切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 396 -401. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.04.007

论著

前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析
陈钊1, 钟克力2,†(), 江志鹏2, 傅宇翔2, 范宝航1, 吴文飞1   
  1. 1. 518020　深圳，暨南大学第二临床医学院
    2. 518020　暨南大学医学院第二临床医学院　南方科技大学医学院附属第一医院　深圳市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-13 出版日期:2024-08-18
  • 通信作者: 钟克力
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市医学重点学科建设经费(SZXK015)

Analysis of incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery

Zhao Chen1, Keli Zhong2,†(), Zhipeng Jiang2, Yuxiang Fu2, Baohang Fan1, Wenfei Wu1   

  1. 1. Jinan University Second Clinical Medical College, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Gastroenterology Department, Jinan University Second Clinical Medical College, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2024-06-13 Published:2024-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Keli Zhong
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.

Zhao Chen, Keli Zhong, Zhipeng Jiang, Yuxiang Fu, Baohang Fan, Wenfei Wu. Analysis of incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.

目的

探讨前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝（PIH）的发生率和危险因素。

方法

采用回顾性病例对照研究方法，分析深圳市人民医院2018年1月至2022年12月共260例因诊断前列腺癌行前列腺根治切除术患者的临床资料，根据术后随访是否发现并发腹股沟疝分为PIH组和非PIH组。观察2组患者基本特征、肿瘤相关指标、手术相关指标，包括年龄、体重指数、是否有下腹手术史、术前1个月内前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）结果，国际泌尿病理学会（ISUP）分级、前列腺根治术标本大小、前列腺癌病理T分期（pT）、是否术前内分泌治疗、手术时长、术中出血量、手术方式、手术入路、是否行淋巴结清扫等情况。

结果

PIH组平均年龄明显高于非PIH组[（70.48±4.47）岁比（66.31±7.75）岁]，差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。PIH组平均体重、体重指数显著低于非PIH组[（62.71±8.84）kg比（68.60±9.82）kg，（22.46±2.71）kg/m2比（24.35±2.97）kg/m2]，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.001）。行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术（LRP）患者的PIH发生率高于机器人辅助下腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术（RARP）（15.6%比7.6%），行盆腔淋巴结清扫术的患者PIH发生率高于未行该术者（14.9%比5.9%），差异均有统计学意义（χ2=3.97，P=0.046；χ2=4.39，P=0.036）。经腹腔入路PIH发生率明显低于腹膜外入路（8.1%比17.1%），差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.98，P=0.026）。2组身高、既往下腹手术史率、术前1个月PSA、pT、根治术标本体积、ISUP分级、术前内分泌治疗率、手术时间、手术出血量差异无统计学意义。根治性前列腺切除术术后1、2、3年累计发生率分别为7.7%、11.4%、13.4%。高龄、低体重指数对PIH发展的影响有统计学意义（HR=1.064，95% CI 1.010～1.120，P=0.020；HR=0.842，95% CI 0.743～0.953，P=0.007），手术方式、盆腔淋巴结清扫、手术时间等其他变量对PIH发展的影响无统计学意义。

结论

高龄、低体重指数是前列腺癌术后并发腹股沟疝的高危因素。

关键词: 前列腺癌, 疝，腹股沟, 危险因素
Objective

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative inguinal hernia (PIH) after prostate cancer surgery.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 260 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Shenzhen People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into the PIH group and the non-PIH group, according to whether they were found to have concomitant inguinal hernia in the postoperative follow-up. The basic characteristics, tumor-related indexes, and surgery-related indexes of the patients in the two groups were observed, including age, body mass index (BMI), history of previous lower abdominal surgery, prostate specific antigen (PSA) results within one month before surgery, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, size of the radical prostatectomy specimen, pathological T-stage (pT) of prostate cancer, whether preoperative endocrine therapy, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, surgical method, surgical approaches, and whether lymph node dissection was performed.

Results

The mean age of the PIH group was significantly higher than that of the non-PIH group (70.48±4.47 years vs. 66.31±7.75 years), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The mean weight and BMI of the PIH group were significantly lower than those of the non-PIH group (62.71±8.84 kg vs. 68.60±9.82 kg, 22.46±2.71 kg/m2 vs. 24.35±2.97 kg/m2), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The incidence of PIH in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), pelvic lymph node dissection was higher than that in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) (15.6% vs. 7.6%), non-pelvic lymph node dissection (14.9% vs. 5.9%). The differences were statistically significant (χ2=3.97, P=0.046; χ2=4.39, P=0.036). Conversely, the incidence of PIH was significantly lower in the transperitoneal approach than in the extraperitoneal approach (8.1% vs. 17.1%), with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.98, P=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of height, previous history of lower abdominal surgery, one-month preoperative PSA, pT, volume of radical specimen, ISUP grade, rate of preoperative endocrine therapy, operative time, or operative bleeding. The cumulative incidence of PIH 1, 2, and 3 years after radical prostatectomy was 7.7%, 11.4%, 13.4%, respectively. A statistically significant effect of advanced age and low BMI on the development of PIH was observed (HR=1.064, 95% CI 1.010-1.120, P=0.020; HR=0.842, 95% CI 0.743-0.953, P=0.007). Surgical procedure, pelvic lymph node dissection, duration of surgery and other variables had no statistical significance on the development of PIH.

Conclusion

Advanced age and low BMI were identified as risk factors for the development of inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery.

Key words: Prostate cancer, Inguinal hernia, Risk factors
表1 2组前列腺癌患者的基本特征、肿瘤相关指标、手术相关指标比较
影响因素 非PIH组(n=229) PIH组(n=31) t/χ2/Z值 P值
基本特征        
年龄(岁,±s) 66.31±7.75 70.48±4.47 -4.38 <0.001
体重(kg,±s) 68.60±9.82 62.71±8.84 3.17 0.001
身高(m,±s) 1.68±0.06 1.70±0.06 0.70 0.485
体重指数(kg/m2,±s) 24.35±2.97 22.46±2.71 3.35 <0.001
既往下腹手术史[例(%)] 36(15.7) 7(22.6) 0.93① 0.335
肿瘤相关指标        
前列腺特异性抗原[ng/ml,M(P25～P75)] 8.37(4.79,15.74) 11.26(7.59,19.2) -1.50② 0.133
病理T分期[例(%)]        
1 4(1.5) 0(0.0)    
2 159(61.2) 23(8.8)    
3 55(21.1) 8(3.1)    
4 0(0.0) 0(0.0) -0.23② 0.821
\* 11(4.2) 0(0.0)    
根治术标本体积[cm3,M(P25～P75)] 70.0(47.3,96.0) 61.5(44.8,91.0) -0.48② 0.630
国际泌尿病理学会分级[例(%)]        
1 35(13.5) 3(1.2)    
2 71(27.3) 10(3.8)    
3 50(19.2) 7(2.7)    
4 19( 7.3) 3(1.2)    
5 28(10.8) 6(2.3) -1.11② 0.269
\** 26(10.0) 2(0.8)    
术前内分泌治疗[例(%)] 34(13.1) 3(1.2) 0.25① 0.618
手术相关指标        
手术时间(min,±s) 303.05±89.30 291.84±72.64 0.67 0.504
手术出血量[ml,M(P25～P75)] 100(50,100) 100(100,200) -1.85 0.064
表2 前列腺癌患者采用不同手术处理方法术后腹股沟疝发生率的比较[例（%）]
手术处理方法 例数 术后腹股沟疝 χ2值 P值
手术方式     3.97 0.046
LRP 141 22(15.6)    
RARP 119 9(7.6)    
手术入路     4.98 0.026
经腹腔入路 149 12(8.1)    
腹膜外入路 111 19(17.1)    
盆腔淋巴结清扫     4.39 0.036
有 175 26(14.9)    
无 85 5(5.9)    
图1 前列腺癌根治术后患者无腹股沟疝生存率K-M曲线
图2 不同年龄层次的前列腺癌根治术后患者无腹股沟疝生存率K-M曲线
图3 不同体重指数的前列腺癌根治术后患者无腹股沟疝生存率K-M曲线
表3 术后腹股沟疝的危险因素Cox回归分析
因素 单因素 多因素(全模型) 多因素(简化模型)
HR(95% CI) P HR(95% CI) P HR(95% CI) P
年龄(岁,±s) 1.068(1.022~1.117) 0.005 1.068(1.010~1.130) 0.022 1.064(1.010~1.120) 0.020
体重指数(kg/m2,±s) 0.814(0.720~0.921) 0.001 0.833(0.733~0.946) 0.005 0.842(0.743~0.953) 0.007
既往下腹手术史[例(%)] 1.452(0.625~3.369) 0.380 1.012(0.412~2.484) 0.980    
术前PSA[ng/ml, M(P25～P75)] 1.001(0.986~1.017) 0.910 0.996(0.975~1.017) 0.700    
病理T分期≥3比≤2 [例(%)] 1.063(0.476~2.378) 0.881 0.874(0.348~2.196) 0.775    
根治术标本体积[cm3,M(P25～P75)] 0.997(0.989~1.006) 0.540 0.997(0.987~1.007) 0.555    
国际泌尿病理学会分级≥4比≤3 [例(%)] 1.391(0.633~3.056) 0.412 1.511(0.636~3.591) 0.350    
手术时间(min,±s) 0.998(0.994~1.003) 0.456 0.997(0.992~1.003) 0.289    
手术方式(LRP比RARP) [例（%）] 0.524(0.241~1.142) 0.104 1.237(0.474~3.230) 0.664    
手术出血量[ml, M(P25～P75)] 1.001(0.999~1.002) 0.370 1.002(1.000~1.004) 0.131    
盆腔淋巴结清扫[例(%)] 2.468(.0947~6.431) 0.640 3.780(1.074~13.305) 0.038 2.522(0.963~6.603) 0.060
术前内分泌治疗[例(%)] 0.653(0.198~2.147) 0.483 0.592(0.068~5.167) 0.636    
[1]
邢念增. 中国前列腺癌规范诊疗质量控制指标(2022版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2022, 44(10): 1011-1016.
[2]
中国抗癌协会泌尿男生殖系肿瘤专业委员会微创学组. 中国前列腺癌外科治疗专家共识[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(10): 721-724.
[3]
Fernando H, Garcia C, Hossack T, et al. Incidence, Predictive Factors and Preventive Measures for Inguinal Hernia following Robotic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review[J]. J Urology, 2019, 201(6): 1072-1079.
[4]
Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, et al. Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. Urology, 1996, 47(4): 536-537.
[5]
唐健雄, 黄磊, 李绍杰, 等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1): 15-19.
[6]
Rasmus A, Dennis Z, Jacob R. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Urol, 2020, 203(2): 265-274.
[7]
Liu L, Xu H, Qi F, et al. Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia occurred after radical prostatectomy-comparisons of different approaches[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1): 218.
[8]
Xiang AP, Shen YF, Shen XF, et al. Correlation between the incidence of inguinal hernia and risk factors after radical prostatic cancer surgery: a case control study[J]. BMC Urol, 2024, 24(1): 131.
[9]
Yoshimine S, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, et al. Extraperitoneal approach induces postoperative inguinal hernia compared with transperitoneal approach after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2010, 40(4): 349-352.
[10]
Koie T, Yoneyama T, Kamimura N, et al. Frequency of postoperative inguinal hernia after endoscope-assisted mini-laparotomy and conventional retropubic radical prostatectomies[J]. Int J Urol, 2008, 15(3): 226-229.
[11]
Shimbo M, Endo F, Matsushita K, et al. Incidence, risk factors and a novel prevention technique for inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Urol Int, 2017, 98: 54-60.
[12]
Matsubara A, Yoneda T, Nakamoto T, et al. Inguinal Hernia After Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: Comparison with the Retropubic Approach[J]. Urology, 2007, 70(6): 1152-1156.
[13]
Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Santok GDR, et al. Anatomical Retzius-space preservation is associated with lower incidence of postoperative inguinal hernia development after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(4): 555-561.
[14]
Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(13): 3050.
[15]
Chen H, Ting H, Kao C, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may induce inguinal hernia within the first 2 years[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(37): e12208.
[16]
Umeda K, Takeda T, Hakozaki K, et al. A low subcutaneous fat mass is a risk factor for the development of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(7): 3107-3112.
[17]
De Goede B, Timmermans L, Van Kempen BJH, et al. Risk factors for inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men: Results from the Rotterdam Study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(3): 540-546.
[18]
Kaiho Y, Mitsuzuka K, Yamada S, et al. Urinary straining contributes to inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2016, 23(6): 478-483.
[19]
Shikuma H, Mochizuki H, Nomura N, et al. Postoperative Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Prevention Technique Using Spermatic Cord Isolation[J]. Hinyokika Kiyo, 2021, 67(3): 91-95.
[20]
Toide M, Ebara S, Tatenuma T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan(the MSUG94 group)[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 38.
[21]
Soma T, Fukuda S, Matsuyama Y, et al. Peritoneal closure and the processus vaginalis transection method to prevent inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2023, 30(6): 532-538.
[22]
赫捷, 陈万青, 李霓, 等. 中国前列腺癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2022, 31(1): 30.
[1] 杨倩, 李秋洋, 李楠, 罗渝昆, 唐杰. 基于超声纹理影像转录组学预测前列腺癌[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(03): 319-326.
[2] 郑爽, 张昕彤, 陈晨, 王思凡, 燕晓翔, 王长青, 胡雅娟. 神经重症患者气管插管拔除失败的风险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 211-218.
[3] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[4] 李国煜, 丛赟, 祖丽胡马尔·麦麦提艾力, 何铁英. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[5] 黄海, 邓艳庆, 张培杰, 周学鲁. 手术解剖层面转换在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用体会：附视频[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 216-219.
[6] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[7] 丁关棣, 黄云, 曹震, 刘刚. 胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测：基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.
[8] 黄俊龙, 刘柏隆, 罗瑞翔, 李晓阳, 李文双, 柳政, 陈嘉良, 周祥福. 联合盆底彩超数据和临床资料探讨压力性尿失禁的危险因素[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-330.
[9] 江杰, 沈城, 潘永昇, 陈新风, 刘振民, 朱华, 郑兵. 尿酸结石的危险因素分析及双能量CT特征研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 361-365.
[10] 刘中文, 刘畅, 高洋, 刘东, 林世庆, 杨建华, 赵福义. 尿液microRNA-326与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 386-391.
[11] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[12] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[13] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[14] 冀旭, 朱峰, 冯业晨. 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 509-514.
[15] 吴宏彬, 陶晓刚, 田润发, 王翀昊, 吴量, 刘伟明, 高国一, 刘佰运. 颅骨修补术后硬膜外积血/积液的危险因素分析及防治措施[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 141-146.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号