切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 374 -377. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.04.013

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果分析
孙衍模1,(), 张文智2, 杨针2   
  1. 1. 572000 海南省,三亚市人民医院肝胆胰外科
    2. 572000 海南三亚,解放军总医院海南分院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-18 出版日期:2020-08-18
  • 通信作者: 孙衍模
  • 基金资助:
    海南省卫生计生行业科研项目(16A200209)

Effect of application of mesh plug hernia repair in the treatment of elderly inguinal hernia

Yanmo Sun1,(), Wenzhi Zhang2, Zhen Yang2   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya 572000, Hainan
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572000, Hainan
  • Received:2019-06-18 Published:2020-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Yanmo Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yanmo, Email:
引用本文:

孙衍模, 张文智, 杨针. 疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 374-377.

Yanmo Sun, Wenzhi Zhang, Zhen Yang. Effect of application of mesh plug hernia repair in the treatment of elderly inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 374-377.

目的

探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝治疗中的应用价值。

方法

选取2016年11月至2018年2月,三亚市人民医院接受治疗的老年腹股沟疝患者82例,按随机数字表法将患者分为试验组和对照组,每组41例。对照组行Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术,试验组行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术。比较2组手术相关指标、术后不同时间疼痛程度、术后第1天血清β-内啡肽(β-EP)水平,记录2组并发症及复发情况。

结果

82例患者顺利完成手术及随访,随访率100%,平均随访时间为(12.45±1.14)个月。相较于对照组,试验组术后伤口疼痛持续时间明显缩短(P<0.05),2组手术时间、术中出血量、自主活动时间及住院时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后2 h 2组VAS评分均最低,术后2 h至7 d 2组患者VAS评分均先升高后降低,且术后12 h及3 d试验组VAS评分均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第1天,试验组血清β-EP水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组术后急性疼痛发生率明显低于对照组。对照组疝复发1例,试验组无疝复发病例。

结论

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术对老年腹股沟疝患者产生的应激反应更小,可降低术后疼痛程度,并发症少,安全性高。

Objective

To study the application value of mesh plug tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of elderly inguinal hernia.

Methods

82 elderly patients with inguinal hernia who were treated in the Sanya People's Hospital from November 2016 to February 2018 were selected and divided into the experiment group and the control group according to random number table method, with 41 cases in each group. The control group underwent Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair, and the experiment group underwent mesh plug tension-free hernia repair. The surgical related indexes, degree of pain at different time after operation and the level of serum β-endorphin (β-EP) on the 1st day after the operation were compared between the 2 groups, and the complications and recurrence of the 2 groups were recorded.

Results

All patients successfully completed the operation and follow-up. Compared with the control group, the autonomic activity time of the experiment group significantly advanced, and the duration of wound pain significantly shortened (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the autonomic activity time and hospitalization time between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores of the 2 groups were the lowest at 2 hours after operation, and the VAS scores of the 2 groups increased first and then decreased from 2 hours to 7 days after operation, the VAS scores of the experiment group were significantly lower than the control group at 12 hours and 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The level of serum β-EP on 1st day after the operation in the experiment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of acute pain in the experiment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of recurrence in the control group, and none in the experiment group during the follow-up of 12 months.

Conclusion

The mesh plug tension-free hernia repair has less stress response to elderly patients with inguinal hernia. It can reduce postoperative pain, has less complications and high safety.

表1 2组患者手术相关参数比较(±s
表2 2组患者术后不同时间疼痛视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表3 2组患者术后并发症及复发情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
蔡涛,吴锋,刘芳. 腹股沟疝修补术应用腹腔镜与开腹手术的临床效果比较(附120例报告)[J]. 贵州医药, 2015, 39(1): 37-39.
[2]
Song B, Liu D, Liu S, et al. Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open tension-free hernia repair using biologic mesh for inguinal strangulated hernia[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 18(11): 1088-1091.
[3]
贺家勇,杨晨晨,李义亮, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝前间隙修补术、无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术临床疗效比较[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2015, 38(9): 1146-1150.
[4]
陈康,王光远,郎庆华, 等. 局麻下无张力疝修补术在基层医院开展的可行性[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 71-73.
[5]
李亮. 实用腹股沟疝外科学[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版西安有限公司, 2014: 121-123.
[6]
Sabuncuoglu MZ, Dandin O, Piskin T. What should be the correct indications for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(5): 1748-1749.
[7]
孙雪峰. 腹膜外腹腔镜疝气修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2015, 36(6): 703-705.
[8]
黄涛,陈娟,招婷. 无张力修补术和传统手术治疗腹外疝的临床效果对比分析[J]. 锦州医科大学学报, 2016, 10(1): 50-52.
[9]
孙刚,赵英男,李冬, 等. 腹股沟疝传统疝修补术、平片及疝环填充无张力疝修补术的临床研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2015, 43(4): 348-350.
[10]
Aguilar-García J, Cano-González H A, Martínez-Jiménez M A, et al. Unilateral Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernia repair and testicular perfusion: a prospective control study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 479-482.
[11]
邹海明. 疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2017, 10(12): 149-150.
[12]
Yenli E M T, Abanga J, Tabiri S, et al. Our Experience with the Use of Low Cost Mesh in Tension-Free Inguinal Hernioplasty in Northern Ghana[J]. Ghana Med J, 2017, 51(2): 78-82.
[13]
黄壮生,吴俊伟,李颖. 疝环充填与平片无张力修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝的对比[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(22): 3727-3729.
[14]
方勇,姜双,印慨, 等. 腹膜前无张力疝修补术对比传统加强腹股沟后壁疝修补术的优势分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 62-65.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[12] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[13] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[14] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[15] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?