切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 90 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.025

所属专题: 文献

护理园地

临床护理路径在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用效果
符冰1,(), 严敏2, 王艳良2   
  1. 1. 571700 海南,儋州市人民医院手术室
    2. 571700 海南,儋州市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-17 出版日期:2019-02-18
  • 通信作者: 符冰

Application effect of clinical nursing pathway in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia

Bing Fu1,(), Min Yan2, Yanliang Wang2   

  1. 1. Operating Room, Danzhou People's Hospital, Hainan Danzhou 571700, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Danzhou People's Hospital, Hainan Danzhou 571700, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Published:2019-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Bing Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Bing, Email:
引用本文:

符冰, 严敏, 王艳良. 临床护理路径在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 90-92.

Bing Fu, Min Yan, Yanliang Wang. Application effect of clinical nursing pathway in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 90-92.

目的

探讨临床护理路径在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用效果。

方法

选取2016年2月至2017年7月,儋州市人民医院行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的144例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,根据围术期护理方法的不同进行分组,分为研究组及对照组,各72例。研究组采取临床护理路径,对照组采取常规护理。比较2组术后疼痛状况及相关临床指标,观察2组术后并发症及疾病复发情况。

结果

研究组住院时间及术后卧床时间等均较对照组显著缩短,住院总费用较对照组减少,差异均均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。自术前至出院前1 d 2组VAS评分均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且除术前外各时间点研究组均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后研究组并发症发生率及复发率均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中依据临床护理路径进行护理可有效减轻患者疼痛感,降低术后并发症及复发风险,有利于患者康复,因此值得推广。

Objective

To explore the application effect of clinical nursing pathway in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia.

Methods

144 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent tension-free repair in Danzhou People's Hospital from February 2016 to July 2017 were selected as the study subjects, they were divided into the study group and the control group according to the different perioperative nursing methods, 72 cases in each group. The study group adopted clinical nursing pathway, while the control group received routine nursing. The postoperative pain status and related clinical indicators were compared between the 2 groups, and the postoperative complications and disease recurrence were observed.

Results

Hospitalization time and postoperative bed rest time in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and total hospitalization costs were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the 2 groups decreased significantly from preoperative to 1 day before discharge (P<0.01), and the VAS scores of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group at all time points except preoperative (P<0.05). The incidence and recurrence rate of complications in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Nursing in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia according to clinical nursing pathway can effectively reduce the pain, postoperative complications and the risk of recurrence. It is beneficial to the recovery of patients, an is worth popularizing.

表1 2组临床指标比较(±s
表2 2组手术前后疼痛视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
[1]
蔡涛, 吴锋, 刘芳. 腹股沟疝修补术应用腹腔镜与开腹手术的临床效果比较(附120例报告)[J]. 贵州医药, 2015, 39(1): 37-39.
[2]
Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, et al. Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218(1): 102-102.
[3]
刘丹, 周庆红. 快速康复外科护理对无张力腹股沟疝修补术患者术后恢复及护理满意度的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2016, 22(6): 1033-1035.
[4]
施选梅. 临床路径应用在腹股沟疝修补术患者围术期的价值[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2018, 10(10): 184-185.
[5]
Leonard J, Hieken TJ, Hussein M, et al. Delineation of factors associated with prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair leads to a clinical pathway and improves quality of care[J]. Surg Endos, 2015, 30(4): 1-5.
[6]
Mohebian M, Modaghegh M, Parsapoor A. Assessment of diagnostic criteria of incarcerated inguinal hernia[J]. Tehran University Medical J, 1999, 47(1): 33-34.
[7]
董纪华, 程红霞. 临床护理路径用于腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术围术期的效果评价[J]. 护理研究, 2014, 7(31): 3887-3888.
[8]
Dibenedetto LM, Lei Q, Gilroy AM, et al. Variations in the inferior pelvic pathway of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: Implications for laparoscopic hernia repair[J]. Clin Anat, 2015, 9(4): 232-236.
[9]
罗洪梅. 临床护理路径应用于腹股沟疝无张力修补术的效果评价[J]. 重庆医学, 2014, 43(22): 2970-2971.
[10]
Montes A, Roca G, Sabate S, et al. Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Hernia Repair, Hysterectomy, and Thoracotomy: A Two-year Multicenter Cohort Study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 122(5): 1122-1123.
[11]
陆贞, 张芹. 临床管理路径应用于腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术围手术期的效果分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 214-217.
[12]
邓群, 王俭, 蒋媛. 腹股沟疝临床护理路径的体会[J]. 新疆医学, 2016, 46(6): 740-742.
[13]
Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Neupane R, et al. Benefits of Multimodal Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Ventral Hernia Repair[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2016, 222(6): 1106-1115.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[15] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?