切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 116 -120. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.01.023

论著

综合性优质护理对老年腹股沟疝患者干预效果分析
王毅香1, 尹芳芳1,(), 燕燕1   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,中国人民解放军总医院第二医学中心综合外科二病区,国家老年疾病临床研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-26 出版日期:2024-02-18
  • 通信作者: 尹芳芳

Analysis of intervention effect in elderly patients with inguinal hernia using comprehensive high-quality nursing

Yixiang Wang1, Fangfang Yin1,(), Yan Yan1   

  1. 1. Ward II, Surgery Department, Second Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, 100853, China
  • Received:2023-01-26 Published:2024-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Fangfang Yin
引用本文:

王毅香, 尹芳芳, 燕燕. 综合性优质护理对老年腹股沟疝患者干预效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 116-120.

Yixiang Wang, Fangfang Yin, Yan Yan. Analysis of intervention effect in elderly patients with inguinal hernia using comprehensive high-quality nursing[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 116-120.

目的

探究综合性优质护理对老年腹股沟疝患者的临床护理效果。

方法

选取2021年3月至2023年3月中国人民解放军总医院第二医学中心收治的86例老年腹股沟疝患者,以随机数表法分为对照组(n=43)与研究组(n=43),给予对照组常规护理,研究组则在其基础上予以综合性优质护理。比较2组患者术后康复情况、焦虑量表(SAS)评分、抑郁量表(SDS)评分、综合舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分、护理满意度,并统计2组并发症发生情况。

结果

研究组患者下床活动、排气及住院时间均少于对照组(P<0.05)。术前1 d、出院时研究组患者SAS评分与SDS评分均较对照组低(P<0.05)。研究组患者的环境、生理、心理及社会文化等各项GCQ评分均较对照组高(P<0.05);研究组患者对护理内容与护理责任心的满意度均较对照组高(P<0.05)。研究组患者并发症总发生率为2.33%,低于对照组的18.60%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

综合性优质护理可以促进老年腹股沟疝患者术后康复,改善患者心理状态,有助于提高患者舒适度与满意度,降低术后并发症发生风险。

Objective

To investigate the clinical nursing effect of comprehensive high-quality nursing in elderly patients with inguinal hernia.

Methods

A total of 86 elderly patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Second Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from March 2021 to March 2023 were selected and randomly divided into the study group (n=43) and the control group (n=43). The control group was given routine nursing, while the study group was given comprehensive high-quality nursing on this basis. The two groups were compared on postoperative rehabilitation, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score, General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) score and nursing satisfaction. The incidence rates of complications in both groups were calculated.

Results

The time to get out of bed, exhaust time and length of hospital stay in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The SAS scores and SDS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group on the day before surgery and at discharge (P<0.05). The GCQ scores of the study group in terms of environment, physiology, psychology and social culture were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, patients in the study group were more satisfied with nursing content and nursing responsibility (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the study group was 2.33%, lower than 18.60% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Comprehensive high-quality nursing can promote postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients with inguinal hernia, improve their psychological states, comfort level and satisfaction, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者术后恢复情况比较(±s
表3 2组患者心理状态比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者综合舒适状况量表评分比较(±s
表5 2组患者护理满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
王海波, 何大勇. 老年腹股沟疝患者微创修补术后复发的影响因素分析及预防建议[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2023, 26(2): 131-135.
[2]
Soma T, Fukuda S, Matsuyama Y, et al. Peritoneal closure and the processus vaginalis transection method to prevent inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2023, 30(6): 532-538.
[3]
Spivak J, Chan PH, Prentice HA, et al. Mesh-based inguinal hernia repairs in an integrated healthcare system and surgeon and hospital volume: a cohort study of 110, 808 patients from over a decade[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(5): 1209-1223.
[4]
汪峰, 谢俊华, 何中文. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对老年腹股沟疝患者呼吸功能、促胃动素的影响[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2023, 46(12): 1112-1116.
[5]
刘文云. 双环节协同护理模式对腹股沟疝患者术后康复及护理工作满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(13): 2416-2418.
[6]
杨海利, 闫春梅. 快速康复外科护理对无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝患者满意度的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2023, 47(1): 135-136.
[7]
张静, 孟华, 耿元元. 优质护理干预在脊柱骨折伴脊髓损伤患者中的应用[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2022, 51(21): 2504-2506.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 浙江医学, 2014, (15): 1285-1287.
[9]
任杰, 黄博. 老年腹股沟疝特点及手术方式研究进展[J]. 安徽医药, 2022, 26(9): 1697-1701.
[10]
邱欣国, 崔喆. 轻量立体3D补片对腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝病人并发症、疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1068-1071.
[11]
丁鹂, 寿宇雁. 奥马哈系统结合压力管理对心肌梗死患者介入治疗中Barthel指数、舒适度评分及GQOLI-74评分的影响[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2021, 16(10): 1160-1162, 1166.
[12]
Fafaj A, Lo Menzo E, Alaedeen D, et al. Effect of Intraoperative Urinary Catheter Use on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(8): 667-674.
[13]
邓先锐, 宋应寒, 杨春, 等. 老年男性腹股沟疝与肌肉质量、肌力及腹内压的相关性[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2023, 23(15): 2951-2955.
[14]
侯军辉, 梅勇. 老年腹股沟疝治疗中采取腹股沟疝无张力修补术对减少并发症的价值研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(16): 2822-2824.
[15]
阮召杰, 夏悦明, 李翰城. 两种腔镜腹股沟疝手术对老年患者呼吸功能的影响及疗效分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(12): 926-928, 943.
[16]
朱立军, 戴旭东, 庄海文, 等. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗单侧腹股沟斜疝的临床效果[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(9): 659-662.
[17]
胡明超, 王强, 俞文渊, 等. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术中腹股沟疝囊处理方式对术后并发症的影响分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2021, 26(4): 288-290, 298.
[18]
杨璐, 卞伶玲, 杨雨佳. 补偿差异化需求供给法在老年腹股沟疝修补术患者中的应用分析[J]. 河北医药, 2021, 43(16): 2518-2520, 2525.
[19]
王玲玲, 刘立新. 综合性优质护理在老年腹股沟疝围手术期中的价值探究[J]. 生命科学仪器, 2022, 20(z1): 180, 182.
[20]
胥方琴, 徐俊马, 韩姝, 等. 运动康复疗法在老年肌少症患者临床治疗中的应用进展[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2023, 22(3): 232-235.
[21]
Lorenzo IL, Tonelli CM, Bunn C, et al. Supervised independence in elective inguinal hernia repairs performed by surgical residents is not associated with compromised short clinical outcome or rates of reoperation for recurrence[J]. Am J Surg, 2022, 223(3): 470-474.
[1] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[2] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[10] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[11] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[12] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[13] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[14] 邓杨, 彭豪, 刘剑文. 腹腔镜疝修补术腹膜前负压引流的效果和长期安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 402-405.
[15] 邱志东, 张杰, 薛鹏, 郑玲玲, 杨建桃, 赵海军, 陈双. 补片固定与否对腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术后患者并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-409.
阅读次数
全文


摘要