切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 258 -264. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.03.003

论著

前列腺MRI参数及临床因素与机器人前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝发生的相关性研究
张嘉炜1, 吴宇光1, 余维东2, 陈江明1, 杨诚2, 熊茂明1,()   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科
    2. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-23 出版日期:2025-06-18
  • 通信作者: 熊茂明
  • 基金资助:
    抗炎免疫药物教育部重点实验室开放课题基金(KFJJ-2023-10)安徽省高等学校省级质量工程教学研究重点项目(2023jyxm1095,2024jyxm0753)安徽医科大学临床科学基金(2022xkj146)

Correlation study between prostate MRI parameters and clinical factors with the occurrence of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Jiawei Zhang1, Yuguang Wu1, Weidong Yu2, Jiangming Chen1, Cheng Yang2, Maoming Xiong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,China
    2. Department of Urology Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,China
  • Received:2025-04-23 Published:2025-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Maoming Xiong
引用本文:

张嘉炜, 吴宇光, 余维东, 陈江明, 杨诚, 熊茂明. 前列腺MRI参数及临床因素与机器人前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝发生的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 258-264.

Jiawei Zhang, Yuguang Wu, Weidong Yu, Jiangming Chen, Cheng Yang, Maoming Xiong. Correlation study between prostate MRI parameters and clinical factors with the occurrence of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 258-264.

目的

探讨前列腺术前MRI参数及临床因素对机器人前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝(PIH)的预测价值。

方法

采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2020年1月至2024年8月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的469例患者的临床资料、术前前列腺MRI和术后病理报告。根据术后疝外科医师随访诊断结果分为病例组(有PIH)和对照组(无PIH),采用Kaplan-Meier绘制RARP术后无PIH生存曲线,logistic回归分析PIH的危险因素。

结果

最终纳入438例RARP患者,中位随访时间(19.3±8.6)个月,共50例(11.4%)发生PIH。2组患者在年龄、吸烟史、饮酒史、术前前列腺特异性抗原、术前Gleason评分、术中盆腔淋巴结清扫、手术时间和术后病理N分期方面差异无统计学意义。2组患者的体重指数和术后病理的T分期差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。体重指数<18.5 kg/m²和体重指数≥25.0 kg/m²术后2年无PIH生存率分别为76.50%和92.22%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.029)。≤T2和≥T3术后2年无PIH生存率分别为91.01%和80.64%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.037)。前列腺MRI参数中,矢状位T2加权图像上测量的最大纵向长度(Sag-H)差异有统计学意义(t=2.555,P=0.011)。多因素logistic分析结果显示,术后病理的T分期(≥T3)和矢状位T2加权图像上测量的前列腺Sag-H(>5.46 cm)是PIH发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05),调整后OR值为1.847(95% CI 1.017~3.356)和1.419(95%CI 1.033~1.949)。

结论

低体重指数、高T分期(≥T3)和前列腺Sag-H(>5.46 cm)是机器人前列腺癌根治术后PIH发生的危险因素,未来仍需要多中心前瞻性研究以进一步验证。

Objective

To explore the predictive value of preoperative MRI parameters of the prostate and clinical factors for inguinal hernia (PIH) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data, preoperative prostate MRI and postoperative pathological reports of 469 patients who underwent RARP in the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to August 2024. According to the follow-up diagnosis results of hernia surgeons after surgery, they were divided into the case group (PIH group) and the control group (non-PIH group). Kaplan-Meier plotted the PIH free survival curve after RARP and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of PIH.

Results

A total of 438 patients with RARP were included in this study. The median follow-up time was (19.3±8.6) months, and a total of 50 patients (11.4%) developed PIH. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, level of preoperative prostate-specific antigen, preoperative Gleason score, intraoperative pelvic lymph node dissection, duration of operation, and pathological N stage. Body mass index (BMI) and T stage of postoperative pathology were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). The 2-year PIH-free survival rates of BMI<18.5 kg / m2 and BMI≥25.0 kg / m2 were 76.50 % and 92.22 %, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.029). The 2-year PIH-free survival rates of≤T2 and≥T3 were 91.01 % and 80.64 %, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.037). In prostate MRI parameters, Sag-H measured on sagittal T2-weighted images had significant differences (t=2.555, P=0.011).Multivariate logistic analysis showed that T stage of postoperative pathology (≥T3) and Sag-H (>5.46 cm)measured on sagittal T2-weighted images were independent risk factors for PIH (P<0.05). Adjusted OR values were 1.847 (95% CI 1.017-3.356) and 1.419 (95% CI 1.033-1.949).

Conclusion

Low BMI, high T stage (≥T3) and Sag-H (>5.46 cm) are risk factors for PIH after RARP. The results still require multi-center prospective studies for further verification in the future.

图1 前列腺癌根治术前MRI多参数示意图 注:1A轴向T2加权图像,Ax-H最大纵向长度,Ax-W最大横向长度;1B矢状位T2加权图像,Sag-H最大纵向长度,Sag-W最大横向长度。
表1 纳入本研究的2组前列腺癌患者的临床基线资料及对照比较[例(%)]
表2 2组机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者术前MRI多参数数据比较(cm,
图2 2组机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者术前MRI多参数数据小提琴图比较(对照组n=388;病例组n=50) 注:ns为P>0.05;*P<0.05。Ax-H轴位最大纵向长度,Ax-W轴位最大横向长度; Sag-H矢状位最大纵向长度,Sag-W矢状位最大横向长度。
图3 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者无PIH生存率Kaplan-Meier曲线 注:3A 不同体重指数患者无PIH生存率;3B 不同术后病理T分期患者无PIH生存率。PIH 术后腹股沟疝;BMI体重指数(单位:kg/m2)。
表3 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后腹股沟疝的危险因素logistic回归分析
[1]
Han B, Zheng R, Zeng H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4(1):47-53.
[2]
黄海, 程必盛, 黄健. 2024年欧洲泌尿外科学会年会:前列腺癌研究的前沿探索与未来趋势[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(3):202-207.
[3]
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(17):1547-1558.
[4]
刘容, 翁铭芳, 郭春雨, 等. 机器人辅助与普通腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对老年患者尿控功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(2):169-172.
[5]
Yatabe Y, Tanioka T, Waseda Y, et al. Inguinal hernia repair in patients with artificial urinary sphincter after radical prostatectomy[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(4):1331-1336.
[6]
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Calì M, et al. Is previous radical prostatectomy a contraindication to minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair? A contemporary meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5):1525-1536.
[7]
Nilsson H, Stranne J, Hugosson J, et al. Risk of hernia formation after radical prostatectomy:a comparison between open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within the prospectively controlled LAPPRO trial[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(1):157-164.
[8]
Toide M, Ebara S, Tatenuma T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan(the MSUG94 group)[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1):38.
[9]
陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 等. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024,18(4):396-401.
[10]
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. 1:2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2[J]. Eur Urol, 2019,76(3):340-351.
[11]
Berlin A, Brierley J, Cornford P, et al. TNM Staging of Prostate Cancer:Challenges in Securing a Globally Applicable Classification[J]. Eur Urol, 2022, 82(2):e52-e53.
[12]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(2):121-127.
[13]
Ambrosini F, Knipper S, Tilki D, et al. Robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy:a propensity score-matched comparative analysis based on 15 years and 18, 805 patients[J].World J Urol, 2024, 42(1):131.
[14]
王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 等. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(5):435-440.
[15]
Alder R, Zetner D, Rosenberg J. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Urol, 2020, 203(2):265-274.
[16]
Hakozaki Y, Yamada Y, Fujimura T, et al. Novel clipping procedure for preventing post-operative inguinal hernia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2024, 31(11):1241-1247.
[17]
Liu L, Xu H, Qi F, et al. Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia occurred after radical prostatectomy-comparisons of different approaches[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1):218.
[18]
Kasakewitch JPG, da Silveira CAB, Lima DL, et al. Is previous prostatectomy a risk factor for postoperative complications following minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(10):5505-5513.
[19]
Stranne J, Johansson E, Nilsson A, et al. Inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer:results from a randomized setting and a nonrandomized setting[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(5):719-726.
[20]
Koie T, Yoneyama T, Kamimura N, et al. Frequency of postoperative inguinal hernia after endoscope-assisted mini-laparotomy and conventional retropubic radical prostatectomies[J]. Int J Urol, 2008,15(3):226-229.
[21]
Bakker WJ, Roos MM, Meijer RP, et al. Influence of previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair on performing radical prostatectomy:a nationwide survey among urological surgeons[J].Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(6):2583-2591.
[22]
Otaki T, Hasegawa M, Yuzuriha S, et al. Clinical impact of psoas muscle volume on the development of inguinal hernia after robotassisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(7):3320-3328.
[23]
Ng A, Khetrapal P, Kasivisvanathan V. Is It PRIME Time for Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?[J]. Eur Urol, 2022, 82(1):1-2.
[24]
李全喜, 唐辉军, 张健生, 等. 基于MUSE-DWI与SS-DWI技术在前列腺癌图像中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(6):553-557.
[25]
Magnetta MJ, Catania R, Girometti R, et al. Prostate MRI:staging and decision-making[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY), 2020, 45(7):2143-2153.
[26]
Hu C, Qiao X, Huang R, et al. Development and Validation of a Multimodality Model Based on Whole-Slide Imaging and Biparametric MRI for Predicting Postoperative Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer[J]. Radiol Imaging Cancer, 2024,6(3):e230143.
[27]
Moningi S, Choudhury AD, Martin NE, et al. MR-guided prostate SBRT in prostate cancer patients with low-volume metastatic disease[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(12):3889-3894.
[28]
Stone NN, Crawford ED, Skouteris VM, et al. The Ratio of the Number of Biopsy Specimens to Prostate Volume(Biopsy Density)Greater Than 1. 5 Improves the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate in Men Undergoing Transperineal Biopsy of the Prostate[J]. J Urol,2019, 202(2):264-271.
[29]
Mazaheri Y, Goldman DA, Di Paolo PL, et al. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy[J]. Acad Radiol, 2015, 22(5):556-562.
[30]
Habes M, Bahr J, Schiller T, et al. New technique for prostate volume assessment[J]. World J Urol, 2014, 32(6):1559-1564.
[31]
Shimbo M, Endo F, Matsushita K, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors and a Novel Prevention Technique for Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy[J]. Urol Int, 2017, 98(1):54-60.
[32]
Mignot H, Diack B, Capitaine J, et al. Retrospective evaluation of a single surgeon's experience in robot-assisted inguinal repair with the Dexter System™ during the learning curve[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2024, 7(2):75-82.
[1] 刘静, 柴彦华, 来彦博, 马立燕. 儿童肾脓肿的临床特征及治疗[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 189-194.
[2] 郭任博, 邹本奎, 边家盛. 新辅助联合后入路机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术在高危前列腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 540-540.
[3] 刘博皓, 罗云. 腹腔镜下筋膜内前列腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 542-542.
[4] 李永红, 王骏, 肖恒军. 2025-NCCN前列腺癌诊治指南更新解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 129-133.
[5] 邱皓炜, 徐臻, 肖泽秀, 夏燕, 查高峰, 庞俊. 前列腺癌mRNA 疫苗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-139.
[6] 刘咏博, 郭佳. 外泌体在前列腺癌细胞免疫逃逸中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 140-145.
[7] 杨健, 杨璐. 体液外泌体在前列腺癌诊断中的应用前景[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-151.
[8] 董振阳, 瞿旻, 王燕, 张韻, 高旭. 序贯多学科会诊模式在前列腺癌全程管理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 152-158.
[9] 周松, 蒋湘勇, 康海, 杨科, 危安, 唐振华, 李铁求. 超声造影诊断前列腺癌的应用价值:一项荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 159-166.
[10] 潘永昇, 江杰, 曹栋梁, 季陈, 姜丽丽, 陈建刚, 朱华, 郑兵. 经会阴认知融合靶向穿刺在PI-RADS V2.1评分为五分患者中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 167-173.
[11] 万颂, 刘璇, 黄源兴, 江文聪, 周宇林, 习明. 胆固醇生物合成相关基因对前列腺癌预后和治疗的意义[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 205-215.
[12] 罗添龙, 贺情情, 黄海. 泌尿功能障碍慢性病的长期综合管理和持久康复实践[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 21-26.
[13] 柳凯, 李向各, 王成, 汤润. ZEB1 通过调控Wnt/β-catenin 信号通路促进前列腺癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 157-166.
[14] 张双, 樊清语, 田雅乐, 柏福运, 贾岩龙. 肝脏乏脂肪型血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的影像学特征[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 97-102.
[15] 石继开, 王平, 陈军. 基于胆固醇代谢相关基因构建前列腺癌复发的风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 22-29.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?