切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 126 -129. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.008

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜与开放手术治疗小儿疝的成本-效益分析
万顷1,(), 邓先锐1, 徐国宏1, 宋琴1, 郑磊1   
  1. 1. 620010 四川省,眉山市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-01 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 万顷

Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia

Qing Wan1,(), Xianrui Deng1, Guohong Xu1, Qin Song1, Lei Zheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Meishan People's Hospital, Meishan 620010, China
  • Received:2019-11-01 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Qing Wan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wan Qing, Email:
引用本文:

万顷, 邓先锐, 徐国宏, 宋琴, 郑磊. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗小儿疝的成本-效益分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 126-129.

Qing Wan, Xianrui Deng, Guohong Xu, Qin Song, Lei Zheng. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 126-129.

目的

从全社会的角度对本地区腹腔镜与开放手术两种方法用于小儿疝的治疗成本和收益进行对比,为眉山市医保部门决策的制定提供理论支持,为患者根据自身需求选择手术方式提供科学依据。

方法

从2017年1月至12月眉山市人民医院诊治的小儿疝患者中,选取年龄1~3岁的患儿共144例进行分析。经济成本分析包括住院费用、手术费用和其他费用三个部分,疗效评价采用质量调整寿命年(QALY)。

结果

开放手术组治疗小儿腹股沟疝的平均费用为3918.346元,腹腔镜手术组为4764.809元;开放手术组的QALY为0.345,腹腔镜手术组为0.380;与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗小儿疝的增量成本效益比为1159.738元/年;敏感性分析得出,对成本效益比(C/E)的影响最大的是器械耗材费,其次是麻醉费和手术费;临界值分析得出,当腹腔镜组术中耗材器械使用费降至912.082元时,2组患者的C/E相当。

结论

腹腔镜手术相比开放手术虽然花费更高,但其同时会给患儿带来更大的获益,从分析的结果来看,腹腔镜手术应该作为治疗小儿疝的首选手术方式。

Objective

Our research compares the cost and benefit of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia in local area from social perspective. The purpose of our study is to provide the theories for the decision-making of the health insurance department in Meishan, providing the scientific basis for the patients to choose the surgical method according to their own needs.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2017, clinical data of 144 children aged from 1 to 3 were analyzed retrospectively. Costs include hospitalization, surgery, and other expenses. And efficacy evaluation is converted into quality- adjusted life years (QALY) gained.

Results

The average cost of open surgery group was 3918.346 yuan, while laparoscopic group was 4764.809 yuan. The QALY was 0.345 in open surgery group and 0.380 in laparoscopic group. Compared with open surgery, the incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICER) of laparoscopic hernia treatment was 1159.738 yuan/QALY. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of equipment was the most influential factor in our study, followed by anesthesia and surgery costs. Criticality analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E) would be equivalent between the two groups when the costs of equipment fall to 912.082 yuan.

Conclusion

Although laparoscopic surgery is more expensive than open surgery, it is still the preferred surgical choice for pediatric hernia because of the favorable benefits it offers.

表1 2组手术费用明细
表2 2组疗效比较(±s
表3 2组成本效益分析
图1 腹腔镜手术组费用项目敏感性分析
图2 腹腔镜手术组临界值分析
[1]
MollenKP, Kane TD. Inguinal hernia: what we have learned from laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateml side [J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2007, 19(3): 344-348.
[2]
Schier F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1998, 33: 1495-1497.
[3]
宋伟,童彦炜,章跃滨, 等. 腹腔镜微创技术和传统手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝单中心对照研究[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(6): 568-570.
[4]
申帅,晏建华,蔡银忠. 小儿疝开放与腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎治疗的对比分析[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2019, 21(3): 59-61.
[5]
Ostlie DJ, Ponsky TA. Technical options of the laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24: 194-198.
[6]
刘振勇,曹海波,杨鹏程. 单孔法与双孔法腹腔镜下小儿疝囊高位结扎术的疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 138-141.
[7]
郭朝晖,罗宏宇,戴玉容, 等. 两孔一针法腹腔镜小儿斜疝疝囊高位结扎术与传统术式比较[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 225-228.
[8]
徐国宏. 腹腔镜下治疗小儿腹股沟疝与传统手术的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(5): 26-28.
[9]
Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, et al. Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost- effectiveness analysis. Health Econ, 2000, 9: 235-251.
[10]
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[J]. 中国统计,2018(3):7-20.
[11]
O'Boyle CJ, Royston CM, Sedman PC. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial[J]. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(5): 653-661.
[1] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[2] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[10] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[11] 张洁宇, 朱文君, 高伟, 王新昇, 贺贝贝, 吴世乐. 青海地区不同海拔男性腹股沟疝患者腹壁组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原纤维表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-389.
[12] 周劲鸿, 王鉴杰, 谢肖俊. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后尿潴留发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[13] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[14] 邓杨, 彭豪, 刘剑文. 腹腔镜疝修补术腹膜前负压引流的效果和长期安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 402-405.
[15] 邱志东, 张杰, 薛鹏, 郑玲玲, 杨建桃, 赵海军, 陈双. 补片固定与否对腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术后患者并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-409.
阅读次数
全文


摘要