切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 399 -404. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.04.009

论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术用于老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析
王英1, 尤理想2, 郑成1,(), 吴石兵3   
  1. 1222000 江苏省中医院连云港医院急诊医学科
    2222000 江苏省中医院连云港医院普外科
    3222000 江苏省中医院连云港医院烧伤外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-23 出版日期:2026-08-18
  • 通信作者: 郑成
  • 基金资助:
    2023年市卫生健康面上科技项目(202319)

Efficacy and safety analysis of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in elderly patients with acute incarcerated inguinal hernia

Ying Wang1, Lixiang You2, Cheng Zheng1,(), Shibing Wu3   

  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Lianyungang Hospital, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China;
    2Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Lianyungang Hospital, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China;
    3Department of Burn Surgery, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Lianyungang Hospital, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-12-23 Published:2026-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Cheng Zheng
引用本文:

王英, 尤理想, 郑成, 吴石兵. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术用于老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 399-404.

Ying Wang, Lixiang You, Cheng Zheng, Shibing Wu. Efficacy and safety analysis of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in elderly patients with acute incarcerated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 399-404.

目的

探究腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究为回顾性临床对照研究。纳入2022年4月至2025年6月,江苏省中医院连云港医院急诊医学科收治的老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者80例。由主管医师根据临床情况综合判断决定患者的手术方式并获得患者知情同意。依据手术方式将患者分为对照组(传统开放无张力疝修补术,n=38)和试验组(TAPP,n=42)。比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后早期疼痛评分、应激指标、胃肠功能恢复情况、肠黏膜屏障功能指标以及并发症发生情况。

结果

2组患者均顺利完成手术及3个月随访,无脱落病例。试验组手术时间、术后首次下床活动时间及术后住院时间均较对照组更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d、1周、3个月,试验组疼痛视觉模拟评分法评分较对照组更低,差异有统计学意义(F=0.816,P=0.041);术后1 d,2组患者的P物质、神经肽Y水平较术前均明显下降,且试验组均更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组术后首次排便时间、肠鸣音恢复时间均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d,2组患者肾上腺素、皮质醇、血清丙二醛水平均明显升高,但试验组均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1 d,2组患者二胺氧化酶水平、血清D-乳酸水平均明显降低,且试验组均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组均无不全性肠梗阻及疝复发病例。试验组总并发症发生率11.90%(5/42)与对照组7.89%(3/38)比较,差异无统计学意义(Fisher精确检验,P=0.715)。

结论

TAPP治疗老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝在减轻术后早期疼痛与应激、促进胃肠功能恢复方面优于传统开放手术,且安全性相当。

Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) in the treatment of elderly patients with acute incarcerated inguinal hernia.

Methods

This retrospective controlled clinical study included 80 elderly patients with acute incarcerated inguinal hernia who were admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine, Lianyungang Hospital of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from April 2022 to June 2025. The surgical approach was determined by the physician in charge based on a comprehensive assessment of each patient's clinical condition, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. According to the surgical approach, the patients were divided into the control group, which underwent conventional open tension-free hernia repair (n=38), and the experimental group, which underwent TAPP (n=42). Surgical-related indicators, early postoperative pain scores, stress indicators, gastrointestinal function recovery, intestinal mucosal barrier function indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

Both groups of patients successfully underwent surgery and completed the 3-month follow-up and no drop-out cases were found. The operation time, the time of the first postoperative ambulation, and the postoperative hospital stay in the experimental group were all shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The visual analogue scale scores for pain in the experimental group on the 1st day, 1st week, and 3rd month after surgery were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (F=0.816, P=0.041). On the 1st day after surgery, the levels of substance P and neuropeptide Y in both groups decreased significantly compared to those before the operation, and the levels in the experimental group were lower, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The first defecation time and the recovery time of bowel sounds in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The levels of epinephrine, cortisol, and serum malondialdehyde in both groups significantly increased on the 1st day after surgery, but the levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The levels of diamine oxidase and serum D-lactic acid in both groups significantly decreased on the 1st day after surgery, and the levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There were no cases of partial intestinal obstruction or recurrence of hernia in both groups. The complication and recurrence rates between groups were 11.90% (5/42) and 7.89% (3/38), there was no statistically significant difference (Fisher's exact test, P=0.715).

Conclusion

Compared with conventional open surgery, TAPP is superior in alleviating early postoperative pain and stress response and promoting gastrointestinal function recovery in elderly patients with acute incarcerated inguinal hernia, while providing comparable safety.

表1 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者一般资料比较
表2 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者VAS疼痛评分与疼痛介质指标比较(±s
表4 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者胃肠功能恢复情况(h,±s
表5 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者氧化应激因子指标(±s
表6 2组老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术患者肠黏膜屏障功能指标比较(±s
[1]
李绍杰, 李绍春, 苏远涛, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝急诊手术术式选择及疗效分析(附单中心10年497例报告)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 688-691.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 唐健雄, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝腹腔镜诊治流程中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(7): 721-729.
[3]
翁山耕, 陈易平, 刘国忠, 等. 腹股沟疝急诊手术治疗原则[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 671-675.
[4]
曾冬竹, 石彦, 余佩武, 等. 成人腹股沟疝腹腔镜修补术512例[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2012, 27(3): 200-203.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[6]
刘吉平, 张国胜, 高志伟. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补联合腹股沟小切口治疗特殊类型腹股沟疝[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 22(7): 599-602.
[7]
Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdiscectomy[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2022, 2022: 5337483.
[8]
屈振武, 赵永奎, 郭志伟. 基于倾向性评分匹配对比不同年龄分层中TAPP治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2025, 45(2): 330-333.
[9]
梁宗超. TAPP治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(1): 246-248.
[10]
俞瑞东, 杨荣铎, 李绍春, 等. 85岁及以上患者腹股沟疝手术方式选择及疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2025, 40(9): 686-690.
[11]
仝聪, 陈曦, 周哲琦, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与Lichtenstein手术对腹股沟疝患者术后早期疼痛和行动力的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1530-1537.
[12]
王桐生, 丁磊, 赵爱民, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 118-121.
[13]
Eminoglu L. Is TAPP the right alternative for patients undergoing emergency surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia?[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2024, 30(2): 97-100.
[14]
Ashrafi A, Kabiri A, Zadeh BS, et al. Comparison of postoperative short-term complications and recurrence after one year between laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal(TAPP)and lichtenstein tension free repair on the treatment of primary unilateral inguinal hernia[J]. World J Plast Surg, 2024, 13(3): 87-91.
[15]
缪传文, 陈德键. 日间手术模式下腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化实践及与开放手术对比分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(5): 582-585.
[16]
Deeba S, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P, et al. Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias[J]. JSLS, 2008, 13(3): 327-331.
[17]
Takayama Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(2): 156-162.
[18]
Xie HY, Chen B, Shen J, et al. Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Surg, 2024, 24(1): 274.
[19]
Marzoug OA, Anees A, Malik EM. Assessment of risk factors associated with surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol, 2023, 5(1): e000182.
[20]
韩曲, 曾慧, 汪艮亮, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜前放置引流管减轻血清肿形成的Meta分析[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2023, 63(6): 27-32, 38.
[1] 高嘉敏, 韩俊毅. 老年胃肠癌患者多模式预康复:异质性挑战与分类管理策略[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 192-199.
[2] 葛杨洋, 姚尚龙. 多模式镇痛在加速康复外科中的应用现状[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 212-216.
[3] 王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明. α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.
[4] 程正武, 李浩然, 奚士航, 王俊峰. 后鞘后入路单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外补片修补术治疗腹股沟疝[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 394-398.
[5] 李文婷, 黄欢. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 296-300.
[6] 郑宇, 邱少凡, 宋春义, 张翔宇, 王佳, 马少卫. 不同腹腔镜手术对老年男性复发性腹股沟疝的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 307-312.
[7] 陈康, 王光远, 苟天相, 刘勇, 瞿涛. 生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 313-317.
[8] 段飞, 杨尚, 毕旭东, 董永明, 赵琴, 张金柱. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与经腹股沟腹膜前修补术对单侧腹股沟疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 318-323.
[9] 华志鹏, 黄菏, 张维, 骆成林, 苏宁, 洪琼, 张宏文. 弓状线入路单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 324-328.
[10] 阴明, 唐翔宇, 李居剑, 赵铁彦. 完全腹膜外、经腹腹膜前与Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术的临床结局比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 329-333.
[11] 张鹏, 舒芳, 肖赟, 吴书清, 钟斌. 针式抓钳辅助单孔腹腔镜在治疗小儿腹股沟嵌顿斜疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-340.
[12] 部凡迪, 邹振玉, 刘雨辰, 曹金鑫, 邢晓伟, 蒋凤茹, 崔洁, 王明刚. 新型疝穿戴装置对腹股沟疝修补术后早期预后影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 341-345.
[13] 张嘉木, 王万垠, 周落亮, 陈扬帆, 蔡文华, 郭亮. THA手术时机选择对老年股骨颈骨折患者结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 159-165.
[14] 刘改梅, 朱彦东, 舒庆. 地舒单抗注射液联合碳酸钙D3片对老年股骨转子间骨折髓内针内固定术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 166-172.
[15] 魏立国, 翟浩宇, 张英立. 瑞芬太尼联合咪达唑仑静脉麻醉对内镜黏膜下剥离术及内镜下黏膜切除术操作的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 268-273.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?