切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 458 -462. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.04.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

全身免疫炎症指数对腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织活力的预测价值
曾佑超1,2, 赵俊宇1,3, 张雪1,3, 黄丹2, 方向2,()   
  1. 1637000 四川南充,川北医学院
    2618099 四川,德阳市人民医院疝外科
    3637002 四川南充,川北医学院附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-15 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 方向
  • 基金资助:
    德阳市科技计划项目(2021SZZ064)

Predictive value of the systemic immunoinflammatory index for intestinal tissue viability in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia

Youchao Zeng1,2, Junyu Zhao1,3, Xue Zhang1,3, Dan Huang2, Xiang Fang2,()   

  1. 1North Sichuan Medical College, Nanyun 637000, Sichuan Province, China
    2Hernia Surgery, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang 618099, Sichuan Province, China
    3Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanyun 637002, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2024-01-15 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Fang
引用本文:

曾佑超, 赵俊宇, 张雪, 黄丹, 方向. 全身免疫炎症指数对腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织活力的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 458-462.

Youchao Zeng, Junyu Zhao, Xue Zhang, Dan Huang, Xiang Fang. Predictive value of the systemic immunoinflammatory index for intestinal tissue viability in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 458-462.

目的

评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织活力的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2023年4月因腹股沟嵌顿疝于川北医学院附属医院急诊接受手术且疝内容物仅为肠管的140例患者的病例资料。根据术中肠道组织活力分为非缺血坏死组(49例)和缺血坏死组(91例)。采用独立样本t检验、MannWhitney U检验、χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行患者肠缺血坏死影响因素的单因素分析,采用Logistic回归进行多因素分析,利用斯皮尔曼相关性分析探究SII与炎症的相关性,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定SII的截断值,评估SII预测肠缺血坏死的诊断价值。

结果

缺血组91例患者中,59例发生不可逆肠缺血行肠切除术,占全部患者的42.1%(59/140)。多因素分析结果显示,白细胞计数升高、嵌顿时间超过2 d、SII增加、血清磷升高是腹股沟嵌顿疝患者发生肠缺血坏死的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。白细胞计数与SII呈正相关(r=0.636;P<0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,SII指数预测肠道组织活力的ROC曲线下面积为0.820,(95.0% CI 0.744~0.895;P<0.001),最佳截断值为1128.1127,特异度79.6%,灵敏度75.8%。

结论

早期SII指数超过1128.1127与腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织缺血坏死的不良状况高度相关,可用于腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠道组织活力的预测。

Objective

To assess the predictive value of the systemic immunoinflammatory index (SII) for intestinal tissue viability in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia.

Methods

Case data of 140 patients who underwent surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency department of the Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College from January 2014 to April 2023 and whose hernia contents were only intestinal tubes were retrospectively analyzed. According to intraoperative intestinal tissue viability, they were divided into non-ischemic necrosis group (49 cases) and ischemic necrosis group (91 cases). Univariate analysis of factors influencing intestinal ischemic necrosis was performed using the independent-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact probability test. Multivariate analysis was conducted with logistic regression. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to explore the relationship between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and inflammation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of SII and to evaluate its diagnostic value in predicting intestinal ischemic necrosis.

Results

Of the 91 patients in the ischemia group, irreversible intestinal ischemia for colectomy occurred in 59 patients, accounting for 42.1% (59/140) of all patients. The results of multifactorial analysis showed that elevated leukocyte count, incarceration duration of more than two days, increased SII, and elevated serum phosphorus (P<0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of intestinal ischemic necrosis in patients with incarcerated hernia in the inguinal area. Leukocyte count was positively correlated with SII (P<0.001) with a correlation coefficient of r=0.636. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the SII index predicting intestinal tissue viability was 0.820, with a 95.0% credible interval (0.744~0.895, P<0.001, and the optimal cut-off value was 1128.1127, with a specificity of 79.6% and a sensitivity of 75.8%.

Conclusion

An early SII index of more than 1128.1127 is highly correlated with poor intestinal tissue ischemic necrosis in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernias and can be used to predict intestinal tissue viability in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernias.

表1 不同肠管状态的腹股沟嵌顿疝患者临床特征比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 性别[例(%)] 年龄[例(%)] 疝类型[例(%)] 嵌顿时间[例(%)] 腹部手术史[例(%)]
男性 女性 <70岁 ≥70岁 斜疝 直疝 股疝 <48 h ≥48 h
非缺血坏死组 49 36(73.5) 13(26.5) 21(42.9) 28(57.1) 28(57.1) 3(6.1) 18(36.8) 41(83.7) 8(16.3) 7(14.3) 42(85.7)
缺血组 91 53(58.2) 38(41.8) 23(25.3) 68(74.7) 30(33.0) 5(5.5) 56(61.5) 45(49.5) 46(50.5) 26(28.6) 65(71.4)
χ2/t/Z   3.189 4.569 8.223 - 3.608
P   0.075 0.033 0.016 <0.001 0.058
组别 例数 伴发腹内压增高疾病[例(%)] 术前肠梗阻[例(%)] 高血压[例(%)] 糖尿病[例(%)] 体重指数(kg/m2, ±s) 白细胞(×109/L)
非缺血坏死组 49 9(18.4) 40(81.6) 17(34.7) 32(65.3) 8(16.3) 41(83.7) 0(0.0) 49(100.0) 20.91±2.60 6.93(5.25,8.38)
缺血组 91 35(38.5) 56(61.5) 75(82.4) 16(17.6) 21(23.1) 70(76.9) 5(5.5) 86(94.5) 21.25±2.40 9.25(7.39,11.21)
χ2/t/Z   5.967 32.196 0.884 - -0.770 -4.847
P   0.015 <0.001 0.347 0.112 0.442 <0.001
组别 例数 血小板(×109/L,M(Q1,Q3)) 肌酐[µmol/L,M(Q1,Q3)] 总胆红素[µmol/L,M(Q1,Q3)] 间接胆红素[µmol/L,M(Q1,Q3)]
非缺血坏死组 49 176(124.5,230.0) 74.3(56.85,85.00) 13.97(10.93,20.05) 10.60(7.75,13.50)
缺血组 91 170(134.0,218.0) 78(62.30,97.00) 16.70(12.23,24.86) 10.30(7.40,16.00)
χ2/t/Z   -0.024 -1.550 -1.831 -0.518
P   0.981 0.120 0.067 0.605
组别 例数 血清磷[mmol/L,M(Q1,Q3)] APTT[s,M(Q1,Q3)] TT [s,M(Q1,Q3)] SII [M(Q1,Q3)]
非缺血坏死组 49 1.00(0.85,1.14) 32.80(29.80,37.10) 13.20(12.60,13.95) 628.34(358.79,1103.39)
缺血组 91 1.09(0.94,1.21) 33.80(31.10,36.90) 13.50(12.80,14.40) 1868.11(1132.50,3203.29)
χ2/t/Z   -2.159 -0.870 -1.526 -6.228
P   0.031 0.385 0.127 <0.001
表2 腹股沟嵌顿疝发生肠缺血坏死的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 全身免疫炎症指数与白细胞计数相关性分析的散点图
图2 SII和白细胞计数预测的腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠缺血坏死的ROC曲线注:SII为全身免疫炎症指数;ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线;AUC为曲线下面积。
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[2]
Chen P, Huang L, Yang W, et al. Risk factors for bowel resection among patients with incarcerated groin hernias: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2020, 38(2): 376-383.
[3]
Köckerling F, Heine T, Adolf D, et al. Trends in emergent groin hernia repair—an analysis from the herniamed registry[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 655755.
[4]
Di Saverio S, GorI A, Chisari E, et al. Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction with strangulation: when to resect and how to distinguish reversible from nonreversible bowel ischaemia—a video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2019, 21(6): 727-729.
[5]
李绍春,唐健雄,唐文皓, 等. 腹壁嵌顿疝合并肠坏死的早期诊断[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 13-15.
[6]
Jomrich G, Paireder M, Kristo I, et al. High systemic immune- inflammation index is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(3): 532-541.
[7]
Wang P, Yue W, Li W, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index and ultrasonographic classification of breast imaging-reporting and data system predict outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 813-819.
[8]
Zhou H, Ruan X, Shao X, et al. Clinical value of the neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio in diagnosing adult strangulated inguinal hernia[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 36(Pt A): 76-80.
[9]
Hu B, Yang X R, Xu Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2014, 20(23): 6212-6222.
[10]
Islam MM, Satici MO, Eroglu SE. Unraveling the clinical significance and prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and delta neutrophil index: an extensive literature review[J]. Turk J Emerg Med, 2024, 24(1): 8-19.
[11]
Mangoni AA, Zinellu A. Systemic inflammation index, disease severity, and mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1212998.
[12]
Liu X, Guan G, Cui X, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) can be an early indicator for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2021, 14: 9483-9489.
[13]
Nicoară DM, Munteanu AI, Scutca AC, et al. Examining the relationship between systemic immune-inflammation index and disease severity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis[J]. Cells, 2024, 13(5): 442.
[14]
姜笑明,黄文海. 腹股沟嵌顿疝患者肠坏死的预测和危险因素分析[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2023, 50(5): 710-716.
[15]
袁燕,林炳静,胡加亮. 中性粒细胞在急性炎症诱导的组织损伤中的作用[J]. 药物生物技术, 2018, 25(1): 81-85.
[16]
Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities [J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2006, 6(3): 173-182.
[17]
施德兵,符伟国. 肠系膜缺血性疾病的临床病理生理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2006, 26(6): 405-407.
[18]
Jenne CN, Kubes P. Platelets in inflammation and infection[J]. Platelets, 2015, 26(4): 286-292.
[19]
Karabulut K, Gül M, Dündar ZD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of procalcitonin and phosphorus in acute mesenteric ischemia[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2011, 17(3): 193-198.
[1] 邱玉芬, 高晓燕. 新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病诊治的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 133-139.
[2] 王丽敏, 周小建. LncRNA 及相关miRNA 在缺氧缺血性脑损伤中的表达[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 145-150.
[3] 陈英斌, 黄银涛, 首家保, 崔泽龙, 宋蕊, 龙照忠, 徐海永. 坏死性筋膜炎临床特征及预后影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(02): 122-127.
[4] 郭依丹, 王军, 朱祥, 吉泽, 王蓓娟. TWEAK 在诱导痰中的表达与哮喘严重程度的关联性探讨[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 375-379.
[5] 韩秋霞, 朱晗玉, 段颖洁, 田明威, 朱凯怡, 马丽洁, 孙倩美. 维持性血液透析患者单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值和血小板/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值与脑卒中风险的相关性[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 140-145.
[6] 王晓丽, 王晓媛, 孙洪涛. 老年急性缺血性脑卒中伴房颤患者预后的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 111-116.
[7] 郑鸥, 黄信全, 李学杰, 黄年平, 谭支文. 血浆MCP-1、YKL-40与单侧症状性MCA-M1段重度狭窄或闭塞的AIS患者脑侧支循环不良的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 115-121.
[8] 吴娟娟, 武海龙. 监测术前NLR、PLR 及SII 水平对全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术后并发肠梗阻的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 214-218.
[9] 赵顺, 韩小阳, 赵亭亭. 术前营养状态及术后早期全身免疫炎症指数、C 反应蛋白/白蛋白比值、NLR 与食管癌术后吻合口瘘的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 235-239.
[10] 李亚妮, 韩霜, 陈敏, 秦军胜. 溃疡性结肠炎患者粪便细菌与粪钙卫蛋白、全身免疫炎症指数、D-二聚体水平及疾病严重程度的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 179-184.
[11] 付志勇, 马欣, 董静, 杜祥颖, 尹春琳. 压力感受器分布动脉的粥样硬化总负荷对卒中后新监测到的心房颤动的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 175-183.
[12] 武德崴, 王秀玲, 郭呈龙, 褚研研, 高敬, 王宇彬, 尹春琳. CT肺动脉造影不可见的肺动静脉交通与心源性栓塞的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 207-212.
[13] 孙攀喜, 魏丽丽, 陈勇, 樊东升. 王不留行黄酮苷对小鼠缺血性脑损伤的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 220-227.
[14] 马芬, 王保爱. 细胞间黏附分子-1与卒中的相关性研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 244-249.
[15] 庞淇丹, 崔玮, 唐涛, 姜德春, 李深. 检测脑缺血再灌注损伤的探针及技术进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 149-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?