切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 131 -134. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.013

所属专题： 文献；

论著

股疝开放式前入路修补的临床疗效
刘小春1,†(), 陈伟清1, 郑国富1, 谢海亮1, 叶波1, 陈革2   
  1. 1. 341000　江西省，赣州市人民医院普外二科
    2. 200040　上海，复旦大学附属华东医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-07 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 刘小春

Clinical analysis of 40 cases of open preperitoneal repair for femoral hernia

Xiaochun Liu1,†(), Weiqing Chen1, Guofu Zheng1, Hailiang Xie1, Bo Ye1, Ge Chen2   

  1. 1. Second Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi 341000, China
    2. Department of Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery, Shanghai Huadong Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2017-05-07 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiaochun Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Xiaochun, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

刘小春, 陈伟清, 郑国富, 谢海亮, 叶波, 陈革. 股疝开放式前入路修补的临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 131-134.

Xiaochun Liu, Weiqing Chen, Guofu Zheng, Hailiang Xie, Bo Ye, Ge Chen. Clinical analysis of 40 cases of open preperitoneal repair for femoral hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 131-134.

目的

总结开放式腹膜前修补40例股疝的手术效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年5月至2016年12月，赣州市人民医院接受手术40例股疝的临床资料，其中急诊股疝组27例，择期股疝组13例。

结果

择期组中疝囊内容物8例为网膜，4例为积液，1例为小肠；急诊组中内容物为肠管的26例，1例为单纯嵌顿网膜。13例择期组和13例急诊组患者进行了经腹膜前使用补片修补，另14例急诊组患者进行了Mcvay法组织的缝合修补；急诊组中有6例进行了肠切除肠吻合。择期组中早期并发症为3例次，急诊组为24例次，2组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；2组的平均住院时间分别为（6.615±1.321）d和（7.777±2.206）d，平均手术时间分别（77.692±22.695）min和（94.211±13.927）min，2组比较差异均有统计学意义（P均<0.05）；随访过程中26例补片修补的患者均未发生补片感染；补片修补的无复发病例，急诊组缝合修补的出现1例复发。

结论

开放式腹膜前无张力补片疝修补术是一种安全和可供选择的治疗择期股疝和部分急诊股疝的手术方式；但急诊手术的早期并发症较择期手术多，建议尽可能在择期状态下对股疝进行手术治疗。

关键词: 股疝, 疝修补术, 急诊手术, 择期手术, 并发症
Objective

To summarize the effect of open preperitoneal repair in 40 cases of femoral hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 cases of femoral hernia in Ganzhou People's Hospital from May 2014 to December 2016, including 27 emergency cases and 13 elective cases.

Results

In the elective group, the contents were 8 cases of omentum, 4 cases of hydrops, and 1 case of small intestine. In the emergency group, there were 26 cases of intestinal and 1 case of incarcerated omentum. 13 elective cases and 13 emergency cases received the preperitoneal mesh repair, and the other 14 emergency cases were perfomed with the suture repair following the Mcvay method. In the emergency group, 6 cases underwent intestinal excision. 3 elective cases and 24 emergency cases developed early complications, and the difference was statistically significant. The operation time was (94.211±13.927 min) and the length of stay was (7.777±2.206 d) in the emergency group, were longer than elective cases of (77.692±22.695 min) and (6.615±1.321 d), both had statistical significance; No mesh infection and no recurrence were found in mesh group in the follow-up duration, while there was one emergency case in suture group occurred.

Conclusion

Open preperitoneal mesh repair is a safe and optional procedure for the treatment of selective and some emergency femoral hernia. However, the early complication of the femoral hernia in the emergency cases was more than that in the selective cases. So we suggest that surgical treatment of femoral hernia should be performed at the time of selection as far as possible.

Key words: Femoral hernia, Herniorrhaphy, Emergency surgery, Elective surgery, complications
表1 2组患者疝内容物及其处理情况比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 单纯积液 单纯网膜 网膜和小肠 单纯小肠 结肠 损伤肠壁修补 坏死网膜切除 切除坏死小肠
择期组 13 4 (30.8) 8 (61.5) 0 1 (7.7) 0 0 0 0
急诊组 27 0 1 (3.7) 2 (7.4) 22 (81.5) 2 (7.4) 3 (11.1) 2 (7.4) 6 (22.2)
χ2/Z值 ? Z=6.736 χ2=16.832 Z=1.622 χ2=19.551 Z=4.372 Z=5.758 Z=4.372 Z=17.489
P值 ? 0.009 0 0.203 0 0.037 0.016 0.037 0
表2 2组患者围手术期及早期并发症结果比较
组别 例数 住院时间(d,±s) 手术时间(min,±s) 血肿[例(%)] 血清肿[例(%)] 膀胱损伤[例(%)] 尿潴留[例(%)] 早期伤口疼痛[例(%)] 切口感染[例(%)]
择期组 13 6.615±1.321 77.692±22.695 0 1(7.7) 0 1(7.7) 1(7.7) 0
急诊组 27 7.777±2.206 94.211±13.927 4(14.8) 4(14.8) 1(3.7) 3(11.1) 8(29.6) 4(14.8)
t/Z/χ2值 ? t=6.342 t=4.796 χ2=2.140 χ2=0.407 Z=0.494 χ2=0.114 χ2=2.422 χ2=2.140
P值 ? 0 0 0.144 0.523 0.482 0.736 0.12 0.144
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组，中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(7): 481-484.
[2]
Suppiah A, Gatt M, Barandiaran J, et al. Outcomes of emergency and elective femoral herniasurgeryin four district general hospitals: a 4-year study[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(6): 509-512.
[3]
禹仲，周建平，董明. 腹股沟嵌顿疝急诊手术应用补片的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 266-269.
[4]
Akrami M, Karami MY, Zangouri V, et al. Small bowel obstructionsecondary to femoral hernia; casereport and review of the literature[J]. Bull Emerg Trauma, 2016, 4(1): 51-53.
[5]
Chia CF, Chan WH, Yau KW, et al. Emergency femoral hernia repair: 13-year retrospectivecomparison of the three classical open surgical approaches[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(1): 89-93.
[6]
Yetişir F, Salman AE, Özlü O, et al. An alternative anterior tension free preperitoneal patch techniqueby help of the endoscope for femoral hernia repair[J]. Int J Surg, 2013; 11(9): 962-966.
[7]
吴礼果，王徐. 聚丙烯补片与传统术式修补股疝的比较分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(5): 430-432.
[8]
侯海金，张振华，潘文泉, 等. UHSL补片在股疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术中的应用体[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 308-309.
[9]
陈康，王光远，毛宏铭, 等. 腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补治疗股疝体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 503.
[10]
陈大伟，费哲为，黄侠, 等. 股管内环口网塞填塞联合腹膜前间隙平片在股疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(4): 325-326.
[11]
周峰，于鹏，于跃洋, 等. 经腹膜前间隙行无张力疝修补术治疗股疝20例分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(2): 134-137.
[12]
Yang XF, Liu JL. Laparoscopic repair offemoral hernia[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(19): 371.
[13]
Pillay Y. Laparoscopic repair of an incarcerated femoral hernia[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2015, 17: 85-88.
[14]
Yang L, Wang H, Liang X, et al. Bacteria in hernia sac an important risk fact for surgical site infection after incarcerated hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(2): 279-283.
[15]
Bessa SS, Abdel-fattah MR, Al-Sayes IA, et al. Results of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated andor strangulated groin hernias a 10-year study[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(3): 909-914.
[16]
成春发，刘振华，沈炜. 腹膜前修补术在嵌顿性股疝治疗中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(4): 377.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[6] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[7] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[8] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[9] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[10] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[11] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[12] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号