切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 375 -378. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.04.015

临床论著

ProGripTM自固定补片和UHS补片在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的对比研究
康欣1,(), 杨显富1, 杨兴建1, 尹天圣1, 张雅军1, 李斌1, 徐茂林1, 杨小丽1, 徐玲2   
  1. 1. 610000 四川省成都市双流区第一人民医院普外科
    2. 610000 四川省成都市双流区第一人民医院科教科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-04 出版日期:2021-08-18
  • 通信作者: 康欣

Randomized controlled trial comparing self-gripping mesh (ProgripTM) and ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS) in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia

Xin Kang1,(), Xianfu Yang1, Xingjian Yang1, Tiansheng Yin1, Yajun Zhang1, Bin Li1, Maolin Xu1, Xiaoli Yang1, Ling Xu2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shuangliu District First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
    2. Department of Science and Education, Shuangliu District First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
  • Received:2019-11-04 Published:2021-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Xin Kang
引用本文:

康欣, 杨显富, 杨兴建, 尹天圣, 张雅军, 李斌, 徐茂林, 杨小丽, 徐玲. ProGripTM自固定补片和UHS补片在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 375-378.

Xin Kang, Xianfu Yang, Xingjian Yang, Tiansheng Yin, Yajun Zhang, Bin Li, Maolin Xu, Xiaoli Yang, Ling Xu. Randomized controlled trial comparing self-gripping mesh (ProgripTM) and ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS) in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 375-378.

目的

比较ProGripTM自固定补片和UHS补片行无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果的差异。

方法

选取2015年1月至2017年6月成都市双流区第一人民医院收治成人腹股沟疝患者300例,采用数字表法随机分为ProGripTM自固定补片组150例和UHS补片组150例。患者术后随访6~24个月,对2组手术前后临床数据、临床效果及术后并发症发生情况进行分析比较。

结果

2组患者术后1 d、1周、1个月视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3、6个月VAS比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);慢性疼痛发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ProGripTM自固定补片组平均手术时间、住院时间短于UHS补片组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ProGripTM自固定补片组未出现异物感、切口感染、切口血肿和血清肿;术后阴囊积液1例,复发1例,慢性疼痛8例。UHS补片组出现术后异物感12例,切口感染2例,切口血肿和血清肿3例,阴囊积液7例,复发1例,慢性疼痛27例。

结论

应用ProGripTM自固定补片可降低腹股沟疝患者行无张力疝修补术后的慢性疼痛等并发症,值得临床推广。

Objective

To compare the differences between ProGripTM self-gripping mesh and Ultrapro hernia system (UHS) repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

From January 2015 to July 2017, 300 adult patients with inguinal hernia from Shuangliu district first people's hospital were enrolled. They were randomly divided into ProGripTM self-gripping mesh group and UHS repair group, with 150 cases in each group. The patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months. The clinical data, clinical effect and postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

No statistical differences had been found in the comparison of pain score at 1 day, 1 week, or even 1 month after operation (P>0.05). However, the difference compared between the two groups was significant at 3 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). Another statistical difference in the incidence of chronic pain was significant from the comparison between the ProGripTM self-gripping mesh group and the UHS repair group (P<0.05). The average operation time and hospital stay in the ProGripTM self-gripping mesh group were shorter than those in the UHS group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no foreign body sensation, incision infection, incision hematoma and edema occurred in the ProGripTM self-gripping mesh group; in the ProGripTM self-gripping mesh group, scrotal effusion occurred in 1 case, recurrence in 1 case, and chronic pain in 8 cases. In the UHS group, foreign body sensation occurred in 12 cases, incisional infection in 2 cases, incision hematoma and serum swelling in 3 cases, scrotal effusion in 7 cases, recurrence in 1 case, chronic pain in 27 cases.

Conclusion

The chronic pain and other complications can be reduced with the ProGripTM self-gripping mesh in the treatment of patients with inguinal hernia. It is worth the clinical promotion.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者手术情况及术后并发症发生情况比较
表3 2组患者术后VAS的比较
[1]
唐健雄. 我国腹股沟疝治疗现状和急需解决的几个问题[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1197-1201.
[2]
陈浩, 姚琪远. 腹股沟疝日间手术体系标准建立及常见问题处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1296-1297.
[3]
朱雷, 李绍杰, 唐文皓, 等. 自固定补片和生物补片在腹股沟疝术后疼痛的临床对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 193-197.
[4]
Gilbert AI. Inguinal herniorrhaphy: reduced morbidity, recurrences, and costs[J]. South Med J. 1979, 72(7): 831-834.
[5]
王学虎, 赵渝. 腹股沟疝修补术后并发症原因分析及处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1231-1234.
[6]
Merskey H. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms[J]. PainSuppl, 1986, 3: S1-S226.
[7]
Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C, Strobbe LJ, et al. An overview of the features influencing pain after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Int J Surg, 2008, 6(4)351-356.
[8]
王荫龙, 张新, 谢加东. Lichtenstein手术治疗腹股沟疝临床经验(附单中心5795例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2013, 18(3): 218-223.
[9]
孟令勤, 杨福全. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后慢性疼痛治疗研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 419-421.
[10]
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain followinginguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3): 239.
[11]
Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(11): 1373-1382.
[12]
Crombie IK, Davies HT, Macrae WA. Cut and thrust antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic[J]. Pain, 1998, 76 (1-2): 167-171.
[13]
Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Little john M, Nienhuijs S, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping ParietexTM Pro GripTM polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 287-294.
[14]
Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(2): 137-142.
[15]
兰岭, 申乐, 黄宇光. 术后慢性疼痛相关炎症反应及炎症细胞因子研究进展[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2015, 37(6): 741-745.
[16]
廖海, 刘祖明. 自固定补片与超普网塞补片在无张力疝修补术中的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 378-381.
[17]
李继东, 耿天祥. ProGrip自固定补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 342.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[15] 陈金水, 陈金福, 郑开福, 祝晓路, 王铁虎, 谭俊, 李正平. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗原发性耻骨上疝七例的临床体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 548-551.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?