切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 578 -582. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.05.020

临床论著

右美托咪定联合不同浓度罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用
吕鹏龙1, 张丹妮1,(), 郝春光1, 任玲1   
  1. 1. 0140160 内蒙古包头,内蒙古包钢医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-30 出版日期:2022-10-18
  • 通信作者: 张丹妮
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81560251)

Application of dexmedetomidine combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine local nerve block in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients

Penglong Lv1, Danni Zhang1,(), Chunguang Hao1, Ling Ren1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia, Baotou 0140160, China
  • Received:2022-05-30 Published:2022-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Danni Zhang
引用本文:

吕鹏龙, 张丹妮, 郝春光, 任玲. 右美托咪定联合不同浓度罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 578-582.

Penglong Lv, Danni Zhang, Chunguang Hao, Ling Ren. Application of dexmedetomidine combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine local nerve block in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 578-582.

目的

分析右美托咪定联合不同浓度罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用。

方法

2020年3月至2022年3月内蒙古包钢医院收治的老年腹股沟疝患者80例,采用随机数字表法分为A组与B组,各40例。2组均接受无张力疝修补术治疗,A组接受0.1%罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞联合右美托咪定静脉泵入麻醉,B组采用0.2%罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞联合右美托咪定静脉泵入麻醉,术后均观察7 d。分析2组不同时间点生命体征,术后2 h、24 h疼痛、镇静、运动及认知评分,术前、术后7 d 2组血清Tau蛋白、β-淀粉样蛋白多肽42(Aβ42)蛋白以及Tau/Aβ42水平,术后24 h不良反应发生情况。

结果

切皮时(T2)B组心率低于入室(T0)、阻滞后15 min(T1)及手术结束时(T3),且低于A组(P<0.05),其余时刻心率、平均动脉压、脉搏血氧饱和度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与术后2 h比较,术后24 h 2组视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Bromage评分均降低,且A组VAS评分在2组中更低(P<0.05);术后24 h 2组简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE)评分均升高,且A组在2组中更高(P<0.05)。与术前比较,术后7 d 2组血清Tau蛋白、Tau/Aβ42水平均升高,但A组较B组更低;术后7 d 2组血清Aβ42蛋白降低,但A组较B组更高(P<0.05)。术后24 h,A组不良反应发生率较B组更低(7.50% vs 27.50%,P<0.05)。

结论

0.1%罗哌卡因局部神经阻滞联合右美托咪定静脉泵入麻醉可稳定老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者生命体征,缓解疼痛,改善患者认知功能,安全性更高,分析与其调节Tau蛋白、Aβ42蛋白水平有关,值得临床进一步研究。

Objective

To analyze the application of dexmedetomidine combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine local nerve block in tension-free repair in inguinal hernia in elderly patients.

Methods

Eighty elderly patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Baogang Hospital of Inner Mongolia from March 2020 to March 2022 were divided into group A and group B, with 40 cases in each group. The method was the random number table method. Group A received 0.1% ropivacaine local nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine intravenous pump anesthesia, and group B received 0.2% ropivacaine local nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine intravenous pump anesthesia. All patients were observed for 7 days after the operation. The vital signs at different time points, pain, sedation, exercise and cognition scores 2h and 24h after operation, serum levels of Tau protein, beta amyloid polypeptide 42 (Aβ42) protein and Tau/Aβ42 before and 7 d after the operation, and the occurrence of adverse reactions 24h after operation of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

The heart rate of the group B at skin incision (T2) was lower than that of room entry (T0), 15 minutes after block (T1) and at the end of operation (T3), and lower than that of the group A (P<0.05), HR at other times, mean arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation of the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Compared with 2h after operation, the scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) and Bromage in the two groups decreased at 24 h after operation, and the score of VAS in group A was lower in the two groups (P<0.05). The score of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was elevated at 24 h after operation, and the score of group A was higher in both groups (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative, serum levels of Tau protein and Tau/Aβ42 in both groups increased at 7 d after operation, and were lower in group A; Aβ42 protein decreased in both groups at 7d after operation and was higher in group A (P<0.05). At 24h after operation, the incidence of adverse reactions in the group A was lower (7.50% vs 27.50%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

0.1% ropivacaine local nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine intravenous pump anesthesia can stabilize vital signs, relieve pain, and improve cognitive function of elderly patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair and has higher safety. Analysis of its relationship with regulating Tau protein and Aβ42 protein levels is worthy of further clinical research and application.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者不同时点生命体征比较(±s
表3 2组患者术后2 h、24 h疼痛、镇静、运动及认知评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者术前、术后7 d血清Tau蛋白、Aβ42蛋白水平比较(±s
表5 2组患者术后24 h不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
曹亮,王步云. 对比分析开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 贵州医药, 2020, 44(3): 410-412.
[2]
陈惠英,刘衬云,叶玉燕. 超声引导下右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对儿童腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛效果研究[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(2): 219-222.
[3]
Meyer A C, Eklund H, Hedström M, et al. The asa score predicts infections, cardiovascular complications, and hospital readmissions after hip fracture-a nationwide cohort study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2021, 32(11): 2185-2192.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[5]
Chiarotto A, Maxwell L J, Ostelo R W, et al. Measurement properties of visual analogue scale, numeric rating scale, and pain severity subscale of the brief pain inventory in patients with low back pain: a systematic review[J]. J Pain, 2019, 20(3): 245-263.
[6]
Xia Y, Sun Y, Liu J. Effects of dezocine on paed scale and ramsay sedation scores in patients undergoing nuss procedure[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(5): 5468-5475.
[7]
田青川,杨晓春,梁淑娟. 不同剂量罗哌卡因在高龄前列腺电切术中的麻醉效果及对Bromage评级的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2022, 21(5): 553-556.
[8]
Jia X, Wang Z, Huang F, et al. A comparison of the mini-mental state examination(mmse) with the montreal cognitive assessment(moca) for mild cognitive impairment screening in chinese middle-aged and older population: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2021, 21(1): 485-485.
[9]
刘煜鑫,陈红,闫东. 不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉对老年腹股沟疝开放修补术患者的镇静作用及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 527-531.
[10]
王春平,邵亚军,李玉霞, 等. 右美托咪定滴鼻对腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝手术患儿顺苯磺酸阿曲库铵肌松效应的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2019, 41(19): 2958-2961.
[11]
李富辉,张月玲. 右美托咪定及地佐辛对结直肠癌根治性手术镇静及炎症因子影响[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(5): 987-990.
[12]
付越,刘俊艳. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定对老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者麻醉效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 243-246.
[13]
肖甄男,商丽华,龙波. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术术中及术后的镇痛效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 507-512.
[14]
杜彦茹,韩霜,张秀果. 盐酸右美托咪定对老年患者腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后残余肌松效应的影响[J]. 医药导报, 2018, 37(8): 964-966.
[15]
王黎,李佳蔓. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻联合腹横肌平面及髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞对行全身麻醉腹股沟疝手术患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 396-399.
[16]
李欣洁,程小兵,张宁. 硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉与全身麻醉对老年腹部手术患者围术期血流动力学变化与术后认知功能的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(10): 1561-1562.
[17]
雷鸣,唐作垒,李文忠, 等. 右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼对肺癌胸腔镜手术血流动力学及不良反应的影响[J]. 成都医学院学报, 2021, 76(3): 311-314.
[18]
陈俊,王绍林. 右美托咪定对妇科腔镜手术患者七氟醚最低肺泡浓度和苏醒期质量的影响[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2021, 247(4): 482-486.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[9] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[13] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[14] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要