切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 303 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.04.018

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较
吴国刚1,(), 刘吉盛1, 冷梅1, 刘兆润1, 刘嘉文1   
  1. 1. 114002 辽宁鞍山,鞍钢集团总医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-27 出版日期:2018-08-18
  • 通信作者: 吴国刚

Comparison of the efficacy of 3D laparoscopic and 2D laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Guogang Wu1,(), Jisheng Liu1, Mei Leng1, Zhaorun Liu1, Jiawen Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Ansteel Group Hospital, Liaoning 114002, China
  • Received:2018-03-27 Published:2018-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Guogang Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Guogang, Email:
引用本文:

吴国刚, 刘吉盛, 冷梅, 刘兆润, 刘嘉文. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 303-305.

Guogang Wu, Jisheng Liu, Mei Leng, Zhaorun Liu, Jiawen Liu. Comparison of the efficacy of 3D laparoscopic and 2D laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 303-305.

目的

探讨3D腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床优势。

方法

回顾性分析2016年2月至2017年5月,鞍钢集团总医院60例行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(laparoscopic trans- abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP)手术患者的临床资料,按照手术方式分为3D腹腔镜组和2D腹腔镜组,每组患者30例。观察比较3D组和2D组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症。

结果

本组60例腹腔镜TAPP手术均顺利完成手术。3D组手术时间(65±24.5)min短于2D组(78±25.6)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2组共出现5例阴囊血清肿,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2组均未出现尿潴留、暂时性感觉神经障碍、慢性疼痛等并发症。

结论

3D腹腔镜技术极大改善了外科医师的手眼配合度,提供了最精确的空间定位,降低手术操作难度,缩短了手术时间及学习曲线。

Objective

To explore the clinical advantages of 3D laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair(TAPP).

Methods

From February 2016 to May 2017, 60 patients who underwent TAPP surgery in Ansteel Group Hospital were randomly divided into 3D laparoscopic group and 2D laparoscopic group, 30 patients in each group. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost and postoperative complications were observed and compared between the 3D group and 2D group.

Results

This group of 60 patients with laparoscopic TAPP surgery successfully completed the operation. The operation time of the 3D group was shorter than that of the 2D group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization cost between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 5 cases of scrotal seroma in the two groups. There was no difference between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no complications such as urinary retention, temporary sensory neuropathy and chronic pain in the two groups.

Conclusion

The 3D laparoscopic technique greatly improves the surgeon's hand-eye fit, provides the most accurate spatial positioning, reduces the difficulty of surgical operation, and shortens the operation time and learning curve.

表1 2组腹腔镜TAPP术后相关指标比较
[1]
闵长国, 刘利松, 江小云, 等. 腹膜前空间区域解剖及手术技巧对腹股沟疝无张力修补手术的影响[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 367-370.
[2]
韩松, 宋大鹏. 浅谈熟练掌握腹股沟解剖对腹股沟疝规范手术的重要性[J/CD]. 临床普外科电子杂志, 2016, 4(3): 32-34.
[3]
Yang C, Mo L, Ma Y, et al. A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2015, 7(10): 1798-1805.
[4]
Buchs NC, Morel P. Three-dimensional laparoscopy: a new tool in the surgeon's armamentarium[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2013, 23: 19-22.
[5]
陈昕, 徐露, 殷骏, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效及术后并发症危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(9): 915-920.
[6]
Fergo C, Pommergaard HC, Burcharth J, et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopy has the potential to replace two-dimensional laparoscopy in abdominal surgery[J]. Ugeskr Laeger, 2015, 177(26). pii: V11140635.
[7]
Rie Matsunaga, Yuji Nishizawa, Norio Saito, et al. Quantitative evaluation of 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surgery Today, 2017, 47(4): 440-444.
[8]
黄永刚, 顾卯林, 朱景元, 等. 3D腹腔镜下治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 辽宁医学院学报, 2016, 37(4): 79-80.
[9]
朱玉, 平洪, 王明考, 等. 经腹腹膜前3D腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术48例诊治分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 132-133.
[10]
杨帅帅, 李海玲, 崔景利, 等. 3D腹腔镜与开放手术治疗成人双侧腹股沟疝的对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(4): 278-280.
[11]
王海江, 敬亚恒, 周力波, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝学习曲线[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 407-412.
[1] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[2] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[3] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[7] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[8] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[9] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[13] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[15] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
阅读次数
全文


摘要