切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 135 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜与开腹无张力腹股沟疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的效果
王俭1,(), 蒋媛1, 时娟1, 马静1, 屈鹏1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-29 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 王俭
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院院内科研项目(20140306)

Comparative analysis of incision compression of salt bag after laparoscopic and open tension-free herniorrhaphy

Jian Wang1,(), Yuan Jiang1, Juan Shi1, Jing Ma1, Peng Qu1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally invasive Surgery & Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2017-11-29 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jian Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jian, Email:
引用本文:

王俭, 蒋媛, 时娟, 马静, 屈鹏. 腹腔镜与开腹无张力腹股沟疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 135-138.

Jian Wang, Yuan Jiang, Juan Shi, Jing Ma, Peng Qu. Comparative analysis of incision compression of salt bag after laparoscopic and open tension-free herniorrhaphy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 135-138.

目的

探讨腹腔镜与开腹无张力疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的必要性及其对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2014年10月至2017年8月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的258例Ⅰ~Ⅲ型的腹股沟疝(inguinal hernia,IH)患者的临床资料,其中行腹腔镜无张力疝修补术患者165例(腹腔镜组),107例术后给予盐袋压迫,行Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术患者93例(开腹组),68例术后给予盐袋压迫,比较2组患者的术后自主下床活动时间、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后切口感染、阴囊或大阴唇水肿、患者的主观感觉等。

结果

2组患者均顺利完成手术,无围手术期死亡,无严重并发症出现,术后均痊愈出院。开腹组术后给予切口盐袋压迫患者术后第1天疼痛评分和阴囊或大阴唇水肿发生率、患者主观感受均优于无盐袋压迫患者,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.639、χ2=6.934、F=3.376,P=0.024、0.008、0.039),而术后自主下床活动时间及术后切口感染发生率无明显差异(t=1.294、χ2=0.463,P=0.121、0.496)。腹腔镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者术后自主下床活动时间、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后切口感染、阴囊或大阴唇水肿和患者的主观感觉比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.149、1.396、χ2=0.196、1.739、F=0.370,P=0.217、0.084、0.658、0.187、0.692)。术后给予盐袋压迫患者的比较中,腹腔镜组术后第1天疼痛评分和患者主观感受均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.963、F=4.869,P=0.044、0.009),术后自主下床活动时间及术后切口感染及阴囊或大阴唇水肿发生率无明显差异(t=0.417、χ2=2.251、1.114,P=0.562、0.134、0.291)。

结论

对于开腹无张力疝修补术,术后切口盐袋压迫可减轻患者术后疼痛,有效预防阴囊或大阴唇水肿,提高患者的主观感受,而对于腹腔镜无张力疝修补术,术后盐袋压迫与否对其预后影响不大。

Objective

To investigate the necessity of salt bag compression after laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair, and to review its influence on prognosis.

Methods

The clinical data of 258 patients with typeⅠ-Ⅲ inguinal hernia admitted to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from October 2014 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 165 cases underwent laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair (laparoscopic group), and 107 cases were treated with salt bag compression; 93 cases underwent Lichtenstein repair (open group), and 68 cases treated with salt bag compression. Compare the two groups of patients with the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative incision infection, edema of the scrotum or labia majora, subjective feelings and so on.

Results

There was no perioperative deaths and serious complications during perioperative period in these two groups. In open group, the patients who treated with salt bag compression were superior to those without salt bag compression in postoperative pain score, edema of the scrotum or labia majora and subjective feelings. The difference was statistically significant (t=4.639、χ2=6.934、F=3.376, P=0.024、0.008、0.039). There was no significant difference in the postoperative ambulation time and the incidence of postoperative incision infection (t=1.294、χ2=0.463, P=0.121、0.496). There was no significant difference in above indicators between the patients who treated with salt bag compression and non-salt bag compression in the laparoscopic group (t=1.149、1.396、χ2=0.196、1.739、F=0.370, P=0.217、0.084、0.658、0.187、0.692). Compared to the patients who treated with salt bag compression, laparoscopic group was better in postoperative pain score and subjective feelings than open group. The difference was statistically significant (t=3.963、F=4.869, P=0.044、0.009). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative incision infection and edema of the scrotum or labia majora (t=0.417、χ2=2.251、1.114, P=0.562、0.134、0.291).

Conclusion

For open tension-free hernia repair, postoperative salt bag compression can reduce postoperative pain, effectively prevent scrotum or labia majora edema, and improve the patient's subjective feeling. But for laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair, postoperative salt bag compression has little effect on the prognosis.

表1 腹腔镜组和开腹组患者基线资料的比较[例(%)]
表2 开腹镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
表3 腹腔镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
表4 腹腔镜组与开腹组术后给予盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
[1]
蔡伟,康骅,海涛, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝的外科治疗策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(8): 451-453.
[2]
路夷平,张能维,李凯, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用与术式选择[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2008, 13(1): 41-43.
[3]
路夷平,姚琪远,张能维, 等. 完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2009, 36(12): 815-818.
[4]
马颂章,李燕青,王艳, 等. 腹股沟疝的分型[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2001, 21(6): 360-361.
[5]
苏福增,王志,张成, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝合并肾病综合征患者的围手术期处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 260-262.
[6]
胡星辰,李绍杰,唐健雄, 等. 聚丙烯补片运用于嵌顿性腹股沟疝的临床评价(附46例报告)[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 171-173.
[7]
黄建朋,陈亮,韩明福, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(6): 460-461.
[8]
肖乾虎. 腹股沟疝的围手术期处理[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(2): 1-8.
[9]
Lohsiriwat V, Srtdermma W, Akaraviputh T, et al. Surgical outcoms of Lichtenstein tension-free hemioplasty for acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Today, 2007, 37(3): 212-214.
[10]
Mc Cormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et a1. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Databasia Syst Rev, 2003, 4(1): CD001785.
[11]
张成,李梅,克力木, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术对比研究[J/CD]中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(3): 311-314.
[12]
张杰,李德宁,阎玉矿, 等. 腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术56例报告[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2010, 15(8): 583-585.
[13]
龚金星,郭吕. 腹股沟疝与精索脂肪瘤[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2009, 36(2): 129-131.
[14]
磨鹏诗,何暖坚,谭浩明. 腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2010, 15(10): 777-778.
[15]
Wakasugi M, Tei M, Anno K, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in elderly patients: A single-center experience of 365 procedures[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2016, 9(4): 281-284.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[13] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[14] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[15] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?