mmHg. Detected and compared the blood gas index and circulating parameters preoperative, 10 min, 30 min after pneumoperitoneum and 10 min after deflated.

Results

The pneumoperitoneum time, pneumoperitoneum formation time and gas released time had no significant difference (P>0.05). Compared with pre-operation, the Paw, PetCO2, PaCO2 and CVP, SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, CO and SVR showed first increasing then decreasing trend. At 10 min and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum, those indicators were significantly higher in both two groups, and high pneumoperitoneum pressure group was higher than low pneumoperitoneum pressure group (P<0.01). The Paw, CVP and HR of 2 groups return to the preoperation level gradually at 10 min after deflated, and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). While the PetCO2 and PaCO2 at 10 min after deflated were higher than those in preoperation, and above indicators in high pneumoperitoneum pressure group were higher than those in low pneumoperitoneum pressure group (P<0.01). At the same time, the SBP, DBP, MAP, CO and SVR in high pneumoperitoneum pressure group were higher than preoperation level and SBP, DBP and CO were higher than those in low pneumoperitoneum pressure group. Compared with preoperation, the Cmp1 of 2 groups decreased significantly at 10 min and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum, and high pneumoperitoneum pressure group was higher than low pneumoperitoneum pressure group; the PaO2 and SaO2 had no significant changes (P>0.05); compared with preoperation, the ABE and SBE of low pneumoperitoneum pressure group had no significant changes (P>0.05), while the ABE and SBE of high pneumoperitoneum pressure group at 30 min after pneumoperitoneum increased significantly (P<0.05). The SV of 2 groups from pneumoperitoneum to 10 min after deflated had no significant changes (P>0.05).

Conclusion

High pneumoperitoneum pressure had a great influence on the blood gas index and circulating parameters in pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery, so we should avoid >12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum in clinic.

表1 2组气腹建立情况比较(±s
表2 2组患儿围手术期血气分析比较(±s
表3 2组患儿围手术期体内循环状况比较(±s
[1]
Lei Z, Gao F, Bao P, et al. Design and Fabrication of a Device for Intraperitoneal Treatment of Pediatric Hernia[J]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, 2015, 32(3): 675-679.
[2]
刘玉,夏立平,郑武平, 等. 传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2009, 15(1): 52-53.
[3]
袁甫军,程小玉. 微型腹腔镜与传统手术在治疗小儿疝气中的临床效果分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2014, 35(20): 4507-4507.
[4]
廖冬平, 刘继荣. 腹腔镜疝气手术对婴幼儿呼吸循环影响的探讨[C]. 长沙: 中华护理学会全国手术室护理学术交流会议, 2012.
[5]
Salas A A, Bhat R, Dabrowska K, et al. The value of Pa(CO2) in relation to outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2014, 31(11): 939-946.
[6]
晁延军,李英,马富平, 等. 免气腹与CO2气腹在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床对照研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(3): 41-45.
[7]
Matsuzaki S, Jardon K, Maleysson E, et al. Impact of intraperitoneal pressure of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the surgical peritoneal environment[J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(6): 1613-1623.
[8]
侯苏. 不同气腹压对腹腔镜手术患儿围手术期血气的影响[J]. 现代医学, 2014, 12(9): 983-986.
[9]
林石全,黄庆清,翁迪贵. 不同气腹压对腹腔镜手术患者呼吸功能的影响[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2014, 36(3): 10-12.
[10]
Luketina RR, Knauer M, Köhler G, et al. Comparison of a standard CO2, pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal™: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2014, 15(1): 1-6.
[11]
Suh MK, Seong KW, Jung SH, et al. The effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on respiratory mechanics during pelviscopic surgery[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2010, 59(5): 329-334.
[12]
徐国栋,关勇. 腹腔镜及后腹腔镜手术中CO2气腹对机体呼吸循环功能的影响[J]. 海南医学, 2007, 18(5): 148-149.
[13]
张勇,蔡英敏,张珍妮, 等. FloTrac/Vigileo系统监测不同气腹压对幼儿腹腔镜疝气手术围手术期血流动力学的影响[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2013, 44(11): 898-900.
[14]
李宝永,武建华,刘铁军. FloTrac/Vigileo监测CO2气腹压对腹腔镜手术患者血流动力学的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(6): 1569-1571.
[15]
宋洁一. 不同气腹压对后腹腔镜肾癌根治术患者机体的影响[D]. 保定: 河北大学, 2011.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?