切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 135 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜与开腹无张力腹股沟疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的效果
王俭1,(), 蒋媛1, 时娟1, 马静1, 屈鹏1   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-29 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 王俭
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院院内科研项目(20140306)

Comparative analysis of incision compression of salt bag after laparoscopic and open tension-free herniorrhaphy

Jian Wang1,(), Yuan Jiang1, Juan Shi1, Jing Ma1, Peng Qu1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally invasive Surgery & Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2017-11-29 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jian Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jian, Email:
引用本文:

王俭, 蒋媛, 时娟, 马静, 屈鹏. 腹腔镜与开腹无张力腹股沟疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 135-138.

Jian Wang, Yuan Jiang, Juan Shi, Jing Ma, Peng Qu. Comparative analysis of incision compression of salt bag after laparoscopic and open tension-free herniorrhaphy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 135-138.

目的

探讨腹腔镜与开腹无张力疝修补术后切口盐袋压迫的必要性及其对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2014年10月至2017年8月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的258例Ⅰ~Ⅲ型的腹股沟疝(inguinal hernia,IH)患者的临床资料,其中行腹腔镜无张力疝修补术患者165例(腹腔镜组),107例术后给予盐袋压迫,行Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术患者93例(开腹组),68例术后给予盐袋压迫,比较2组患者的术后自主下床活动时间、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后切口感染、阴囊或大阴唇水肿、患者的主观感觉等。

结果

2组患者均顺利完成手术,无围手术期死亡,无严重并发症出现,术后均痊愈出院。开腹组术后给予切口盐袋压迫患者术后第1天疼痛评分和阴囊或大阴唇水肿发生率、患者主观感受均优于无盐袋压迫患者,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.639、χ2=6.934、F=3.376,P=0.024、0.008、0.039),而术后自主下床活动时间及术后切口感染发生率无明显差异(t=1.294、χ2=0.463,P=0.121、0.496)。腹腔镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者术后自主下床活动时间、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后切口感染、阴囊或大阴唇水肿和患者的主观感觉比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.149、1.396、χ2=0.196、1.739、F=0.370,P=0.217、0.084、0.658、0.187、0.692)。术后给予盐袋压迫患者的比较中,腹腔镜组术后第1天疼痛评分和患者主观感受均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.963、F=4.869,P=0.044、0.009),术后自主下床活动时间及术后切口感染及阴囊或大阴唇水肿发生率无明显差异(t=0.417、χ2=2.251、1.114,P=0.562、0.134、0.291)。

结论

对于开腹无张力疝修补术,术后切口盐袋压迫可减轻患者术后疼痛,有效预防阴囊或大阴唇水肿,提高患者的主观感受,而对于腹腔镜无张力疝修补术,术后盐袋压迫与否对其预后影响不大。

Objective

To investigate the necessity of salt bag compression after laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair, and to review its influence on prognosis.

Methods

The clinical data of 258 patients with typeⅠ-Ⅲ inguinal hernia admitted to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from October 2014 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 165 cases underwent laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair (laparoscopic group), and 107 cases were treated with salt bag compression; 93 cases underwent Lichtenstein repair (open group), and 68 cases treated with salt bag compression. Compare the two groups of patients with the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative incision infection, edema of the scrotum or labia majora, subjective feelings and so on.

Results

There was no perioperative deaths and serious complications during perioperative period in these two groups. In open group, the patients who treated with salt bag compression were superior to those without salt bag compression in postoperative pain score, edema of the scrotum or labia majora and subjective feelings. The difference was statistically significant (t=4.639、χ2=6.934、F=3.376, P=0.024、0.008、0.039). There was no significant difference in the postoperative ambulation time and the incidence of postoperative incision infection (t=1.294、χ2=0.463, P=0.121、0.496). There was no significant difference in above indicators between the patients who treated with salt bag compression and non-salt bag compression in the laparoscopic group (t=1.149、1.396、χ2=0.196、1.739、F=0.370, P=0.217、0.084、0.658、0.187、0.692). Compared to the patients who treated with salt bag compression, laparoscopic group was better in postoperative pain score and subjective feelings than open group. The difference was statistically significant (t=3.963、F=4.869, P=0.044、0.009). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative incision infection and edema of the scrotum or labia majora (t=0.417、χ2=2.251、1.114, P=0.562、0.134、0.291).

Conclusion

For open tension-free hernia repair, postoperative salt bag compression can reduce postoperative pain, effectively prevent scrotum or labia majora edema, and improve the patient's subjective feeling. But for laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair, postoperative salt bag compression has little effect on the prognosis.

表1 腹腔镜组和开腹组患者基线资料的比较[例(%)]
表2 开腹镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
表3 腹腔镜组术后给予盐袋压迫与无盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
表4 腹腔镜组与开腹组术后给予盐袋压迫患者各项指标比较
[1]
蔡伟,康骅,海涛, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝的外科治疗策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(8): 451-453.
[2]
路夷平,张能维,李凯, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用与术式选择[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2008, 13(1): 41-43.
[3]
路夷平,姚琪远,张能维, 等. 完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2009, 36(12): 815-818.
[4]
马颂章,李燕青,王艳, 等. 腹股沟疝的分型[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2001, 21(6): 360-361.
[5]
苏福增,王志,张成, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝合并肾病综合征患者的围手术期处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 260-262.
[6]
胡星辰,李绍杰,唐健雄, 等. 聚丙烯补片运用于嵌顿性腹股沟疝的临床评价(附46例报告)[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 171-173.
[7]
黄建朋,陈亮,韩明福, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(6): 460-461.
[8]
肖乾虎. 腹股沟疝的围手术期处理[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(2): 1-8.
[9]
Lohsiriwat V, Srtdermma W, Akaraviputh T, et al. Surgical outcoms of Lichtenstein tension-free hemioplasty for acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Today, 2007, 37(3): 212-214.
[10]
Mc Cormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et a1. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Databasia Syst Rev, 2003, 4(1): CD001785.
[11]
张成,李梅,克力木, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术对比研究[J/CD]中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(3): 311-314.
[12]
张杰,李德宁,阎玉矿, 等. 腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术56例报告[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2010, 15(8): 583-585.
[13]
龚金星,郭吕. 腹股沟疝与精索脂肪瘤[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2009, 36(2): 129-131.
[14]
磨鹏诗,何暖坚,谭浩明. 腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2010, 15(10): 777-778.
[15]
Wakasugi M, Tei M, Anno K, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in elderly patients: A single-center experience of 365 procedures[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2016, 9(4): 281-284.
[1] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[2] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[3] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[7] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[8] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[9] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[13] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[15] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
阅读次数
全文


摘要