切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 588 -592. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.019

论著

超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果
谢文龙(), 周建军   
  1. 433000 湖北,长江大学附属仙桃市第一人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 谢文龙

Effect of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and inferior iliac nerve block combined with transversus abdominis plane block in elderly patients with inguinal hernia

Wenlong Xie(), Jianjun Zhou   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Xiantao First People's Hospital Affiliated to Changjiang University, Xiantao, 433000, China
  • Received:2023-04-11 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Wenlong Xie
引用本文:

谢文龙, 周建军. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 588-592.

Wenlong Xie, Jianjun Zhou. Effect of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and inferior iliac nerve block combined with transversus abdominis plane block in elderly patients with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 588-592.

目的

探究超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞(IINB)联合腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对老年腹股沟疝修补术患者术中心率、血压与术后镇痛效果及应激反应的影响。

方法

选取2020年4月至2022年2月于长江大学附属仙桃市第一人民医院行腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术治疗的老年患者86例,行前瞻性研究,按随机数表法分为对照、观察组,每组43例。对照组予超声引导下的IINB,观察组行超声引导下的IINB联合TAPB。比较2组患者进入手术室(T0)、切皮(T1)、缝皮(T2)时的心率、收缩压、舒张压,不同时点镇痛效果,术后应激指标[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),C反应蛋白(CRP),皮质醇]及术后不良反应发生情况。

结果

T0时刻,2组心率、收缩压、舒张压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),T1时刻观察组心率、收缩压显著低于对照组,T2时刻观察组收缩压显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后2、4、8、12、24 h视觉模拟评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前,2组CRP、TNF-α、皮质醇比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1、3 d,观察组CRP、TNF-α、皮质醇明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。86例患者麻醉并发症发生率为5.81%(5/86),2组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超声引导下IINB联合TAPB对稳定老年腹股沟疝修补术患者心率、收缩压、舒张压效果更好,可提高镇痛效果,改善应激反应,且安全性有保障。

Objective

To explore the effects of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and inferior iliac nerve block (IINB) combined with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on heart rate, blood pressure, postoperative analgesia and stress response in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair..

Methods

A prospective study method was used to select 86 elderly patients who received inguinal hernia Lichtenstein treatment in Xiantao First People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University from April 2020 to February 2022, and were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method, with 43 cases in each group. The control group received ultrasound guided IINB, and the observation group received ultrasound guided IINB combined with TAPB. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, analgesic effect at different time points, postoperative stress index (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), cortisol and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups when entering the operating room (T0), skin resection (T1) and skin suture (T2).

Results

At T0, there was no statistical significance in heart rate, systolic blood pressureor diastolic blood pressure between the two groups (P>0.05). The heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the observation group at T1 were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the systolic blood pressure in the observation group at T2 was significantly lower than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the observation group at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after operation were lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before surgery, CRP, TNF-α and cortisol were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). 1 and 3 days after surgery, CRP, TNF-α and cortisol in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The incidence of anesthesia complications in 86 patients was 5.81%(5/86), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided IINB combined with TAPB has a better effect on stabilizing heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, and can improve analgesic effect and stress response, with guaranteed safety.

图1 患者纳入流程图
表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者术中心率、收缩压、舒张压比较(±s
表3 2组患者视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者应激指标比较(±s
表5 2组患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Dewulf M, Aspeslagh L, Nachtergaele F, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(3): 2105-2112.
[2]
Patel VH, Wright AS. Controversies in Inguinal Hernia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2021, 101(6): 1067-1079.
[3]
周达磊, 顾仕贤, 毛菇, 等. 联合神经阻滞应用于老年患者腹股沟疝修补术的镇痛效果[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(6): 1337-1344.
[4]
黄志, 夏维, 柯晋源, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞联合生殖股神经生殖支阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(2): 135-139.
[5]
王远彬, 刘盼盼, 叶润娣, 等. 超声引导髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经联合股神经及腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在老年病人大隐静脉曲张手术中的应用[J]. 实用老年医学, 2018, 32(10): 983-985.
[6]
陈双, 唐健雄. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[7]
朱绪贤, 姜建华, 史周鼐, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术患者中的应用效果及安全性[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(34): 104-106.
[8]
范慧珍, 郑玉宾. 髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞与腹横平面阻滞在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中应用比较[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(13): 2260-2262.
[9]
朱尤壮, 柴军, 杨福全, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面两点阻滞在高危老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2021, 36(11): 835-840.
[10]
Tseng SI, Li CC, Lee HY, et al. Previous unilateral inguinal hernia repair increase risk of new developed inguinal hernia: a nation wide Longitudinal Cohort Study in Asian male adult patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1): 346-351.
[11]
张晗, 毛珊珊, 刘静, 等. 七氟醚麻醉下右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞在老年患者腹股沟疝手术中的效果观察[J]. 临床研究, 2020, 28(1): 101-103.
[12]
易治国, 赵欣蕊, 李娟, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年斜疝手术最少药物剂量的探讨[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(11): 2190-2192.
[13]
韩蓓, 许日昇, 汪洪. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用及其安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 276-280.
[14]
许滔, 唐国强, 贺光宏, 等. 超声引导下连续髂腹下和髂腹股沟神经阻滞在高龄疝修补术后镇痛效果评价[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2021, 24(4): 361-365.
[15]
温福腾, 古嘉欣, 杨尚甜, 等. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合髂腹下髂腹股沟神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 中国医药科学, 2018, 8(3): 160-163.
[16]
曾英, 陈明富, 刘淑平, 等. 腹横肌平面阻滞对老年患者腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2019, 40(17): 2166-2168.
[17]
魏俊湛, 刘春阁, 刘素梅. 区域麻醉镇静下超声引导双腹横肌平面阻滞在老年单侧腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 河南医学研究, 2022, 31(14): 2572-2575.
[18]
谢星彤, 梁龙. 腹横肌平面阻滞复合髂腹下髂腹股沟神经阻滞及切口局部浸润麻醉用于腹股沟疝手术老年患者的效果[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2021, 27(1): 65-67.
[19]
张同寅, 宋江玲, 魏潇. 罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞联合静脉麻醉在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用研究[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2022, 49(10): 53-56.
[20]
吴艳, 马启刚, 高贵. 3种阻滞方法在老年腹股沟疝修补术患者中的应用比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2023, 44(8): 956-959.
[21]
谭军源, 张荣, 李银妹. 超声引导下IINB联合TAPB在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的临床应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(2): 255-259.
[1] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[2] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[3] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[9] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[13] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[14] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[15] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
阅读次数
全文


摘要