切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 548 -551. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.05.013

临床论著

改良医用胶黏合假疝囊预防腹腔镜全腹膜外直疝修补术后血清肿临床观察
申亚伟1, 黄新1,(), 李万林1   
  1. 1. 710004 西安市中心医院普一科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-09 出版日期:2022-10-18
  • 通信作者: 黄新

Clinical observation on the prevention of seroma after laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal direct hernia repair with modified medical adhesive false hernia sac

Yawei Shen1, Xin Huang1,(), Wanlin Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an 710006, China
  • Received:2022-02-09 Published:2022-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Xin Huang
引用本文:

申亚伟, 黄新, 李万林. 改良医用胶黏合假疝囊预防腹腔镜全腹膜外直疝修补术后血清肿临床观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 548-551.

Yawei Shen, Xin Huang, Wanlin Li. Clinical observation on the prevention of seroma after laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal direct hernia repair with modified medical adhesive false hernia sac[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 548-551.

目的

探讨应用改良医用胶黏合假疝囊技术预防腹腔镜全腹膜外直疝修补术后血清肿的可行性。

方法

纳入2017年4月至2019年5月西安市中心医院普一科收治的36例腹股沟直疝患者。所有患者采用TEP手术。术中直疝假疝囊均给予改良医用胶黏合预防术后血清肿。

结果

36例患者,其中男31例,女5例;年龄31~82岁,平均年龄67.5岁;体质量指数17.6~31.5 kg/m2;平均体质量指数24.6 kg/m2。其中Ⅱ型疝13例,Ⅲ型疝23例,均为单侧腹股沟直疝;其中右侧疝25例,左侧疝11例。所有手术均顺利完成,无中转腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术病例,无感染等严重并发症。手术时间36.6~53.2 min,平均用时44.5 min,其中1例因游离弓状线外侧缘时分破腹膜,术中用3-0可吸收线缝合,因而手术时间延长。术中出血1~5 ml,平均3 ml;术后24~36 h下床,平均下床时间30 h;术后1~3 d出院,平均2 d;住院花费1135.42~1269.74元,平均1189.42元。术后经视觉模拟评分进行评估,所有患者术后1d评分为2~5分,平均3.5分。其中2例分别于术后1周和2周出现血清肿,经腹股沟超声检查证实,血清肿发生率为5.56%,1例因较小,未特殊处理,随访3个月后自行消失,1例给予2次局部抽液,3个月后消失。余患者均未出现明显血清肿。

结论

改良医用胶黏合假疝囊技术预防直疝TEP术后血清肿的技术,方法简便易行,效果可靠,值得推广及进一步研究。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of applying modified medical adhesive false hernia sac to prevent seroma after laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) direct hernia repair.

Methods

From April 2017 to May 2019, 36 patients with direct inguinal hernia admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of Xi'an Central Hospital were included. All patients underwent TEP hernia repair. Direct hernia false hernia sacs were given modified medical adhesive to prevent postoperative seroma.

Results

There were 36 patients, including 31 males and 5 females. Patients aged 31~82 years, with an average age of 67.5 years. The body mass index ranged 17.6~31.5 kg/m2, with an average body mass index of 24.6 kg/m2. Among them, there were 13 cases of typeⅡ hernia and 23 cases of typeⅢ hernia, all of which were unilateral direct inguinal hernias. There were 25 cases of right hernia and 11 cases of left hernia. All the operations were successfully completed, there was no case converted to laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP), and no serious complications such as infection. The operation time ranged from 36.6 to 53.2 minutes, with an average time of 44.5 minutes. The peritoneum of one patient was ruptured when dissociating the outer edge of arcuate line, and 3-0 absorbable thread was sutured during the operation, leading to prolongation of operation time. Intraoperative bleeding was 1~5 ml, with an average of 3 ml. Patients got out of bed 24 to 36 hours after surgery, with an average time of 30 hours. Patients were discharged 1~3 days after surgery, with an average of 2 days. The hospitalization cost was 1135.42~1269.74 yuan, with an average of 1189.42 yuan. The postoperative visual simulation score (VAS) was used for evaluation. All patients had a VAS score of 2~5 at the first day after operation, with an average of 3.5. Among all patients, 2 cases had seroma at 1 week and 2 weeks after operation. The incidence of seroma was confirmed by inguinal B-ultrasound. The incidence of seroma was 5.56%. Seroma of one case disappeared spontaneously after 3 months of follow-up due to its small size and no special treatment. The other case was given partial fluids twice, it disappeared after 3 months. No other patients had obvious seroma.

Conclusion

The modified medical adhesive false hernia sac is a simple and easy-to-use technique to prevent seroma after TEP, with reliable effect, and worthy of promotion and further research.

[1]
王文超,邢小平,郑志. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后血清肿情况分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 142-145.
[2]
李炳根,龚独辉,赖泽如. 腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中疝环关闭技术的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 219-222.
[3]
Kock Erling F, Bittner R, Kraft B, et al. Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hemia repair?[J]. Surg Endose, 2017, 31(2): 578-585.
[4]
Gao D, Wei S, Zhai C, et al. Clinical research of preperitoneal drainage after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 789-794.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[6]
戴向华,丁浩,汤飞, 等. 不同术式疝修补术后发生血清肿的临床分析[J]. 交通医学, 2019, 33(5): 490-491, 494.
[7]
张旭,姚国忠,朱初明, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中斜疝疝囊横断术与剥离术对其术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 93-95.
[8]
黄敏,武建,汪为林, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的危险因素及防治[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(4): 304-307.
[9]
吕志强,沈根海,戴玮, 等. 肥胖对腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术手术难度及术后血清肿形成的影响(附529例报告)[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(10): 750-752.
[10]
王文超,邢小平,郑志. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后血清肿情况分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 142-145.
[11]
Reiner M A, Bresnahan E R. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair outcomes[J]. JSLS, 2016, 20(3): 43-49.
[12]
朱信强,黄海龙,蒋学通. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟直疝无张力修补术技术要点及并发症处理[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 312-314.
[13]
Oberg S, Andresen K, Klausen T W, et al. Chronic pain after mesh versus nonmesh repair of inguinal hernias: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surgery, 2018, 163(5): 1151-1159.
[14]
王明镜,黄鹤光,林贤超, 等. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(1): 81-86.
[15]
付焱,李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 58-61.
[16]
王章菊,李德方. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的影响因素分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022, 24(3): 543-544.
[17]
叶智斌,张立晓,范亚男, 等. "8"字缝合假性疝囊在腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中的临床应用[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2021, 21(86): 13-15.
[1] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[2] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[3] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[11] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[12] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[13] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[14] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[15] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?