切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 155 -159. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.02.008

临床论著

开放式腹膜前间隙补片修补对腹股沟嵌顿或绞窄性疝的疗效
廖巧1,†(), 周新竹2   
  1. 1. 210306　上海市第六人民医院普外科
    2. 417599　湖南省冷江市人民医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-27 出版日期:2023-04-18
  • 通信作者: 廖巧
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金项目(18ZW1433500)

Effect of open preperitoneal space patch repair on incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia

Qiao Liao1,†(), Xinzhu Zhou2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 210306, China
    2. Department of Internal Medicine, People's Hospital of Lengjiang City, Hunan Province, Lengjiang 417599, China
  • Received:2022-10-27 Published:2023-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Qiao Liao
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

廖巧, 周新竹. 开放式腹膜前间隙补片修补对腹股沟嵌顿或绞窄性疝的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 155-159.

Qiao Liao, Xinzhu Zhou. Effect of open preperitoneal space patch repair on incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 155-159.

目的

探讨开放式腹膜前间隙补片修补术对腹股沟嵌顿或绞窄性疝的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月在上海市第六人民医院普外科接受腹股沟疝手术治疗的82例患者的资料。依据患者手术过程中是否采用补片修补进行分组：41例未使用补片修补的患者作为对照组，41例采用补片修补的患者作为观察组。对比2组手术相关指标（手术耗时、失血量、术后下床活动时间、总住院时间）、疼痛情况指标（视觉模拟评分法评估术后1、6、12 h及出院时的疼痛严重程度）、术后并发症指标（切口感染、阴囊水肿、伤口血肿、肺部感染、麻痹性肠梗阻）、术后半年的复发情况。

结果

2组患者的手术耗时、失血量、术后下床活动时间、总住院时间差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组患者术后1、6、12 h及出院时的疼痛严重程度差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组术后各类并发症差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后半年复发率观察组为0（0/41）低于对照组17.07%（7/41）（χ2=5.623，P<0.05）。

结论

在腹股沟嵌顿或绞窄性疝急诊手术采用开放式腹膜前间隙补片修补术，治疗效果良好，具有较好的安全性，可以防止疝复发。

关键词: 腹膜前间隙, 疝，腹股沟, 嵌顿疝, 绞窄性疝, 疝修补术
Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of open preperitoneal space patch repair on an incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia.

Methods

The data of 82 patients with inguinal hernias who underwent surgery in the Department of General Surgery of our Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into groups according to whether patch repair was used during the operation: 41 patients who did not use patch repair were in the control group, and 41 patients who used patch repair were in the observation group. The operation related indicators (operation time, blood loss, postoperative ambulation time, total hospital stay), pain indicators (1, 6, 12 h after operation, pain severity at discharge. Visual analogue scale), postoperative complications indicators (incision infection, scrotal edema, wound hematoma, lung infection, paralytic intestinal obstruction) and recurrence of half a year after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time, blood loss, postoperative ambulation time and total hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the severity of pain between the two groups at 1, 6, 12 h after operation and at discharge (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The recurrence rate of patients in the observation group half a year after operation was lower than that of patients in the control group [0 vs 17.07% (7/41)] (χ2=5.623, P<0.05).

Conclusion

In the emergency surgical treatment of patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias, the use of open preperitoneal patch repair can achieve good therapeutic effect, have good safety, and prevent the recurrence of the patient's condition.

Key words: Preperitoneal space, Hernia, inguinal, Incarcerated hernia, Strangulated hernia, Herniorrhaphy
表1 2组患者一般资料比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 性别 年龄(岁,±s) 体质量指数(kg/m2,±s) 病发后就诊时间(h,±s) 美国麻醉医师协会分级
男性 女性 Ⅰ Ⅱ
对照组 41 28(68.29) 13(31.71) 66.13±4.37 23.42±2.76 4.32±1.63 29(70.73) 12(29.27)
观察组 41 30(73.17) 11(26.83) 67.38±5.01 23.56±2.88 4.28±1.77 31(75.61) 10(24.39)
χ2/t值   0.236 -1.204 -0.225 0.106 0.248
P值   0.627 0.232 0.823 0.915 0.618
组别 例数 病变位置 嵌顿疝 绞窄性疝 疝分类 高血压 糖尿病 高血脂
左侧 右侧 斜疝 直疝 是 否 是 否 是 否
对照组 41 15(36.59) 26(63.41) 33(80.49) 8(19.51) 23(56.10) 18(43.90) 18(43.90) 23(56.10) 14(34.15) 27(65.85) 15(36.59) 26(63.41)
观察组 41 13(31.71) 28(68.29) 34(82.93) 7(17.07) 25(60.98) 16(39.02) 20(48.78) 21(51.22) 11(26.83) 30(73.17) 17(41.46) 24(58.54)
χ2值   0.217 0.082 0.201 0.196 0.518 0.901
P值   0.641 0.775 0.654 0.658 0.472 0.342
表2 2组患者手术情况相关指标（±s）
组别 例数 手术耗时(min) 失血量(ml) 术后下床活动时间(h) 总住院时间(d)
对照组 41 68.06±10.36 50.33±12.36 11.45±2.36 5.93±1.38
观察组 41 70.45±10.78 49.35±14.35 11.23±1.36 6.05±1.32
t值   -1.024 0.331 0.517 -0.402
P值   0.309 0.741 0.606 0.688
表3 2组患者术后不同时间疼痛视觉模拟评分（分，±s）
组别 例数 术后1 h 术后6 h 术后12 h 出院时
对照组 41 3.99±0.54 3.02±0.36 2.55±0.22 1.15±0.24
观察组 41 4.01±0.56 3.04±0.45 2.51±0.26 1.20±0.23
t值   -0.165 -0.222 0.752 -0.963
P值   0.870 0.825 0.454 0.338
表4 2组患者术后并发症情况[例（%）]
组别 例数 切口感染 阴囊水肿 伤口血肿 肺部感染 麻痹性肠梗阻 合计
对照组 41 1(2.44) 1(2.44) 1(2.44) 0 0 3(7.32)
观察组 41 1(2.44) 0 1(2.44) 1(2.44) 1(2.44) 4(9.76)
χ2值             0.000
P值             1.000
[1]
宫能银, 伍南斌. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和开放疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 591-594.
[2]
Tebala GD, Kola-Adejumo A, Yee J. Hernioscopy: a reliable method to explore the abdominal cavity in incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias spontaneously reduced after general anaesthesia[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(2): 403-406.
[3]
Yang Q, Gao Y. Incarcerated recurrent inguinal hernia as a cause of secondary torsion of the greater omentum: a rare case report and literature review[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(11): 5867-5872.
[4]
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for strangulated inguinal hernia[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2018, 11(2): 155-159.
[5]
Navaratne L, Ashrafian H, Martínez-Isla A. Quantifying tension in tension-free hiatal hernia repair: a new intra-operative technique[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(9): 3040-3049.
[6]
Qin C, Chen J, Shen Y. Individualized tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients[J]. Minerva Chir, 2019, 74(3): 275-276.
[7]
刘海军. 急性嵌顿绞窄性腹股沟疝患者应用无张力疝修补术的临床疗效与并发症分析[J]. 当代医学, 2016, 22(19): 73-74.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[9]
刘景平, 万智恒, 李瑞斌. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 485-488.
[10]
Chen F, Liu M, Jin C, et al. Tension-free mesh repair for incarcerated groin hernia: a comparative study[J]. Surg Innov, 2020, 27(4): 352-357.
[11]
刘俊杰. 轻量型补片与中量型补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版), 2022, 6(9): 44-46.
[12]
Martin MJ, Pakula AM. Minimally invasive approach to incarcerated or strangulated groin hernias: a 2018 EAST master class video presentation[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 85(1): 239-241.
[13]
Cai LZ, Foster D, Kethman WC, et al. Surgical site infections after inguinal hernia repairs performed in low and middle human development index countries: a systematic review[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2018, 19(1): 11-20.
[14]
Gossetti F, D'Amore L, Annesi E, et al. Mesh-related visceral complications following inguinal hernia repair: an emerging topic[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(4): 699-708.
[15]
AlMarzooqi R, Tish S, Huang LC, et al. Review of inguinal hernia repair techniques within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 429-438.
[16]
Kulacoglu H, Celasin H, Oztuna D. Individual mesh size for open anterior inguinal hernia repair: an anthropometric study in Turkish male patients[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(6): 1229-1235.
[17]
唐晓明, 吴胜, 李伟, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后并发肠粘连的危险因素探讨[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2021, 24(6): 489-491.
[18]
Arnold MR, Coakley KM, Fromke EJ, et al. Long-term assessment of surgical and quality-of-life outcomes between lightweight and standard(heavyweight) three-dimensional contoured mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surgery, 2019, 165(4): 820-824.
[19]
黄世华, 杜明, 牟云川, 等. 部分可吸收补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015(1): 43-45.
[20]
Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A, et al. Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal(R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(5): 827-836.
[21]
Na Y, Sun YH, Sun ZC, et al. Mesh erosion into sigmoid colon after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2017, 130(9): 1133-1134.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[15] 陈金水, 陈金福, 郑开福, 祝晓路, 王铁虎, 谭俊, 李正平. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗原发性耻骨上疝七例的临床体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 548-551.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号