切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 450 -457. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.04.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

多排螺旋CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝鉴别及嵌顿疝预测中的应用
丁文博1, 陈颖2,(), 李红3, 施海华4   
  1. 1215000 江苏,苏州大学附属传染病医院放射科
    2215001 江苏,南京医科大学附属苏州医院 苏州市立医院放射科
    3215001 江苏,南京医科大学附属苏州医院 苏州市立医院胃肠外科
    4215008 江苏,苏州大学附属第二医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-27 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 陈颖
  • 基金资助:
    苏州市医学应用基础研究项目(SKY2023198); 苏州市"科教兴卫"青年科技项目(KJXW2020021)

The value of MSCT multi-planar reconstruction technique in the identification of inguinal hernia and prediction of incarcerated hernia

Wenbo Ding1, Ying Chen2,(), Hong Li3, Haihua Shi4   

  1. 1Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China
    2Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215001, Jiangsu Province, China
    3Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215008, Jiangsu Province, China
    4Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215001, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-09-27 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Ying Chen
引用本文:

丁文博, 陈颖, 李红, 施海华. 多排螺旋CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝鉴别及嵌顿疝预测中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 450-457.

Wenbo Ding, Ying Chen, Hong Li, Haihua Shi. The value of MSCT multi-planar reconstruction technique in the identification of inguinal hernia and prediction of incarcerated hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 450-457.

目的

分析多排螺旋CT(MSCT)多平面重建(MPR)技术在腹股沟疝鉴别及嵌顿疝预测中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月南京医科大学附属苏州医院经手术证实的110例腹股沟疝术前MSCT图像,其中斜疝49例、直疝36例及股疝25例。观察冠状位及斜冠状位MPR图像中腹股沟韧带、腹壁下动脉、直疝三角、股三角的显示情况,以及疝内容物、疝囊颈比、特殊征象等。

结果

腹股沟韧带在冠状位MPR和斜冠状位MPR图像中完全显示分别为24例(20.7%)和63例(54.3%),部分显示分别为43例(37.1%)和33例(28.4%),不显示分别为49例(42.2%)和20例(17.2%),斜冠状位MPR对腹股沟韧带的完全显示率优于冠状位MPR,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三种类型疝内容物包括小肠、积液、肠系膜、脂肪等。其中,股疝疝囊内出现积液的概率高于斜疝和直疝(P<0.05),斜疝疝囊内出现脂肪的概率低于直疝和股疝(P<0.05)。侧新月征和直疝三角填塞征在直疝中的发生率高于斜疝和股疝(P<0.05),股三角填塞征在股疝中的发生率高于斜疝和直疝(P<0.05)。7个(7/51,13.7%)斜疝疝囊发生嵌顿,6个(6/39,15.4%)直疝疝囊发生嵌顿,19个(19/26,73.1%)股疝疝囊发生嵌顿,股疝嵌顿发生率高于斜疝和直疝(P<0.05)。嵌顿性斜疝和直疝中,疝囊出现积液的概率高于非嵌顿性疝(P<0.05)。嵌顿性和非嵌顿性斜疝的疝囊颈比中位数分别为3.1和1.3,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),当临界值为2.3时,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.97;嵌顿性和非嵌顿性直疝的疝囊颈比中位数分别为4.5和2.8,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05),当临界值为3.9时,AUC为0.98;嵌顿性和非嵌顿性股疝的疝囊颈比分别为3.8和2.3,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02),当临界值为3.2时,AUC为0.84。

结论

MSCT MPR技术有助于腹股沟区解剖结构的显示及腹股沟疝类型的判断,疝囊内出现积液、疝囊颈比增大对嵌顿疝具有提示作用。

Objective

To analyze the value of the multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) technique of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in the identification of inguinal hernia and prediction of incarcerated hernia.

Methods

Retrospectively analyze the preoperative MSCT images of 110 cases of surgically confirmed inguinal hernia at the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022, including 49 cases of indirect inguinal hernia, 36 cases of direct inguinal hernia, and 25 cases of femoral hernia. To observe the following targets in coronal and oblique coronal MPR images: inguinal ligament, inferior epigastric artery, Hesselbach's triangle, femoral triangle, hernia contents, the ratio of the hernia sac to the neck and special CT signs.

Results

In coronal MPR and oblique coronal MPR images, the inguinal ligament was completely displayed in 24 (20.7%) and 63 (54.3%) cases respectively, partially displayed in 43 (37.1%) and 33 (28.4%) cases respectively, and not displayed in 49 (42.2%) and 20 (17.2%) cases respectively. The complete display rate of the inguinal ligament in oblique coronal MPR was better than that in coronal MPR, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The contents of three types of inguinal hernia included small intestine, fluid, mesentery, fat, etc. The incidence of fluid accumulation in the femoral hernia sac was higher than that in indirect inguinal hernias and direct inguinal hernias (P<0.05). The incidence of fat in the indirect inguinal hernia sac was lower than that in direct inguinal hernias and femoral hernias (P<0.05). The lateral crescent sign and Hesselbach's triangle filling sign only appeared in direct inguinal hernias (P<0.05). The femoral triangle filling sign only appeared in femoral hernia (P<0.05). Seven (7/51, 13.7%) indirect inguinal hernia sacs were incarcerated, 6 (6/39, 15.4%) direct inguinal hernia sacs incarcerated, and 19 (19/26, 73.1%) femoral hernia sacs were incarcerated. The incidence of incarceration in femoral hernia was higher than that in indirect inguinal hernias and direct inguinal hernias (P<0.05). The incidence of fluid accumulation in the hernia sac of incarcerated indirect hernia and direct hernia was higher than that in non-incarcerated hernia (P<0.05). The median of the ratio of the hernia sac to the neck in incarcerated and non-incarcerated indirect inguinal hernias was 3.1 and 1.3, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). When the critical value was 2.3, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.97. The median of the ratio of the hernia sac to the neck in incarcerated and non-incarcerated direct inguinal hernias was 4.5 and 2.8, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.03). When the critical value was 3.9, AUC was 0.98. The median of the ratio of the hernia sac to the neck in incarcerated and non-incarcerated femoral hernias was 3.8 and 2.3, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). When the critical value was 3.2, the AUC was 0.84.

Conclusion

MSCT MPR technology is advantageous in displaying the anatomical structure of the inguinal area and determining the type of inguinal hernia. The presence of fluid accumulation in the hernia sac and an increase in the ratio of the hernia sac to the neck can provide clues for incarcerated hernia.

图1 病例筛选流程图
图2 左侧腹股沟斜疝多排螺旋CT注:2A为冠状位图像,显示疝囊内容物为小肠、脂肪及系膜,最狭窄处为疝囊颈(圈),位于腹壁下动脉(箭)外侧。2B为斜冠状位图像,左侧腹股沟韧带(箭头)完全显示。2C为冠状位图像,左侧腹股沟韧带(箭头)部分显示。
表1 不同类型腹股沟疝患者的一般资料比较
表2 MSCT对腹股沟疝囊的显示情况[例(%)]
图3 双侧腹股沟直疝多排螺旋CT注:3A为冠状位图像,显示双侧疝囊内容物为脂肪和系膜,疝囊位于腹壁下动脉(箭)内侧,腹股沟韧带部分显示(箭头),直疝三角(虚线)被疝囊填塞(星)。3B为斜冠状位图像,右侧腹股沟韧带完全显示(箭头)。3C为斜冠状位图像,左侧腹股沟韧带完全显示(箭头)。
图4 左侧腹股沟直疝多排螺旋CT注:4A为横断位图像,显示左侧疝囊,内容物为脂肪,可见侧新月征(箭头)。4B为冠状位图像,显示左侧疝囊,可见侧新月征(箭头)。
图5 右侧股疝多排螺旋CT注:5A为冠状位图像,显示右侧疝囊自股三角(虚线)突出,腹股沟韧带显示不清。5B为斜冠状位图像,显示右侧疝囊内容物为小肠,可见肠梗阻表现。疝囊最狭窄处为疝囊颈(圈),股三角(虚线)被填塞(星),右侧股静脉推压变细(箭头)。5C为斜冠状位图像,腹股沟韧带(箭头)完全显示。
表3 MSCT冠状位及斜冠状位MPR对患侧腹股沟区解剖结构的显示情况[个(%)]
表4 MSCT对疝囊内容物及特殊征象显示情况[个(%)]
表5 腹股沟疝疝囊内容物与嵌顿疝的关系[个(%)]
表6 疝囊颈比与嵌顿疝的关系
图6 斜疝、直疝和股疝疝囊颈比预测嵌顿疝的ROC曲线注:图6A为斜疝疝囊颈比预测嵌顿的ROC曲线;图6B为直疝疝囊颈比预测嵌顿的ROC曲线;图6C为股疝疝囊颈比预测嵌顿的ROC曲线。ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线;AUC为曲线下面积。
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[2]
Aykan A, Hakan TY, Incarcerated appendix epiploica in a right inguinal hernia sac[J], Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2022, 28(12): 1744-1746.
[3]
朱杰,汤黎明,钱峻, 等. 经疝囊腹腔镜探查诊治腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床价值[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(6): 560-561.
[4]
The Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 4, 28-30.
[5]
Marta RB, Tomas G, Fritz HB. Inguinal herenia-review[J]. Laeknabladid, 2019, 105(9): 385-391.
[6]
赵仕懂,李冬菊,丘武应, 等. MSCT重建技术在腹股沟疝分类中的应用. 海南医学, 2018, 29(11): 1537-1539.
[7]
Jacek B, Przemysław P, Ryszard A, et al. Unsuspected femoral hernias diagnosed during endoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Adv Cl Exp Med, 2021, 30(2): 135-138.
[8]
齐大鹏,计朝飞,王晓亮, 等. 多排螺旋CT对腹股沟疝患者的影像鉴别与诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 146-149.
[9]
章家强,蔡亲磊,詹兴云, 等. 腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 243-247.
[10]
罗云,黄勇军,陈文贞, 等. 多排螺旋CT扫描联合影像后处理在腹股沟疝中临床应用探讨[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2022, 31(2): 286-288.
[11]
占海生,曹俊杰. 多层螺旋CT结合血清C反应蛋白对腹股沟嵌顿疝患者的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 70-73.
[12]
王振国,谢正宇,圣磊, 等. 彩色多普勒超声联合多层螺旋CT诊断腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(3): 330-333.
[13]
韩文静,陈舒婷,曹剑标. 彩超高频探头双体位扫查在腹股沟疝诊断中的作用及影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 162-165.
[14]
向武昌,吴滨海,何泽清, 等. 腹壁下动脉的活体形态学表现与腹股沟疝的MSCT增强影像特点[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(4): 110-113.
[15]
张万宇,孙海燕,黎东伟. 经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 509-511.
[16]
陆方方. MSCT及后处理重建鉴别诊断腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2020, 24: 3952-3953.
[17]
朱止平,窦文广,岳军艳, 等. 成人腹股沟斜疝与直疝和股疝的多排螺旋CT检查影像学特征[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1127-1133.
[18]
Daniel KK, Stacey LK, Phillip DJ, et al. Preoperative Computed Tomography for Acutely Incarcerated Ventral or Inguinal Hernia[J]. Surgery, 2022, 172(1): 193-197.
[19]
Loftus TJ, Go KL, Jordan JR, et al. Computed tomography evidence of fluid in the hernia sac predicts surgical site infection following mesh repair of acutely incarcerated ventral and groin hernias[J]. J Tr Acute Care Surg, 2017, 83(1): 170-174.
[20]
Ryuji K, Hiroomi O, Takahiro T, et al. Significance of routine preoperative prone computed tomography for predicting intractable cases of inguinal hernias treated by transabdominal preperitoneal repair[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2022, 101(48): e31917.
[1] 罗彬予, 柏丹, 滕庆, 郭炜, 黄斌, 田云鸿. 基于倾向评分匹配评价70岁及以上患者在日间手术模式下行腹股沟疝修补术的安全性及可行性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 427-433.
[2] 许桂祥, 彭新刚. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术经验总结及对术后血清肿的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 438-441.
[3] 曾佑超, 赵俊宇, 张雪, 黄丹, 方向. 全身免疫炎症指数对腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织活力的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 458-462.
[4] 宋勤勤, 黄敏. 整体护理干预对老年腹股沟疝术后恢复情况的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 463-465.
[5] 李亮, 谢肖俊, 隋梁. 腹外疝的关键病理生理:肌肉减少症[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 475-477.
[6] 张嘉炜, 吴宇光, 余维东, 陈江明, 杨诚, 熊茂明. 前列腺MRI参数及临床因素与机器人前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝发生的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 258-264.
[7] 杨洋, 张晓贝, 曹栋, 张建岭, 俞永江. 接受抗血栓治疗老年患者行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 269-275.
[8] 高金伟, 张琪, 王泽升, 成晓舟, 张宇鹏, 王小虎, 曹维嘉, 屈坤鹏. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用不同材质补片的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 281-285.
[9] 游志恒, 席红卫, 石正峰. 腹股沟疝女性患儿腹腔镜手术中筛查完全性雄激素不敏感综合征的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 292-295.
[10] 卢飞飞, 王隽, 江志伟, 冯秀梅, 权红光, 刘静. 纳布啡联合罗哌卡因超声引导髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞对腹股沟疝术后疼痛及早期恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 296-300.
[11] 彭泉, 陈亮, 郑玉, 于华杰, 陈旭, 王刚, 张明金. 超声引导下双平面阻滞和局部浸润麻醉在老年腹股沟疝患者手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 301-305.
[12] 崔洁, 刘雨辰, 王明刚. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 325-330.
[13] 王可依, 吴冲, 刘寒松, 高磊. 腹股沟疝术后补片感染的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 331-334.
[14] 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组, 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华消化外科菁英荟疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华志愿者协会中西医结合专家工作委员会疝和腹壁外科专业组, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会. 成人腹股沟疝日间手术管理模式下加速康复策略专家共识[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 125-131.
[15] 贾宝明, 杨硕. 疝和腹壁外科手术中闭孔血管的保护策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 136-139.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?