切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 30 -33. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

负压引流在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后减少血清肿的临床应用
司仙科1, 李炜1, 杨佳华1, 郑侃1, 张计训1, 华蕾1,()   
  1. 1. 200062 上海中医药大学附属普陀医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-16 出版日期:2018-02-15
  • 通信作者: 华蕾
  • 基金资助:
    上海中医药大学附属普陀医院院级课题项目(2016122B)

Application of negative pressure drainage for reducing seroma after Transabdominal Preperitoneal

Xianke Si1, Wei Li1, Jiahua Yang1, Kan Zhen1, Jixun Zhang1, Lei Hua1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Putuo Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2017-11-16 Published:2018-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Lei Hua
  • About author:
    Corresponding auther: Hua Lei, Email:
引用本文:

司仙科, 李炜, 杨佳华, 郑侃, 张计训, 华蕾. 负压引流在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后减少血清肿的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 30-33.

Xianke Si, Wei Li, Jiahua Yang, Kan Zhen, Jixun Zhang, Lei Hua. Application of negative pressure drainage for reducing seroma after Transabdominal Preperitoneal[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 30-33.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)中放置负压引流管在减少术后血清肿发生的临床应用价值。

方法

将2016年2月至2017年2月,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院连续收治的68例成人单侧Ⅱ、Ⅲ型腹股沟斜疝患者随机分为2组,均接受TAPP术。其中引流组38例,在关腹膜前将十字形负压引流管放置于疝补片与腹膜之间,引流管从同侧戳卡孔引出接负压吸球。对照组30例,未放置负压引流。将2组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、术后血清肿发生率进行比较。

结果

68例患者均顺利出院,引流组平均手术时间较对照组长[(52.50±12.06)min比(48.83±15.23)min],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。引流组术后平均住院时间较对照组长[(3.29±0.98)d比(1.93±0.69)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。引流组血清肿发生率明显低于对照组[2.6%(1/38)比26.7%(8/30)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

负压引流可观察术后积液或出血情况,降低血清肿发生;负压管还可有效减少死腔,防止补片移动。十字形负压引流无侧孔洞,引流效果佳,不易堵塞,拔除便捷,不易使补片移位。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure drainage for reducing seroma after transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP).

Methods

From Feb.2016 to Feb.2017, 68 consecutive adult patients with unilateral indirect inguinal hernia in Putuo Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM were randomly divided into two groups and underwent TAPP.38 cases in the drainage group had a cross-type negative pressure drainage tube placed between the mesh and peritoneum before suturing peritoneum, while 30 cases in the control group without any drainage tube. The operative time, hospital stays and the incidence rate of seroma between the two groups were compared.

Results

All 68 patients had smooth recovery. Compared with the control group, the drainage group had a longer average operative time (52.50±12.6 min vs. 48.83±15.23 min; P>0.05), but this result was not statistically significant, and also had a longer hospital stays after operation (3.29±0.98 day vs. 1.93±0.69 day; P<0.05), the result was statistically significant. Incidence of seroma in drainage group was obviously lower than that in the control group (1/38, 2.6% vs. 8/30, 26.7%; P<0.05), the result was significantly different.

Conclusion

Negative pressure drainage is helpful to observe fluid collection and bleeding after surgery, and to reduce the incidence of seroma. In addition, the negative pressure drainage tube can reduce dead space and prevent the migration of the mesh. The cross-type negative pressure drainage tube has no side holes with better drainage effect and is not easy to be blocked. The removal of drainage tube is convenient, and not easy to cause mesh migration.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较(±s
图1 腹膜另打孔引出负压引流管
图2 缝合关闭腹膜
图3 引流管从同侧Trocar孔引出
[1]
李健文,王明刚,唐健雄, 等. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J], 中国实用外科杂志, 2013, 33(7): 566-570.
[2]
Souba WW. Laparoscopic hernia repair[M]. In: ACS surgery principles practice. WebMD professional Publishing, Inc. 2005.
[3]
Birch DW. Characterizing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair[J]. Can J Surg, 2007, 50(3): 195-201.
[4]
姚胜,李基业. B超检查诊断腹壁疝无张力修补术后积液[J], 外科理论与实践, 2009, 14(2): 215-216.
[5]
Muysoms F,Campanelli G,Champault GG, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 239-250.
[6]
李文君,夏鑫,孙喜太, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的探讨[J/CD], 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(6): 473-475.
[7]
曾玉剑,孙亮,施承民, 等. 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术618例[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 409-411
[8]
Novik B,Hagedorn S,Mork UB, et al. Fibrin glue for securing the mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a study with a 40-month prospective follow-up period[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(3): 462-467.
[9]
王明刚,陈杰,申英末, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中疝固定器与医用胶固定补片的疗效研究[J]. 北京医学, 2010, 32(7): 528-530.
[10]
Honigmann P,Fischer H,Kurmann A, et al. Investigating the effect of intra-operative infiltration with local anaesthesia on the development of chronic postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair, a randomized placebo controlled triple blinded and group sequential study design[J]. BMC Surg, 2007, 7: 22.
[11]
Hollinsky C,Sandberg S,Koch T, et al. Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(12): 2679-2685.
[12]
吴日钊,隋梁,李亮, 开放式双侧腹股沟疝腹膜前修补术防治血清肿的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(8): 282-288.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[13] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[14] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[15] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?