切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 99 -104. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.005

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

论著

腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术对胃食管反流病患者食管动力学的影响
胡志伟1, 李侁1, 汪忠镐1, 吴继敏1,(), 田书瑞1, 邓昌荣1, 张玉1, 战秀岚1, 陈新1, 王峰1, 许辉1   
  1. 1. 100088 北京,火箭军总医院胃食管反流病科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-15 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 吴继敏

Effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on esophageal motility in GERD patients

Zhiwei Hu1, Shen Li1, Zhonggao Wang1, Jimin Wu1,(), Shurui Tian1, Changrong Dend1, Yu Zhang1, Xiulan Zhang1, Xin Chen1, Feng Wang1, Hui Xu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Rocket Force General Hospital PLA, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2017-12-15 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jimin Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Jimin, Email:
引用本文:

胡志伟, 李侁, 汪忠镐, 吴继敏, 田书瑞, 邓昌荣, 张玉, 战秀岚, 陈新, 王峰, 许辉. 腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术对胃食管反流病患者食管动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 99-104.

Zhiwei Hu, Shen Li, Zhonggao Wang, Jimin Wu, Shurui Tian, Changrong Dend, Yu Zhang, Xiulan Zhang, Xin Chen, Feng Wang, Hui Xu. Effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on esophageal motility in GERD patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 99-104.

目的

通过食管高分辨率测压(high resolution manometry,HRM)对比胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)患者腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠术(laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication,LNF)前后食管动力学的改变情况,探讨手术的抗反流原理。

方法

选取2014年6月至2016年7月,火箭军总医院73例连续住院的GERD患者,LNF术前1周内行包括HRM在内一系列术前评估,术后GERD症状明显缓解且吞咽困难等并发症已经消失时复查HRM。对手术前后2次HRM的9个食管动力学参数进行对比分析,并按术前是否存在食管裂孔疝进一步分组分析。

结果

术后患者食管长度平均延长了(0.43±1.72)cm,腹腔内下食管括约肌长度平均延长了(1.20± 0.94)cm,术后患者下食管括约肌静息压平均增加了(5.99±7.79)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),综合松弛压平均增加了(3.41±5.43)mmHg;远端收缩分数平均增加了(157.26±596.01)mmHg·s·cm,远端收缩延迟时间平均增加了(0.93±2.30)s;上述6个动力学参数与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P=0.04,<0.01,<0.01,<0.01,0.03,<0.01)。而术后下食管括约肌长度、食管上括约肌压力和收缩前沿速度与术前相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.83,0.43,0.73)。食管长度、下食管括约肌长度和远端收缩分数在食管裂孔疝患者中较无食管裂孔疝患者改善更为显著(P<0.01,<0.01,<0.01)。

结论

LNF主要通过延长腹腔内食管长度,增强下食管括约压力,增强食管的廓清功能,从而到达有效的抗反流作用。其中合并食管裂孔疝的患者较无食管裂孔疝患者术后上述食管动力学改善更为显著。

Objective

To compare the esophageal dynamic changes before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by high resolution manometry (HRM) and to explore the anti-reflux mechanism of the procedure.

Methods

A total of 73 consecutive hospitalized patients with GERD were included. A series of preoperative evaluations including HRM were performed within 1 weeks before LNF. After the GERD symptoms were significantly relieved and dysphagia and other complications disappeared, the HRM was rechecked. The 9 esophageal motility parameters of the HRM before and after operation were compared and analyzed, and further analysis was made on whether or not there were hiatus hernia before the operation.

Results

The average length of esophagus was prolonged by (0.43±1.72) cm after operation, and the length of intra-abdominal and lower esophageal sphincter was prolonged by (1.20±0.94) cm. Postoperative resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter increased by an average of (5.99±7.79) mmHg and the integrated relaxation pressure increased by (3.41±5.43) mmHg. The distal contractile integral increased by an average of (157.26±596.01) mmHg?s?cm, the distal latency increased by an average of (0.93±2.30) s, the above 6 motility parameters compared with preoperative had significant difference (P=0.04, <0.01, <0.01, <0.01, 0.03, <0.01). There were no significant differences in the length of the lower esophageal sphincter, the pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter and the contractile front velocity after operation (P=0.83, 0.43, 0.73). The length of the esophagus, the length of the lower esophageal sphincter, and the distal contractile integral were significantly improved in the patients with hiatal hernia comparing with those without hiatal hernia (P<0.01, <0.01, <0.01).

Conclusion

The effective anti-reflux effect is mainly achieved by prolonging the length of the intraperitoneal esophageal, enhancing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and enhancing the esophageal clearance function by LNF. Patients with esophageal hiatal hernia had better esophageal motility improvement than those without esophageal hiatal hernia.

图1 腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术
表1 73例胃食管反流病患者腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠手术前后食管高分辨率测压参数对比(±s
表2 H组与N组GERD患者LNF术前后HRM参数对比(±s
[1]
Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108(3): 308-328, quiz 329.
[2]
汪忠镐,胡志伟. 胃食管反流病及其食管外反流:一个常被忽视的重大公共卫生问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(1): 5-11.
[3]
胡志伟,吴继敏,汪忠镐. 胃食管反流病:知己知彼,百战不殆[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(1): 8-14.
[4]
Badillo R, Francis D. Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. World J Gastro Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 5(3): 105-112.
[5]
Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(11): 2647-2669.
[6]
胡志伟,汪忠镐,吴继敏, 等. 胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝及哮喘症状的腹腔镜外科治疗[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 396-402.
[7]
Khajanchee YS, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL, et al. Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2013, 26(1): 1-6.
[8]
Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015, 27(2): 160-174.
[9]
Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Schijven MP, et al. Long-term effects of anti-reflux surgery on the physiology of the esophagogastric junction[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(12): 3726-3732.
[10]
Savarino E, Gemignani L, Pohl D, et al. Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 34(4): 476-486.
[11]
Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, et al. Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux[J]. Gastroenterology, 2006, 130(2): 334-340.
[12]
Marjoux S, Roman S, Juget-Pietu F, et al. Impaired postoperative EGJ relaxation as a determinant of post laparoscopic fundoplication dysphagia: a study with high-resolution manometry before and after surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12): 3642-3649.
[13]
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Revisited[J]. Clinical Endosc, 2016, 49(5): 408-416.
[14]
Goyal RK, Cobb BW. Motility of the pharynx, esophagus and esophageal sphincters[M]// Johnson LR, ed. Physiology of the astrointestinal Tract. New York: Raven Press, 1981: 359-391.
[15]
Zhu GC, Gao X, Wang ZG, et al. Experimental study for the mechanism of gastroesophageal-reflux-associated asthma[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2014, 27(4): 318-324.
[16]
Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans[J]. Am J Physiol, 1990, 258(2 Pt 1): G173-178.
[17]
Wilson JA, Pryde A, Cecilia A, et al. Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 1989, 34(10): 1590-1599.
[18]
Nadaleto BF, Herbella FA, Pinna BR, et al. Upper esophageal sphincter motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease in the light of the high-resolution manometry[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(4): 1-5.
[19]
Wang Z, Hu Z, Wu J, et al. Insult of gastroesophageal reflux on airway: clinical significance of pharyngeal nozzle[J]. Front Med, 2014, 9(1): 117-122.
[20]
Lin Z, Roman S, Pandolfino JE, et al. Automated calculation of the distal contractile integral in esophageal pressure topography with a region-growing algorithm[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2012, 24(1): e4-10.
[21]
Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ, et al. High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107(11): 1647-1654.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要